Skip to main content

Forensic Psychiatric Contributions to Understanding Financial Crime

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues

Abstract

Forensic psychiatric evaluation and consultation can make significant contributions to understanding, preventing, and responding to financial crimes. Drawing on forensic psychiatric principles and experience, and research and analysis from related fields of inquiry, this chapter explores the individual psychological dimensions of financial crimes in their social context, the group dynamics of corrupt organizations, and the interrelationship between the two. At the individual level, there is a need to distinguish “mad” from “bad,” i.e., psychosis from character pathology and crimes committed with deliberation and foreknowledge of their consequences. In this context we explore the limitations of rational choice theory as a foundation for the legal approaches to preventing acts of financial crime, understanding their meaning, responding in accordance with the fundamentals of justice. We also address the limitations of classic actuarial responses to the prevention and postvention acts of financial crime. From a forensic psychiatric perspective the prevention and postvention of acts of financial crime needs to be on a case by case basis. In any given case a forensic psychiatric analysis may make reference to such psychopathology and character traits as manic-depressive illness and narcissitic grandiosity, Freud’s notion of “criminals from a sense of guilt,” and antisocial personality disorder. The forensic psychiatric evaluation of any act of financial crime needs to ask how it is most likely to be the product of individual or institutional psychopathology, character traits, or states of desire. While we will discuss prevention of financial crime in future work, this chapter concludes via setting forth a psychodynamically informed forensic psychiatric perspective as an aid for sentencing of white-collar crime.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abrams, R., and D.B. Henriques. 2014. Jury says 5 Madoff employees knowingly aided swindle of clients’ billions. New York Times (March 25, 2014), B1.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alalehto, T. 2003. Economic crime: Does personality matter? International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology 47(3): 335–355.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Altman, D.G., and P. Royston. 2000. What do we mean by validating a prognostic model? Statistics in Medicine 19: 453–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andrews, D., J. Bonta, and J. Wormith. 2004. Manual for the Level of Service/Case Management Inventory (LS/CMI). Toronto: Multi-Health Systems.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appelbaum, P.S. 2008. Ethics and forensic psychiatry: Translating principles into practice. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 36: 195–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P. 2007. From darkness into the Light: Psychopathy in industrial and organizational psychology. In The psychopath: Theory research and practice, ed. H. Herve, and J.C. Yuille, 411–428. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Babiak, P., C. Neumann, and R. Hare. 2010. Corporate psychopathy: Talking the walk. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 28(2): 174–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnard, J.W. 2008. Securities fraud, recidivism, and deterrence. Pennsylvania State Law Review 113(1): 189–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Becker, G.S. 1976. The economic approach to human behavior. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson, M.L., and E. Moore. 1992. Are white-collar and common offenders the same? An empirical and theoretical critique of a recently proposed general theory of crime. Journal of Research in Crime and Delinquency 29: 251–272.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blickle, G., P. Fassbender, U. Klein, A. Schlegel, et al. 2006. Some personality correlates of business white-collar crime. Applied Psychology International Review 55: 220–233.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Breyer, S. 1988. The Federal Sentencing Guidelines and the key compromises upon which they rest, 17. Hofstra Law Review 1: 20–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucy, P.H., E. Formby, M.S. Raspanti, and K.E. Rooney. 2008. Why do they do it?—the motives, mores and character of white-collar criminals. St. Johns Law Review 82: 401–571.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bursztajn, H.J., A.E. Scherr, and A. Brodsky. 1994. The rebirth of forensic psychiatry in light of recent historical trends in criminal responsibility. Psychiatric Clinics of North America 17: 611–635.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley, H. 1941. The mask of sanity. St. Louis, MO: Mosby.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cleckley, H. 1988. The mask of sanity, 5th ed. Augusta, GA: Cleckley, E.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coletsos, I.C., and H.J. Bursztajn. 2012. Shared paranoid disorder. In The 5-minute clinical consult, 20th ed, ed. F.J. Domino, 1200–1201. Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins, J.M., and F.L. Schmidt. 1993. Personality, integrity, and white-collar crime: A construct validity study. Personnel Psychology 46: 295–311.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Committee on Identifying the Needs of the Forensic Science Community, Committee on Science, Technology, and Law Policy and Global Affairs, Committee on Applied and Theoretical Statistics, Division on Engineering and Physical Sciences. 2009. Strengthening forensic science in the United States: A path forward. Washington, DC: The National Academies Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, D., and C. Michie. 2010. Limitations of diagnostic precision and predictive utility in the individual case: A challenge for forensic practice. Law and Human Behavior 34: 259–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Creswell, J., and L. Thomas. 2009. The talented Mr. Madoff. New York Times (January 24, 2009).

    Google Scholar 

  • Ellin, A. 2002. Scared straight in business school. New York Times (January 13, 2002) Ed.7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fazel, S., J.P. Singh, and M. Grann. 2012. Use of risk assessment instruments to predict violence and antisocial behavior in 73 samples involving 24,827 people: Systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ 345: 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freud, A. 1949. Certain types and stages of social maladjustment. In Searchlight on delinquency, ed. K.R. Eissler. New York: New International Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freud, S. 1923. The Ego and the Id. London: Hogarth.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, C., and J. Solomon. 1996. Representational models of relationships: Links between care giving and attachment. Infant Mental Health Journal 17: 198–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilligan, J. 2002. Violence: Reflections on our deadliest epidemic. London: Jessica Kingsley Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldstein, A.M., and H.J. Bursztajn. 2011. Capital litigation: Special considerations. In Handbook of forensic assessment: Psychological and psychiatric perspectives, ed. E.Y. Drogin, F. Drogin, M. Dattilio, R.L. Sadoff, and T.G. Gutheil, 145–170. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, H.G. 1987. California Psychological Inventory administrator’s guide. Palo Alto CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hare, R.D. 1999. Psychopathy as a risk factor for violence. Psychiatric Quarterly 70: 181–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, S.D., C. Michie, and D.J. Cooke. 2007. The precision of actuarial risk assessment instruments: Evaluating the “Margins of Error “of group versus individual predictions of violence. British Journal of Psychiatry 170(49): 60–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hessick, C. 2006. Motive’s role in criminal punishment, 80 S. California Law Review 89: 95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pub. L. No. 98–473, 98 Stat. 1987 (1984) (codified at 18 U.S.C. § §3551–3673 (2000) and 28 U.S.C. § § 991–998 (2000)).

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapoor, R., and A. Williams. 2012. An unwelcome guest: The unconscious mind in the courtroom. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 40(4): 456–461.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, B. 2003. An empirical examination of the construct validity of two alternative self-control measures. Educational and Psychological Measurement 63: 674–706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLean, B., and P. Elkind. 2003. The smartest guys in the room: The amazing rise and scandalous fall of enron. New York: Portfolio.

    Google Scholar 

  • Monahan, J., H. Steadman, E. Silver, et al. 2001. Rethinking risk assessment: The MacArthur study of mental disorder and violence. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Owens, W.A., and L.F. Schoenfeldt. 1979. Toward a classification of persons. Journal of Applied Psychology 65: 569–607.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paajanen, G.E. 1988. The prediction of counterproductive behavior by individual and organizational variables. Doctoral Dissertation, University of Minnesota.

    Google Scholar 

  • Piquero, N.L., M.L. Exum, and S.S. Simpson. 2005. Integrating the desire-for-control and rational choice in a corporate crime context. Justice Quarterly 22(2): 252–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poortinga, E., C. Lemmen, and M.D. Jibson. 2006. A case control study: White-collar defendants compared with other defendants charged with other nonviolent theft. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 34: 82–89.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quinsey, V.L. 2006. Violent offenders: Appraising and managing risk, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raine, A., W.S. Laufer, Y. Yang, K.L. Narr, P. Thompson, and A.W. Toga. 2012. Increased executive functioning, attention, and cortical thickness in white-collar criminals. Human Brain Mapping 33(12): 2932–2940.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scott, C. 2013. Believing doesn’t make it so: Forensic education and the search for truth. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 41: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J.L., and J. Monahan. 2011. Current directions in violence risk assessment. Current Directions in Psychological Science 20: 38–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skeem, J.L., S.M. Manchak, and J.K. Peterson. 2011. Correctional policy for offenders with mental illness: Creating a new paradigm for recidivism reduction. Law and Human Behavior 35: 110–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland, Edwin H. 1940. White-collar criminality. American Sociological Review 5(February): 1–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tversky, A., and D. Kahneman. 1981. The farming of decision and the psychology of choice. Science 211(4481): 453–548.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Booker 543 U.S. 220, 245 (2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • United States v. Ranum, 353 F. Supp. 2d 984 (E.D. Wis. 2005).

    Google Scholar 

  • Webster, C., K. Douglas, D. Eaves, et al. 1997. HCR-20: Assessing risk for violence (version 2). Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada: Simon Fraser University.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weiss, J.M. 1998. Some reflections on countertransference in the treatment of criminals. Psychiatry 61: 172–177.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., D. Weisburd, and N. Bode. 1982. Sentencing the white-collar offender: Rhetoric and reality. American Sociological Review 47: 641–659.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., K. Mann, and A. Sarat. 1988a. Sitting in judgment: The sentencing of white-collar criminals. New Haven: Yale University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wheeler, S., D. Weisburd, E. Waring, et al. 1988b. White-collar crimes and criminals. Am Crim Law Rev 25: 331–358.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yakeley, J., and G. Adshead. 2013. Locks, keys, and security of mind: Psychodynamic approaches to forensic psychiatry. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and Law 41(1): 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yang, M., S.C. Wong, and J. Coid. 2010. The efficacy of violence prediction: A meta-analytic comparison of nine risk assessment tools. Psychological Bulletin 136(5): 740–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sara Brady .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Brady, S., Rabin, E., Wu, D., Haque, O.S., Bursztajn, H.J. (2016). Forensic Psychiatric Contributions to Understanding Financial Crime. In: Dion, M., Weisstub, D., Richet, JL. (eds) Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 68. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32419-7_5

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics