Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Transnational Organisation of the Drugs Trade

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues

Part of the book series: International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine ((LIME,volume 68))

Abstract

The international trade in illicit drugs, one of the largest industries in the world economy, is firmly under the control of transnational criminal organisations (TCOs). These groups have prospered under a long standing regime of drug prohibition. This chapter examines the global drugs trade with three main aims. First, it outlines the nature of the illicit drug industry, its size and methods of organisation. We find that there are marked similarities in the ways in which both legitimate and illegitimate international businesses are organised, in part because both have responded to continuing globalisation. Both types of businesses are fragmenting, partially externalising activities, and increasing locational flexibility. Second, we consider the impact of new technologies on the illicit drugs industry. It is apparent that TCOs are using such technologies to both improve the efficiency of their operations and to reduce the likelihood of their detection. This creates significant challenges for drug law enforcement agencies. Third, we consider the ethics of the global drugs industry. The key ethical challenge for an industry which generates huge social, economic and health costs is whether continuation of a 40 year war on drugs founded on prohibition, is more ethically acceptable than an evidence-based approach focusing on harm reduction. The drugs policy reform debate is a vibrant and sweeping one, currently attracting massive interest worldwide.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alertnet. 2011. Colombians seek refuge in Ecuador. AlertNet (14 January). www.trust.org/alertnet/news.

  • Associated Press. 2010. After 40 years, $1 trillion, U.S. war on drugs has failed to meet any of its goals. Associated Press (13 May).

    Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, D., C. Cook, R. Lines, G. Stimson, and J. Bridge. 2009. Harm reduction and human rights. The global response to drug-related HIV epidemics. London: International Harm Reduction Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berl economics. 2009. Costs of harmful alcohol and other drug use. Final Report to Ministry of Health and ACC BERL Economics, Wellington, New Zealand.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bostock, D. 2000. Aristotle’s ethics. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brenner, S.W., and J.J. Schwerha IV. 2002. Transnational evidence gathering and local prosecution of international cybercrime. The John Marshall Journal of Computer and Information Law 20(3): 347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Buckley, P.J. 2011. International integration and coordination in the global factory. Management International Review 51(2): 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bureau of Justice Statistics. 2011. Office of justice programs. www.bjs.ojp.usdoj.gov.

  • Carl, T. 2009. Progress in Mexico drug war is drenched in blood. Associated Press (Nov 3).

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalrymple, T. 2006. Romancing opiates: Pharmacological lies and the addiction bureaucracy. New York: Encounter.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dorsey, T.L., and P. Middleton. 2010. Drugs and crime facts. Washington DC: U.S. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Statistics.

    Google Scholar 

  • Drug Policy Alliance. 2010. Making your voice heard 2010 annual report. New York: Drug Policy Alliance.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, J.H. 2000. The eclectic paradigm as an envelope for economic and business theories of MNE activity. International Business Review 9: 163–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberstadt, M., and M.A. Layden. 2010. The social costs of pornography. Princeton, NJ: The Witherspoon Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Economist. 2001. Stumbling in the dark: Special report on illegal drugs. The Economist (28 July).

    Google Scholar 

  • Enderwick, P. 2009. Applying the eclectic framework: The strategy of transnational criminal enterprises in the global era. Critical Perspectives in International Business 5(3): 170–186.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FBI (Federal Bureau of Investigation). 2000. Crime in the United States, 1999. Washington, DC: U.S. Government Printing Office.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fieser, E. 2011. Drug addiction surges in Dominican Republic. GlobalPost (22 August).

    Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, M. 2000. The tyranny of health: Doctors and the regulation of lifestyle. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gaviria, A., and D. Mejia. 2011. Anti-drugs policies in Colombia: Successes, failures and wrong turns. Bogota: Ediciones Uniandes.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi, G., J. Humphrey, and T. Sturgeon. 2005. The governance of global value chains. Review of International Political Economy 12(1): 78–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gettman, J. 2006. Marijuana production in the United States. The Bulletin of Cannabis Reform 2: 1–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Girion, L., S. Glover, and D. Smith. 2011. Drug deaths now outnumber traffic fatalities in the U.S., data shows. Los Angeles Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Global Commission on Drug Policy. 2011. War on drugs. Report of the global commission on drug policy. www.globalcommissionondrugs.org.

  • Greenwald, G. 2009. Drug decriminalization in Portugal: Lessons for creating fair and successful drug policies. Washington: Cato Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hagemann, H. 2008. Consequences of the new information and communication technologies for growth, productivity and employment. Competitiveness Review 18(1/2): 57–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harm Reduction International. 2010. The global state of harm reduction 2010. London: Harm Reduction International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hathaway, A. 2001. Shortcomings of harm reduction: Toward a morally invested drug reform strategy. International Journal of Drug Policy 12: 125–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havocscope. 2012. Estimates of global drug trafficking. www.havocscope.com/black-market/drugtrafficking.

  • Hernandez, D. 2011. How many have died in Mexico’s drug war? Los Angeles Times (7 June).

    Google Scholar 

  • Heyne, P. 2008. An economic perspective on illegal drugs. In: Are economists basically immoral? and other essays in economics, ethics and religion. Indianapolis: Liberty fund.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, C.E., and A. Stevens. 2010. What can we learn from the Portuguese decriminalization of illicit drugs? British Journal of Criminology 50(6): 999–1022.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • INCB. 2001. Report of the international narcotics control board for 2001. Globalisation and new technologies: Challenges to drug law enforcement in the 21st century. Vienna: INCB.

    Google Scholar 

  • Johnston, L.D., P.M. O’Malley, J.G. Bachman, and J.E. Schulenberg. 2011. Monitoring the future: National survey results on drug use 1975–2010 vol 1, secondary school students. Ann Arbor: The University of Michigan, Institute for Social Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • Latin American Commission on Drugs and Democracy. 2009. Drugs and democracy: Towards a paradigm shift. www.drugsanddemocracy.org.

  • Lee, H.G., and T.H. Clark. 1996. Impacts of the electronic marketplace on transaction cost and market structures. International Journal of Electronic Commerce 1(1): 127–149.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lyons, D. 1965. Forms and limits of utilitarianism. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • McConnell International. 2000. Cyber crime…and punishment? Archaic laws threaten global information. Washington DC: McConnell International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, P. 2001. A critical review of the harm minimization ideology in Australia. Critical Public Health 11(2): 167–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Naim, M. 2005. Illicit: How smugglers, traffickers and copycats are hijacking the global economy. New York: Doubleday.

    Google Scholar 

  • Newcombe, R. 2004. Attitudes to drug policy and drug laws: A review of the international evidence. www.tdpf.org.uk/newcombe2004.pdf.

  • NIDA. 2010. Drugs, brains, and behavior: The science of addiction. National Institute on Drug Abuse. Bethesda, Maryland: National Institute of Health, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • North, D.C., J.J. Wallis, and B.R. Weingast. 2006. A conceptual framework for interpreting recorded human history. NBER Working Paper No 12795. Cambridge, MA: National Bureau of Economic Research.

    Google Scholar 

  • No 10 Strategy Unit. 2003. No 10 strategy unit drugs report phase one—understanding the issues, 12 May, London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nutt, D., L.A. King, W. Saulsbury, and C. Blakemore. 2007. Development of a rational scale to assess the harm of drugs of potential misuse. Lancet 369: 1047–1053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okrent, D. 2010. The rise and fall of prohibition. New York: Scribner.

    Google Scholar 

  • ONDCP. 2004. The economic costs of drug abuse in the United States, 1992–2002. Washington DC: Executive Office of the President (Publication No 207303).

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmateer, N., J. Kimber, M. Hickman, S. Hutchinson, T. Rhodes, and D. Goldberg. 2010. Evidence for the effectiveness of sterile injecting equipment provision in preventing hepatitis C and human immunodeficiency virus transmission among injecting drug users: A review of reviews. Addiction 105(5): 844–859.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K.R. 1945. The open society and its enemies, vol. 1. Plato. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.

    Google Scholar 

  • Romero, S. 2010. Coca production makes a comeback in Peru. The New York Times.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, P. 2002. Drugs, morality and the law. Journal of Applied Philosophy 19(3): 233–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration (SAMHSA). 2011. Results of the 2010 national survey on drug use and health: Summary of national findings. NSDUH Series H 41. Rockville, MD: US Department of Health and Human Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transform. 2006. After the war on drugs: Options for control. Bristol: Transform Drug Policy Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Transform. 2009. After the war on drugs: Blueprint for regulation. Bristol: Transform Drug Policy Foundation.

    Google Scholar 

  • Travis, A. 1998. Drugs ‘boosting property crime’. The Guardian (22 April).

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. 2002. Results of a pilot survey of 40 selected organized criminal groups in 16 countries: Global programme against transnational organised crime. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. 2008. World drug report 2008. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. 2011a. World drug report 2011. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • UNODC. 2011b. Global study on homicides: Trends/contexts/data. Vienna: United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of State. 2010. International narcotics control strategy report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State, Bureau of International Narcotics and Law Enforcement Affairs.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Cleave, M.K. 2007. Counterintelligence and national strategy. Washington, DC: National Defense University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. 1994. Sense and nonsense about crime and drugs: A policy guide. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werb, D., G. Rowell, G. Guyatt, T. Kerr, J. Montaner, and E. Wood. 2011. Effect of drug law enforcement on drug market violence: A systematic review. International Journal of Drug Policy 22(2): 87–94.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winterdyk, J., B. Perrin, and P. Reichel (eds.). 2011. Human trafficking: Exploring the international nature, concerns and complexities. Boca Raton, FL: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh, A. 2006. China becoming drawn into global drugs trade. Financial Times (June 23).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Auckland University of Technology, Auckland, New Zealand

    Peter Enderwick

Authors
  1. Peter Enderwick
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Peter Enderwick .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculté d'administration, Chairholder of CIBC Res.Chair in Fin.Int, Sherbrooke, Québec, Canada

    Michel Dion

  2. Faculte de Medicine, Universite de Montreal, Montreal, Québec, Canada

    David Weisstub

  3. ESSEC, Institute for Strategic Innovation & Ser, Suresnes, France

    Jean-Loup Richet

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Enderwick, P. (2016). The Transnational Organisation of the Drugs Trade. In: Dion, M., Weisstub, D., Richet, JL. (eds) Financial Crimes: Psychological, Technological, and Ethical Issues. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, vol 68. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32419-7_15

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation