Basic Ultrasound Pathology



Knowledge of the appearance of normal anatomy is critical before identifying abnormal pathology. This chapter reviews the definitions and appearance of general sonographic findings that correspond to commonly encountered rheumatologic pathologies, its associated conditions, and supporting literature.


Ultrasound Pathology 


  1. 1.
    Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2485–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Iagnocco A, et al. The OMERACT ultrasound task force – status and perspectives. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2063–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Dalvi SR, Moser DW, Samuels J. Ultrasound and treatment algorithms of RA and JIA. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013;39:669–88.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Bruyn GA, Pineda C, Hernandez-Diaz C, et al. Validity of ultrasonography and measures of adult shoulder function and reliability of ultrasonography in detecting shoulder synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging as a gold standard. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:1079–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R52.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Savnik A, et al. Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of synovial inflammation of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2434–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Quinn M, et al. Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee: a comparison with arthroscopy and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:387–94.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Wakefield RJ, Freeston JE, O'Connor P, et al. The optimal assessment of the rheumatoid arthritis hindfoot: a comparative study of clinical examination, ultrasound and high field MRI. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1678–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Naredo E, Moller I, Moragues C, et al. Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a “Teach the Teachers” rheumatologist course. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:14–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Cheung PP, Dougados M, Gossec L. Reliability of ultrasonography to detect synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review of 35 studies (1,415 patients). Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Brown AK. Using ultrasonography to facilitate best practice in diagnosis and management of RA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:698–706.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, et al. Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:331–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, et al. Synovial tissue of the hip at power Doppler US: correlation between vascularity and power Doppler US signal. Radiology. 2002;225:225–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, et al. Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:375–81.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Sandrock D, et al. Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:895–904.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Freeston JE, Brown AK, Hensor EM, et al. Extremity magnetic resonance imaging assessment of synovitis (without contrast) in rheumatoid arthritis may be less accurate than power Doppler ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1351.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Boutry N, Lardé A, Lapègue F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the hands and feet in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:671–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Schmidt WA, Schicke B, Ostendorf B, et al. Low-field MRI versus ultrasound: which is more sensitive in detecting inflammation and bone damage in MCP and MTP joints in mild or moderate rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31:91–6.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Cervini C. Sonographic imaging of tendons. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:969–76.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Micu MC, Serra S, Fodor D, et al. Inter-observer reliability of ultrasound detection of tendon abnormalities at the wrist and ankle in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:1120–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Bruyn GA, Möller I, Garrido J, et al. Reliability testing of tendon disease using two different scanning methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2012;51:1655–61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Boutry N, Morel M, Flipo RM, et al. Early rheumatoid arthritis: a review of MRI and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1502–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Funck-Brentano T, Etchepare F, Joulin SJ, et al. Benefits of ultrasonography in the management of early arthritis: a cross-sectional study of baseline data from the ESPOIR cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1515–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, et al. Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:595–600.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:2762–70.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lopez-Ben R, Bernreuter WK, Moreland LW, Alarcon GS. Ultrasound detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison to routine radiographs of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:80–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Court-Payen M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R110.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Ostergaard M, Szkudlarek M. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis – why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored. Scandinavian J Rheumatol. 2003;32:63–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, et al. Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:955–62.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Ruta S, et al. Inter-observer reliability of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience of an intensive dedicated training programme. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:373–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Hammer HB, Sveinsson M, Kongtorp AK, Kvien TK. A 78-joints ultrasonographic assessment is associated with clinical assessments and is highly responsive to improvement in a longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting adalimumab treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1349–51.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Perricone C, Ceccarelli F, Modesti M, et al. The 6-joint ultrasonographic assessment: a valid, sensitive-to-change and feasible method for evaluating joint inflammation in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51:866–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1092–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:515–22.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1163–9. Epub 2012 Sep 6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1194–201.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Iagnocco A, Naredo E, Wakefield R, et al. Responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. a report from the OMERACT 11 ultrasound workshop. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:379–82.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, et al. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2958–67.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, et al. Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:116–24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2248–56.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J, et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1107–16.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Boyesen P, Haavardsholm EA, van der Heijde D, et al. Prediction of MRI erosive progression: a comparison of modern imaging modalities in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:176–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3761–73.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. 44.
    Zufferey P, Moller B, Brulhart L, et al. Persistence of ultrasound synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis fulfilling the DAS28 and/or the new ACR/EULAR RA remission definitions: results of an observational cohort study. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:426–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. 45.
    Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, et al. Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:792–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. 46.
    Meenagh G, Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist VIII. Ultrasound imaging in osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:172–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. 47.
    Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG. A systematic review of ultrasonography in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:611–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. 48.
    Riecke BF, Christensen R, Torp-Pedersen S, et al. An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:1675–91.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. 49.
    Keen HI, Lavie F, Wakefield RJ, et al. The development of a preliminary ultrasonographic scoring system for features of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:651–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. 50.
    Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Grainger AJ, et al. Can ultrasonography improve on radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis of the hands? A comparison between radiographic and ultrasonographic detected pathology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1116–20.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. 51.
    Picerno V, Filippou G, Bertoldi I, et al. Prevalence of Baker’s cyst in patients with knee pain: an ultrasonographic study. Reumatismo. 2013;65:264–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. 52.
    Artul S, Khazin F, Hakim J, Habib G. Ultrasonographic findings in a large series of patients with knee pain. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;4:45.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. 53.
    Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Le Bars M, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of joint replacement for knee osteoarthritis: results from a large, 3-year, prospective EULAR study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:644–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. 54.
    Kristoffersen H, Torp-Pedersen S, Terslev L, et al. Indications of inflammation visualized by ultrasound in osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:281–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. 55.
    Moller I, Bong D, Naredo E, et al. Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16 Suppl 3:S4–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. 56.
    D’Agostino MA, Conaghan P, Le Bars M, et al. EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1703–9.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. 57.
    Atchia I, Kane D, Reed MR, Isaacs JD, Birrell F. Efficacy of a single ultrasound-guided injection for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:110–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. 58.
    Maheu E, Berenbaum F. Time for new outcome measures in hand osteoarthritis? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2009;5:136–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. 59.
    Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Grainger AJ, et al. An ultrasonographic study of osteoarthritis of the hand: synovitis and its relationship to structural pathology and symptoms. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1756–63.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. 60.
    Kortekaas MC, Kwok WY, Reijnierse M, et al. In erosive hand osteoarthritis more inflammatory signs on ultrasound are found than in the rest of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:930–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. 61.
    De Miguel E, Falcao S, Castillo C, et al. Enthesis erosion in spondyloarthritis is not a persistent structural lesion. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):2008–10.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. 62.
    Aydin SZ, Bas E, Basi O, et al. Validation of ultrasound imaging for Achilles entheseal fibrocartilage in bovines and description of changes in humans with spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(12):2165–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. 63.
    Falcao S, De Miguel E, Castillo-Gallego C, et al. Achilles enthesis ultrasound: the importance of the bursa in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(3):422–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. 64.
    Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Perrotta FM, et al. Clinical and ultrasonography assessment of peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:2080–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. 65.
    Hamdi W, Chelli MB, Ghannouchi MM, et al. Performance of ultrasounds compared with radiographs to detect chronic enthesitis signs in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:497–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. 66.
    Huang Z, Cao J, Li T, et al. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided local injections of etanercept into entheses of ankylosing spondylitis patients with refractory Achilles enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(4):642–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  67. 67.
    Aydin SZ, Karadag O, Filippucci E, et al. Monitoring Achilles enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-α antagonist therapy: an ultrasound study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:578–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. 68.
    Sakellariou G, Iagnocco A, Meenagh G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVII. Sonographic assessment of the hip in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(1):1–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. 69.
    Mohammedi A, Ghasemi-rad M, Aghdashi M, et al. Evaluation of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis; diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:219–24.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. 70.
    Zhu J, Xing C, Jiang Y, et al. Evaluation of complex appearance in vascularity of sacroiliac joint in ankylosing spondylitis by color Doppler ultrasonography. Rheumatology Int. 2012;32:69–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. 71.
    Hu Y, Zhu J, Xue Q, et al. Scanning of the sacroiliac joint and enthesis by color Doppler ultrasonography in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1651–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. 72.
    Jiang Y, Chen L, Zhu J, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of infliximab treatment for sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2025–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. 73.
    Freeston JE, Coates LC, Nam JL, et al. Is there subclinical synovitis in early psoriatic arthritis? A clinical comparison with gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(3):432–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. 74.
    Freeston JE, Coates LC, Helliwell PS, et al. Is there subclinical enthesitis in early psoriatic arthritis? A clinical comparison with power Doppler ultrasound. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(10):1617–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. 75.
    Bandinelli F, Prignano F, Bonciani D, et al. Ultrasound detects occult entheseal involvement in early psoriatic arthritis independently of clinical features and psoriasis severity. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(2):219–4.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  76. 76.
    Gladman DD, Shuckett R, Russell MI. Psoriatic arthritis (PSA) – an analysis of 220 patients. Quarterly J Med. 1987;62(238):127–41.Google Scholar
  77. 77.
    De Simone C, Caldarola G, D’Agostino M, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound imaging in detecting psoriatic arthritis of fingers and toes in patients with psoriasis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:390726.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. 78.
    Naredo E, Moller I, De Miguel E, et al. High prevalence of ultrasonographic synovitis and enthesopathy in patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis: a prospective case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:1838–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. 79.
    Tinazzi I, McGonagle D, Biasi D, et al. Preliminary evidence that subclinical enthesopathy may predict psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(12):2691–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. 80.
    Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, De Angelis R, et al. Subclinical entheseal involvement in patients with psoriasis: an ultrasound study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;40:407–12.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. 81.
    El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, et al. Tailored approach to early psoriatic arthritis patients: clinical and ultrasonographic predictors for structural joint damage. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(2):307–13.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. 82.
    Bonifati C, Elia F, Graceffa D, et al. Clinical and contrast-enhanced ultrasound echography outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients after one year of continuous therapy with anti-TNF drugs. ISRN Dermatol. 2014;2014:932721. eCollection 2014.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. 83.
    Riente L, Delle Sedie A, Sakellariou G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVIII. Sonographic assessment of the hip in psoriatic arthritis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(2):152–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  84. 84.
    Iagnocco A, Spadaro A, Marchesoni A, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis. A multi-center study. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79:323–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. 85.
    Husic R, Gretler J, Felber A, et al. Disparity between ultrasound and clinical findings in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1529–36.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. 86.
    Kaeley GS. Ultrasound imaging module: report from the GRAPPA 2012 Annual Meeting. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:1450–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. 87.
    Bakewell CJ, Olivieri I, Aydin SZ, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of psoriatic dactylitis: status and perspectives. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:1951–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. 88.
    Healy PJ, Groves C, Chandramohan M, Helliwell PS. MRI changes in psoriatic dactylitis – extent of pathology, relationship to tenderness and correlation with clinical indices. Rheumatology. 2008;47:92–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. 89.
    Olivieri I, Scarano E, Padula A, et al. Fast spin echo-T2-weighted sequences with fat saturation in toe dactylitis of spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1141–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. 90.
    Olivieri I, Barozzi L, Favaro L, et al. Dactylitis in patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Assessment by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;39:1524–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. 91.
    Kane D, Greaney T, Bresnihan B, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of psoriatic dactylitis. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:1746–51.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  92. 92.
    Jevtic V, Watt I, Rozman B, et al. Distinctive radiological features of small hand joints in rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthritis demonstrated by contrast-enhanced (Gd-DTPA) magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:351–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. 93.
    Fournie B, Margarit Coll N, Champetier De Ribes TL, et al. Extrasynovial ultrasound abnormalities in the psoriatic finger. Prospective comparative power-doppler study versus rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73:527–31.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. 94.
    Gutierrez M, Wortsman X, Filippucci E, et al. High frequency sonography in the evaluation of psoriasis: nail and skin involvement. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(11):1569–74.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  95. 95.
    Wortsman X, Jemec G. Common inflammatory diseases of the skin: from the skin to the screen. Adv Psoriasis Inflamm Skin Dis. 2010;2:9–15.Google Scholar
  96. 96.
    Sandobal C, Carbo E, Iribas J, et al. Utrasound nail imaging on patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis compared with rheumatoid arthritis and control subjects. J Clin Rheumatol. 2014;20(1):21–4.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. 97.
    Aydin SB, Castillo-Gallego C, Ash ZR, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of nail in psoriatic disease shows a link between onychopathy and distal interphalangeal joint extensor tendon enthesopathy. Dermatology. 2012;225:231–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. 98.
    Klauser AS, Wipfler E, Dejaco C, et al. Diagnostic values of history and clinical examination to predict ultrasound signs of chronic and acute enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26(4):548–53.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  99. 99.
    Eder L, Jayaker J, Thavaneswaran A, et al. Is the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index useful for differentiating psoriatic arthritis from psoriasis alone and healthy controls. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:466–72.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  100. 100.
    Ibrahim G, Groves C, Chandramohan M, et al. Clinical and ultrasound examination of the Leeds Enthesitis Index in PSoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. ISRN Rheumatol. 2011;2011:731917.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. 101.
    Schafer VS, Fleck M, Kellner H, et al. Evaluation of the novel ultrasound score for large joints in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: six month experience in daily clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:358.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. 102.
    Ottaviani S, Gill G, Palazzo E, et al. Ultrasonography of shoulders in spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a case-control study. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:247–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  103. 103.
    Toprak H, Kilic E, Serter A, et al. Doppler US in rheumatic diseases with special emphasis on rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20:72–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  104. 104.
    Ruta S, Felquer MLA, Rosa J, et al. Responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(1):125–32.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. 105.
    McCarty DJ, Hollander JL. Identification of urate crystals in gouty synovial fluid. Ann Intern Med. 1961;54:452–60.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. 106.
    Filippucci E, Di Geso L, Girolimetti R, Grassi W. Ultrasound in crystal-related arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(1Suppl 80):S42–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  107. 107.
    Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Iagnocco A, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist X. Ultrasound imaging in crystal-related arthropathies. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(4):513–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  108. 108.
    Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Jansen TL, et al. New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:1748–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. 109.
    Grassi W, Meenagh G, Pascual E, Filippucci E. “Crystal Clear” – Sonographic assessment of gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;36:197–202.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. 110.
    Chen LX, Schumacher HR. Gout: can we create an evidence-based systematic approach to diagnosis and management? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:673–84.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. 111.
    Filippucci E, Meenagh G, Delle Sedie A, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVI. Sonographic assessment of the foot in gout patinets. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(6):901–5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  112. 112.
    Wright SA, Filippucci E, McVeigh C, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint in gout: a controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:859–64.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  113. 113.
    Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology. 2007;46:1116–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  114. 114.
    Daboiko JC, Ouali B, Ouattara B. Use of ultrasound guidance in an inaugural acute gout of the hip joint; Apropos of a west African case. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17(2):94–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  115. 115.
    Wakefield R, Emery P, Pease C. Gout related upper limb cellulitis: an ultrasound study. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(2):417–9.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  116. 116.
    Le Goff B, Berthelot MJ, Andre V, Guillot P, Maugars Y. Ultrasonography for diagnosing atypical gout. Two case reports. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:610–2.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  117. 117.
    Aslam N, Lo S, McNab I. Gouty flexor tenosynovitis mimicking infection: a case report emphasizing the value of ultrasound in diagnosis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70:368–70.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  118. 118.
    Puig JG, de Miguel E, Castillo MC, et al. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: impact of ultrasonography. Nuclosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008;27(6-7):592–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  119. 119.
    De Miguel E, Puig JG, Castillo C, et al. Diagnosis of gout in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a pilot ultrasound study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(1):157–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  120. 120.
    Pineda C, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Solano C, et al. Joint and tendon subclinical involvement suggestive of gouty arthritis in asymptomatic hyperuricemia: an ultrasound controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R4.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  121. 121.
    Ottaviani S, Allard A, Bardin T, Richette P. An exploratory ultrasound study of early gout. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(5):816–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  122. 122.
    Filippucci E, Gutierrez M, Georgescu D, et al. Hyaline cartilage involvement in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. An ultrasound study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(2):178–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. 123.
    Howard RG, Pillinger MH, Gyftopoulos S, et al. Reproducibility of musculoskeletal ultrasound for determining monosodium urate deposition: concordance between readers. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(10):1456–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. 124.
    Rettenbecher T, Ennemoser S, Welrich H, et al. Diagnostic imaging of gout: comparison of high-resolution US versus conventional X-ray. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:621–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  125. 125.
    Gruber M, Bodner G, Rath E, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography compared with ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(1):173–9. Epub 2013 Oct 17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. 126.
    Gerster JC, Landry M, Dufresne L, Meuwly JY. Imaging of tophaceous gout: computed tomography provides specific images compared with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;61:52–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. 127.
    Poh YJ, Dalbeth N, Doyle A, McQueen FM. Magnetic resonance imaging bone edema is not a major feature of gout unless there is concomitant osteomyelitis: 10-year findings from a high-prevalence population. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(11):2475–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  128. 128.
    Carter JD, Kedar RP, Anderson SR, et al. An analysis of MRI and ultrasound imaging in patients with gout who have normal plain radiographs. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1442–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  129. 129.
    Naredo E, Uson J, Jimenez-Palop M, et al. Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1522–8. Epub 2013 May 24.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  130. 130.
    Peiteado D, De Miguel E, Villalba A, et al. Value of a short four-joint ultrasound test for gout diagnosis: a pilot study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(6):830–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  131. 131.
    De Avila FE, Kubota ES, Sandim GB, et al. Ultrasound features of tophi in chronic tophaceous gout. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:309–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  132. 132.
    De Avila FE, Lopes MG, Mitraud SAV, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of gouty tophi in the olecranon bursa and evaluation of their reproducibility. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:317–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  133. 133.
    Dalbeth N, Schauer C, MacDonald P, et al. Methods of tophus assessment in clinical trials of gout: a systematic literature review and pictorial reference guide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(4):597–604. Epub 2011 Jan 7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  134. 134.
    Balbir Gurman A, Nahir AM, Braun-Moscovici Y, Soudack M. Sonographic features of a tophaceous nodule. IMAJ. 2005;7:746–7.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  135. 135.
    Kunkel G. Tophaceous gout mimicking osteomyelitis; the value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in establishing the diagnosis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2010;16(6):295–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  136. 136.
    Frediani B, Filippou G, Falsetti P, et al. Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystal deposition disease: ultrasonographic criteria proposed. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(4):638–40.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  137. 137.
    Gutierrez M, Di Geso L, Filippucci E, Grassi W. Calcium pyrophosphate crystals detected by ultrasound in patients without radiographic evidence of cartilage calcifications. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(2):2602–3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  138. 138.
    Sofka CM, Adler RS, Cordasco FA. Ultrasound diagnosis of chondrocalcinosis in the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31:43–5.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  139. 139.
    Filippou G, Frediani B, Gallo A, et al. A “new” technique for the diagnosis of chondrocalcinosis of the knee: sensitivity and specificity of high-frequency ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1126–8.PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  140. 140.
    Filippou G, Filippucci E, Tardella M, et al. Extent and distribution of CPP deposits in patients affected by calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate deposition disease: an ultrasonographic study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1836–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  141. 141.
    Ellaban AS, Kamel SR, Abo Omar HAS, et al. Ultrasonographic findings of Achilles tendon and plantar fascia in patients with calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31:697–704.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  142. 142.
    Checa A, Wong H, Chun W. Sonographic characterization of mixed crystal arthropathy due to monosodium urate and calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate: the triple-contour sign. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:859–67.Google Scholar
  143. 143.
    Yoon HS, Kim KJ, Baek IW, et al. Ultrasonography is useful to detect subclinical synovitis in SLE patients without musculoskeletal involvement before symptoms appear. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(3):341–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  144. 144.
    Wright S, Filippucci E, Grassi W, et al. Hand arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus: an ultrasound pictorial essay. Lupus. 2006;15(8):501–6.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  145. 145.
    Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Scire CA, et al. Ultrasound imaging for rheumatologist, XXIV, Sonographic evaluation of wrist and hand joint and tendon involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;26(6):897–901.Google Scholar
  146. 146.
    Demirkaya E, Ozcakar L, Turker T, et al. Musculoskeletal sonography in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2009;61(1):58–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  147. 147.
    Gabba A, Piga M, Vacca A, et al. Joint and tendon involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: an ultrasound study of hands and wrists in 108 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(12):2278–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  148. 148.
    Ossandon A, Iagnocco A, Alessandri C, et al. Ultrasonographic depiction of knee joint alterations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(2):329–32.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  149. 149.
    Kaya A, Kara M, Tiftik T, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(4):899–901.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  150. 150.
    Piga M, Gabba A, Cauli A, et al. Rituximab treatment for ‘rhupus syndrome’: clinical and power-doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response. A longitudinal pilot study. Lupus. 2013;22(6):624–8.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  151. 151.
    Song GG, Lee YH. Diagnostic accuracies of sialography and salivary ultrasonography in Sjogren’s syndrome patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(4):516–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  152. 152.
    Niemela RK, Takalo R, Paakko E, et al. Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance sialography of parotid glands. Rheumatology. 2004;43(7):875–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  153. 153.
    Milic VD, Petrovic RR, Boricic IV, et al. Major salivary gland sonography in Sjogren’s syndrome: diagnostic value of a novel ultrasonography score (0-12) for parenchymal inhomogeneity. Scan J Rheumatol. 2010;39(2):160–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  154. 154.
    Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Solbiati L, et al. Color Doppler sonography of salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(4):933–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  155. 155.
    Carotti M, Salaffi F, Manganelli P, Argalia G. Ultrasonography and colour Doppler sonography of salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(3):213–9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  156. 156.
    Hocevar A, Ambrozic A, Rozman B, et al. Ultrasonographic changes of major salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Diagnostic value of a novel scoring system. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(6):768–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  157. 157.
    Ariji Y, Ohki M, Ecguchi K, et al. Texture analysis of sonographic features of the parotid gland in Sjogren’s syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:935–41.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  158. 158.
    Takagi Y, Sumi M, Nakamura H, et al. Ultrasonography as an additional item in the American College of Rheumatology classification of Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(11):1977–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  159. 159.
    Cornec D, Jousse-Joulin S, Marhadour T, et al. Salivary gland ultrasonography improves the diagnostic performance of the 20123 American College of Rheuamtology classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(9):1604–7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  160. 160.
    Milic V, Petrovic R, Boricic I. Ultrasonography of major salivary glands could be an alternative tool to sialoscintigraphy in the American-European classification criteria for primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(6):1081–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  161. 161.
    Amezcua-Guerra LM, Hoffmann F, Vargas A, et al. Joint involvement in primary Sjogren’s syndrome: an ultrasound “target area approach to arthritis”. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013(640265):1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  162. 162.
    Jousse-Joulin S, Morvan J, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Saraux A. Ultrasound assessment of the enthuses in primary Sjogren syndrome. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2485–7.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Musculoskeletal CareNYU Langone Hospital for Joint DiseasesNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.Department of MedicineLoma Linda University Medical CenterLoma LindaUSA

Personalised recommendations