Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Basic Ultrasound Pathology

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Rheumatology Review

  • 1988 Accesses

Abstract

Knowledge of the appearance of normal anatomy is critical before identifying abnormal pathology. This chapter reviews the definitions and appearance of general sonographic findings that correspond to commonly encountered rheumatologic pathologies, its associated conditions, and supporting literature.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 99.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Wakefield RJ, Balint PV, Szkudlarek M, et al. Musculoskeletal ultrasound including definitions for ultrasonographic pathology. J Rheumatol. 2005;32:2485–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Naredo E, Wakefield RJ, Iagnocco A, et al. The OMERACT ultrasound task force – status and perspectives. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:2063–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Dalvi SR, Moser DW, Samuels J. Ultrasound and treatment algorithms of RA and JIA. Rheum Dis Clin North Am. 2013;39:669–88.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Bruyn GA, Pineda C, Hernandez-Diaz C, et al. Validity of ultrasonography and measures of adult shoulder function and reliability of ultrasonography in detecting shoulder synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis using magnetic resonance imaging as a gold standard. Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:1079–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Szkudlarek M, Klarlund M, Narvestad E, et al. Ultrasonography of the metacarpophalangeal and proximal interphalangeal joints in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with magnetic resonance imaging, conventional radiography and clinical examination. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R52.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Terslev L, Torp-Pedersen S, Savnik A, et al. Doppler ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging of synovial inflammation of the hand in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:2434–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Karim Z, Wakefield RJ, Quinn M, et al. Validation and reproducibility of ultrasonography in the detection of synovitis in the knee: a comparison with arthroscopy and clinical examination. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:387–94.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Wakefield RJ, Freeston JE, O'Connor P, et al. The optimal assessment of the rheumatoid arthritis hindfoot: a comparative study of clinical examination, ultrasound and high field MRI. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1678–82.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Naredo E, Moller I, Moragues C, et al. Interobserver reliability in musculoskeletal ultrasonography: results from a “Teach the Teachers” rheumatologist course. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:14–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cheung PP, Dougados M, Gossec L. Reliability of ultrasonography to detect synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis: a systematic literature review of 35 studies (1,415 patients). Arthritis Care Res. 2010;62:323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Brown AK. Using ultrasonography to facilitate best practice in diagnosis and management of RA. Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2009;5:698–706.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, et al. Correlation of power Doppler sonography with vascularity of the synovial tissue of the knee joint in patients with osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2001;44:331–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Walther M, Harms H, Krenn V, et al. Synovial tissue of the hip at power Doppler US: correlation between vascularity and power Doppler US signal. Radiology. 2002;225:225–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Naredo E, Bonilla G, Gamero F, et al. Assessment of inflammatory activity in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparative study of clinical evaluation with grey scale and power Doppler ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:375–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Backhaus M, Burmester GR, Sandrock D, et al. Prospective two year follow up study comparing novel and conventional imaging procedures in patients with arthritic finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2002;61:895–904.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Freeston JE, Brown AK, Hensor EM, et al. Extremity magnetic resonance imaging assessment of synovitis (without contrast) in rheumatoid arthritis may be less accurate than power Doppler ultrasound. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1351.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Boutry N, Lardé A, Lapègue F, et al. Magnetic resonance imaging appearance of the hands and feet in patients with early rheumatoid arthritis. J Rheumatol. 2003;30:671–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Schmidt WA, Schicke B, Ostendorf B, et al. Low-field MRI versus ultrasound: which is more sensitive in detecting inflammation and bone damage in MCP and MTP joints in mild or moderate rheumatoid arthritis? Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31:91–6.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Grassi W, Filippucci E, Farina A, Cervini C. Sonographic imaging of tendons. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:969–76.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Micu MC, Serra S, Fodor D, et al. Inter-observer reliability of ultrasound detection of tendon abnormalities at the wrist and ankle in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:1120–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bruyn GA, Möller I, Garrido J, et al. Reliability testing of tendon disease using two different scanning methods in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Rheumatology. 2012;51:1655–61.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Boutry N, Morel M, Flipo RM, et al. Early rheumatoid arthritis: a review of MRI and sonographic findings. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2007;189:1502–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Funck-Brentano T, Etchepare F, Joulin SJ, et al. Benefits of ultrasonography in the management of early arthritis: a cross-sectional study of baseline data from the ESPOIR cohort. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1515–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Scheel AK, Hermann KG, Ohrndorf S, et al. Prospective 7 year follow up imaging study comparing radiography, ultrasonography, and magnetic resonance imaging in rheumatoid arthritis finger joints. Ann Rheum Dis. 2006;65:595–600.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Wakefield RJ, Gibbon WW, Conaghan PG, et al. The value of sonography in the detection of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison with conventional radiography. Arthritis Rheum. 2000;43:2762–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lopez-Ben R, Bernreuter WK, Moreland LW, Alarcon GS. Ultrasound detection of bone erosions in rheumatoid arthritis: a comparison to routine radiographs of the hands and feet. Skeletal Radiol. 2004;33:80–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Dohn UM, Ejbjerg BJ, Court-Payen M, et al. Are bone erosions detected by magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography true erosions? A comparison with computed tomography in rheumatoid arthritis metacarpophalangeal joints. Arthritis Res Ther. 2006;8:R110.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Ostergaard M, Szkudlarek M. Imaging in rheumatoid arthritis – why MRI and ultrasonography can no longer be ignored. Scandinavian J Rheumatol. 2003;32:63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Szkudlarek M, Court-Payen M, Jacobsen S, et al. Interobserver agreement in ultrasonography of the finger and toe joints in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2003;48:955–62.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, Ruta S, et al. Inter-observer reliability of high-resolution ultrasonography in the assessment of bone erosions in patients with rheumatoid arthritis: experience of an intensive dedicated training programme. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:373–80.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hammer HB, Sveinsson M, Kongtorp AK, Kvien TK. A 78-joints ultrasonographic assessment is associated with clinical assessments and is highly responsive to improvement in a longitudinal study of patients with rheumatoid arthritis starting adalimumab treatment. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:1349–51.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Perricone C, Ceccarelli F, Modesti M, et al. The 6-joint ultrasonographic assessment: a valid, sensitive-to-change and feasible method for evaluating joint inflammation in RA. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51:866–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Scire CA, Montecucco C, Codullo V, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of joint involvement in early rheumatoid arthritis in clinical remission: power Doppler signal predicts short-term relapse. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1092–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Naredo E, Rodriguez M, Campos C, et al. Validity, reproducibility, and responsiveness of a twelve-joint simplified power doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammation in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:515–22.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Backhaus TM, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. The US7 score is sensitive to change in a large cohort of patients with rheumatoid arthritis over 12 months of therapy. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72(7):1163–9. Epub 2012 Sep 6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Backhaus M, Ohrndorf S, Kellner H, et al. Evaluation of a novel 7-joint ultrasound score in daily rheumatologic practice: a pilot project. Arthritis Rheum. 2009;61:1194–201.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Iagnocco A, Naredo E, Wakefield R, et al. Responsiveness in rheumatoid arthritis. a report from the OMERACT 11 ultrasound workshop. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:379–82.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Brown AK, Conaghan PG, Karim Z, et al. An explanation for the apparent dissociation between clinical remission and continued structural deterioration in rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2958–67.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Naredo E, Collado P, Cruz A, et al. Longitudinal power Doppler ultrasonographic assessment of joint inflammatory activity in early rheumatoid arthritis: predictive value in disease activity and radiologic progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2007;57:116–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Naredo E, Moller I, Cruz A, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response to anti-tumor necrosis factor therapy in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;58:2248–56.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Taylor PC, Steuer A, Gruber J, et al. Comparison of ultrasonographic assessment of synovitis and joint vascularity with radiographic evaluation in a randomized, placebo-controlled study of infliximab therapy in early rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum. 2004;50:1107–16.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Boyesen P, Haavardsholm EA, van der Heijde D, et al. Prediction of MRI erosive progression: a comparison of modern imaging modalities in early rheumatoid arthritis patients. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:176–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Brown AK, Quinn MA, Karim Z, et al. Presence of significant synovitis in rheumatoid arthritis patients with disease-modifying antirheumatic drug-induced clinical remission: evidence from an imaging study may explain structural progression. Arthritis Rheum. 2006;54:3761–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Zufferey P, Moller B, Brulhart L, et al. Persistence of ultrasound synovitis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis fulfilling the DAS28 and/or the new ACR/EULAR RA remission definitions: results of an observational cohort study. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:426–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Saleem B, Brown AK, Keen H, et al. Should imaging be a component of rheumatoid arthritis remission criteria? A comparison between traditional and modified composite remission scores and imaging assessments. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:792–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Meenagh G, Filippucci E, Iagnocco A, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist VIII. Ultrasound imaging in osteoarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25:172–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Conaghan PG. A systematic review of ultrasonography in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2009;68:611–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Riecke BF, Christensen R, Torp-Pedersen S, et al. An ultrasound score for knee osteoarthritis: a cross-sectional validation study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2014;22:1675–91.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Keen HI, Lavie F, Wakefield RJ, et al. The development of a preliminary ultrasonographic scoring system for features of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:651–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Grainger AJ, et al. Can ultrasonography improve on radiographic assessment in osteoarthritis of the hands? A comparison between radiographic and ultrasonographic detected pathology. Ann Rheum Dis. 2008;67:1116–20.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Picerno V, Filippou G, Bertoldi I, et al. Prevalence of Baker’s cyst in patients with knee pain: an ultrasonographic study. Reumatismo. 2013;65:264–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Artul S, Khazin F, Hakim J, Habib G. Ultrasonographic findings in a large series of patients with knee pain. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014;4:45.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  53. Conaghan PG, D'Agostino MA, Le Bars M, et al. Clinical and ultrasonographic predictors of joint replacement for knee osteoarthritis: results from a large, 3-year, prospective EULAR study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69:644–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Kristoffersen H, Torp-Pedersen S, Terslev L, et al. Indications of inflammation visualized by ultrasound in osteoarthritis of the knee. Acta Radiol. 2006;47:281–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Moller I, Bong D, Naredo E, et al. Ultrasound in the study and monitoring of osteoarthritis. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2008;16 Suppl 3:S4–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. D’Agostino MA, Conaghan P, Le Bars M, et al. EULAR report on the use of ultrasonography in painful knee osteoarthritis. Part 1: prevalence of inflammation in osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64:1703–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  57. Atchia I, Kane D, Reed MR, Isaacs JD, Birrell F. Efficacy of a single ultrasound-guided injection for the treatment of hip osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70:110–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Maheu E, Berenbaum F. Time for new outcome measures in hand osteoarthritis? Nat Clin Pract Rheumatol. 2009;5:136–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Keen HI, Wakefield RJ, Grainger AJ, et al. An ultrasonographic study of osteoarthritis of the hand: synovitis and its relationship to structural pathology and symptoms. Arthritis Rheum. 2008;59:1756–63.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Kortekaas MC, Kwok WY, Reijnierse M, et al. In erosive hand osteoarthritis more inflammatory signs on ultrasound are found than in the rest of hand osteoarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:930–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. De Miguel E, Falcao S, Castillo C, et al. Enthesis erosion in spondyloarthritis is not a persistent structural lesion. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(11):2008–10.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Aydin SZ, Bas E, Basi O, et al. Validation of ultrasound imaging for Achilles entheseal fibrocartilage in bovines and description of changes in humans with spondyloarthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2010;69(12):2165–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Falcao S, De Miguel E, Castillo-Gallego C, et al. Achilles enthesis ultrasound: the importance of the bursa in spondyloarthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(3):422–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Spadaro A, Iagnocco A, Perrotta FM, et al. Clinical and ultrasonography assessment of peripheral enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:2080–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Hamdi W, Chelli MB, Ghannouchi MM, et al. Performance of ultrasounds compared with radiographs to detect chronic enthesitis signs in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:497–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  66. Huang Z, Cao J, Li T, et al. Efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided local injections of etanercept into entheses of ankylosing spondylitis patients with refractory Achilles enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(4):642–9.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Aydin SZ, Karadag O, Filippucci E, et al. Monitoring Achilles enthesitis in ankylosing spondylitis during TNF-α antagonist therapy: an ultrasound study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2010;49:578–82.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  68. Sakellariou G, Iagnocco A, Meenagh G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVII. Sonographic assessment of the hip in ankylosing spondylitis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(1):1–5.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  69. Mohammedi A, Ghasemi-rad M, Aghdashi M, et al. Evaluation of disease activity in ankylosing spondylitis; diagnostic value of color Doppler ultrasonography. Skeletal Radiol. 2013;42:219–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhu J, Xing C, Jiang Y, et al. Evaluation of complex appearance in vascularity of sacroiliac joint in ankylosing spondylitis by color Doppler ultrasonography. Rheumatology Int. 2012;32:69–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  71. Hu Y, Zhu J, Xue Q, et al. Scanning of the sacroiliac joint and enthesis by color Doppler ultrasonography in patients with Ankylosing Spondylitis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38:1651–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  72. Jiang Y, Chen L, Zhu J, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonography in the evaluation of infliximab treatment for sacroiliitis in patients with ankylosing spondylitis. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33:2025–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Freeston JE, Coates LC, Nam JL, et al. Is there subclinical synovitis in early psoriatic arthritis? A clinical comparison with gray-scale and power Doppler ultrasound. Arthritis Care Res. 2014;66(3):432–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  74. Freeston JE, Coates LC, Helliwell PS, et al. Is there subclinical enthesitis in early psoriatic arthritis? A clinical comparison with power Doppler ultrasound. Arthritis Care Res. 2012;64(10):1617–21.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  75. Bandinelli F, Prignano F, Bonciani D, et al. Ultrasound detects occult entheseal involvement in early psoriatic arthritis independently of clinical features and psoriasis severity. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2013;31(2):219–4.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  76. Gladman DD, Shuckett R, Russell MI. Psoriatic arthritis (PSA) – an analysis of 220 patients. Quarterly J Med. 1987;62(238):127–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  77. De Simone C, Caldarola G, D’Agostino M, et al. Usefulness of ultrasound imaging in detecting psoriatic arthritis of fingers and toes in patients with psoriasis. Clin Dev Immunol. 2011;2011:390726.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  78. Naredo E, Moller I, De Miguel E, et al. High prevalence of ultrasonographic synovitis and enthesopathy in patients with psoriasis without psoriatic arthritis: a prospective case-control study. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2011;50:1838–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  79. Tinazzi I, McGonagle D, Biasi D, et al. Preliminary evidence that subclinical enthesopathy may predict psoriatic arthritis in patients with psoriasis. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(12):2691–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Gutierrez M, Filippucci E, De Angelis R, et al. Subclinical entheseal involvement in patients with psoriasis: an ultrasound study. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2011;40:407–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. El Miedany Y, El Gaafary M, Youssef S, et al. Tailored approach to early psoriatic arthritis patients: clinical and ultrasonographic predictors for structural joint damage. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(2):307–13.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Bonifati C, Elia F, Graceffa D, et al. Clinical and contrast-enhanced ultrasound echography outcomes in psoriatic arthritis patients after one year of continuous therapy with anti-TNF drugs. ISRN Dermatol. 2014;2014:932721. eCollection 2014.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  83. Riente L, Delle Sedie A, Sakellariou G, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVIII. Sonographic assessment of the hip in psoriatic arthritis patients. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(2):152–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  84. Iagnocco A, Spadaro A, Marchesoni A, et al. Power Doppler ultrasonographic evaluation of enthesitis in psoriatic arthritis. A multi-center study. Joint Bone Spine. 2012;79:323–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  85. Husic R, Gretler J, Felber A, et al. Disparity between ultrasound and clinical findings in psoriatic arthritis. Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1529–36.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  86. Kaeley GS. Ultrasound imaging module: report from the GRAPPA 2012 Annual Meeting. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:1450–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  87. Bakewell CJ, Olivieri I, Aydin SZ, et al. Ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of psoriatic dactylitis: status and perspectives. J Rheumatol. 2013;40:1951–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  88. Healy PJ, Groves C, Chandramohan M, Helliwell PS. MRI changes in psoriatic dactylitis – extent of pathology, relationship to tenderness and correlation with clinical indices. Rheumatology. 2008;47:92–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  89. Olivieri I, Scarano E, Padula A, et al. Fast spin echo-T2-weighted sequences with fat saturation in toe dactylitis of spondyloarthritis. Clin Rheumatol. 2008;27:1141–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  90. Olivieri I, Barozzi L, Favaro L, et al. Dactylitis in patients with seronegative spondyloarthropathy. Assessment by ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging. Arthritis Rheum. 1995;39:1524–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  91. Kane D, Greaney T, Bresnihan B, et al. Ultrasonography in the diagnosis and management of psoriatic dactylitis. J Rheumatol. 1999;26:1746–51.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  92. Jevtic V, Watt I, Rozman B, et al. Distinctive radiological features of small hand joints in rheumatoid arthritis and seronegative spondyloarthritis demonstrated by contrast-enhanced (Gd-DTPA) magnetic resonance imaging. Skeletal Radiol. 1995;24:351–5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  93. Fournie B, Margarit Coll N, Champetier De Ribes TL, et al. Extrasynovial ultrasound abnormalities in the psoriatic finger. Prospective comparative power-doppler study versus rheumatoid arthritis. Joint Bone Spine. 2006;73:527–31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  94. Gutierrez M, Wortsman X, Filippucci E, et al. High frequency sonography in the evaluation of psoriasis: nail and skin involvement. J Ultrasound Med. 2009;28(11):1569–74.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  95. Wortsman X, Jemec G. Common inflammatory diseases of the skin: from the skin to the screen. Adv Psoriasis Inflamm Skin Dis. 2010;2:9–15.

    Google Scholar 

  96. Sandobal C, Carbo E, Iribas J, et al. Utrasound nail imaging on patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis compared with rheumatoid arthritis and control subjects. J Clin Rheumatol. 2014;20(1):21–4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  97. Aydin SB, Castillo-Gallego C, Ash ZR, et al. Ultrasonographic assessment of nail in psoriatic disease shows a link between onychopathy and distal interphalangeal joint extensor tendon enthesopathy. Dermatology. 2012;225:231–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  98. Klauser AS, Wipfler E, Dejaco C, et al. Diagnostic values of history and clinical examination to predict ultrasound signs of chronic and acute enthesitis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2008;26(4):548–53.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  99. Eder L, Jayaker J, Thavaneswaran A, et al. Is the Madrid Sonographic Enthesitis Index useful for differentiating psoriatic arthritis from psoriasis alone and healthy controls. J Rheumatol. 2014;41:466–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  100. Ibrahim G, Groves C, Chandramohan M, et al. Clinical and ultrasound examination of the Leeds Enthesitis Index in PSoriatic arthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. ISRN Rheumatol. 2011;2011:731917.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  101. Schafer VS, Fleck M, Kellner H, et al. Evaluation of the novel ultrasound score for large joints in psoriatic arthritis and ankylosing spondylitis: six month experience in daily clinical practice. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2013;14:358.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  102. Ottaviani S, Gill G, Palazzo E, et al. Ultrasonography of shoulders in spondyloarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis: a case-control study. Joint Bone Spine. 2014;81:247–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  103. Toprak H, Kilic E, Serter A, et al. Doppler US in rheumatic diseases with special emphasis on rheumatoid arthritis and spondyloarthritis. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014;20:72–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  104. Ruta S, Felquer MLA, Rosa J, et al. Responsiveness to therapy change of a global ultrasound assessment in spondyloarthritis patients. Clin Rheumatol. 2015;34(1):125–32.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  105. McCarty DJ, Hollander JL. Identification of urate crystals in gouty synovial fluid. Ann Intern Med. 1961;54:452–60.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  106. Filippucci E, Di Geso L, Girolimetti R, Grassi W. Ultrasound in crystal-related arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(1Suppl 80):S42–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  107. Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Iagnocco A, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist X. Ultrasound imaging in crystal-related arthropathies. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2007;25(4):513–7.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  108. Dalbeth N, Fransen J, Jansen TL, et al. New classification criteria for gout: a framework for progress. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2013;52:1748–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  109. Grassi W, Meenagh G, Pascual E, Filippucci E. “Crystal Clear” – Sonographic assessment of gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2006;36:197–202.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  110. Chen LX, Schumacher HR. Gout: can we create an evidence-based systematic approach to diagnosis and management? Best Pract Res Clin Rheumatol. 2006;20:673–84.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  111. Filippucci E, Meenagh G, Delle Sedie A, et al. Ultrasound imaging for the rheumatologist XXXVI. Sonographic assessment of the foot in gout patinets. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(6):901–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  112. Wright SA, Filippucci E, McVeigh C, et al. High-resolution ultrasonography of the first metatarsal phalangeal joint in gout: a controlled study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:859–64.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  113. Thiele RG, Schlesinger N. Diagnosis of gout by ultrasound. Rheumatology. 2007;46:1116–21.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  114. Daboiko JC, Ouali B, Ouattara B. Use of ultrasound guidance in an inaugural acute gout of the hip joint; Apropos of a west African case. J Clin Rheumatol. 2011;17(2):94–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  115. Wakefield R, Emery P, Pease C. Gout related upper limb cellulitis: an ultrasound study. J Rheumatol. 2003;30(2):417–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  116. Le Goff B, Berthelot MJ, Andre V, Guillot P, Maugars Y. Ultrasonography for diagnosing atypical gout. Two case reports. Joint Bone Spine. 2008;75:610–2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  117. Aslam N, Lo S, McNab I. Gouty flexor tenosynovitis mimicking infection: a case report emphasizing the value of ultrasound in diagnosis. Acta Orthop Belg. 2004;70:368–70.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  118. Puig JG, de Miguel E, Castillo MC, et al. Asymptomatic hyperuricemia: impact of ultrasonography. Nuclosides Nucleotides Nucleic Acids. 2008;27(6-7):592–5.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  119. De Miguel E, Puig JG, Castillo C, et al. Diagnosis of gout in patients with asymptomatic hyperuricaemia: a pilot ultrasound study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2012;71(1):157–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  120. Pineda C, Amezcua-Guerra LM, Solano C, et al. Joint and tendon subclinical involvement suggestive of gouty arthritis in asymptomatic hyperuricemia: an ultrasound controlled study. Arthritis Res Ther. 2011;13:R4.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  121. Ottaviani S, Allard A, Bardin T, Richette P. An exploratory ultrasound study of early gout. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2011;29(5):816–32.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  122. Filippucci E, Gutierrez M, Georgescu D, et al. Hyaline cartilage involvement in patients with gout and calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. An ultrasound study. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009;17(2):178–81.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  123. Howard RG, Pillinger MH, Gyftopoulos S, et al. Reproducibility of musculoskeletal ultrasound for determining monosodium urate deposition: concordance between readers. Arthritis Care Res. 2011;63(10):1456–62.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  124. Rettenbecher T, Ennemoser S, Welrich H, et al. Diagnostic imaging of gout: comparison of high-resolution US versus conventional X-ray. Eur Radiol. 2008;18:621–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  125. Gruber M, Bodner G, Rath E, et al. Dual-energy computed tomography compared with ultrasound in the diagnosis of gout. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(1):173–9. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  126. Gerster JC, Landry M, Dufresne L, Meuwly JY. Imaging of tophaceous gout: computed tomography provides specific images compared with magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2001;61:52–4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  127. Poh YJ, Dalbeth N, Doyle A, McQueen FM. Magnetic resonance imaging bone edema is not a major feature of gout unless there is concomitant osteomyelitis: 10-year findings from a high-prevalence population. J Rheumatol. 2011;38(11):2475–81.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  128. Carter JD, Kedar RP, Anderson SR, et al. An analysis of MRI and ultrasound imaging in patients with gout who have normal plain radiographs. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009;48:1442–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  129. Naredo E, Uson J, Jimenez-Palop M, et al. Ultrasound-detected musculoskeletal urate crystal deposition: which joints and what findings should be assessed for diagnosing gout? Ann Rheum Dis. 2014;73(8):1522–8. Epub 2013 May 24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  130. Peiteado D, De Miguel E, Villalba A, et al. Value of a short four-joint ultrasound test for gout diagnosis: a pilot study. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2012;30(6):830–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  131. De Avila FE, Kubota ES, Sandim GB, et al. Ultrasound features of tophi in chronic tophaceous gout. Skeletal Radiol. 2011;40:309–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  132. De Avila FE, Lopes MG, Mitraud SAV, et al. Ultrasound characteristics of gouty tophi in the olecranon bursa and evaluation of their reproducibility. Eur J Radiol. 2012;81:317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  133. Dalbeth N, Schauer C, MacDonald P, et al. Methods of tophus assessment in clinical trials of gout: a systematic literature review and pictorial reference guide. Ann Rheum Dis. 2011;70(4):597–604. Epub 2011 Jan 7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  134. Balbir Gurman A, Nahir AM, Braun-Moscovici Y, Soudack M. Sonographic features of a tophaceous nodule. IMAJ. 2005;7:746–7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  135. Kunkel G. Tophaceous gout mimicking osteomyelitis; the value of musculoskeletal ultrasound in establishing the diagnosis. J Clin Rheumatol. 2010;16(6):295–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  136. Frediani B, Filippou G, Falsetti P, et al. Diagnosis of calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate crystal deposition disease: ultrasonographic criteria proposed. Ann Rheum Dis. 2005;64(4):638–40.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  137. Gutierrez M, Di Geso L, Filippucci E, Grassi W. Calcium pyrophosphate crystals detected by ultrasound in patients without radiographic evidence of cartilage calcifications. J Rheumatol. 2010;37(2):2602–3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  138. Sofka CM, Adler RS, Cordasco FA. Ultrasound diagnosis of chondrocalcinosis in the knee. Skeletal Radiol. 2002;31:43–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  139. Filippou G, Frediani B, Gallo A, et al. A “new” technique for the diagnosis of chondrocalcinosis of the knee: sensitivity and specificity of high-frequency ultrasonography. Ann Rheum Dis. 2007;66:1126–8.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  140. Filippou G, Filippucci E, Tardella M, et al. Extent and distribution of CPP deposits in patients affected by calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate deposition disease: an ultrasonographic study. Ann Rheum Dis. 2013;72:1836–9.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  141. Ellaban AS, Kamel SR, Abo Omar HAS, et al. Ultrasonographic findings of Achilles tendon and plantar fascia in patients with calcium pyrophosphate deposition disease. Clin Rheumatol. 2012;31:697–704.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  142. Checa A, Wong H, Chun W. Sonographic characterization of mixed crystal arthropathy due to monosodium urate and calcium pyrophosphate dehydrate: the triple-contour sign. J Ultrasound Med. 2011;30:859–67.

    Google Scholar 

  143. Yoon HS, Kim KJ, Baek IW, et al. Ultrasonography is useful to detect subclinical synovitis in SLE patients without musculoskeletal involvement before symptoms appear. Clin Rheumatol. 2014;33(3):341–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  144. Wright S, Filippucci E, Grassi W, et al. Hand arthritis in systemic lupus erythematosus: an ultrasound pictorial essay. Lupus. 2006;15(8):501–6.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  145. Delle Sedie A, Riente L, Scire CA, et al. Ultrasound imaging for rheumatologist, XXIV, Sonographic evaluation of wrist and hand joint and tendon involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;26(6):897–901.

    Google Scholar 

  146. Demirkaya E, Ozcakar L, Turker T, et al. Musculoskeletal sonography in juvenile systemic lupus erythematosus. Arthritis Care Res. 2009;61(1):58–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  147. Gabba A, Piga M, Vacca A, et al. Joint and tendon involvement in systemic lupus erythematosus: an ultrasound study of hands and wrists in 108 patients. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(12):2278–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  148. Ossandon A, Iagnocco A, Alessandri C, et al. Ultrasonographic depiction of knee joint alterations in systemic lupus erythematosus. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2009;27(2):329–32.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  149. Kaya A, Kara M, Tiftik T, et al. Ultrasonographic evaluation of the femoral cartilage thickness in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus. Rheumatol Int. 2013;33(4):899–901.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  150. Piga M, Gabba A, Cauli A, et al. Rituximab treatment for ‘rhupus syndrome’: clinical and power-doppler ultrasonographic monitoring of response. A longitudinal pilot study. Lupus. 2013;22(6):624–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  151. Song GG, Lee YH. Diagnostic accuracies of sialography and salivary ultrasonography in Sjogren’s syndrome patients: a meta-analysis. Clin Exp Rheumatol. 2014;32(4):516–22.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  152. Niemela RK, Takalo R, Paakko E, et al. Ultrasonography of salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. A comparison with magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance sialography of parotid glands. Rheumatology. 2004;43(7):875–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  153. Milic VD, Petrovic RR, Boricic IV, et al. Major salivary gland sonography in Sjogren’s syndrome: diagnostic value of a novel ultrasonography score (0-12) for parenchymal inhomogeneity. Scan J Rheumatol. 2010;39(2):160–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  154. Martinoli C, Derchi LE, Solbiati L, et al. Color Doppler sonography of salivary glands. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1994;163(4):933–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  155. Carotti M, Salaffi F, Manganelli P, Argalia G. Ultrasonography and colour Doppler sonography of salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Clin Rheumatol. 2001;20(3):213–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  156. Hocevar A, Ambrozic A, Rozman B, et al. Ultrasonographic changes of major salivary glands in primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Diagnostic value of a novel scoring system. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2005;44(6):768–72.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  157. Ariji Y, Ohki M, Ecguchi K, et al. Texture analysis of sonographic features of the parotid gland in Sjogren’s syndrome. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1996;166:935–41.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  158. Takagi Y, Sumi M, Nakamura H, et al. Ultrasonography as an additional item in the American College of Rheumatology classification of Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(11):1977–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  159. Cornec D, Jousse-Joulin S, Marhadour T, et al. Salivary gland ultrasonography improves the diagnostic performance of the 20123 American College of Rheuamtology classification criteria for Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2014;53(9):1604–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  160. Milic V, Petrovic R, Boricic I. Ultrasonography of major salivary glands could be an alternative tool to sialoscintigraphy in the American-European classification criteria for primary Sjogren’s syndrome. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2012;51(6):1081–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  161. Amezcua-Guerra LM, Hoffmann F, Vargas A, et al. Joint involvement in primary Sjogren’s syndrome: an ultrasound “target area approach to arthritis”. Biomed Res Int. 2013;2013(640265):1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  162. Jousse-Joulin S, Morvan J, Devauchelle-Pensec V, Saraux A. Ultrasound assessment of the enthuses in primary Sjogren syndrome. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2013;39(12):2485–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Division of Rheumatology, Department of Medicine, Center for Musculoskeletal Care, NYU Langone Hospital for Joint Diseases, 333 East 38th Street, 4th Floor, New York, NY, 10016, USA

    Jonathan Samuels MD, FACR, RhMSUS

  2. Department of Medicine, Loma Linda University Medical Center, 11234 Anderson Street, Suite 1521, Loma Linda, CA, 92354, USA

    Karina D. Torralba MD, MACM, FACR, RhMSUS

Authors
  1. Jonathan Samuels MD, FACR, RhMSUS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Karina D. Torralba MD, MACM, FACR, RhMSUS
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Samuels MD, FACR, RhMSUS .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts, USA

    Minna J. Kohler

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Samuels, J., Torralba, K.D. (2016). Basic Ultrasound Pathology. In: Kohler, M. (eds) Musculoskeletal Ultrasound in Rheumatology Review. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32367-1_2

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32367-1_2

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32365-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32367-1

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation