Abstract
This chapter considers the difficulties of effectively teaching about evolution – a topic that cannot be sensibly omitted from any authentic science or biology curriculum. There are a number of features of natural selection that make teaching this topic challenging for teachers. Some of these features are similar to problems in teaching other ‘difficult’ science topics and relate to the intellectual challenge students face in learning about abstract and counterintuitive ideas. Learning about evolution by natural selection is problematic because it only fully makes sense once a range of different ideas can be coordinated into a complex scheme. The notion may seem counterintuitive to many learners because they lack direct experience of the time scales over which natural selection occurs, and their experience of the world generally reflects discrete and quite distinct species. Additionally, there are particular challenges in teaching evolution in contexts where community norms are to actively deny the science and oppose its teaching in schools and colleges. All teachers of evolutionary theory will face the first set of challenges, but for those working in particular countries or areas, there will be the additional problem of being asked to teach something that some students find morally objectionable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, D. R. (2009). After Darwin: Is intelligent design intelligent? In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 22–40). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
Association for Science Education. (2007). Science education and intelligent design: A statement from the Association for Science Education. Association for Science Education, Hatfield.
Beer, G. (1986). ‘The face of nature’: Anthropomorphic elements in the language of the origin of species. In L. J. Jordanova (Ed.), Languages of nature: Critical essays on science and literature (pp. 212–243). London: Free Association Books.
Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Simon & Schulster.
Behe, M. J. (2007). The edge of evolution: The search for the limits of Darwinism. New York: Free Press.
Berry, R. J. (2009). Biology after Darwin. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 4–21). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
Bowler, P.J. (1983/1989). Evolution: The history of an idea (Rev. ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.
Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books.
Darwin, C. (1859/1968). The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Darwin, C. (1871/2006). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. In E. O. Wilson (Ed.), From so simple a beginning: The four great books of Charles Darwin (pp. 767–1248). New York: W W Norton & Company.
Darwin, C., & Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Proceedings of the Linnean Society, 3, 45–62.
Dawkins, R. (1988). The blind watchmaker. Harmondsworth: Penguin.
Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.
Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.
Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.
Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel: IPN – Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education.
Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.
Galilei, G. (1610/1989). Sidereus Nuncius (A. van Helden, Trans.). In A. van Helden (Ed.), Sidereus Nuncius or the Sidereal Messenger (pp. 25–86). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Garwin, L., & Lincoln, T. (Eds.). (2003). A century of nature: Twenty-one discoveries that changed science and the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Gilbert, J. K., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1985). A conceptual framework for science education: The case study of force and movement. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 107–120.
Gould, S. J. (1991). Wonderful life: The burgess shale and the nature of history. London: Penguin.
Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–151. doi:10.2307/2400177.
Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1993/2000). Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. In H. Gee (Ed.), Shaking the tree: Readings form nature in the history of life (pp. 17–31). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Hameed, S. (2008). Bracing for Islamic creationism. Science, 322(5908), 637–1638. doi:10.1126/science.1163672.
Hameed, S. (2010). Evolution and creationism in the Islamic world. In T. Dixon, G. Cantor, & S. Pumfrey (Eds.), Science and religion: New historial perspectives (pp. 133–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395–419.
Keil, F. C. (1992). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.
Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.
Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.
Mandelbaum, M. (1958). Darwin’s religious views. Journal of the History of Ideas, 19(3), 363–378. doi:10.2307/2708041.
Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. London: Allen Lane.
McCalla, A. (2006). The creationist debate: The encounter between the Bible and the historical mind. London: Continuum.
Medin, D. L., & Scott, A. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
Messer, N. (2009). Natural evil after Darwin. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 139–154). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.
Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.). (1998). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego: Academic.
Moreland, J. P., & Reynolds, J. M. (1999). Introduction. In J. P. Moreland & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Three views on creation and evolution. Grand Rapids: Zonderzan.
Morris, H. M. (1985). Scientific creationsim (2nd ed.). Green Forest: Master Books.
Morris, H. M. (2000). The long war against God: The history and impact of the creation/evolution conflict. Green Forest: Master Books.
National Science Teachers Association. (2013). NSTA position statement: The teaching of evolution. Retrieved 8 Apr 2013, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/evolution.aspxacce
Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
Pimenta, L. R. (1984). Fountains of the deep. Chichester: New Wine Press.
Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.
Rachels, J. (1990). Created from animals: The moral implications of Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Reiss, M.J. (2008, September 11). Science lessons should tackle creationism and intelligent design. guardian.co.uk
Ruse, M. (1986/1993). Teleology and the biological sciences. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Darwinian paradigm: Essays on its history, philosophy and religious implications (pp. 146–154). London: Routledge.
Ruse, M. (1987/1993). Biological species: Natural kinds, individuals, or what? In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Darwinian paradigm: Essays on its history, philosophy and religious implications (pp. 97–117). London: Routledge.
Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy – in school and society. London: Falmer Press.
Taber, K. S. (2000). Finding the optimum level of simplification: The case of teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(5), 320–325.
Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116.
Taber, K. S. (2006). Exploring pupils’ understanding of key ‘nature of science’ terms through research as part of initial teacher education. School Science Review, 87(321), 51–61.
Taber, K. S. (2008). Towards a curricular model of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 179–218. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4.
Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2011a). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational theory (pp. 39–61). New York: Nova. Retrieved from https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/wiki/eclipse/Constructivism.html
Taber, K. S. (2011a). The natures of scientific thinking: Creativity as the handmaiden to logic in the development of public and personal knowledge. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in the nature of science research – concepts and methodologies (pp. 51–74). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2013a). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2013b). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. doi:10.1039/C3RP00012E.
Taber, K. S. (2014a). Methodological issues in science education research: A perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1839–1893). Dordrecht: Springer.
Taber, K. S. (2014b). Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners’ ideas. New York: Routledge.
Taber, K. S. (in press). Knowledge, beliefs and pedagogy: How the nature of science should inform the aims of science education (and not just when teaching evolution). Cultural Studies in Science Education. doi:DOI: 10.1007/s11422-016-9750-8
Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2015). English secondary students’ thinking about the status of scientific theories: Consistent, comprehensive, coherent and extensively evidenced explanations of aspects of the natural world – or just ‘an idea someone has’. The Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 370–403.
Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Oxford: Princeton University Press.
Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. London: Routledge.
Wallace, A. R. (1858/2003). On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. In A. Berry (Ed.), Infinitive tropics: An Alfred Russel Wallace anthology (pp. 52–62). London: Verso.
Williams, P. A. (2001). Doing without Adam and Eve: Sociobiology and original sin. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.
Wood, D. (1988). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.
Wood-Robinson, C. (1994). Young people’s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Studies in Science Education, 24(1), 29–47. doi:10.1080/03057269408560038.
Yahya, H. (2008). Atlas of creation (13th ed., Vol. 1). Instanbul: Global Publishing.
Ziman, J. (1978/1991). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199811)82:6<679::aid-sce3>3.0.co;2-e.
Acknowledgement
The author would like to thank Dr. Mark Winterbottom for advice given during the preparation of this chapter.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Taber, K.S. (2017). Representing Evolution in Science Education: The Challenge of Teaching About Natural Selection. In: Akpan, B. (eds) Science Education: A Global Perspective . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32350-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32351-0
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)