Skip to main content

Representing Evolution in Science Education: The Challenge of Teaching About Natural Selection

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Science Education: A Global Perspective

Abstract

This chapter considers the difficulties of effectively teaching about evolution – a topic that cannot be sensibly omitted from any authentic science or biology curriculum. There are a number of features of natural selection that make teaching this topic challenging for teachers. Some of these features are similar to problems in teaching other ‘difficult’ science topics and relate to the intellectual challenge students face in learning about abstract and counterintuitive ideas. Learning about evolution by natural selection is problematic because it only fully makes sense once a range of different ideas can be coordinated into a complex scheme. The notion may seem counterintuitive to many learners because they lack direct experience of the time scales over which natural selection occurs, and their experience of the world generally reflects discrete and quite distinct species. Additionally, there are particular challenges in teaching evolution in contexts where community norms are to actively deny the science and oppose its teaching in schools and colleges. All teachers of evolutionary theory will face the first set of challenges, but for those working in particular countries or areas, there will be the additional problem of being asked to teach something that some students find morally objectionable.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, D. R. (2009). After Darwin: Is intelligent design intelligent? In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 22–40). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Association for Science Education. (2007). Science education and intelligent design: A statement from the Association for Science Education. Association for Science Education, Hatfield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beer, G. (1986). ‘The face of nature’: Anthropomorphic elements in the language of the origin of species. In L. J. Jordanova (Ed.), Languages of nature: Critical essays on science and literature (pp. 212–243). London: Free Association Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe, M. J. (1996). Darwin’s black box: The biochemical challenge to evolution. New York: Simon & Schulster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behe, M. J. (2007). The edge of evolution: The search for the limits of Darwinism. New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, R. J. (2009). Biology after Darwin. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 4–21). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowler, P.J. (1983/1989). Evolution: The history of an idea (Rev. ed.). Berkeley: University of California Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruner, J. S. (1960). The process of education. New York: Vintage Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1859/1968). The origin of species by means of natural selection, or the preservation of favoured races in the struggle for life. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C. (1871/2006). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. In E. O. Wilson (Ed.), From so simple a beginning: The four great books of Charles Darwin (pp. 767–1248). New York: W W Norton & Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, C., & Wallace, A. R. (1858). On the tendency of species to form varieties; and on the perpetuation of varieties and species by natural means of selection. Proceedings of the Linnean Society, 3, 45–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dawkins, R. (1988). The blind watchmaker. Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dobzhansky, T. (1973). Nothing in biology makes sense except in the light of evolution. The American Biology Teacher, 35(3), 125–129.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R. (1983). The pupil as scientist? Milton Keynes: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Asoko, H., Leach, J., Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (1994). Constructing scientific knowledge in the classroom. Educational Researcher, 23(7), 5–12.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Driver, R., Leach, J., Millar, R., & Scott, P. (1996). Young people’s images of science. Buckingham: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duit, R. (2009). Bibliography – students’ and teachers’ conceptions and science education. Kiel: IPN – Leibniz Institute for Science and Mathematics Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fensham, P. J., Gunstone, R. F., & White, R. T. (1994). The content of science: A constructivist approach to its teaching and learning. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Galilei, G. (1610/1989). Sidereus Nuncius (A. van Helden, Trans.). In A. van Helden (Ed.), Sidereus Nuncius or the Sidereal Messenger (pp. 25–86). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garwin, L., & Lincoln, T. (Eds.). (2003). A century of nature: Twenty-one discoveries that changed science and the world. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert, J. K., & Zylbersztajn, A. (1985). A conceptual framework for science education: The case study of force and movement. European Journal of Science Education, 7(2), 107–120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J. (1991). Wonderful life: The burgess shale and the nature of history. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1977). Punctuated equilibria: The tempo and mode of evolution reconsidered. Paleobiology, 3(2), 115–151. doi:10.2307/2400177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gould, S. J., & Eldredge, N. (1993/2000). Punctuated equilibrium comes of age. In H. Gee (Ed.), Shaking the tree: Readings form nature in the history of life (pp. 17–31). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, S. (2008). Bracing for Islamic creationism. Science, 322(5908), 637–1638. doi:10.1126/science.1163672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hameed, S. (2010). Evolution and creationism in the Islamic world. In T. Dixon, G. Cantor, & S. Pumfrey (Eds.), Science and religion: New historial perspectives (pp. 133–152). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hodson, D. (2009). Teaching and learning about science: Language, theories, methods, history, traditions and values. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hokayem, H., & BouJaoude, S. (2008). College students’ perceptions of the theory of evolution. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 45(4), 395–419.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keil, F. C. (1992). Concepts, kinds and cognitive development. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (3rd ed.). Chicago: University of Chicago.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lakatos, I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In I. Lakatos & A. Musgrove (Eds.), Criticism and the growth of knowledge (pp. 91–196). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Leach, J., & Scott, P. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: An approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, D. E. (2011). Evolution and religion in American education: An ethnography. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Mandelbaum, M. (1958). Darwin’s religious views. Journal of the History of Ideas, 19(3), 363–378. doi:10.2307/2708041.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mayr, E. (1991). One long argument: Charles Darwin and the genesis of modern evolutionary thought. London: Allen Lane.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCalla, A. (2006). The creationist debate: The encounter between the Bible and the historical mind. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Medin, D. L., & Scott, A. (Eds.). (1999). Folkbiology. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Messer, N. (2009). Natural evil after Darwin. In M. S. Northcott & R. J. Berry (Eds.), Theology after Darwin (pp. 139–154). Milton Keynes: Paternoster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mintzes, J. J., Wandersee, J. H., & Novak, J. D. (Eds.). (1998). Teaching science for understanding: A human constructivist view. San Diego: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moreland, J. P., & Reynolds, J. M. (1999). Introduction. In J. P. Moreland & J. M. Reynolds (Eds.), Three views on creation and evolution. Grand Rapids: Zonderzan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. M. (1985). Scientific creationsim (2nd ed.). Green Forest: Master Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Morris, H. M. (2000). The long war against God: The history and impact of the creation/evolution conflict. Green Forest: Master Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • National Science Teachers Association. (2013). NSTA position statement: The teaching of evolution. Retrieved 8 Apr 2013, from http://www.nsta.org/about/positions/evolution.aspxacce

  • Perry, W. G. (1970). Forms of intellectual and ethical development in the college years: A scheme. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pimenta, L. R. (1984). Fountains of the deep. Chichester: New Wine Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Popper, K. R. (1934/1959). The logic of scientific discovery. London: Hutchinson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rachels, J. (1990). Created from animals: The moral implications of Darwinism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reiss, M.J. (2008, September 11). Science lessons should tackle creationism and intelligent design. guardian.co.uk

  • Ruse, M. (1986/1993). Teleology and the biological sciences. In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Darwinian paradigm: Essays on its history, philosophy and religious implications (pp. 146–154). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruse, M. (1987/1993). Biological species: Natural kinds, individuals, or what? In M. Ruse (Ed.), The Darwinian paradigm: Essays on its history, philosophy and religious implications (pp. 97–117). London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, J. (1992). Getting to know about energy – in school and society. London: Falmer Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2000). Finding the optimum level of simplification: The case of teaching about heat and temperature. Physics Education, 35(5), 320–325.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2005). Learning quanta: Barriers to stimulating transitions in student understanding of orbital ideas. Science Education, 89(1), 94–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2006). Exploring pupils’ understanding of key ‘nature of science’ terms through research as part of initial teacher education. School Science Review, 87(321), 51–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2008). Towards a curricular model of the nature of science. Science & Education, 17(2–3), 179–218. doi:10.1007/s11191-006-9056-4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2009). Progressing science education: Constructing the scientific research programme into the contingent nature of learning science. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2011a). Constructivism as educational theory: Contingency in learning, and optimally guided instruction. In J. Hassaskhah (Ed.), Educational theory (pp. 39–61). New York: Nova. Retrieved from https://camtools.cam.ac.uk/wiki/eclipse/Constructivism.html

  • Taber, K. S. (2011a). The natures of scientific thinking: Creativity as the handmaiden to logic in the development of public and personal knowledge. In M. S. Khine (Ed.), Advances in the nature of science research – concepts and methodologies (pp. 51–74). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013a). Modelling learners and learning in science education: Developing representations of concepts, conceptual structure and conceptual change to inform teaching and research. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2013b). Revisiting the chemistry triplet: Drawing upon the nature of chemical knowledge and the psychology of learning to inform chemistry education. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 14(2), 156–168. doi:10.1039/C3RP00012E.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2014a). Methodological issues in science education research: A perspective from the philosophy of science. In M. R. Matthews (Ed.), International handbook of research in history, philosophy and science teaching (pp. 1839–1893). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (2014b). Student thinking and learning in science: Perspectives on the nature and development of learners’ ideas. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S. (in press). Knowledge, beliefs and pedagogy: How the nature of science should inform the aims of science education (and not just when teaching evolution). Cultural Studies in Science Education. doi:DOI: 10.1007/s11422-016-9750-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Taber, K. S., Billingsley, B., Riga, F., & Newdick, H. (2015). English secondary students’ thinking about the status of scientific theories: Consistent, comprehensive, coherent and extensively evidenced explanations of aspects of the natural world – or just ‘an idea someone has’. The Curriculum Journal, 26(3), 370–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thagard, P. (1992). Conceptual revolutions. Oxford: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosniadou, S. (Ed.). (2008). International handbook of research on conceptual change. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wallace, A. R. (1858/2003). On the tendency of varieties to depart indefinitely from the original type. In A. Berry (Ed.), Infinitive tropics: An Alfred Russel Wallace anthology (pp. 52–62). London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Williams, P. A. (2001). Doing without Adam and Eve: Sociobiology and original sin. Minneapolis: Fortress Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood, D. (1988). How children think and learn: The social contexts of cognitive development. Oxford: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wood-Robinson, C. (1994). Young people’s ideas about inheritance and evolution. Studies in Science Education, 24(1), 29–47. doi:10.1080/03057269408560038.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yahya, H. (2008). Atlas of creation (13th ed., Vol. 1). Instanbul: Global Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ziman, J. (1978/1991). Reliable knowledge: An exploration of the grounds for belief in science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zohar, A., & Ginossar, S. (1998). Lifting the taboo regarding teleology and anthropomorphism in biology education—heretical suggestions. Science Education, 82(6), 679–697. doi:10.1002/(sici)1098-237x(199811)82:6<679::aid-sce3>3.0.co;2-e.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgement

The author would like to thank Dr. Mark Winterbottom for advice given during the preparation of this chapter.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith S. Taber .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Taber, K.S. (2017). Representing Evolution in Science Education: The Challenge of Teaching About Natural Selection. In: Akpan, B. (eds) Science Education: A Global Perspective . Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32351-0_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32350-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32351-0

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics