Skip to main content

Religions and Contemporary Accounting Issues

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Accounting, Capitalism and the Revealed Religions

Abstract

This chapter exposes the lessons that can be drawn from Chap. 3 on the joint development of the book’s four religions and double-entry bookkeeping. Pursuant of this objective, the Chapter draws lessons pertaining to accounting. Those mostly relate to the evaluation of counterparts, with a particular emphasis placed on intangibles (faith). Also, the four religions initiated a discussion as to the need for reporting and auditing standards. Building on the philosophy of religions, this chapter next discusses how contemporary accountability systems have been influenced by the book’s religions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Alles, M., & Debreceny, R. (2012). The evolution and future of XBRL research. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 83–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Rafee, S., & Cronan, T. (2006). Digital piracy: Factors that influence attitude toward behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(3), 237–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Audebrand, L. K., & Pauchant, T. C. (2009). Can the fair trade movement enrich traditional business ethics? An historical study of its founders in Mexico. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 343–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2001). Ethics: An essay on the understanding of evil. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2003). Saint Paul: The foundation of universalism. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2007). Being and event. London: Continuum International Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Badiou, A. (2009). The logics of worlds: being and event II. London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • de Bakker, F. G. A., & Hellsten, L. (2013). Capturing online presence: Hyperlinks and sematic networks in activitst group websites on corporate social responsibility. Journal of Business Ethics, 118, 807–823.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bebbington, J., & Gray, R. (2001). An Account of Sustainability: Failure, Success and a Reconceptualization. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 12(5), 557–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, W. (2004). The “digital divide” is not a problem in need of rectifying. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 393–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blumenthal, K. (2012). Steve Jobs—The man who thought differently. London: Bloomsbury Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, A., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The role of criticism in the dynamics of performance evaluation systems. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 16(6), 665–700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brenkert, G. (2009). Google, human rights, and moral compromise. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(4), 453–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bridgman, T. (2010). Beyond the manager’s moral dilemma: Rethinking the ‘ideal-type’ business ethics case. Journal of Business Ethics, 94(2), 311–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charters, D. (2002). Electronic monitoring and privacy issues in business-marketing: The ethics of the doubleclick experience. Journal of Business Ethics, 35, 243–254.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., Guidry, R. P., Hageman, A. M., & Patten, D. M. (2012). Do actions speak louder than words? An empirical investigation of corporate environmental reputation. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 37(1), 14–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cho, C. H., & Patten, D. M. (2013). Green accounting: Reflections from a CSR and environmental disclosure perspective. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 24(6), 443–447.

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi, C., & Berger, R. (2009). Ethics of global internet, community and fame addiction. Journal of Business Ethics, 85(2), 193–200.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, L., & Roberts, S. J. (2010). Employers’ use of social networking sites a socially irresponsible practice. Journal of Business Ethics, 95, 507–525.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cohen-Almagor, R. (2012). Freedom of expression, internet responsibility, and business ethics: The Yahoo! saga and its implications. Journal of Business Ethics, 106(3), 353–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davison, J. (2004). Sacred vestiges in financial reporting: Mythical readings guided by Mircea Eliade. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(3), 476–497.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, J. (2010). [In]visible [in]tangibles: Visual portraits of the business Élite. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(2), 165–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davison, J. (2011). Barthesian perspectives on accounting communication and visual images of professional accountancy. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 24(2), 250–283.

    Google Scholar 

  • DeLorme, D. E., Zinkman, G. M., & French, W. (2001). Ethics and the internet: Issues associated with qualitative research. Journal of Business Ethics, 33, 271–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1992). Post-scriptum: Aporias, ways and voices. In H. Coward & T. Foshay (Eds.), Derrida and negative theology (pp. 283–323). New York: State University of New York Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Derrida, J. (1994). Specters of Marx: The state of the debt, the work of mourning, and The New International. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dormehl, L. (2013). The Apple revolution: Steve Jobs, the counterculture and how the crazy ones took over the world. London: Virgin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dukerich, J. M., Waller, M. J., George, E., & Huber, G. P. (2000). Moral intensity and managerial problem solving. Journal of Business Ethics, 24, 29–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunne, T., Helliar, C., Lymer, A., & Mousa, R. (2013). Stakeholder engagement in internet financial reporting: The diffusion of XBRL in the UK. The British Accounting Review, 45(3), 167–182.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freestone, O., & Mitchell, V. W. (2004). Generation Y attitudes towards e-ethics and internet-related misbehaviours. Journal of Business Ethics, 54, 121–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frías-Aceituno, J. V., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2013). Is integrated reporting determined by a country’s legal system? An exploratory study. Journal of Cleaner Production, 44(0), 45–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gambling, T. (1977). Magic, accounting and morale. Accounting Organizations and Society, 2(2), 141–151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Sánchez, I.-M., Rodríguez-Ariza, L., & Frías-Aceituno, J.-V. (2013). The cultural system and integrated reporting. International Business Review, 22(5), 828–838.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibson, K. (2000). The moral basis of stakeholder theory. Journal of Business Ethics, 26, 245–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goode, S., & Cruise, S. (2006). What motivates software crackers? Journal of Business Ethics, 65(2), 173–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabner-Kräuter, S. (2009). Web 2.0 social networks: The role of trust. Journal of Business Ethics, 90(4), 505–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (1992). Accounting and environmentalism: An exploration of the challenge of gently accounting for accountability, transparency and sustainability. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 17(5), 399–425.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2002). The social accounting project and Accounting Organizations and Society Privileging engagement, imaginings, new accountings and pragmatism over critique? Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27(7), 687–708.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation?: Whose value? Whose creation? Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 19(6), 793–819.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R. (2010). Is accounting for sustainability actually accounting for sustainability...and how would we know? An exploration of narratives of organisations and the planet. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 47–62.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gray, R., Owen, D., & Maunders, K. (1988). Corporate Social Reporting: Emerging Trends in Accountability and the Social Contract. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 1(1), 6–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Guidi, M. G. D., Hillier, J., & Tarbert, H. (2008). Maximizing the firm’s value to society through ethical business decisions: Incorporating ‘moral debt’ claims. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 19(5), 603–619.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, P. B., Gould, S. J., & Pola, B. (2004). To priate or not to pirate: A omparative study of the ethical versus other influences on the consumber’s software acquisition-mode decision. Journal of Business Ethics, 55, 255–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, J. B., Knouse, S. B., & Hill, V. (2009). Google in China: A manager-friendly heuristic model for resolving cross-cultural ethical conflicts. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 143–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haniffa, R., & Hudaib, M. (2007). Locating audit expectations gap within a cultural context: The case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 16(2), 179–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoskin, K. W., & Macve, R. H. (1986). Accounting and the examination: A genealogy of disciplinary power. Accounting Organizations and Society, 11(2), 105–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Humber, J. (2002). Beyond stockholders and stakeholders: A plea for corporate moral autonomy. Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 207–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IIRC. (2011). Towards integrated reporting. Communicating value in the 21st century. Discussion paper, available at http://www.theiirc.org/theintegrated-reporting-discussion-paper/ accessed 10 August 2012.

  • Jarvis, J. (2011). What would Google do? London: Harper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joannidès, V. (2012). Accounterability and the problematics of accountability. Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 23(3), 244–257.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joannidès, V., & McKernan, J. (2014). Ethics: From negative regulations to fidelity to the event. In P. O’Sullivan (Ed.), From hubris to disgrace: The philosophy, politics and economics of finance in the 21st century. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamuf, P. (2007). Accounterability. Textual Practice, 21(2), 251–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirkpatrick, D. (2011). The Facebook effect: The real inside story of Mark Zuckerberg and the world’s fastest growing company. London: Virgin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Knights, D., & Vurdubakis, T. (1993). Calculations of risk: Towards an understanding of insurance as a moral and political technology. Accounting Organizations and Society, 18(7–8), 729–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laughlin, R. (1996). Principals and higher-principals: Accounting for accountability in the caring professions. In R. Munro & J. Mouritsen (Eds.), Accountability: Power, ethos and the technologies of managing (pp. 225–244). London: International Thomson Business Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Le Menestrel, M., Hunter, M., & de Bettignies, H.-C. (2002). Internet e-ethics in confrontation with an activists’ agenda: Yahoo! on trial. Journal of Business Ethics, 39, 135–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, C., Wang, T., & Yao, L. J. (2014). XBRL’s impact on analyst forecast behavior: An empirical study. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 33(1), 69–82.

    Google Scholar 

  • Loughran, T. (2005). NASD rule 2110 and the VA Linux IPO. Journal of Business Ethics, 62, 141–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maury, M. D., & Kleiner, D. S. (2002). E-commerce, ethical commerce? Journal of Business Ethics, 36, 21–31.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, J. F. (2007). Objectivity in accounting. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 32(1–2), 155–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, J. F., & Kosmala, K. (2004). Accounting, love and justice. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 17(3), 327–360.

    Google Scholar 

  • McKernan, J. F., & Kosmala, K. (2007). Doing the truth: religion deconstruction justice, and accounting. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 20(5), 729–764.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S., & Wekcert, J. (2000). Privacy the workplace and the internet. Journal of Business Ethics, 28, 255–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. (2004). The fair trade movement: Parameters, issues, and future research. Journal of Business Ethics, 53, 73–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Multatuli, R. P. (1860). Max Havelaar: Or the coffee auctions of a Dutch trading company. London: Pinguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Napier, C. (2009). Defining Islamic accounting: current issues, past root. Accounting History, 14(1/2), 121–144.

    Google Scholar 

  • Natoli, G. (2008). Augustinian moral consciousness and the businessman. Journal of Business Ethics, 78(1–2), 97–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls, A. (2010). Fair trade: Towards an economics of virtue. Journal of Business Ethics, 92, 241–255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nyberg, D. (2008). The morality of everyday activities: Not the right, but the good thing to do. Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 587–598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Riain, S., Curry, E., & Harth, A. (2012). XBRL and open data for global financial ecosystems: A linked data approach. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 13(2), 141–162.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagallo, U., & Durante, M. (2009). Three roads to P2P systems and their impact on business practices and ethics. Journal of Business Ethics, 90, 551–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, D. E. (2005). Pop-ups cookies, and spam: Toward a deeper analysis of the ethical significance of internet marketing practices. Journal of Business Ethics, 58, 271–280.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, L. D. (2002b). Twentieth-century textbook budgetary discourse: formalisation, normalization and rebuttal in an Anglo-Saxon environment. European Accounting Review, 11(2), 291–313.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2003). Auditing and the production of legitimacy. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 28(3), 379–394.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (2009). The risk management of nothing. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 34(6‚7), 849–855.

    Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, P. (2004). Accounting for god: Accounting and accountability practices in the society of Jesus (Italy, XVI-XVII centuries). Accounting Organizations and Society, 29(7), 647–683.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quattrone, P. (2009). Books to be practiced: Memory, the power of the visual, and the success of accounting. Accounting, Organizations & Society, 34(1), 85–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond, E. S. (1999). The cathedral and the bazaar—Musings on Linux and open cource by an accidental revolutionary. Sebastopol, CA: O’Reilly.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, D. (2009). What do corporations have to do with fair trade? Positive and normative analysis from a value chain perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 86, 3–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1955). Histoire et vérité. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricœur, P. (1991). Du texte à l’action. Paris: Seuil.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schechter, S. (1895). Some aspects of rabbinic theology: The “law”. The Jewish Quarterly Review, 8(1), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw, T. R. (2003). The moral intensity of privacy: An empirical study of webmasters’ attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 46, 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, D. E., & Thevaranjan, A. (2010). A moral solution to the moral hazard problem. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 35(1), 125–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stone, B. (2014). The everything store: Jeff Bezos and the age of Amazon. London: Corgi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tregidga, H., Milne, M. et Kearins, K. (2014). (Re)presenting ‘sustainable organizations’. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39(6), 477–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vise, D. A. (2008). The Google story. New York: Pan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watson, G. (2014). Steve Jobs—The inspirational life story of Steve Jobs, the fruit company that changed our world. London: Amazon Media EU.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wax, M. (1960). Ancient Judaism and the Protestant ethic. The American Journal of Sociology, 65(5), 449–455.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weijters, B., Goedertier, F., & Verstrecken, S. (2013). Online music consumption in today’s technological context: Putting the influence of ethics in perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 124(4), 537–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiaohe, L. (2006). On P2P file-sharing: A major problem—A Chinese perspective. Journal of Business Ethics, 63(1), 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, D., Sonmez, M., Bosworth, D., & Fryxell, G. (2009). Gobal software piracy: Searching for further explanations. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 269–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

de Lautour, V.J. (2017). Religions and Contemporary Accounting Issues. In: Accounting, Capitalism and the Revealed Religions. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32333-6_4

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32333-6_4

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32332-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32333-6

  • eBook Packages: Economics and FinanceEconomics and Finance (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics