Abstract
Sustainable development (SD) is a controversial concept informed by conflictual narratives which reshape the way we envision the earth, the sea and the stars. Its integration in international policies and national strategy plans for development influences the ways we now know the past, our understanding of the present, and our paths to the future. It influences our lives through policies that regulate daily practices, such as the European Common Fisheries Policy which focuses its strategies for SD in trade and education. However, the problems faced by the ocean require understanding sustainable marine ecosystems through the complex interactions between ecological, social, economic, and political dimensions. Analysing the intersection of those dimensions, while respecting peoples’ voices, allowed us to identify how policies and regulations for SD fail, and opened spaces for an emancipatory reflexive research on SD: responsible, accountable and transformative. This approach inevitably raised questions of environmental justice that challenged us to look critically at research and education norms for SD, as well as question how the deficit-model of research is built on the assumption that the failures of SD are due to lack of knowledge. In this chapter we bring together research experience on education and research practices, overlapping our reflexive and educational practices, with the Azores archipelago in Portugal as our background, in order to explore other possibilities. With the help of Augusto Boal’s Theatre of the Oppressed, we explore the potential of multi-directional learning via aesthetic practices and action-based research to enable narrative inquiry to engage people in research, and SD policy development that are environmentally just and sustainable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Althusser, L. (1971). Lenin and philosophy and other essays. New York & London: New Monthly Review.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. London: Duke University Press.
Barca, S. (2014). Discussant for Wilderness Act forum. An environmental history online forum. http://environmentalhistory.net/wilderness-act-forum/, October 18, 2014.
Barca, S. (2015). Greening the job: Trade unions, climate change, and the political ecology of labour. In Raymond Bryant (Ed.), The international handbook of political ecology. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
Beausoleil, E. (2014). The politics, science, and art of receptivity. Ethics & Global Politics, 7(1), 19–40.
Bélanger, P. (2003). Learning environments and environmental education. In L. H. Hill & D. E. Clover (Eds.), Environmental adult education. Ecological learning, theory, and practice for socioenvironmental change (pp. 79–88). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Berkes, F. (2004). Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology, 18(3), 621–630.
Boal, A. (2006). The aesthetics of the oppressed (A. Jackson, Trans.). London & New York: Routledge.
Boal, A. (2008 [1995]). The rainbow of desire—the Boal method of theatre and therapy (A. Jackson, Trans.). London & New York: Routledge.
Brewer, J. F. (2013). From experiential knowledge to public participation: Social learning at the community fisheries action roundtable. Environmental Management, 52(2), 321–334.
Brockington, D. (2011). Ecosystem services and fictitious commodities. Environmental Conservation, 38(4), 367–369.
Campbell, D. E. (2006). What is education’s impact on civic and social engagement? Measuring the Effects of Education On Health And Civic Engagement: Proceedings of the Copenhagen Symposium, March 23–24, 2006.
Connelly, S. (2007). Mapping sustainable development as a contested concept. Local Environment, 12(3), 259–278.
Crook, A., & Zint, M. (1998). Guide to fisheries education resources for grades K-12. Maryland: American Fisheries Society.
Debord, G. (2000 [1970]). Society of the spectacle. Detroit: Black & Red.
Dewey, J. (1938). Experience and education. New York, NY: Collier Books.
Dierkes, M. (2000). Between understanding and trust: The public, science and technology. London: Routledge.
Fagerlind, I., & Saha, L. J. (1983). Education and national development: A comparative perspective. Oxford: Pergamon Press.
Ferreira, P. D., Coimbra, J. L., & Menezes, I. (2012). Diversity within diversity—Exploring connections between community participation and citizenship. Journal of Social Science Education, 11(3), 120–134.
Foster, J. B. (2011). A ecologia de Marx: materialismo e natureza. Rio de Janeiro: Civilização Brasileira.
Freire, P. (1970). Pedagogy of the oppressed. New York & London: Continuum.
Gibson-Graham, J. K. (2008). Diverse economies: Performative practices for ‘other worlds’. Progress in Human Geography, 32(5), 613–632.
Hall, P. A., & Soskice, D. (2001). An introduction to varieties of capitalism. In P. Hall & D. Soskice (Eds.), Varieties of capitalism: The institutional foundation of comparative advantage. New York: Oxford University Press.
Haraway, D. (1997). Modest_Witness @ Second_Millennium. FemanleMan© _ Meets:OncoMouseTM: Feminism and Technoscience. New York & London: Routledge.
Harding, G. (1968). The tragedy of the commons. Science, 162, 1243–1248.
Harvey, D. (2000). Condição pós-moderna: uma pesquisa sobre as origens da mudança cultural. São Paulo: Edições Loyla.
Hoskins, M., & Stoltz, J. (2005). Fear of offending: Disclosing researcher discomfort when engaging in analysis. Qualitative Research, 5(1), 95–111.
Huff, T. E. (2012). The big shift: Science and the universities in crisis. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The age of knowledge. The dynamics of universities, knowledge and society. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Jasanoff, S., & Martello, M. L. (2004). Earthly politics: Local and global in environmental governance. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Jessop, B. (2007). Knowledge as a fictitious commodity: Insights and limits of a Polanyian analysis. In A. Buğra & K. Ağartan (Eds.), Reading Karl Polanyi for the 21st century. Market economy as a political project. Basingstoke: Palgrave.
Jickling, B. (1992). Why I don’t want my children to be educated for sustainable development. The Journal of Environmental Education, 23(4), 5–8.
Khalilian, S., Froese, R., Proelss, A., & Requate, T. (2010). Designed to failure: A critique of the common fisheries policy of the European Union. Marine Policy, 34(6), 1178–1182.
Kulnieks, A., Longboat, D. R., & Young, K. (2013). Contemporary studies in environmental and indigenous pedagogies. A curricula of stories and place. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.
Mansfield, B. (2011). “Modern” industrial fisheries and the crisis of overfishing. In R. Peet, P. Robbins, & M.J. Watts (Eds.), Global political ecology (pp. 84–99). New York: Routledge.
Martinez-Alier, J. (1993). Distribution obstacles to international environmental policy: The failures at Rio and prospects after Rio. Environmental Values, 2(2), 97–124.
Marx, K. (1845). Theses on Feuerbach. Retrived October 15, 2015 https://www.marxists.org/archive/marx/works/1845/theses/theses.htm
Mundy, K. (2005). Discourses of development: The view from education. Presentation at Deconstructing disciplinary discourses of development III—Centre for International Studies, Toronto, March 11, 2005.
Neilson, A. L., Bulhão Pato, C., & Sousa, L. (2012a). A short reflection on research and fishing cultures performing knowledge together. Revista Maria Scientia., 2012(2), 73–82.
Neilson, A. L., Cardwell, E., & Bulhão Pato, C. (2012b). Coastal fisheries in the Azores, Portugal—A question of sovereignty, sustainability and space. In K. Schriewer & T. Højrup (Eds.), European fisheries at a tipping-point (pp. 465–505). Murcia, Es: Cátedra Jean Monnet Universidade de Murcia.
Neilson, A. L., Gabriel, R., Arroz, A. M., & Mendonça, E. (2014). Perspectives about the sea in the Azores: Respecting narratives that sustain inshore fishing communities. In J. Urquhart, T. Acott, & M. Zhao (Eds.), Social issues in sustainable marine fisheries management (pp. 319–338). Dordrecht, NL: Springer.
Neves, K. (2010). Cashing in on cetourism: A critical ecological engagement with dominant E-NGO discourses on whaling, cetacean conservation, and whale watching. Antipode, 42(3), 719–741.
O’Connor, M. (1994). Is capitalism sustainable? A political economy and the politics of ecology. New York: Guildford Press.
O’Connor, J. (1998). Natural causes: Essays in ecological marxism. New York: Guildford Press.
Orellana, I., & Fauteux, S. (2000). Environmental education: Tracing the high points of its history. In A. Jarnet, B. Jickling, L. Sauvé, A. Wals, & P. Clarkin (Eds.), A colloquium on the future of environmental education in a postmodern world? (pp. 2–12). Whitehorse, Yukon: Yukon College.
Polanyi, K. (2000 [1944]). A grande transformação: As Origens da nossa Época (F. Wrobel, Trans., 2nd ed.). São Paulo: Editora Campus.
Rancière, J. (1991). The ignorant schoolmaster: five lessons in intellectual emancipation. California: Stanford University Press.
Richardson, L. (1990). Narrative and sociology. Journal of Contemporary Ethnography, 19(1), 116–135.
Ropke, I. (1994). Trade development and sustainability: A critical assessment of the “free trade dogma”. Ecological Economics, 9(1), 13–22.
Schön, D. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. London, UK: Temple Smith.
Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Cambridge: UIT Cambridge Ltd.
Stone-Mediatore, S. (2003). Reading across border: Storytelling and knowledges of resistance. New York, NY: Palgrave.
Sund, L., & Öhman, J. (2014). On the need to repoliticise environmental and sustainability education: Rethinking the postpolitical consensus. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 639–659.
Taylor, P. J. (2010). Unruly complexity: Ecology, interpretation, engagement. Chicago & London: University of Chicago Press.
Tuck, E., & Yang, K. W. (2014). Unbecoming claims: Pedagogies of refusal in qualitative research. Qualitative Inquiry, 20(6), 811–818.
Tuhiwai Smith, L. (1999). Decolonizing methodologies: Research and indigenous peoples. New York, NY: Zed Books.
WCED, World Commission on Environment and Development. (1987). Our common future. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
World Trade Organization. (2011). Harnessing trade for sustainable development and a green economy. Geneva, Switzerland: World Trade Organization. Retrieved 01 November, 2015 www.wto.org/english/res_e/publications_e/brochure_rio_20_e.pdf
Wotherspoon, T. (2012). Triple helix or triple jeopardy? Universities and the social relations of knowledge. In J. Dzisah & H. Etzkowitz (Eds.), The age of knowledge. The dynamics of universities, knowledge and society. Chicago: Haymarket Books.
Acknowledgements
The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the project “Education for active citizenship: Images of participation in marine policy” funded by the Portuguese Foundation for Science and Technology FCT—IF/01084/2013/CP1164/CT0001 and “EDUMAR Perspectives about the sea and sea life: Cetaceans and tourism in the Azores, Portugal and Newfoundland, Canada” funded by the Azorean Regional Director of Science and Technology DRCT/FRCT—M2.1.2/F/007/2008.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Neilson, A.L., Castro, I. (2016). Reflexive Research and Education for Sustainable Development with Coastal Fishing Communities in the Azores Islands: A Theatre for Questions. In: Castro, P., Azeiteiro, U., Bacelar-Nicolau, P., Leal Filho, W., Azul, A. (eds) Biodiversity and Education for Sustainable Development . World Sustainability Series. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_13
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32318-3_13
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32317-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32318-3
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)