Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Teleological Paradigm

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Reframing Economic Ethics

Part of the book series: Humanism in Business Series ((HUBUS))

  • 443 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter makes the case that economics today can benefit from the long-standing tradition of ethical thought. A first major milestone of economic ethics was reached with the “teleological paradigm” that also dominated much of classical economics. From Aristotle via Thomas Aquinas, up to and including Adam Smith, there was a consensus that both economic theory and practice needed to be legitimated as well as limited by a certain overarching goal (Greek: telos) such as the “common good.” This chapter explores in particular how teleological thinking can orient economic decision-making quantitatively (against excess, as in the philosophy of Aristotle), qualitatively (in pursuit of justice, as in the ethics of Thomas Aquinas), and in regard to the question as to how ethical business strategies can be successfully developed (based on empathy/sympathy, as in the economics of Adam Smith).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 49.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Bibliography

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1929. Scriptum super libros Sententiarum. I and II edited by P. Mandonnet, Paris; III and IV edited by M. Moos, Paris, 1937 and 1947.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1941–1945. Summa theologiae. Ottawa: Studium dominicain.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1961–1967. Summa contra gentiles. Ed. C. Pera, P. Marc, and P. Caramello. Turin: Marietti.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1970. Contra impugnantes Dei cultum et religionem, Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia, vol. 41. Rome: Editio Leonina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aquinas, Thomas. 1972. Quaestiones disputatae de veritate, Sancti Thomae de Aquino Opera omnia, vol. 22. Rome: Editio Leonina.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1981. Eudemian ethics. Aristotle in 23 volumes. Vol. 20. Trans. H. Rackham and W. Heinemann. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1985. Nicomachean ethics. Trans. T. Irwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 1994. Rhetoric. Ed. D.C. Stevenson. The Internet Classics Archives. Available at http://classics.mit.edu/Aristotle/rhetoric.html

  • Aristotle. 2001. Parts of animals. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aristotle. 2007. Politics. Trans. Benjamin Jowett. Adelaide: eBooks@Adelaide.

    Google Scholar 

  • Aßländer, Michael S. 2011. Corporate social responsibility as subsidiary co-responsibility: A macroeconomic perspective. Journal of Business Ethics 99(1): 115–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernstein, Jared, Chauna Brocht, and Maggie Spade-Aguilar. 2000. How much is enough?: Basic family budgets for working families. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Block, Peter. 1993. Stewardship: Choosing service over self interest. San Francisco: Berrett-Koehler Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, V. 1994. Adam’s Smith discourse: Canonicity, commerce and conscience. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cahill, Lisa Sowle. 1980. Toward a Christian theory of human rights. The Journal of Religious Ethics 8(2): 277–301.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cicero, Marcus Tullius. 1913. De officiis. Trans. Walter Miller. London: Loeb Classical Library.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cockfield, Geoff, Ann Firth, and John Laurent (eds.). 2007. New perspectives on Adam Smith’s the theory of moral sentiments. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cornwall, Jeffrey R., and Michael J. Naughton. 2003. Who is the good entrepreneur? An exploration within the Catholic social tradition. Journal of Business Ethics 44(1): 61–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dann, Gary E., and Neil Haddow. 2008. Just doing business or doing just business: Google, Microsoft, Yahoo! and the business of censoring China’s Internet. Journal of Business Ethics 79(3): 219–234.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Davis, James H., F. David Schoorman, and Lex Donaldson. 1997. Toward a stewardship theory of management. Academy of Management Review 22(1): 20–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Demosthenes. 1930. I Olynthiacs, Philippics Minor Public Orations I-XVII and XX. Loeb Classical Library No. 238.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dierksmeier, Claus, and Michael Pirson. 2009. Oikonomia versus Chrematistike: Aristotle on wealth and well-being. Journal of Business Ethics 88(3): 417–430.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Donaldson, Lex, and James H. Davis. 1991. Stewardship theory or agency theory: CEO governance and shareholder returns. Australian Journal of Management 16(1): 49–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dyck, Bruno, and Rob Kleysen. 2001. Aristotle’s virtues and management thought: An empirical exploration of an integrative pedagogy. Business Ethics Quarterly 11(4): 561–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faccarello, Gilbert. 2005. A tale of two traditions: Pierre force’s self-interest before Adam Smith. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought 12(4): 701–712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischacker, Samuel. 2012. Sympathy in Hume and Smith: A contrast, critique, and reconstruction. In Intersubjectivity and objectivity in Adam Smith and Edmund Husserl, ed. C. Fricke and D. Føllesdal, 273–311. Frankfurt: Ontos Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman-Barzilai, Fonna. 2010. Adam Smith and the circles of sympathy: Cosmopolitanism and moral theory, vol. 96. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Freshfields, Bruckhaus, et al. 2006. A legal framework for the integration of Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) issues into institutional investment. New York: United Nations Environment Programme Finance Initiative (UNEP FI).

    Google Scholar 

  • Friedman, M. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits, New York Times Magazine, September 13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Charles L. 1999. Adam Smith and the virtues of enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, K. 2006. Introduction – The coherence of Adam Smith’s thought. In The Cambridge companion to Adam Smith, ed. K. Haakonssen. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Haakonssen, Knud, and Donald Winch. 2006. The legacy of Adam Smith. In The Cambridge companion to Adam Smith, ed. Knud Haakonssen, 366–394. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hawken, Paul, Amory B. Lovins, and L. Hunter Lovins. 2000. Natural capitalism: Creating the next industrial revolution. New York: Back Bay Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, R. 1979. Modern economics and a chapter in the history of economic thought. History of Political Economy 11(2): 192–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heilbroner, Robert L. 2011. The worldly philosophers: The lives, times and ideas of the great economic thinkers. New York: Simon and Schuster.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hoffmann, Tobias. 2011. Conscience and Synderesis. In The oxford handbook of Aquinas, ed. Brian Davies and Eleonore Stump, 255. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hühn, Matthias P. 2014. You reap what you sow: How MBA programs undermine ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 121(4): 527–541.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hühn, Matthias P., and Claus Dierksmeier. 2015. Will the real A. Smith please stand up! Journal of Business Ethics 12:1–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobsen, Michael, and Ole Bruun. 2000. Human rights and Asian values: Contesting national identities and cultural representations in Asia. London: RoutledgeCurzon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, Michael C., and Kevin J. Murphy. 1990. Performance pay and top-management incentives. Journal of Political Economy 98: 225–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, Tim, and Aaron Ahuvia. 2002. Materialistic values and well‐being in business students. European Journal of Social Psychology 32(1): 137–146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koehn, Daryl. 1995. A role for virtue ethics in the analysis of business practice. Business Ethics Quarterly 5(03): 533–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koslowski, Peter. 1993. Politik und Ökonomie bei Aristoteles. Tübingen: Mohr.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowry, S. Todd. 1987. The archaeology of economic ideas: The classical Greek tradition. Durham: Duke University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meikle, Scott. 1994. Aristotle’s economic thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melé, Domènec. 2009a. Integrating personalism into virtue-based business ethics: The personalist and the common good principles. Journal of Business Ethics 88: 227–244.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Melé, Domènec. 2009b. Business ethics in action: Seeking human excellence in organizations. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Montes, Leonidas, and Eric Schliesser (eds.). 2006. New voices on Adam Smith. Abingdon: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moosmayer, Dirk C. 2012. A model of management academics’ intention to influence values. Academy of Management Learning & Education 11: 155–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, Martha C. 1990. Love’s knowledge: Essays on philosophy and literature. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Otteson, James R. 2002. Adam Smith’s marketplace of life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Putnam, Robert D. 2000. Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D.D., and A.L. Macfie. 1976. Introduction. In The theory of moral sentiments, ed. A. Smith. Oxford: Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Raphael, D.D. 1978. Adam Smith: Philosophy, science, and social science. Royal Institute of Philosophy Lectures 12: 77–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rick, Jon. 2007. Hume's and Smith’s partial sympathies and impartial stances. Journal of Scottish Philosophy 5(2): 135–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ross, Ian S. 2004. Great works upon the anvil in 1785. Adam Smith’s projected corpus of philosophy. In The Adam Smith review, ed. V. Brown, Vol. I., 40–59. London/New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothschild, Emma. 1994. Adam Smith and the invisible hand. The American Economic Review 84(2): 319–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, John A. 1942. The economic philosophy of St. Thomas. In Essays in Thomism, ed. R.E. Brennan, 239–260. New York: Sheed and Ward.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacher, Leo Sebastian. 1949. The philosophy of the equitable distribution of wealth: A study in economic philosophy, Vol. 103. Washington, DC: Catholic University of America Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, Joseph A. 1954. History of economic analysis. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seele, Peter. 2016. Business ethics without philosophers? Evidence for and Implications of the shift from applied philosophers to business scholars on the editorial boards of business ethics journals. Metaphilosophy 47(1): 75–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1759/1976. The theory of moral sentiments, The Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith. ed. David Raphael, vol. 1. Glasgow: Glasgow Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, A. 1776/1976. An enquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations, Glasgow edition of the works and correspondence of Adam Smith, 2 vols. Glasgow: Glasgow Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Robert C. 1994. The new word of business: Ethics and free enterprise in the global 1990s. Lanham: Roman & Littjefield.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solomon, Robert C. 2004. Aristotle, ethics and business organizations. Organization Studies 25(6): 1021–1043.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soudek, Josef. 1952. Aristotle’s theory of exchange. An inquiry into the origin of the economic analysis. Proceedings of the American Philosophical Society 96: 55–59.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steele, Gerry R. 2004. Understanding economic man. American Journal of Economics and Sociology 63(5): 1021–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stigler, George J. 1971. Smith’s travels on the ship of state. History of Political Economy 3(2): 265–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varacalli, Joseph A. 1992. Whose justice and justice for what purpose?: A catholic neo-orthodox critique. International Journal of Politics, Culture, and Society 6(2): 309–321.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Villa-Vicencio, Charles. 1999. Christianity and human rights. Journal of Law and Religion 14(2): 579–600.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Long, D. Malhotra, and J.K. Murnighan. 2011. Economics education and greed. Academy of Management Learning and Education 10: 643–660.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Westberg, Daniel. 1994. Aristotle, action, and Prudence in Aquinas, Oxford theological monographs 2. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wijnberg, Nachoem M. 2000. Normative stakeholder theory and Aristotle: The link between ethics and politics. Journal of Business Ethics 25(4): 329–342.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Oliver F. 1993. Catholic social teaching: A communitarian democratic capitalism for the new world order. Journal of Business Ethics 12(12): 919–932.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, Oliver F. 2004. The UN global compact: The challenge and the promise. Business Ethics Quarterly 14(4): 755–774.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Young, Jeffrey T. (ed.). 2009. Elgar companion to Adam Smith. Cheltenham/Northampton: Edward Elgar.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zagzebski, Linda. 2001. The uniqueness of persons. The Journal of Religious Ethics 29: 401–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Weltethos-Institut University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Baden-Württemberg, Germany

    Claus Dierksmeier

Authors
  1. Claus Dierksmeier
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Dierksmeier, C. (2016). The Teleological Paradigm. In: Reframing Economic Ethics. Humanism in Business Series. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32300-8_3

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation