Advertisement

Introduction

  • Claus Dierksmeier
Chapter
  • 288 Downloads
Part of the Humanism in Business Series book series (HUBUS)

Abstract

Recent economic crises have further fueled the debate over the social impact of economics and management education (Krugman 2009; Shiller 2010; Ötsch und Kapeller 2010). Former fixtures of the conventional wisdom of the economics discipline—such as the macroeconomic quest for ever more growth and the microeconomic pursuit of profit—are now held responsible for many social, ecological, and moral failings of the present economic system (Pirson and Steinvorth 2014). Behind this critique and propelled by it, a deeper shift in economic thought is arguably happening. After about 200 years of imitating the methods of the natural sciences and their positivistic approach, and after decades of relegating any and all normative considerations to the margins of business theory, a paradigm shift appears possible in the direction of a more realistic and thus more relevant framework for economics, i.e. humanistic management (Amann 2011).

Keywords

Humanistic Management Business Ethics Economics Economic Ethics Philosophy 

Bibliography

  1. Alvey, James E. 1999. A short history of economics as a moral science. Journal of Markets and Morality 2(1): 53–73.Google Scholar
  2. Amann, Wolfgang. 2011. Business schools under fire: Humanistic management education as the way forward. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. BCG (The Boston Consulting Group). 2009. The business of sustainability. Imperatives, advantages, and actions. Published online in cooperation with the MIT Sloan Management Review, at http://sloanreview.mit.edu/special-report/the-business-of-sustainability/
  4. Bonar, James. 1893. Philosophy and political economy in some of their historical relations. London: S. Sonnenschein.Google Scholar
  5. Brodbeck, Karl-Heinz. 2000. Die fragwürdigen Grundlagen der Ökonomie, Eine philosophische Kritik der modernen Wirtschaftswissenschaften. Darmstadt: Wiss. Buchges.Google Scholar
  6. Chibnik, Michael. 2011. Anthropology, economics, and choice. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  7. Dierksmeier, Claus. 2009. A requisite journey: From business ethics to economic philosophy. In Humanism in business, ed. Heiko Spitzeck et al., 68–83. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Dierksmeier, Claus. 2011a. The freedom–responsibility nexus in management philosophy and business ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 101(2): 263–283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Dierksmeier, Claus (ed.). 2011b. Humanistic ethics in the age of globality. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  10. Dierksmeier, Claus, and Michael Pirson. 2009. Oikonomia versus Chrematistike. Aristotle on wealth and well-being. Journal of Business Ethics 88(3): 417–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Drascek, Matej, and Stane Maticic. 2008. What managers could see in the philosophical block of ‘free will’? Journal of Business Ethics 81(1): 1–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dutt, Amitava K., and Charles K. Wilber. 2010. Economics and ethics: An introduction. Basingstoke/Hampshire: Palgrave McMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Elegido, Juan M. 2009. Business education and erosion of character. African Journal of Business Ethics 4(1): 16–24.Google Scholar
  14. Erhard, Werner, and Michael C. Jensen. 2011. A positive theory of the normative virtues. Harvard Business School NOM Unit (Working paper no. 12–007).Google Scholar
  15. Erhard, Werner, and Michael C. Jensen. 2014. Putting integrity into finance: A purely positive approach. National Bureau of Economic Research, NBER (Working paper). Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w19986
  16. Etzioni, Amitai. 2010. Moral dimension: Toward a new economics. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  17. Fehr, Ernst, and Antonio Rangel. 2011. Neuroeconomic foundations of economic choice—Recent advances. The Journal of Economic Perspectives 25(4): 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Friedman, Milton. 1970. The social responsibility of business is to increase its profits. The New York Times Magazine, September 13.Google Scholar
  19. Gioia, Dennis A. 2002. Business education’s role in the crisis of corporate confidence. Academy of Management Executive 16(3): 142–144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gioia, Dennis A. 2003. Teaching teachers to teach corporate governance differently. Journal of Management & Governance 7(3): 255–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Glimcher, Paul W., and Ernst Fehr (eds.). 2013. Neuroeconomics: Decision making and the brain. San Diego: Academic.Google Scholar
  22. Goshal, Sumantra. 2003. Business schools share the Blame for Enron. Financial Times, July 17.Google Scholar
  23. Goshal, Sumantra. 2005. Bad management theories are destroying good management practices. Academy of Management Learning and Education 4(1): 75–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hausman, Daniel M., and Michael S. McPherson. 1993. Taking ethics seriously: Economics and contemporary moral philosophy. Journal of Economic Literature 31(2): 671–731.Google Scholar
  25. Hühn, Matthias P. 2014. You reap what you sow: How MBA programs undermine ethics. Journal of Business Ethics 121(4): 527–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jensen, Michael. 2002. Value maximization, stakeholder theory and the corporate objective function. Business Ethics Quarterly 12(2): 235–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Krugman, Paul. 2009. How did economists get it so wrong? New York Times, September 2.Google Scholar
  28. Matten, Dirk, and Jeremy Moon. 2004. Corporate social responsibility education in Europe. Journal of Business Ethics 54(4): 323–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Melé, Domènec, and Claus Dierksmeier. 2012. Human development in business: Values and humanistic management in the encyclical Caritas in Veritate. In Human development in business, ed. D. Melé and C. Dierksmeier. London: Palgrave.Google Scholar
  30. Net Impact. 2007a. New leaders, new perspectives: A Net Impact survey on MBA student opinions on the relationship between business and social/environmental issues. San Francisco: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  31. Net Impact. 2007b. New leaders, new perspectives II: A Net Impact survey on undergrad student opinions on the relationship between business and social/environmental issues. San Francisco: The Aspen Institute.Google Scholar
  32. Net Impact. 2008. Business as unusual. San Francisco: Net Impact.Google Scholar
  33. Ötsch, Walter Otto, and Jakob Kapeller. 2010. Perpetuating the failure: Economic education and the current crisis. JSSE-Journal of Social Science Education 9(2) 16–25.Google Scholar
  34. Pfeffer, Jeffrey. 2005. Why do bad management theories persist? A comment on Goshal. Academy of Management Learning & Education 4(1): 96–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Pigou, Arthur C. 1962. The economics of welfare. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  36. Pirson, Michael, and Ulrich Steinvorth. 2014. From capitalistic to humanistic business. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Sahlins, Marshall. 1972. Stone age economics. New York: Aldine Transaction.Google Scholar
  38. Sen, Amartya. 2002. Rationality and freedom. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  39. Shiller, Robert J. 2010. How should the financial crisis change how we teach economics? The Journal of Economic Education 41(4): 403–409.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Smith, Adam. 1759. The theory of moral sentiments. London: Edinburgh.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Smith, Adam. 1776. An inquiry into the nature and causes of the wealth of nations: In two volumes. London: Cadell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Spitzeck, Heiko, Michael Pirson, Wolfgang Amann, Shiban Khan, and Ernst von Kimakowitz (eds.). 2009. Humanism in business. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Veblen, Thorstein. 1898. Why is economics not an evolutionary science? Quarterly Journal of Economics 12: 373–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Walsh, Vivian. 2003. Sen after putnam. Review of Political Economy 15(3): 315–394.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© The Editor(s) (if applicable) and the Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Claus Dierksmeier
    • 1
  1. 1.Weltethos-Institut University of TübingenTübingenGermany

Personalised recommendations