Abstract
The applications of neuroscientific research to education have been expanding over the last few decades. Among other things, the research supports the blending model of cognition, which asserts that concepts are formed through associations and amalgamations in the brain. The theory of blending and its various implications for math pedagogy are explored in this chapter, since these are especially relevant to teaching mathematics in the Global Village.
Mathematics is the most beautiful and most powerful creation of the human spirit.
Stefan Banach (1892–1945)
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Alexander, J. (2012). On the cognitive and semiotic structure of mathematics. In M. Bockarova, M. Danesi, & R. Núñez (Eds.), Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 1–34). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Ardila, A., & Rosselli, M. (2002). Acalculia and dyscalculia. Neuropsychology Review, 12, 179–231.
Bockarova, M., Danesi, M., & Núñez, R. (Eds.). (2012). Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics. Munich: Lincom Europa.
Brian, B., Varma, S., & Laurillard, D. (2011). Dyscalculia: From brain to education. Science, 332, 1049–1053.
Butterworth, B. (1999). What counts: How every brain is hardwired for math. Michigan: Free Press.
de Chardin, P. T. (1945) [2008]. The phenomenon of man. New York: Harper.
Danesi, M. (1987). Formal mother-tongue training and the learning of mathematics in elementary school: An observational note on the Brussels Foyer Project. Scientia Paedogogica Experimentalis, 24, 313–320.
Danesi, M. (2003). Conceptual metaphor theory and the teaching of mathematics: Findings of a pilot project. Semiotica, 145, 71–83.
Danesi, M. (2007). A conceptual metaphor framework for the teaching mathematics. Studies in Philosophy and Education, 26, 225–236.
Dehaene, S. (1997). The number sense: How the mind creates mathematics. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Dehaene, S. (2004). Arithmetic and the brain. Current Opinion in Neurobiology, 14, 218–224.
Dehaene, S., Piazza, M., Pinel, P., & Cohen, L. (2003). Three parietal circuits for number processing. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 20, 487–506.
Devlin, K. (2000). The math gene: How mathematical thinking evolved and Why numbers are like gossip. New York: Basic.
Devlin, K. (2005). The math instinct: Why you’re a mathematical genius (along with Lobsters, Birds, Cats and Dogs). New York: Thunder’s Mouth Press.
Eco, U. (1979). The role of the reader. Explorations in the semiotics of texts. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Fauconnier, G., & Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities. New York: Basic.
Gerofsky, S. (2015). Approaches to embodied learning in mathematics. In: L. D. English, & D. Kirshner (Eds.), Handbook of inernational research in mathematics education. New York: Routledge.
Guhe, et al. (2011). A computational account of conceptual blending in basic mathematics. Cognitive Systems Research, 12, 249–265.
Harel, G., & Sowder, L. (2007). Toward comprehensive perspectives on the learning and teaching of proof. In F. K. Lester (Ed.), Second handbook of research on mathematics teaching and learning (pp. 805–842). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
Harris, Z. (1968). Mathematical structures of language. New York: John Wiley.
Hockett, C. F. (1967). Language, mathematics and linguistics. The Hague: Mouton.
Hyde, D. C. (2011). Two systems of non-symbolic numerical cognition. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience,. doi:10.3389/fnhum.2011.00150.
Isaacs, E. B., Edmonds, C. J., Lucas, A., & Gadian, D. G. (2001). Calculation difficulties in children of very low birthweight: A neural correlate. Brain, 124, 1701–1707.
Izard, V., Pica, P., Spelke, E. S., & Dehaene, S. (2011). Flexible intuitions of euclidean geometry in an Amazonian indigene group. PNAS, 108, 9782–9787.
Kant, I. (2011) [1781]. Critique of pure reason (J. M. D. Meiklejohn, Trans.). CreateSpace Platform.
Kiryushchenko, V. (2012). The visual and the virtual in theory, life and scientific practice: The case of Peirce’s quincuncial map projection. In M. Bockarova, M. Danesi, & R. Núñez (Eds.), Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 61–70). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Lakoff, G. (2012). The contemporary theory of metaphor. In: M. Danesi & S. Maida-Nicol (Eds.), Foundational texts in linguistic anthropology (pp. 128–171). Toronto: Canadian Scholars’ Press.
Lakoff, G., & Núñez, R. (2000). Where mathematics comes from: How the embodied mind brings mathematics into being. New York: Basic Books.
Lesh, R., & Harel, G. (2003). Problem solving, modeling, and local conceptual development. Mathematical Thinking and Learning, 5, 157.
McLuhan, M. (1962). The gutenberg galaxy: The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
McLuhan, M. (2004). In S. McLuhan & D. Staines (Eds.), Understanding me: Lectures and interviews. Toronto: McLelland and Stewart.
McLuhan, M., Gordon, W. Terrence, & Lamberti, E. (2010). The Gutenberg Galaxy. The making of typographic man. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
Núñez, R., Edwards, L. D., & Matos, F. J. (1999). Embodied cognition as grounding for situatedness and context in mathematics education. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 39, 45–65.
Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). In C. Hartshorne & P. Weiss (Eds.), Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce (Vols. 1–8). Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press.
Presmeg, N. C. (1997). Reasoning with metaphors and metonymies in mathematics learning. In L. D. English (Ed.), Mathematical reasoning: Analogies, metaphors, and images (pp. 267–280). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Postman, N. (1992). Technopoly: The surrender of culture to technology. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Presmeg, N. C. (2005). Metaphor and metonymy in processes of semiosis in mathematics education. In J. Lenhard & F. Seeger (Eds.), Activity and sign (pp. 105–116). New York: Springer.
Radford, L. (2010). Algebraic thinking from a cultural semiotic perspective. Research in Mathematics Education, 12, 1–19.
Turner, M. (2005). Mathematics and narrative. http://thalesandfriends.org/en/papers/pdf/turner_paper.pdf.
Visser, B. A., Ashton, M. C., & Vernon, P. A. (2006). g and the measurement of multiple intelligences: A response to Gardner. Intelligence, 34, 507–510.
Whiteley, W. (2013). Mathematical modeling as conceptual blending: Exploring an example within mathematics education. In M. Bockarova, M. Danesi & R. Núñez (Eds.), Semiotic and cognitive science essays on the nature of mathematics (pp. 256–279). Munich: Lincom Europa.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Danesi, M. (2016). Blending, Math, and Technology. In: Learning and Teaching Mathematics in The Global Village. Mathematics Education in the Digital Era, vol 6. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32280-3_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32280-3_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32278-0
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32280-3
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)