Abstract
Specific kinds of neuronal interactions, such as phase coupling of neuronal oscillations, are likely to be essential systems-level mechanisms for coordinating neuronal communication, integration, and segregation. The functional roles of these interactions during cognitive tasks in healthy humans can be investigated with magneto- and electroencephalography (MEG/EEG), the only means for noninvasive electrophysiological recordings of human cortical activity. While advances in source modeling have opened new avenues for assessing inter-areal interactions with MEG/EEG, several factors limit the accuracy and inferential value of such analyses. In this chapter, we provide an overview of common source analysis strategies for mapping inter-areal interactions with MEG/EEG. Linear mixing between sources, as caused by volume conduction and signal mixing, is the principal confounder in connectivity analysis and always leads to false positive observations. We discuss the sensitivity of different interaction metrics to directly and indirectly caused false positives and conclude with approaches to mitigate these problems. In conclusion, MEG and EEG are becoming increasingly useful for assessing inter-areal neuronal interaction in humans.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Antiqueira L, Rodrigues FA, van Wijk BCM, Costa LF, Daffertshofer A (2010) Estimating complex cortical networks via surface recordings—a critical note. Neuroimage 53:439–449
Bassett DS, Bullmore E, Verchinski BA, Mattay VS, Weinberger DR, Meyer-Lindenberg A (2008) Hierarchical organization of human cortical networks in health and schizophrenia. J Neurosci 28:9239–9248
Bassett DS, Nelson BG, Mueller BA, Camchong J, Lim KO (2011) Altered resting state complexity in schizophrenia. Neuroimage 59:2196–2207
Bell AJ, Sejnowski TJ (1995) An information-maximization approach to blind separation and blind deconvolution. Neural Comput 7:1129–1159
Brookes MJ, Woolrich MW, Barnes GR (2012) Measuring functional connectivity in MEG: a multivariate approach insensitive to linear source leakage. Neuroimage 63:910–920
Bruns A (2004) Fourier-, hilbert- and wavelet-based signal analysis: are they really different approaches? J Neurosci Methods 137:321–332
Bullmore E, Sporns O (2009) Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. Nat Rev Neurosci 10:186–198
Buzsaki G, Draguhn A (2004) Neuronal oscillations in cortical networks. Science 304:1926–1929
Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meskaldji D, Thiran JP, Sporns O, Do KQ, Maeder P, Meuli R, Hagmann P (2012) Mapping the human connectome at multiple scales with diffusion spectrum MRI. J Neurosci Methods 203:386–397
Daffertshofer A, van Wijk BCM (2011) On the influence of amplitude on the connectivity between phases. Front Neuroinform 5:6
Dale AM, Fischl B, Sereno MI (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. I. Segmentation and surface reconstruction. Neuroimage 9:179–194
Drakesmith M, El-Deredy W, Welbourne S (2013) Reconstructing coherent networks from electroencephalography and magnetoencephalography with reduced contamination from volume conduction or magnetic field spread. PLoS One 8, e81553
Fischl B, Sereno MI, Dale AM (1999) Cortical surface-based analysis. II: inflation, flattening, and a surface-based coordinate system. Neuroimage 9:195–207
Fischl B, Salat DH, Busa E, Albert M, Dieterich M, Haselgrove C, van der Kouwe A, Killiany R, Kennedy D, Klaveness S, Montillo A, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM (2002) Whole brain segmentation: automated labeling of neuroanatomical structures in the human brain. Neuron 33:341–355
Fischl B, van der Kouwe A, Destrieux C, Halgren E, Segonne F, Salat DH, Busa E, Seidman LJ, Goldstein J, Kennedy D, Caviness V, Makris N, Rosen B, Dale AM (2004) Automatically parcellating the human cerebral cortex. Cereb Cortex 14:11–22
Fries P (2015) Rhythms for cognition: communication through coherence. Neuron 88:220–235
Gross J, Baillet S, Barnes GR, Henson RN, Hillebrand A, Jensen O, Jerbi K, Litvak V, Maess B, Oostenveld R, Parkkonen L, Taylor JR, van Wassenhove V, Wibral M, Schoffelen JM (2013) Good practice for conducting and reporting MEG research. Neuroimage 65:349–363
Hagmann P, Cammoun L, Gigandet X, Meuli R, Honey CJ, Wedeen VJ, Sporns O (2008) Mapping the structural core of human cerebral cortex. PLoS Biol 6, e159
Hamalainen MS, Sarvas J (1989) Realistic conductivity geometry model of the human head for interpretation of neuromagnetic data. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 36:165–171
Hillebrand A, Barnes GR, Bosboom JL, Berendse HW, Stam CJ (2012) Frequency-dependent functional connectivity within resting-state networks: an atlas-based MEG beamformer solution. Neuroimage 59:3909–3921
Hipp JF, Hawellek DJ, Corbetta M, Siegel M, Engel AK (2012) Large-scale cortical correlation structure of spontaneous oscillatory activity. Nat Neurosci 15(6):884–890
Ioannidis JP (2005) Why most published research findings are false. PLoS Med 2, e124
Korhonen O, Palva S, Palva JM (2014) Sparse weightings for collapsing inverse solutions to cortical parcellations optimize M/EEG source reconstruction accuracy. J Neurosci Methods 226C:147–160
Kriegeskorte N, Simmons WK, Bellgowan PS, Baker CI (2009) Circular analysis in systems neuroscience: the dangers of double dipping. Nat Neurosci 12:535–540
Lachaux JP, Rodriguez E, Martinerie J, Varela FJ (1999) Measuring phase synchrony in brain signals. Hum Brain Mapp 8:194–208
Li X, Yao X, Fox J, Jefferys JG (2007) Interaction dynamics of neuronal oscillations analysed using wavelet transforms. J Neurosci Methods 160:178–185
Lin FH, Witzel T, Ahlfors SP, Stufflebeam SM, Belliveau JW, Hamalainen MS (2006) Assessing and improving the spatial accuracy in MEG source localization by depth-weighted minimum-norm estimates. Neuroimage 31:160–171
Micheloyannis S, Pachou E, Stam CJ, Breakspear M, Bitsios P, Vourkas M, Erimaki S, Zervakis M (2006) Small-world networks and disturbed functional connectivity in schizophrenia. Schizophr Res 87:60–66
Mosher JC, Leahy RM, Lewis PS (1999) EEG and MEG: forward solutions for inverse methods. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 46:245–259
Newman M (2003) The structure and function of complex networks. SIAM Rev 45:167–256
Nikulin VV, Linkenkaer-Hansen K, Nolte G, Lemm S, Muller KR, Ilmoniemi RJ, Curio G (2007) A novel mechanism for evoked responses in the human brain. Eur J Neurosci 25:3146–3154
Palva JM, Palva S, Kaila K (2005) Phase synchrony among neuronal oscillations in the human cortex. J Neurosci 25:3962–3972
Palva S, Palva JM (2012) Discovering oscillatory interaction networks with M/EEG: challenges and breakthroughs. Trends Cogn Sci 16:219–230
Palva JM, Monto S, Kulashekhar S, Palva S (2010) Neuronal synchrony reveals working memory networks and predicts individual memory capacity. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:7580–7585
Palva S, Kulashekhar S, Hamalainen M, Palva JM (2011) Localization of cortical phase and amplitude dynamics during visual working memory encoding and retention. J Neurosci 31:5013–5025
Rubinov M, Sporns O (2010) Complex network measures of brain connectivity: uses and interpretations. Neuroimage 52:1059–1069
Schoffelen JM, Gross J (2009) Source connectivity analysis with MEG and EEG. Hum Brain Mapp 30:1857–1865
Sharon D, Hamalainen MS, Tootell RB, Halgren E, Belliveau JW (2007) The advantage of combining MEG and EEG: comparison to fMRI in focally stimulated visual cortex. Neuroimage 36:1225–1235
Siebenhühner F, Weiss SA, Coppola R, Weinberger DR, Bassett DS (2013) Intra- and inter-frequency brain network structure in health and schizophrenia. PLoS One 8, e72351
Singer W (1999) Neuronal synchrony: a versatile code for the definition of relations? Neuron 24(49–65):111–125
Singer W (2009) Distributed processing and temporal codes in neuronal networks. Cogn Neurodyn 3:189–196
Sinkkonen J, Tiitinen H, Naatanen R (1995) Gabor filters: an informative way for analysing event-related brain activity. J Neurosci Methods 56:99–104
Stam CJ, van Straaten ECW (2012) Go with the flow: use of a directed phase lag index (dPLI) to characterize patterns of phase relations in a large-scale model of brain dynamics. Neuroimage 62:1415–1428
Stam CJ, Nolte G, Daffertshofer A (2007) Phase lag index: assessment of functional connectivity from multi channel EEG and MEG with diminished bias from common sources. Hum Brain Mapp 28:1178–1193
Taulu S, Simola J, Kajola M (2005) Applications of the signal space separation method. IEEE Trans Signal Process 53:3359–3372
Van Veen BD, van Drongelen W, Yuchtman M, Suzuki A (1997) Localization of brain electrical activity via linearly constrained minimum variance spatial filtering. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng 44:867–880
van Wijk Bernadette CM, Stam CJ, Daffertshofer A (2010) Comparing brain networks of different size and connectivity density using graph theory. PLoS One 5, e13701
Vinck M, Oostenveld R, van Wingerden M, Battaglia F, Pennartz CM (2011) An improved index of phase-synchronization for electrophysiological data in the presence of volume-conduction, noise and sample-size bias. Neuroimage 55:1548–1565
Yeo BT, Krienen FM, Sepulcre J, Sabuncu MR, Lashkari D, Hollinshead M, Roffman JL, Smoller JW, Zollei L, Polimeni JR, Fischl B, Liu H, Buckner RL (2011) The organization of the human cerebral cortex estimated by intrinsic functional connectivity. J Neurophysiol 106:1125–1165
Watts DJ (2004) Small worlds. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Whalen C, Maclin EL, Fabiani M, Gratton G (2008) Validation of a method for coregistering scalp recording locations with 3D structural MR images. Hum Brain Mapp 29:1288–1301
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Siebenhühner, F., Lobier, M., Wang, S.H., Palva, S., Palva, J.M. (2016). Measuring Large-Scale Synchronization with Human MEG and EEG: Challenges and Solutions. In: Palva, S. (eds) Multimodal Oscillation-based Connectivity Theory. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32265-0_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32265-0_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32263-6
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32265-0
eBook Packages: Biomedical and Life SciencesBiomedical and Life Sciences (R0)