Abstract
The Amazon region poses a great challenge for the water resources management regime in Brazil. Its large area, widely dispersed population, and the small number of economic activities based in the region’s river basins have hampered the implementation of decentralized and participatory institutional structures as defined in Brazil’s Water Law 9433, approved in 1997. The lack of spaces for negotiation, combined with rising demand for water and energy, has led to serious conflict, as was recently the case with the Belo Monte Dam, under construction along the lower Xingu River. The growing demand for water and energy has led to conflict and distress, while state authorities and the agriculture sector have focused their attention on land tenure and deforestation, leaving water management and access as a secondary issue. However, while water is not explicitly on the agenda, it is water availability that allows intensive food production in the region to expand. So, how are formal water institutions reaching the local and municipal scale? Who are the groups involved? How are their strategies influencing water access and environmental conservation in the region?
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Notes
- 1.
- 2.
Since 1965, the Forest Code (Law 4771) has determined the amount of native vegetation to be preserved in rural private properties in Brazil. In 2012, because of the high levels of controversy involved and under pressure from the rural sector, two new versions of the Forest Code were aproved in the same year (Laws 12651 and 12727).
- 3.
The expression Y Ikatu Xingu, in the kamayurá language (one of the many languages spoken in the National Park), means ‘save the good waters of Xingu’.
References
Abers, R.N., and M. Keck.2013. Practical Authority: Agency and Institutional Change in Brazilian Water Politics. New York: Oxford University Press.
Allan, A.J.1998. Virtual Water: A Strategic Resource, Global Solutions to Regional Deficits. Groundwater 36(4): 545–546.
ANA (National Water Agency).2009. Plano Estratégico de Recursos Hídricos da Bacia Hidrográfica dos Rios Tocantins e Araguaia: Relatório Sintese. ANA: Brasília.
———.2012. Conjuntura dos Recursos Hídricos no Brasil—2012. Brasília: Ministério do Meio Ambiente.
Bakker, K.2010. Privatizing Water: Governance Failure and the World’s Urban Water Crisis. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
Barrozo, J.C.2010. A Questão Agrária em Mato Grosso: A Persistência da Grande Propriedade. In Mato Grosso: A (Re)ocupação da Terra na Fronteira Amazônica (Século XX), ed. J.C. Barrozo, 11–26. Cuiabá: EdUFMT.
Bebbington, A.1999. Capitals and Capabilities: A Framework for Analyzing Peasant Viability, Rural Livelihoods and Poverty. World Development 27(12): 2021–2044.
Berry, S.1989. Social Institutions and Access to Resources. Africa 59(1): 41–55.
Budds, J., and L.V. Hinojosa.2012. Restructuring and Rescaling Water Governance in Mining Context: The Co-production of Waterscapes in Peru. Water Alternatives 5(1): 119–137.
Cohen, A., and S. Davidson.2011. The Watershed Approach: Challenges, Antecedents, and the Transition from Technical Tool to Governance Unit. Water Alternatives 4(10): 1–14.
Coles, A., and T. Wallace.2005. Gender, Water and Development. Oxford: BERG.
Cox, K.1998. Spaces of Dependence, Spaces of Engagement and the Politics of Scale, or: Looking for Local Politics. Political Geography 17(1): 1–23.
Daniel, M.A., and S. Sojamo.2012. From Risk to Shared Value? Corporate Strategies in Building a Global Water Accounting and Disclosure Regime. Water Alternatives 5(3): 636–657.
Durigan, G., N. Guerin, and J.N.M.N.D. Costa.2013. Ecological Restoration of Xingu Basin Headwaters: Motivations, Engagement, Challenges and Perspectives. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368(1619).
Empinotti, V.L.2011. E se Eu Não Quiser Participar? O Caso da não Participação nas Eleições do Comitê de Bacia do Rio São Francisco. Ambiente e Sociedade 4: 195–211.
———2015. Beyond the Dualities: A Nuanced Understanding of Brazilian Soybean Producers. Food Security 7: 1165–1174.
Empinotti, V.L., and P. Jacobi.2012. Introdução. In Pegada Hídrica: Inovação, Co-responsabilização e os Desafios de sua Aplicação, eds. V.L. Empinotti and P. Jacobi, 7–14. São Paulo: Annablume.
———.2013. Novas Práticas de Governança da Água? O Uso da Pegada Hídrica e a Transformação das Relações entre o Setor Privado, Organizações Ambientais e Agências Internacionais de Desenvolvimento. Desenvolvimento e Meio Ambiente (UFPR) 27: 23–36.
Ferreyra, C., R.C. de Loë, and R.D. Kreutzwiser.2008. Imagined Communities, Contested Watersheds: Challenges to Integrated Water Resources Management in Agricultural Areas. Journal of Rural Studies 24(3): 304–321.
Galford, G.L., J. Melillo, J.F. Mustard, C.E.P. Cerri, and C.C. Cerri.2010. The Amazon Frontier of Land-Use Change: Croplands and Consequences for Greenhouse Gas Emissions. Earth Interact 14: 1–24.
Harres, M.M., and V. Joanoni Neto.2009. História, Terra e Trabalho em Mato Grosso: Ensaios Teóricos e Resultados de Pesquisa. EdUFMT: Cuiabá.
Hetch, S., and C. Mann.2008. How Brazil Outfarmed the American Farmer. Fortune 19: 92–105.
Himley, M.2008. Geographies of Environmental Governance: The Nexus of Nature and Neoliberalism. Geography Compass 2(2): 433–451.
Ianni, O.1979. Colonização e Contra-reforma Agrária na Amazônia. Vozes: Petrópolis.
IBGE.2012. Municipal Agricultural Production. In Database tables 1612 and 1618. Rio de Janeiro: Instituto Brasileiro de Geografia e Estatísticas.
Ioris, A.A.R.2015. Cracking the Nut of Agribusiness and Global Food Insecurity: In Search of a Critical Agenda of Research. Geoforum 63: 1–4.
Jacobi, P.R., L. De Stefano, E. López-Gunn, M. Solanes, G. Delacámara, G. Marín, A. Embid, V. Empinotti, E. Blanco, G. Donoso, M. Rica, N. Uribe, and A. Jiménez.2014. Reforming Water Governance Structures. In Water for Food Security and Well-Being in Latina America and the Caribbean: Social and Environmental Implications for a Globalized Economy, eds. B.A. Willaarts, A. Garrido, and M. Ramón Llamas, 285–316. Oxford and New York: Routledge.
Jepson, W.2006. Private Agricultural Colonization on a Brazilian Frontier, 1970–1980. Journal of Historical Geography 32: 839–863.
Kooiman, J.1993. Modern Governance. New Government-Society Interactions. Sage: London.
Le Tourneau, F.-M., S. Nasuti, G. Marchand, A. Greissing, M. Bursztyn, M. Droulers, V. Dubreuil, and P. Léna.2013. The DURAMAZ Indicator System: A Cross-disciplinary Comparative Tool for Assessing Ecological and Social Changes in the Amazon. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368(1619).
Leach, M., and R. Mearns.1999. Environmental Entitlements: Dynamics and Institutions in Comunity-Based Natural Resources Management. World Development 27(2): 225–247.
Lebel, L., P. Garden, and M. Imamura.2005. The Politics of Scale, Position, and Place in the Governance of Water Resources in the Mekong Region. Ecology and Society 10(2): 18.
Lévi-Strauss, C.1971. Tristes Tropiques: An Anthropological Study of Primitive Societies in Brazil. New York: Atheneum.
Macedo, M.N., R.S. DeFries, D.C. Morton, C.M. Stickler, G.L. Galford, and Y.E. Shimabukuro.2012. Decoupling of Deforestation and Soy Production in the Southern Amazon during the Late 2000s. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America 109(4): 1341–1346.
MacKinnon, D.2011. Restructuring Scale: Towards a New Scalar Politics. Progress in Human Geography 35(1): 21–36.
Marston, S.2000. The Social Construction of Scale. Progress in Human Geography 24(2): 219–242.
Mato Grosso, State Government.2009. Plano de Recursos Hídricos do Estado de Mato Grosso. KCM Editora: Cuiabá.
McCarthy, J.2005. Scale, Sovereignty and Strategy in Environmental Governance. Antipode 37(4): 327–341.
Perreault, T.2015. Beyond the Watershed: Decision-Making at What Scale? In Negotiating Water Governance: Why the Politics of Scale Matter? eds. E. Norman, C. Cook, and A. Cohen, 117–124. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Prudham, S.2003. Taming Trees: Capital, Science, and Nature in Pacific Slope Tree Improvement. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 93(3): 636–656.
Rhodes, R.1997. Understanding Governance: Policy Networks, Governance, Reflexivity and Accountability. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Ribot, J., and N. Peluso.2003. A Theory of Access. Rural Sociology 68(2): 153–181.
Sojamo, S., and E.A. Larson.2012. Investigating Food and Agribusiness Corporations as Global Water Security, Management and Governance Agents: The Case of Nestlé, Bunge and Cargill. Water Alternatives 5(3): 619–635.
Sojamo, S., M. Keulertz, J. Warner, and J.A. Allan.2012. Virtual Water Hegemony: The Role of Agribusiness in Global Water Governance. Water International 37(2): 169–182.
Swyngedouw, E. 1997. Power, Nature, and the City. The Conquest of Water and the Political Ecology of Urbanization in Guayaquil, Ecuador: 1880–1990. Environment and Planning A, 29, 311–332.
———1999. Modernity and Hybridity: Nature, Regeneracionismo, and the Production of the Spanish Waterscape, 1890–1930. Annals of the Association of American Geographers 89: 443–465.
Swyngedouw, E., M. Kaïka, and E. Castro.2002. Urban Water: A Political-Ecology Perspective. Built Environment 28(2): 124–137.
Vanwey, L.K., S. Spera, R. de Sá, D. Mahr, and J.F. Mustard.2013. Socioeconomic Development and Agricultural Intensification in Mato Grosso. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B 368(1619).
Villas-Bôas, O., and C. Villas-Bôas.1994. A Marcha para o Oeste: A Epopéia da Expedição Roncador-Xingu. Globo: São Paulo.
Warner, J.2007. The Beauty of the Beast: Multi-stakeholder Participation for Integrated Catchment Management. In Multi-stakeholder Platforms for Integrated Water Management, ed. J. Warner, 1–19. Aldershot: Ashgate.
Warner, J., P. Wester, and A. Bolding.2008. Going with the Flow: River Basins as the Natural Units for Water Management? Water Policy 10(2): 121–138.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Empinotti, V.L. (2016). Politics of Scale and Water Governance in the Upper Xingu River Basin, Brazil. In: Ioris, A. (eds) Agriculture, Environment and Development. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32255-1_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32255-1_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32254-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32255-1
eBook Packages: Earth and Environmental ScienceEarth and Environmental Science (R0)