Skip to main content

Drawing Things Together: Concluding Remarks

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line

Part of the book series: Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning ((LARI,volume 11))

  • 691 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter considers some of the ways in which the chapters in this volume contribute to ongoing debates on semantics and pragmatics and some of the directions they suggest for future research. Many of the contributions can be understood as being about exploring existing connections and developing new ones. Some of the chapters explore and develop understanding of existing connections, some make new connections, and some explore contrasting views. All of the work demonstrates the benefits of bringing theorists from different backgrounds together and developing a fuller conversation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 79.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 99.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Bach, K. (1994). Conversational impliciture. Mind & Language, 9, 124–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (2001). You don’t say. Synthese, 128, 15–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bach, K. (2010). Impliciture vs. explicature: What’s the difference?. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (pp. 126–137). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berlin, I. (1953). The hedgehog and the fox: An essay on Tolstoy’s view of history. New York: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borg, E. (2004). Minimal semantics. Oxford: Clarendon.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cappelen, H., & Lepore, E. (2005). Insensitive semantics: A defense of semantic minimalism and speech act pluralism. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2002). Thoughts and utterances. Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Carston, R. (2010). Explicit communication and ‘free’ pragmatic enrichment. In B. Soria & E. Romero (Eds.), Explicit communication: Robyn Carston’s pragmatics (pp. 217–285). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Chapman, S. (2013). Grice, conversational implicature and philosophy. In A. Capone, F. L. Piparo, & M. Carapezza (Eds.), Perspectives on pragmatics and philosophy (pp. 153–188). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B., & Owtram, N. (2012). Imagined inference: Teaching writers to think like readers. In M. Burke, S. Czabo, L. Week, & K. Berkowitz (Eds.), Current trends in pedagogical stylistics (pp. 126–141). London: Continuum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1967). Logic and conversation. The William James lectures. Harvard University. Published in Grice 1975, 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1975). Logic and conversation. In P. Cole, & J. Morgan (Eds.), Syntax and semantics 3: Speech acts (pp. 41–58). New York: Academic Press. (Reprinted in Grice 1989: 86–116).

    Google Scholar 

  • Grice, H. P. (1989). Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, M. D. (1996). The evolution of communication. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1972). On the semantic properties of logical operators in English. PhD thesis, UCLA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1984). Towards a new taxonomy for pragmatic inference: Q- and R-based implicature. In D. Schiffrin (Ed.), Meaning, form, and use in context: Georgetown university round table on languages and linguistics (pp. 11–42). Washington, DC: Georgetown University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horn, L. (1989). A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (1989). A review of ‘relevance’. Journal of Linguistics, 25, 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Levinson, S. C. (2000). Presumptive meanings: The theory of generalised conversational implicature. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I., & Sperber, D. (2004). Experimental pragmatics. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Noveck, I., & Sperber, D. (2007). The why and how of experimental pragmatics: The case of ‘scalar inferences’. In N. Burton-Roberts (Ed.), Pragmatics (pp. 184–212). Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2004). Literal meaning. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Recanati, F. (2007). Perspectival thought. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Saul, J. (2002). What is said and psychological reality: Grice’s project and relevance theorists’ criticisms. Linguistics and Philosophy, 25, 347–372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., & Wilson, D. (1986). Relevance: Communication and cognition (2nd ed. 1995). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sperber, D., Cara, F., & Girotto, V. (1995). Relevance theory explains the selection task. Cognition, 57, 31–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wason, P. (1966). Reasoning. In B. M. Foss (Ed.), New horizons in psychology (pp. 135–151). Harmondsworth: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, T. (2003). Natural pragmatics and natural codes. Mind & Language, 18(5), 447–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wharton, T. (2009). Pragmatics and non-verbal communication. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wilson, D., & Wharton, T. (2006). Relevance and prosody. Journal of Pragmatics, 38(10), 1559–1579.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Billy Clark .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Clark, B. (2017). Drawing Things Together: Concluding Remarks. In: Depraetere, I., Salkie, R. (eds) Semantics and Pragmatics: Drawing a Line. Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, vol 11. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32247-6_19

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics