Skip to main content

Strengths and Weaknesses of the ESMA-SEC Supervisory Cooperation

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Regulating and Supervising European Financial Markets

Abstract

This chapter analyses one important and practical aspect of financial markets supervision: the cooperation between the European Securities and Markets Authority (ESMA) and the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). How do ESMA and SEC cooperate in supervisory matters? What are the major strengths and weaknesses of this cooperation?

Both ESMA and SEC are promoting their international cooperation. The prime example of supervisory cooperation between ESMA and SEC is their Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) of March 2012. Its Annex on Credit Rating Agencies (CRAs) is of particular importance as it addresses a sector where ESMA has direct supervision in the European Union (EU).

Another example of supervisory cooperation between ESMA and SEC concerns the EU Directive on alternative investment fund managers (AIFM), where ESMA is taking a coordinating role. Thus, ESMA drafted a Memorandum of Understanding template and negotiated it with 46 non-EU regulators. With SEC, each of the EU Member States’ authorities concluded the MoU between 2013 and 2014. Thus, we have a MoU formally concluded by SEC and Member States’ regulators, but substantively drafted and negotiated by ESMA centrally.

ESMA might well be considered as promoting its international activities in areas where it enjoys direct supervisory powers (e.g. CRAs) and those where it has a mere coordinating role (e.g. AIFM). This way, ESMA might extend its supervisory reach internationally and “become the EU ‘face’ of financial market supervision” regardless of the internal division of competences between the EU and its Members States.

G. Bianco is Research Fellow at University of Oslo and at Université Paris 1 Panthéon-Sorbonne.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU (2009), pp. 38–39.

  2. 2.

    Moloney (2014), p. 945.

  3. 3.

    Moloney (2011), p. 181.

  4. 4.

    European Commission (2007).

  5. 5.

    Schammo (2012), p. 773.

  6. 6.

    Moloney (2014), p. 950.

  7. 7.

    Moloney (2014), p. 959.

  8. 8.

    European Commission (2009), pp. 10–11.

  9. 9.

    Moloney (2014), p. 943.

  10. 10.

    Moloney (2014), p. 944.

  11. 11.

    Moloney (2014), p. 973.

  12. 12.

    Moloney (2011), p. 191.

  13. 13.

    Moloney (2014), p. 987.

  14. 14.

    Regulation (EU) No 1095/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 establishing a European Supervisory Authority (European Securities and Markets Authority), amending Decision No 716/2009/EC and repealing Commission Decision 2009/77/EC (OJ L 331, 15.12.2010, pp. 84–119). It will be henceforth referred to as the “ESMA Regulation”.

  15. 15.

    Directive 2014/65/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Directive 2002/92/EC and Directive 2011/61/EU, OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, pp. 349–496.

  16. 16.

    Regulation (EU) No 600/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 15 May 2014 on markets in financial instruments and amending Regulation (EU) No 648/2012, OJ L 173, 12.6.2014, pp. 84–148.

  17. 17.

    Moloney (2011), p. 193.

  18. 18.

    Regulation (EU) No 236/2012 of the European Parliament and the Council of 14 March 2012 on short selling and certain aspects of Credit Default Swaps, OJ L 86, 24.3.2012, pp. 1–24.

  19. 19.

    Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 on Alternative Investment Fund Managers and amending Directives 2003/41/EC and 2009/65/EC and Regulations (EC) No 1060/2009 and (EU) No 1095/2010, OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, pp. 1–73.

  20. 20.

    Moloney (2014), p. 982.

  21. 21.

    Moloney (2011), p. 199.

  22. 22.

    Moloney (2011), p. 203.

  23. 23.

    See Deipenbrock (2014b), pp. 214–219.

  24. 24.

    Moloney (2011), p. 203.

  25. 25.

    Regulation (EC) No 1060/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 September 2009 on credit rating agencies (OJ L 302, 17.11.2009, p. 1), in particular amended by Regulation (EU) No 513/2011 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2011 (OJ L 145, 31.5.2011, p. 30); by Directive 2011/61/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 8 June 2011 (OJ L 174, 1.7.2011, p. 1); by Regulation (EU) No 462/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 May 2013 (OJ L 146, 31.5.2013, p. 1); and by Directive 2014/51/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 April 2014 (OJ L 153, 22.5.2014, p. 1).

  26. 26.

    Regulation (EU) No 648/2012 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2012 on OTC derivatives, central counterparties and trade repositories (OJ L 201, 27.7.2012, pp. 1–59).

  27. 27.

    ESMA Board of Supervisors (2012a), p. 2.

  28. 28.

    ESMA Board of Supervisors (2012b), p. 3.

  29. 29.

    Bismuth (2011), p. 78.

  30. 30.

    Securities and Exchange Commission (2014).

  31. 31.

    Murphy (2013), p. 24.

  32. 32.

    Securities and Exchange Commission (2014).

  33. 33.

    Murphy (2013), p. 25.

  34. 34.

    Schapiro (2010).

  35. 35.

    Chang (2014), p. 27.

  36. 36.

    Macneil (2014), p. 183.

  37. 37.

    Zukina (2012), p. 269.

  38. 38.

    Chang (2014), p. 29.

  39. 39.

    Securities and Exchange Commission - European Commission (1991).

  40. 40.

    Securities and Exchange Commission - CESR (2006).

  41. 41.

    Conac (2002), p. 481.

  42. 42.

    On the current EU regulation of credit rating agencies, see Deipenbrock (2014a), pp. 5–11.

  43. 43.

    ESMA Board of Supervisors (2013), p. 3.

  44. 44.

    ESMA Board of Supervisors (2013), p. 3.

  45. 45.

    IOSCO (2002).

  46. 46.

    Moloney (2014), p. 992.

References

  • Bismuth R (2011) La coopération internationale des autorités de régulation du secteur financier et le droit international public. Bruylant, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang K-C J (2014) An optimal global regime for regulating credit rating agencies in the post financial crisis era. From the perspective of the appropriate role of the rating agencies in the capital market. In: Baetens F, Caiado J (eds) Frontiers of international economic law. Legal tools to confront interdisciplinary challenges. Brill, Leiden

    Google Scholar 

  • Conac P-H (2002) La régulation des marchés boursiers par la commission des opérations de bourse (COB) et la securities and exchange commission (SEC). L.G.D.J., Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Deipenbrock G (2014a) After ‘CRA III’ - achievements and challenges from the legal perspective. In: European Parliament, Directorate General for Internal Policies Policy Department A: Economic and Scientific Policy, Study for the ECON Committee on Credit Rating Agencies - Implementation of Legislation. European Parliament, Brussels

    Google Scholar 

  • Deipenbrock G (2014b) Trying or failing better next time? - The European legal framework for credit rating agencies after its second reform. Eur Bus Law Rev 25:207–225

    Google Scholar 

  • ESMA Board of Supervisors (2012a) Summary of conclusions. ESMA/2012/BS/29. 21 February 2012. http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/2012-bs-29.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • ESMA Board of Supervisors (2012b) Summary of conclusions. ESMA/2012/BS/66. 19 June 2012. http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/2012-bs-66.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • ESMA Board of Supervisors (2013) Summary of conclusions. ESMA/2013/BS/86. 4 July 2013. http://www.esma.europa.eu/system/files/2013-bs-86_-_summary_of_conclusions_22_may_meeting.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • European Commission (2007) Review of the Lamfalussy Process. Strengthening Supervisory Convergence (COM(2007) 727)

    Google Scholar 

  • European Commission (2009) Communication on Driving European Recovery (COM (2009) 114)

    Google Scholar 

  • High-Level Group on Financial Supervision in the EU (2009) Report (the DLG Report). http://ec.europa.eu/finance/general-policy/docs/de_larosiere_report_en.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • IOSCO (2002) Multilateral memorandum of understanding concerning consultation and cooperation and the exchange of information. May 2002 (version revised May 2012). http://www.iosco.org/library/pubdocs/pdf/IOSCOPD386.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • Macneil I (2014) Credit rating agencies: regulation and financial stability. In: Cottier T, Lastra RM, Tietje C (eds) The rule of law in monetary affairs. World trade forum. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 178–203

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Moloney N (2014) EU securities and financial markets regulation. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Moloney N (2011) The European securities and markets authority and institutional design for the EU financial market – a tale of two competences: part (2) rules in action. Eur Bus Org Law Rev 12:177–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Murphy EV (2013) Who regulates whom and how? An overview of US financial regulatory policy for banking and securities markets. Congressional Research Service Report. 28 May 2013. http://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43087.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • Schammo P (2012) EU day-to-day supervision or intervention-based supervision: which way forward for the European System of Financial Supervision? Oxf J Leg Stud 32:771–797

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schapiro ML (2010) Oversight of the U.S. securities and exchange commission: evaluating present reforms and future challenges: congressional testimony. 20 July 2010. http://www.sec.gov/news/testimony/2010/ts072010mls.htm. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • Securities and Exchange Commission - CESR (2006) Work plan. 2 August 2006. http://www.sec.gov/news/press/2006/2006-130.htm. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • Securities and Exchange Commission - European Commission (1991) Joint statement on the establishment of improved cooperation. 23 September 1991. http://www.sec.gov/about/offices/oia/oia_bilateral/european.pdf. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • Securities and Exchange Commission (2014) The investor’s advocate: how the SEC protects investors, maintains market integrity, and facilitates capital formation. http://www.sec.gov/about/whatwedo.shtml. Accessed 13 May 2015

  • Zukina J (2012) A step short of change: examining the recent regulation of credit rating agencies and its shortcomings in a global market. J Bus Secur Law 13:259–287

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Giuseppe Bianco .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bianco, G. (2016). Strengths and Weaknesses of the ESMA-SEC Supervisory Cooperation. In: Andenas, M., Deipenbrock, G. (eds) Regulating and Supervising European Financial Markets. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32174-5_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32174-5_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32172-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32174-5

  • eBook Packages: Law and CriminologyLaw and Criminology (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics