Abstract
The problem of orality raises a cluster of important questions. For cultural politics, orality establishes precisely the sort of locality that resists transaction across borders and the ever precarious travel of globalization. This is the sort of resistance that allows Bernabé , Chamoiseau , and Confiant , in one of their strongest moments as a theorist-collective, to draw a rather bold line between créolité and diasporic writing. In this sense, orality gathers together a full range of theoretical problems that, in turn, transform questions of home, language , history, and meaning. For epistemology, and this works intimately with a cultural politics of resistance, orality represents a mode of knowing and transmitting knowledge that is subject to a time other than the global. To be sure, orality is sustained by national cultural borders in a manner that is productive to expression and cultural formation while at the same time engaging the global forces at work in, say, the chaotic dialectic of creolized and vernacular languages. And this epistemology draws on a metaphysics which in turn produces an important, nuanced ethical sensibility: if the ultimate reality of orality lies in the unfolding dynamics of local speech acts and exchanges, then an openness toward the otherness—simply the Other—of language is not only an interesting frame for thinking orality, but actually an imperative without which the meaning, knowing, and cultural politics of orality is impossible.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsWorks Cited
Bernabé, J., Chamoiseau, P., & Confiant, R. (1989). In praise of Creoleness (trans: Taleb-Khyar, M.B.). Paris: Gallimard.
Davis, A. (1998). Unfinished lecture on liberation – II. In The Angela Davis reader (pp. 53–60). Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.
Douglass, F. (2010). Narrative of the Life of Frederick Douglass, An American Slave, Written by Himself. San Francisco: City Lights Books.
Du Bois, W. E. B. (2007). The souls of Black Folk. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Gilroy, P. (1993a). The Black Atlantic. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Glissant, É. (2000). Poetics of relation (trans: Wing, B.). Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1984). The postmodern condition (trans: Bennington, G. & Massumi, B.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Lyotard, J.-F. (1988). The differend: Phrases in dispute (trans: Van Den Abbeele, G.). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 The Author(s)
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Drabinski, J. (2016). Orality and the Slave Sublime. In: Vété-Congolo, H. (eds) The Caribbean Oral Tradition. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32088-5_4
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32088-5_4
Published:
Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32087-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32088-5
eBook Packages: HistoryHistory (R0)