Skip to main content

Ageing of Musical Instruments—About the “Old” and “New Violins”

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Materials for String Musical Instruments
  • 2384 Accesses

Abstract

In a musicians view “good” or “bad”, “old” or “new” descriptions of violins can be related to their perceived tone quality and their acoustic properties. For more than two centuries the Stradivari and other Cremonese violins fascinated the imagination of musicians, scientists and craftsmen. Today, numerous recordings exist allowing subjective and objective appreciation of the remarkable tonal quality of Old Italian violins.  The quality of a “good” or “bad” violin is related to its radiation efficiency. Violin qualities have been described theoretically by mechanical characteristics and it was demonstrated that normal modes of vibration are determined by the corpus (top, ribs and back) the substructural elements (neck-fingerboard, bridge, strings and tailpiece) and the cavity with air. The signature of all violins is characterized by five important resonances: A0 - air mode or Helmholz resonance at about 280 Hz;  A1 is at 470-490 Hz corresponding to the first standing wave in the length of the box with a node at the f- holes;  CBR – the lowest “main resonance” at 380 – 440 Hz ; B1 and B2, two twin modes are at 450-480 Hz and 530-570 Hz. Dünnwald (1991) studied 700 violin spectra and concluded that Old Italian violins can be statistically differentiated from Modern violins. Since 1985 modal analysis greatly contributed to the development of violin dynamics showing that in all violins good or bad, old or new the five modes can be detected. Based on modal analysis “perfect tonal copies” of Old Italian violins can be reproduced in new violins. The parameters which characterize in detail the sound of the violin are the mode shape, the frequency, the total damping and the acoustic radiation efficiency.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 229.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 299.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 449.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Abbreviations

Y(ω):

Mobility (m/s/N)

<Y corpus >:

RMS corpus mobility (mean squared averaged over the corpus—top, ribs, back)

R(ω):

Radiativity (Pa/N)

<R>:

RMS radiativity created from mean square averaged over 266 microphone measurement around a sphere in an anechoic chamber

f crit :

Critical frequency f crit  = <R>/ <Y corpus >

\(\xi_{tot}\) :

Total damping (in percent)

\(\xi_{\text{int}}\) :

Internal (material) damping (in percent)

\(\xi_{rad}\) :

Radiation damping (in percent)

Reff :

Radiation efficiency

Frad :

Fraction of energy radiated

\(\rho_{0}^{{}}\) :

Density of the air

c :

Velocity of sound in air

A:

Area of spherical surface upon which the microphone is located (m2)

S:

Surface area of violin corpus (m2)

M:

Nominal mass of violin corpus (kg)

<v2>:

Mean squared velocities

<p2>:

Mean squared pressure over a sphere

IP:

In plane motion, extensional

OP:

Out of plane motion, flexural

Y :

Axis perpendicular to the violin plane

X :

Axis across

Z :

Axis along the violin

A0 :

Cavity mode-Helmholtz air resonance f A0  ~ 280 Hz

A1 :

The first longitudinal mode fA1 ~ 1.7 fA0

CBR:

Corpus lowest mode near ~400 Hz weakly radiating, with shear like along axis X relative motion between the top and back plates

B1 and B1 + near 500 Hz, both strong radiators

Band average taken over 250 Hz intervals

References

  • Alonso Moral J, Jansson E (1982) Input admittance, eigenmodes, and quality of violins. Report STL QPSR 2–3/1982: 60-75. Speech Transmission Laboratory. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH) Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Andersen PJ, Rodgers OE (2006) What determines the quality of violins? J Violin Soc Am. VSA Papers 20(2):155–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Askenfelt A (1991) Measuring the motion of the piano hammer during string contact. Annual Rep, STL-QPSR 4:19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Beldie IP (2003) About the bridge hill mistery. Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II(4):9–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Beldie IP (1975) Dissertation on violin acoustics. Technical University of Berlin, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Benade A H (1976) Fundamentals of musical instruments. Oxford University Press, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Benedini K (1979) Ein Funktionsmodell zur Beschreibung von Klangfarben-unterschieden. Biol Cybernetics 34:111–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (2008a) Structural acoustics of good and bad violins. J Acoust Soc Am 124(3):1764–1773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (2008b) Structural acoustics model of the violin radiativity profile. J Acoust Soc Am 124(6):4013–4023

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (2005) A unified materials-normal mode approach to violin acoustics. ACTA Acustica united with Acustica 91(2):214–228

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (2004a) Contemporary generalized normal mode violin acoustics. Acustica Acta Acustica 90:590–599

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (2004b) The role of radiation damping in violin sound. Acoust Res Lett Online ARLO 5(3):82–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (2003) Relating normal mode properties of violin to overall quality: modal average trends. Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II 4:46–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (1999) Modal analysis of assembled string instruments. The VIOCADEAS (VIOlin Computer Aided Design Engineering Analysis System) Project. A progress report. Catgut Acoutst Soc J Series II, 3(8):19–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G (1995) Modal analysis comparison of new violin before and after 250 hours of playing. In: Proceedings of the International Modal Analysis Conference—IMAC. http://sem-proceedings.com/13i/sem.org-IMAC-XIII-13th-13-22-3-Modal-Analysis-Comparison-New-Violin-Before-After-250-Hours-Playing.pdf

  • Bissinger G, Rowe D, Oliver D et al (2007) Thoroughly modern modal meets three Old Italian Master violins. J Violin Soc Am VSA Papers XXI 1:213–222

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G, Oliver D (2007) 3D laser vibrometry on legendary Old Italian violins. Sound Vib July 10–14. www.SandV.com

  • Bissinger G, Gregorian A (2003) Relating normal mode properties of violins to overall quality signature modes. Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II 4(8):37

    Google Scholar 

  • Bissinger G, Gearhart F (1998) A standardized qualitative violin evaluation procedure? Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II 3(6):44–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Buen A (2010) What is old Italian timbre? In: Proceedings of the Second Vienna Talk (VITA), University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna: VITA 1-VITA-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Buen A (2007) On timbre parameters and sound of recorded old violins. J Violin Soc Am VSA paper XXI 1:57–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Buen A (2006) Can we hear the geometrical measures of a violin? In: Proceedings of the Joint Baltic-Nordic Acoustics Meeting (BNAM) Gothenburg, Sweden, pp 1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur V (2006) Acoustics of wood. Chapter 7: wood species for musical instruments, pp 171–214. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Bucur V (2003) Nondestructive characterization and imaging of wood. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Cremer L (1984) The physics of the violin. The MIT Press, Cambridge Massachusetts

    Google Scholar 

  • Curtin J, Schleske M (2004) Sound waves—What are the acoustical differences between a classic Italian violin and any other instrument? STRAD 115(1365):16

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünnwald H (1991) Deduction of objective quality parameters on old and new violins. J Catgut Acoust Soc Series II 1(7):1–5

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünnwald H (1990) Ein erweitertes Verfahren zur objektiven Bestimmung der Klangqualitätvon Violinen. Acustica 71:269–276. Reprint in Hutchins and Benade Eds (1997) Research Papers in Violin Acoustics 1975–1993. Publisher Acoust Soc Am 51–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünnwald H (1985) Ein Verfahren zur objektiven Bestimmung der Klangqualität von Violinen. Acustica 58:162–169

    Google Scholar 

  • Dünnwald H (1983) Auswertung von Geigenfrequenzgängen. In: Proceedings of the 11th ICA Paris, 4, pp 373–376

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher NH, Rossing TD (2010) The physics of musical Instruments, 2nd edn. Springer Verlag, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher NH, Rossing TD (1998) The physics of musical instruments, 1st edn. Springer Verlag , Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Fritz C, Blackwell AF, Cross I et al (2012) Exploring violin sound quality. J Acoust Soc Am 131:783–794

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz C, Woodhouse J, Cheng FPH et al (2010) Perceptual studies of violin damping and vibrato. J Acoust Soc Am 127:513–524

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritz C, Cross I, Moor BCJ et al (2007) perceptual thresholds for detecting modifications applied to acoustical properties of a violin. J Acoust Soc Am 122:3640–3650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frolich B, Sturm G, Hinton J, Frolich E (2009) The secrets of the Stradivari string instruments. A non-destructive study of music instruments from the Smithsonian Institution, the Library of Congress, and private collections. A pilot study of seven violins made by Antonio Stradivari in Cremona, Italy, between 1677 and 1709. http://www.4cmedikal.com.tr/html/pdf/2009/19.pdf

  • Garcia-Cobian J, Bissinger G (2001) Creating an accurate solid model of the violin from CT scans. Proc SPIE 4359(1):373–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Geissler P, Martner O, Zerbs C, Schleske M (2003) Psychoacoustic investigation on the possibility of aurally identical violins. In: Proceedings of the Stockholm Music Acoustic Conference, SMAC 03, Stockholm, Sweden, 4p

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough C (2007) The violin: Chladni patterns, plates, shells and sounds. Eur Phys J Special Topics 145:77–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill WH, Hill AF, Hill AE (1909) Antonio Stradivari: his life and work, 1644–1737. W. E. Hill & Sons, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Hunt DG, Balsan E (1996) Why old fiddles sound sweeter. Nature 379: 681, 22 Feb

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM (1998a) A measurable controlling factor in the tone and playing quality of violins. Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II 1(4):10–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM (1998b) A measurable effect of long term playing on violin family instruments. Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II 3(5):38–40

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM (1993) Mode tuning for the violin makers. Catgut Acoust Soc J 2(4):5–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM (1985) Effect of an air-body coupling on the tone and playing qualities of violins. Catgut Acoust Soc Newsl 44:12–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM (1981) The acoustics of violin plates. Sci Am 245(4):170–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM, Benade V (1997) Research paper in violin acoustics, Acoustical Society of America

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutchins CM, Rogers O (1992) Methods of changing the frequency spacing between the A1 and B1 modes of the violin. Catgut Acoust Soc J Series II 2(1):13–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Inta R, Smith J, Wolfe J (2005) Measurement of the effect on violins of ageing and playing. Acoust Australia 33(1):1–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson EV (2004) Violin frequency response-bridge mobility and bridge feet distance. Appl Acoust 65:1197–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jansson EV (2002) Acoustics for violin and guitar makers. Kungl. Tekniska högskolan, Department of Speech. Music and Hearing

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson EV (1997) Admittance measurements of 25 high quality violins. Acustica 83:337–341

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson EV (1977) Acoustical properties of complex cavities. Prediction and measurements of resonance properties of violin-shape and guitar-shaped cavities. Acustica 37:211–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson EV (1973) On higher air modes in the violin. Catgut Acoust Soc Newsl 19:13–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Jansson EV, Niewczyk BK, Fryden L (1995) On the body resonance C3 and its relation to the violin construction. Speech, Music and Hearing. Quarterly Progress and Status Report-STL-QPSR 36, 4, 001–010. http://www.speech.kth.se/qpsr/

  • Jansson EV, Niewczyk BK, Fryden L (1992) Experiments on the construction and the function of the violin. Catgut Acoust Soc J 2(2):6–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Loen J (2003) Thickness graduation maps classic violins, violas and cellos. Jeffery S Loen, Kenmore USA

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan J (2008) The violin, music acoustics from Baroque to Romantic. PhD Dissertation, School of Physics, The University of New South Wales, Sydney, Australia

    Google Scholar 

  • Marshall KD (1985) Modal analysis of a violin. J Acoust Soc Am 77(2):695–709

    Google Scholar 

  • McLennan J, Wolfe J (2008) What have they done to the Strads. J Acoust Soc Am 23(5):3446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J (1983) The tonal quality of violins. In: Proceedings of the SMAC 83, Royal Swedish Academy of Music

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer J (1975) Akustische Untersuchungen zur Klangqualitat von Geigen. Instrumentenbau 20(2):2–8

    Google Scholar 

  • Olivera E, Fushi G, Bein R (1998) The miracle makers: Stradivari, Guarneri. Bein & Fushi Chicago and 3 CD

    Google Scholar 

  • Ricci R (2001) The legacy of Cremona. Ruggiero Ricci plays 18 contemporary violins. Edizioni Musicali Regno Unito, Etichetta Dynamic and 1 CD

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossing TD (ed) (2010) The science of string instruments. Springer Verlag, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rossing TD (2007) Observing and labelling resonances of violins. In: Proceedings of the ISMA 2007, Barcelona. Paper 3-P1–1

    Google Scholar 

  • Saldner HO, Molin NE, Jansson EV (1996) Vibration modes of the violin forced via the bridge and action of the soundpost. J Acoust Soc Am 100(2):1168–1177

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleske M (2004) Soundboard of composite fiber material construction. U.S. Patent No. 6,770,804. 3 Aug 2004

    Google Scholar 

  • Schleske M (1996) On making tonal copies of a violin. Catgut Acoust Soc  J  3(2):18–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stoel BC, Borman TM (2008) A comparison of wood density between classical Cremonese and modern violins. PLoS ONE 3(7):e2554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tai HC, Chung DT (2012) Stradivari violins exhibit formant frequencies resembling vowels produced by females. Savart J 1(2):1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Von Bismarck G (1974) Timbre of steady sound. A factorial investigation of its verbal attributes. Acustica 30:146–159

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich G (1985) Sound hole sum rule and the dipole moment of the violin. J Acoust  Soc Am  77(2):710–718

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinreich G (1997) Directional tone color. J Acoust Soc Am 101(4):2338–2346

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse J (2003) Body vibration of the violin—what can a maker expect to control? Catgut Acoust Soc J 4, 5(Series II):43–49

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodhouse J (1998) The acoustics of A0-B0 mode matching in the violin. J Acoust Soc Am 84:947–956

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Voichita Bucur .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bucur, V. (2016). Ageing of Musical Instruments—About the “Old” and “New Violins”. In: Handbook of Materials for String Musical Instruments. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32080-9_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics