Abstract
Anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) insufficiency is clinically diagnosed by manual tests, such as the pivot-shift and the Lachman tests. These manual tests are used not only for diagnosing a primary ACL injury but also as an outcome measure after ACL reconstruction. The pivot-shift examination has significant associations with both patient satisfaction and overall knee function and may be a better measure of “functional instability.” Residual laxity can be detected by the pivot-shift test in ACL-reconstructed knees in which anterior laxity has been successfully restored. Given of the ability to evaluate a dynamic and a rotational component of the knee laxity, a postoperative stability evaluation should include the pivot-shift test. An electromagnetic tracking device can measure the 6 degrees-of-freedom knee kinematics during the pivot-shift test providing dynamic 3D tibial displacement relative to the femur. This device detected the increase of the tibial anterior translation by about 8 mm and the increase of tibial posterior acceleration by about 1 m/sec2 in ACL-deficient knees compared to the contralateral intact knees. This in vivo measurement can be applied for quantitative evaluation of the dynamic laxity during the pivot-shift test.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y et al (2004) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Single- versus double-bundle multistranded hamstring tendons. J Bone Joint Surg Br 86(4):515–520
Allum R, Jones D, Mowbray MA et al (1984) Triaxial electrogoniometric examination of the pivot shift sign for rotatory instability of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 183:144–146
Andersson C, Gillquist J (1990) Instrumented testing for evaluation of sagittal knee laxity. Clin Orthop Relat Res 256:178–184
Araki D, Kuroda R, Kubo S et al (2011) A prospective randomised study of anatomical single-bundle versus double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: quantitative evaluation using an electromagnetic measurement system. Int Orthop 35(3):439–446
Bedi A, Musahl V, O’Loughlin P et al (2010) A comparison of the effect of central anatomical single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on pivot-shift kinematics. Am J Sports Med 38(9):1788–1794
Bignozzi S, Zaffagnini S, Lopomo N et al (2010) Clinical relevance of static and dynamic tests after anatomical double-bundle ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(1):37–42
Bull AM, Earnshaw PH, Smith A et al (2002) Intraoperative measurement of knee kinematics in reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Br 84(7):1075–1081
Daniel DM, Stone ML, Dobson BE (1994) Fate of the ACL-injured patient. A prospective outcome study. Am J Sports Med 22(5):632–644
Daniel DM, Malcom LL, Losse G et al (1985) Instrumented measurement of anterior laxity of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 67(5):720–726
Ferretti A, Conteduca F, De Carli A et al (1991) Osteoarthritis of the knee after ACL reconstruction. Int Orthop 15(4):367–371
Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:45–50
Ganko A, Engebretsen L, Ozer H (2000) The rolimeter: a new arthrometer compared with the KT-1000. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8(1):36–39
Gillquist J, Messner K (1995) Instrumented analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon after reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Int J Sports Med 16(7):484–488
Grood ES, Suntay WJ (1983) A joint coordinate system for the clinical description of three-dimensional motions: application to the knee. J Biomech Eng 105(2):136–144
Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2007) In vivo measurement of the pivot-shift test in the anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knee using an electromagnetic device. Am J Sports Med 35(7):1098–1104
Hoshino Y, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2012) Optimal measurement of clinical rotational test for evaluating anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(7):1323–1330
Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Ahlden M et al (2013) Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(4):975–980
Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL et al (2001) Development and validation of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form. Am J Sports Med 29(5):600–613
Irrgang JJ, Bost JE, Fu FH (2009) Re: outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 37(2):421–422; author reply 422
Jakob RP, Staubli HU, Deland JT (1987) Grading the pivot shift. Objective tests with implications for treatment. J Bone Joint Surg Br 69(2):294–299
Jarvela T, Moisala AS, Sihvonen R et al (2008) Double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring autografts and bioabsorbable interference screw fixation: prospective, randomized, clinical study with 2-year results. Am J Sports Med 36(2):290–297
Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlstrom K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis: 63 patients followed 5–9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop Scand 75(5):594–599
Kanamori A, Zeminski J, Rudy TW (2002) The effect of axial tibial torque on the function of the anterior cruciate ligament: a biomechanical study of a simulated pivot shift test. Arthroscopy 18(4):394–398
Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, et al (2004)Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(3):629–634
Kondo E, Yasuda K, Azuma H et al (2008) Prospective clinical comparisons of anatomic double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedures in 328 consecutive patients. Am J Sports Med 36(9):1675–1687
Kondo E, Merican AM, Yasuda K et al (2010) Biomechanical comparisons of knee stability after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction between 2 clinically available transtibial procedures: anatomic double bundle versus single bundle. Am J Sports Med 38(7):1349–1358
Kubo S, Muratsu H, Yoshiya S et al (2007) Reliability and usefulness of a new in vivo measurement system of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:54–58
Kuroda R, Hoshino Y, Kubo S et al (2012) Similarities and differences of diagnostic manual tests for anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency: a global survey and kinematics assessment. Am J Sports Med 40(1):91–99
Kuroda R, Hoshino Y, Araki D et al (2012) Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(4):686–691
Labbe DR, de Guise JA, Mezghani N et al (2010) Feature selection using a principal component analysis of the kinematics of the pivot shift phenomenon. J Biomech 43(16):3080–3084
Logan MC, Williams A, Lavelle J et al (2004) Tibiofemoral kinematics following successful anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using dynamic multiple resonance imaging. Am J Sports Med 32(4):984–992
Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E et al (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19(3):297–304
Lopomo N, Zaffagnini S, Signorelli C et al (2012) An original clinical methodology for non-invasive assessment of pivot-shift test. Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin 15(12):1323–1328
Losee RE (1983) Concepts of the pivot shift. Clin Orthop Relat Res 172:45–51
Mae T, Shino K, Miyama T et al (2001) Single- versus two-femoral socket anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique: Biomechanical analysis using a robotic simulator. Arthroscopy 17(7):708–716
Maeyama A, Hoshino Y, Debandi A et al (2011) Evaluation of rotational instability in the anterior cruciate ligament deficient knee using triaxial accelerometer: a biomechanical model in porcine knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1233–1238
Matsumoto H (1990) Mechanism of the pivot shift. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72(5):816–821
Meredick RB, Vance KJ, Appleby D et al (2008) Outcome of single-bundle versus double-bundle reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 36(7):1414–1421
Muneta T, Koga H, Mochizuki T et al (2007) A prospective randomized study of 4-strand semitendinosus tendon anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction comparing single-bundle and double-bundle techniques. Arthroscopy 23(6):618–628
Musahl V, Voos JE, O’Loughlin PF et al (2010) Comparing stability of different single- and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques: a cadaveric study using navigation. Arthroscopy 26(9 Suppl):S41–S48
Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF et al (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon. The knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19(2):148–155
Oliver JH, Coughlin LP (1987) Objective knee evaluation using the genucom knee analysis system. Clinical implications. Am J Sports Med 15(6):571–578
Plaweski S, Grimaldi M, Courvoisier A et al (2011) Intraoperative comparisons of knee kinematics of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(8):1277–1286
Ristanis S, Giakas G, Papageorgiou CD, et al (2003) The effects of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction on tibial rotation during pivoting after descending stairs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11(6):360–365
Schuster AJ, McNicholas MJ, Wachtl SW, et al (2004) A new mechanical testing device for measuring anteroposterior knee laxity. Am J Sports Med 32(7):1731–1735
Siebold R, Dehler C, Ellert T (2008) Prospective randomized comparison of double-bundle versus single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24(2):137–145
Slocum DB, James SL, Larson RL et al (1976) Clinical test for anterolateral rotary instability of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 118:63–69
Snyder-Mackler L, Fitzgerald GK, Bartolozzi AR 3rd et al (1997) The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 25(2):191–195
Tashman S, Collon D, Anderson K et al (2004) Abnormal rotational knee motion during running after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(4):975–983
Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V (1976) Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 4(2):84–93
Tsai AG, Wijdicks CA, Walsh MP et al (2010) Comparative kinematic evaluation of all-inside single-bundle and double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 38(2):263–272
Weiss JR, Irrgang JJ, Sawhney R et al (1990) A functional assessment of anterior cruciate ligament deficiency in an acute and clinical setting. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 11(8):372–373
Yagi M, Wong EK, Kanamori A, et al (2004) Biomechanical analysis of an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 30(5):660–666
Yagi M, Kuroda R, Nagamune K et al (2007) Double-bundle ACL reconstruction can improve rotational stability. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:100–107
Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H et al (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction procedure using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22(3):240–251
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kuroda, R., Hoshino, Y., Matsushita, T., Nagamune, K., Kurosaka, M. (2017). Development of Electromagnetic Tracking for the Pivot Shift. In: Musahl, V., Karlsson, J., Kuroda, R., Zaffagnini, S. (eds) Rotatory Knee Instability. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32070-0_22
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-32070-0_22
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-32069-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-32070-0
eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)