Advertisement

Pivot Shift Test: An Evidence-Based Outcome Tool

  • Marie-Claude Leblanc
  • Devin C. Peterson
  • Olufemi R. AyeniEmail author
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads

Abstract

Restoration of rotational stability is a critical step in the success of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction surgery. Objective evaluation of rotational control after ACL reconstruction surgery requires reliable, precise, and specific measurement tools. The manual pivot shift test remains the most common and valid technique used in daily clinical routine and incorporates two components: anterior translation of the lateral tibial plateau and internal rotation of the tibia relative to the femur.

The evidence in the literature concerning the pivot shift test can be classified as follows: patient satisfaction, subjective symptoms and functional outcomes, and development of osteoarthritis (OA). A significant association has been found with (1) positive pivot shift test and patient dissatisfaction; (2) positive pivot shift test and partial and full giving way, difficulty cutting, difficulty twisting, activity limitation, lower knee function, limitations in sports participation, and lower Lysholm score; (3) negative pivot shift test and better functional subjective outcome score; (4) grade of pivot shift test and level of patient “disabilities”; (5) pivot shift test result and final functional outcome; and(6) positive pivot shift test at 2 years after surgery and subchondral bone scintigraphic uptake at 5–9 years of follow-up.

However, the lack of accuracy of the pivot shift test has pushed research to use adjunct technological support to increase its reproducibility. Standardization of the physical exam technique combined with lateral compartment translation measurements using computer-analyzed skin sensors is undergoing evaluation. This would allow for a simpler, more reproducible, accurate, and precise measurement without relying on the examiner’s impression of displacement.

Keywords

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Pivot Shift International Knee Documentation Committee Pivot Shift Test 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. 1.
    Abrams GD, Harris JD, Gupta AK, McCormick FM, Bush-Joseph CA, Verma NN, Cole BJ, Bach BR (2014) Functional performance testing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. Orthop J Sports Med 2:1–10Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Ahldén M, Araujo P, Hoshino Y, Samuelsson K, Middleton KK, Nagamune K, Karlsson J, Musahl V (2012) Clinical grading of the pivot shift test correlates best with tibial acceleration. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:708–712CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Ahldén M, Hoshino Y, Samuelsson K, Araujo P, Musahl V, Karlsson J (2012) Dynamic knee laxity measurement devices. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:621–632CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Amis AA (2012) The functions of the fibre bundles of the anterior cruciate ligament in anterior drawer, rotational laxity and the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:613–620CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Araujo PH, Ahlden M, Hoshino Y, Muller B, Moloney G, Fu FH, Musahl V (2012) Comparison of three non-invasive quantitative measurement systems for the pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:692–697CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ayeni OR, Chahal M, Tran MN, Sprague S (2012) Pivot shift as an outcome measure for ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:767–777CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Ayeni OR, Evaniew N, Ogilvie R, Peterson DC, Denkers MR, Bhandari M (2013) Evidence-based practice to improve outcomes of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Sports Med 32:71–80CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Bedi A, Musahl V, Lane C, Citak M, Warren RF, Pearle AD (2010) Lateral compartment translation predicts the grade of pivot shift: a cadaveric and clinical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1269–1276CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–288CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Bull AM, Amis AA (1998) The pivot-shift phenomenon: a clinical and biomechanical perspective. Knee 5:141–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Engebretsen L, Wijdicks CA, Anderson CJ, Westerhaus B, LaPrade RF (2012) Evaluation of a simulated pivot shift test: a biomechanical study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:698–702CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop 147:45–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Greenhalgh T, Howick J, Maskrey N, for the Evidence Based Medicine Renaissance Group (2014) Evidence based medicine: a movement in crisis? BMJ 348:g3725CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Ahlden M, Moore CG, Kuroda R, Zaffagnini S, Karlsson J, Fu FH, Musahl V (2012) Standardized pivot shift test improves measurement accuracy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:732–736CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Ahldén M, Samuelsson K, Muller B, Hofbauer M, Wolf MR, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Musahl V (2013) Quantitative evaluation of the pivot shift by image analysis using the iPad. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:975–980CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Hoshino Y, Araujo P, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH, Musahl V (2012) An image analysis method to quantify the lateral pivot shift test. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:703–707CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Johnson DL (2011) Outcome measurement tools for ACL reconstruction: we must do better. Orthopedics 34:417–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Jonsson H, Riklund-Ahlström K, Lind J (2004) Positive pivot shift after ACL reconstruction predicts later osteoarthrosis 63 patients followed 5-9 years after surgery. Acta Orthop 75:594–599CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Junkin DM Jr, Johnson DL, Fu FH, Miller MD, Willenborg M, Fanelli GC, Wascher DC (2009) Chapter 12: Knee ligaments injuries. In: Kibler WB (ed) Orthopaedic knowledge update: sports medicine, 4th edn. American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons, Rosemont, pp 135–154Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kirchhoff C, Brucker PU, Imhoff AB (2013) Chapter 69: Evolving concepts in tunnel placement for Acl reconstruction. In: Johnson DH (ed) Oper. Arthrosc. 4th edn. Wolters Kluwer Health/Lippincott Williams & Wilkins, Philadelphia, pp 772–777Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Kocher MS (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32:629–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs K, Zurakowski D, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2002) Determinants of patient satisfaction with outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg 84:1560–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Kopf S, Kauert R, Halfpaap J, Jung T, Becker R (2012) A new quantitative method for pivot shift grading. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:718–723CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kuroda R, Hoshino Y, Araki D, Nishizawa Y, Nagamune K, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Kurosaka M (2012) Quantitative measurement of the pivot shift, reliability, and clinical applications. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:686–691CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Lane CG, Warren R, Pearle AD (2008) The pivot shift. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 16:679–688CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Leblanc M-C, Kowalczuk M, Andruszkiewicz N, Simunovic N, Farrokhyar F, Turnbull TL, Debski RE, Ayeni OR (2015) Diagnostic accuracy of physical examination for anterior knee instability: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:2805–13CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Leiter JRS, Gourlay R, McRae S, de Korompay N, MacDonald PB (2013) Long-term follow-up of ACL reconstruction with hamstring autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1061–1069Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Bonanzinga T, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Neri MP, Visani A, Marcacci M, Zaffagnini S (2014) Can rotatory knee laxity be predicted in isolated anterior cruciate ligament surgery? Int Orthop 38:1167–1172CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Mohtadi N (1998) Development and validation of the quality of life outcome measure (questionnaire) for chronic anterior cruciate ligament deficiency. Am J Sports Med 26:350–359PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Mouton C, Theisen D, Pape D, Nührenbörger C, Seil R (2012) Static rotational knee laxity in anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:652–662CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Musahl V, Hoshino Y, Becker R, Karlsson J (2012) Rotatory knee laxity and the pivot shift. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:601–602CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Musahl V, Kopf S, Rabuck S, Becker R, van der Merwe W, Zaffagnini S, Fu FH, Karlsson J (2012) Rotatory knee laxity tests and the pivot shift as tools for ACL treatment algorithm. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:793–800CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Musahl V, Seil R, Zaffagnini S, Tashman S, Karlsson J (2012) The role of static and dynamic rotatory laxity testing in evaluating ACL injury. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:603–612CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Okazaki K, Tashiro Y, Izawa T, Matsuda S, Iwamoto Y (2012) Rotatory laxity evaluation of the knee using modified Slocum’s test in open magnetic resonance imaging. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:679–685CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Sackett DL, Rosenberg WM, Gray JA, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Shaw T, Chipchase LS, Williams MT (2004) A users guide to outcome measurement following ACL reconstruction. Phys Ther Sport 5:57–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Spindler KP, Parker RD, Andrish JT, Kaeding CC, Wright RW, Marx RG, McCarty EC, Amendola A, Dunn WR, Huston LJ, Harrell FE, MOON Group (2013) Prognosis and predictors of ACL reconstructions using the MOON cohort: a model for comparative effectiveness studies. J Orthop Res 31:2–9CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Streich NA, Zimmermann D, Bode G, Schmitt H (2011) Reconstructive versus non-reconstructive treatment of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. A retrospective matched-pair long-term follow-up. Int Orthop 35:607–613CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Tanaka M, Vyas D, Moloney G, Bedi A, Pearle AD, Musahl V (2012) What does it take to have a high-grade pivot shift? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:737–742CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Webster KE, Feller JA (2014) Use of the short form health surveys as an outcome measure for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1142–1148CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Wright RW (2009) Knee injury outcomes measures. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 17:31–39CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Lopomo N, Signorelli C, Bonanzinga T, Musiani C, Vassilis P, Nitri M, Marcacci M (2012) Can the pivot-shift be eliminated by anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:743–751CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Zampeli F, Pappas E, Giotis D, Hantes ME, Georgoulis AD (2012) Kinematic predictors of subjective outcome after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo motion analysis study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:785–792CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Marie-Claude Leblanc
    • 1
  • Devin C. Peterson
    • 1
  • Olufemi R. Ayeni
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.Division of Orthopedic Surgery, Department of SurgeryMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations