Advertisement

Development of the IKDC Forms

  • Allen F. AndersonEmail author
  • James J. Irrgang
  • Christian N. Anderson
Chapter
  • 1.1k Downloads

Abstract

The International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) was formed under the auspices of The American Orthopaedic Society for Sports Medicine and The European Society of Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy in 1987 to develop a standardized international documentation system to evaluate treatment for acute ACL injuries. It was anticipated that the IKDC Knee Evaluation Form would serve as a foundation for a more comprehensive evaluation system, allowing for valid scientific analysis of knee function. The first step was to agree on standard terminology to document motion and function. Next, clinical examination of the limits of knee motion was critiqued, and core measurements were adopted.

Studies performed by the committee demonstrated that even under the best circumstances, large variations existed in clinicians’ estimation of tibial displacement. Consequently, clinical examination tests for knee laxity were only considered qualitative; therefore, the IKDC Knee Evaluation Form could not be validated.

In March 1997, the IKDC Knee Evaluation Form was revised to include additional objective assessment. Advancement in the measurement of patient-reported outcomes was also used to develop the IKDC Subjective Knee Form, making this module valid and more broadly applicable.

The IKDC Subjective Knee Form was rigorously tested and found to be valid, reliable, and responsive for evaluation of symptoms, function, and sports activity in patients with a variety of knee disorders. As a result of rigorous psychometric testing, the availability of normative data, development of a pediatric version, and psychometric characteristics that are superior to other patient-reported outcome instruments, the IKDC Subjective Knee Form has gained worldwide recognition and popularity. It has been culturally adapted and translated into 19 languages.

Keywords

Patient-reported outcomes Knee IKDC ACL Knee region-specific form 

References

  1. 1.
    Anderson AF, Federspiel CF, Snyder RB (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament rating systems. Am J Knee Surg 6:67–74Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Anderson AF, Irrgang JJ, Kocher MS, Mann BJ, Harrast JJ, Committee IKD (2006) The international knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form: normative data. Am J Sports Med 34(1):128–135CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Apley AG (1990) An assessment of assessment. J Bone Joint Surg 72B:957–958Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boykin RE, McFeely ED, Shearer D, Frank JS, Harrod CC, Nasreddine AY, Kocher MS (2013) Correlation between the child health questionnaire and the International Knee Documentation Committee score in pediatric and adolescent patients with an anterior cruciate ligament tear. J Pediatr Orthop 33(2):216–220CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Crawford K, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2007) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy 23(8):839–844CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Daniel DM (1991) Assessing the limits of knee motion. Am J Sports Med 19:139–146CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Feagin JA, Blake WP (1983) Postoperative evaluation and result recording in the anterior cruciate reconstructed knee. Clin Orthop 172:143–147PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, Cole BJ, Farr J, Nissen CW, Irrgang JJ (2010) Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med 38(5):891–902. Epub 2009 Dec 31CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Guyett G, Walter S, Norman G (1987) Measuring change over time: assessing the usefulness of evaluation instruments. J Chronic Dis 40:171–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Hambly K, Griva K (2008) IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? Am J Sports Med 37(9):1695–1704. Epub 2008 Jun 24CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Haverkamp D, Sierevelt IN, Breugem SJ, Lohuis K, Blankevoort L, van Dijk CN (2006) Translation and validation of the Dutch version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 34(10):1680–1684CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP et al (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Kurosaka M, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelborne KD (2001) Development and validation of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 29:600–613PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Irrgang JJ, Anderson AF, Boland AL, Harner CD, Neyret P, Richmond JC, Shelbourne KD, International Knee Documentation Committee (2006) Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. Am J Sports Med 34(10):1567–1573CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Iversen MD, Lee b, Connell P, Anderson J, Anderson AF, Kocher MS. (2010) Validity and comprehensibility of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee evaluation form in children. Scand. J Med Sci Sports 20:e87–e95Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Kirshner B, Guyett G (1985) A methodological frame work for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis 38:27–36CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Relationships between objective assessment of ligament stability and subjective assessment of symptoms and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(3):629–634CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Kocher MS, Smith JT, Iversen MD, Brustowicz K, Ogunwole O, Andersen J, Yoo WJ, McFeely ED, Anderson AF, Zurakowski D (2011) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of a modified International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form (Pedi-IKDC) in children with knee disorders. Am J Sports Med 39(5):933–939CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Lertwanich P, Praphruetkit T, Keyurapan E, Lamsam C, Kulthanan T (2008) Validity and reliability of Thai version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form. J Med Assoc Thai 91(8):1218–1225PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Metsavaht L, Leporace G, Riberto M, Sposito MM, Batista LA (2010) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the Brazilian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: validity and reproducibility. Am J Sports Med 38(9):1894–1899Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Muller W, Biedert R, Hefti F, Jacob RP, Munzinger U, Staubli HU (1988) OAK knee evaluation: a new way to assess knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 232:37–50PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Nitko AJ (1983) Educational tests and measurement: an introduction. Harcourt Brace Jovanovich Inc., New YorkGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1990) Bone patellar ligament bone and fascia lata allografts for reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone J Surg 72A:1125–1136Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Noyes FR, Grood ES, Torzelli PA (1989) Current concepts review: the definitions of terms for motion and position of the knee and injuries of the ligaments. J Bone Joint Surg 71A:465–472Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Noyes FR, Cummings JF, Grood ES, Walz-Hasselfeld KA, Wroble RR (1991) The diagnosis of knee motion limits, subluxations and ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 19:163–170CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Noyes FR, Grood ES, Cummings JF, Wroble RR (1991) An analysis of the pivot shift phenomenon: the knee motions and subluxations induced by different examiners. Am J Sports Med 19:148–155CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Noyes FR, Barber SD, Mangine RE (1991) Abnormal lower limb symmetry determined by function hop test after anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Am J Sports Med 19:513–518CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Oak SR, O’Rourke C, Strnad G, Andrish JT, Parker RD, Saluan P, Jones MH, Stegmeier NA, Spindler KP (2015) Statistical comparison of the pediatric versus adult IKDC Subjective Knee Evaluation Form in adolescents. Am J Sports Med 43(9):2216–2221Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Padua R, Bondi R, Ceccarelli E, Bondi L, Romanini E, Zanoli G, Campi S (2004) Italian version of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy 20(8):819–823CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Schmitt LC, Paterno MV, Huang S (2010) Validity and internal consistency of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Evaluation Form in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 38(12):2443–2447CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Slobogean GP, Mulpuri K, Reilly CW (2008) The International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Evaluation Form in a preadolescent population: pilot normative data. Am J Sports Med 36(1):129–132CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Snyder-Mackler L, Fitzgerald GK, Bartolozzi AR, Ciccotti MD (1997) The relationship between passive joint laxity and functional outcome after anterior cruciate ligament injury. Am J Sports Med 25:191–195CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Tanner SM, Dainty KN, Marx RG, Kirkly A (2007) Knee-specific quality-of-life instruments: which ones measure symptoms and disabilities most important to patients? Am J Sports Med 35(9):1450–1458CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating system in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop 198:43–49PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    van de Graaf VA, Wolterbeek N, Scholtes VA, Mutsaerts EL, Poolman RW (2014) Reliability and validity of the IKDC, KOOS, and WOMAC for patients with meniscal injuries. Am J Sports Med 42(6):1408–1416CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    van Meer BL, Meuffels DE, Vissers MM, Bierma-Zeinstra SM, Verhaar JA, Terwee CB, Reijman M (2013) Knee injury and osteoarthritis outcome score or International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form: which questionnaire is most useful to monitor patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture in the short term? Arthroscopy 29(4):701–715CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Allen F. Anderson
    • 1
    Email author
  • James J. Irrgang
    • 2
  • Christian N. Anderson
    • 1
  1. 1.Tennessee Orthopaedic AllianceNashvilleUSA
  2. 2.Department of Orthopedic SurgeryUniversity of PittsburgPittsburgUSA

Personalised recommendations