Skip to main content

Part of the book series: Second Language Learning and Teaching ((SLLT))

  • 1283 Accesses

Abstract

In 1967 both L1 and L2 reading specialists were provided with a particularly influential model of reading, that of reading as ‘a psycholinguistic guessing game’ by Kenneth Goodman. The model not only revolutionized the conceptualization of the reading process by referring to its psycholinguistic background, but also offered a metaphor of reading as a game-like process based on extensive guessing, still found appealing by some practicing L2/FL teachers. The present paper will argue why the definition of reading as a hypothesis-testing process based on prediction, sampling, confirming and verification worked out by Goodman gave such an important impetus for change in understanding the reading process and the development of reading competence. On a more practical side, it will be explained why the view that L2 readers can build the meaning of a text on the basis of contextual redundancy, as well as infer the meanings of unfamiliar vocabulary by sampling selected features of the visual display has proved problematic for second/foreign language instruction. Finally, some current conceptualizations of the reading process and the way they counteracted the influence of the belief in top-down processing of texts with the abundant use of context will be analyzed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Adams, M. J. (1994). Modeling the connection between word recognition and reading. In R. B. Ruddell, M. R. Ruddell, & H. Singer (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (4th ed., pp. 830–863). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Adams, M. J., & Bruck, M. (1993). Word recognition: The interface of educational policies and scientific research. Reading and Writing, 5, 113–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett, M. (1989). More than meets the eye. Foreign language reading: Theory and practice. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall Regents.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. B. (1991). Reading development in a second language: Theoretical, empirical, and classroom perspectives. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. B. (2005). Progress and procrastination in second language reading. Annual Review of Applied Linguistics, 25, 133–150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt, E. B. (2011). Understanding advanced second-language reading. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Birch, B. M. (2007). English L2 reading. Getting to the bottom. Mahwah, NJ.: Lawrence Earlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, H. D. (1994). Teaching by principles: An interactive approach to language pedagogy. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chall, J. S (1967/1983/1996). Learning to read. The great debate. Fort Worth: Harcourt Brace College Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chodkiewicz, H. (2000). Vocabulary acquisition from the written context: Inferring word meanings by Polish learners of English. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, M. A., & Silberstein, S. (1977). Toward a realization of psycholinguistic principles in the ESL reading class. Language Learning, 27(1), 135–154.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coady, J. (1979). A psycholinguistic model of ESL reader. In R. Mackey, B. Barkman, & R. R. Jordan (Eds.), Reading in a second language (pp. 5–12). Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cziko, G. A. (1980). Language competence and reading strategies: A comparison of first and second-language readers. Language Learning, 30, 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eskey, D. E. (2005). Reading in a second language. In E. Hinkel (Ed.) Handbook of research in teaching and learning, (pp. 563–580). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fender, M. (2001). A review of L1 and L2/ESL word integration skills and the nature of L2/ESL word integration development involved in lower-level text processing. Language Learning, 51, 319–396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forrester, M. A. (1996). Psychology of language: A critical introduction. London: Sage Publications.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Glucksberg, S. (1986). How people use context to resolve ambiguity implications for an interactive model of language understanding. In I. Kurcz, G. W. Shugar, & J. H. Danks (Eds.), Knowledge and language (pp. 303–325). Amsterdam: Elsevier Science Publishers.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1967). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. Journal of the Reading Specialist, 6, 126–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1976). Reading: A psycholinguistic guessing game. In H. Singer & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (2nd ed., pp. 497–508). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goodman, K. (1988). The reading process. In P. L. Carrell, J. Devine, & D. E. Eskey (Eds.), Interactive approaches to second language reading (pp. 11–21). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. (1972). One second of reading. In J. F. Kavanagh & I. G. Mattingly (Eds.), Language by eye and ear (pp. 331–358). Cambridge: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B. (1983). Context, form, and interaction. In K. Rayner (Ed.), Eye movements in reading: Perceptual and language processes (pp. 203–211). New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gough, P. B., Alford, J. A, Jr, & Holley-Wilcox, P. (1981). Words and contexts. In J. L. Ovid & T. H. Singer (Eds.), Perception of print (pp. 84–102). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (1991). Current developments in second language reading research. TESOL Quarterly, 25, 375–406.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W. (2009). Reading in a second language. Moving from theory to practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grabe, W., & Stoller, F. L. (2002). Teaching and researching reading. Harlow: Pearson Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grellet, F. (1981). Developing reading skills. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedgcock, J. S., & Ferris, D. R. (2009). Teaching readers of English. Students, texts, and contexts. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hedge, T. (2000). Teaching and learning in the Classroom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson, T. (2007). Teaching second language reading. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87, 329–354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (1999). Development of L2 intraword orthographic sensitivity and decoding skills. Modern Language Journal, 83, 51–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koda, K. (2005). Insights into second language reading. A cross-linguistic approach. Cambridge: CUP.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology, 6, 293–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mackay, R., Barkman, B., & Jordan, R. R. (1979). Reading in a second language: Hypothesis, organization and practice. Rowley, MA: Newbury House.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, B. (1990). Restructuring. Applied Linguistics, 11, 113–128.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McNeil, L. (2012). Extending the compensatory model of second language reading. System, 40, 64–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paran, A. (1996). Reading in EFL: facts and fictions. ELT Journal, 50, 25–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pearson, P. D. (2009). The roots of reading comprehension instruction. In S. E. Israel & G. G. Duffy (Eds.), Handbook of research on reading comprehension (pp. 3–31). New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A. (1995). Cognitive research can inform reading education. Journal of Research in Reading, 18, 106–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Goldman, S. R., & Hogaboam, T. W. (1979). Reading skill and the identification of words in discourse context. Memory & Cognition, 7, 273–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 227–247). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollatsek, A. (1993). Eye movements in reading. In D. M. Willows, R. S. Kruk, & E. Corcos (Eds.), Visual processes in reading and reading disabilities (pp. 191–213). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pressley, M. (2006). Reading instruction that works. A case for balanced teaching. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rayner, K., & Sereno, J. (1994). Eye movements in reading. In M. Gernsbacher (Ed.), Handbook of psycholinguistics (pp. 57–81). San Diego, CA: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rivers, W. M., & Temperley, M. S. (1978). A practical guide to the teaching of English as a second or foreign language. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saville-Troike, M. (1973). Reading in the AL method. TESOL Quarterly, 7, 395–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith, F. (1971). Understanding reading. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, C. E., & Juel, C. (2005). Teaching children to read: What do we know about how to do it? In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading (pp. 501–520). Malden, MA: Blackwell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1980). Toward an interactive-compensatory model of individual differences in the development of reading fluency. Reading Research Quarterly, 16, 32–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1988). The language code: Issues in word recognition. In S. R. Yussen & M. C. Smith (Eds.), Reading across the life span (pp. 111–135). New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (1991). Word recognition: changing perspectives. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. II (pp. 418–52). White Plains, New York: Longman.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E. (2000). Progress in understanding reading. Scientific foundations and new frontiers. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stanovich, K. E., & West, R. F. (1981). The effect of sentence context on ongoing word recognition: Tests of a two-process theory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 7, 658–672.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tracy, D. H., & Morrow, L. M. (2006). Lenses on reading: An introduction to theories and models. New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • Unrau, N. J., & Alvermann, D. E. (2013). Literacies and their investigation through theories and models. In D. E. Alvermann, N. J. Unrau, & R. B. Ruddell (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 47–90). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Dijk, T. A., & Kintsch, W. (1983). Strategies of discourse comprehension. New York: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wesche, M. B., & Paribakht, T. S. (2009). Lexical inferencing in a first and second language. Cross-linguistic dimensions. Bristol: Multilingual Matters.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Halina Chodkiewicz .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Chodkiewicz, H. (2016). Why L2 Readers Cannot Play a Psycholinguistic Guessing Game. In: Gałajda, D., Zakrajewski, P., Pawlak, M. (eds) Researching Second Language Learning and Teaching from a Psycholinguistic Perspective. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31954-4_8

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31954-4_8

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31953-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31954-4

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics