Abstract
Multilingual speakers, bilingual and more often multilingual, are diverse in many ways. They undergo different kinds of experiences in a variety of social spaces, in particular when undergoing changes in their linguistic environments. This article suggests a conceptual tool to examine the various contexts in which multilingual speakers emerge and re-establish their identity: the concept of spacetime. The concept of spacetime allows analytical vision of the circumstances and actors. It can be instrumental in teasing out the mechanisms by which new linguistic practices appear both in local settings and globally. From the complexity perspective, each spacetime of multilingualism is an emergent, dynamic and self-organizing system that cannot be understood simply by understanding its separate parts, but by exploring their interaction in complex and non-linear ways. It is the interaction between the many elements of each spacetime that makes it unique. The spacetime approach takes into consideration both space and time. Thus the understanding of multilingualism becomes more realistic and more attuned to the diversity and unpredictability of each particular sociolinguistic situation.
The research work of the first author of this article on the topic of ‘spacetimes of multilingualism’ was supported by the Visiting Research Fellowship at the Trinity Long Room Hub Arts and Humanities Research Institute, TCD, Dublin, Ireland.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Aronin, L. (2007). Current multilingualism as a new linguistic world order. CLCS Occasional Paper #67. Dublin: Trinity College.
Aronin, L. (2014). Spacetimes of multilingualism. Paper presented at the 9th International Conference on Third Language Acquisition and Multilingualism, Uppsala, Sweden, June 12–14.
Aronin, L. (2015). Current multilingualism and new developments in multilingual research. In P. Safont-Jordà & L. Portoles (Eds.), Multilingual development in the classroom: Current findings from research (pp. 1–27). Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Aronin, L., & Hufeisen, B. (2009). Methods of research in multilingualism studies: Reaching a comprehensive perspective. In L. Aronin & B. Hufeisen (Eds.), The exploration of multilingualism: Development of research on L3, multilingualism and multiple language acquisition (pp. 103–120). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Aronin, L., & Jessner, U. (2014). Methodology in bi- and multilingual studies: From simplification to complexity. AILA Review, 27: Research Methods and approaches in Applied Linguistics: Looking back and moving forward.
Aronin, L., & Jessner, U. (2015). Understanding current multilingualism: What can the butterfly tell us? In C. Kramsch & U. Jessner (Eds.), The multilingual challenge (pp. 271–291). Berlin: De Gruyter.
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2008a). Multilingualism as a new linguistic dispensation. International Journal of Multilingualism, 5, 1–16.
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2008b). The complexity of multilingual contact and language use in times of globalization. Conversarii. Studi Linguistici, 2, 33–47.
Aronin, L., & Singleton, D. (2012). Multilingualism. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity. London: Sage Publications.
Blommaert, J. (2010). The sociolinguistics of globalization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Capra, F. (2005). Complexity and life. Theory, Culture and Society, 22, 33–44.
Castellani, B., & Hafferty, F. W. (2009). Sociology & complexity science. New York: Springer.
Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity. Oxford: Blackwell.
Cilliers, P. (1998). Complexity and postmodernism. Understanding complex systems. London: Routledge.
Cilliers, P. (2005). On the importance of a certain slowness: Stability, memory and hysteresis in complex systems. Paper delivered at the Complexity, Science and Society Conference. Liverpool, UK.
Giddens, A. (1990). The consequences of modernity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Giddens, A. (1991). Modernity and self-identity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Habermas, J. (1981). Modernity versus postmodernity (Trans. by Seyla Ben-Habib). In V. E. Taylor & Ch. E. Winquist (Eds.), New German Critique, 22, 3–14.
Herdina, P., & Jessner, U. (2002). A dynamic model of multilingualism: Perspectives of change in psycholinguistics. Clevedon: Multilingual Matters.
Jessner, U. (2008). The dynamics of multilingual development. In C. Vergaro (Ed.), Dynamics of language contact in the twenty-first century. Conversarii. Studi Linguistici 2 (pp. 49–65) Perugia: Guerra Edizioni.
Jessner, U. (2013). Complexity in multilingual systems. In C. A. Chapelle (Ed.), The encyclopedia of applied linguistics (pp. 802–807). New York: Wiley-Blackwell.
Klein, W. (1994). Time in language. London: Routledge.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2002). Language acquisition and language use from a chaos/complexity theory perspective. In C. Kramsch (Ed.), Language acquisition and language socialization, Ecological perspectives (pp. 33–46). London: Continuum.
Larsen-Freeman, D. (2006). The emergence of complexity, fluency, and accuracy in the oral and written production of five Chinese learners of English. Applied Linguistics, 27, 590–619.
Lyotard, J. F. (1984). The postmodern condition: A report on knowledge. Manchester: Manchester University Press.
May, J., & Thrift, N. (2003). Timespace: Geographies of temporality (Critical geographies). London & New York: Routledge.
Minkowski, H. (1952). Space and time. In H. A. Lorentz, A. Einstein, H. Minkowski, & H. Weyl (Eds.), The principle of relativity: A collection of original memoirs on the special and general theory of relativity (pp. 75–91). New York: Dover.
Porter, K. J. (2006). Meaning, language, and time. Towards a consequentialist philosophy of discourse. West Lafayette, IN: Parlor Press.
Prigogine, I. (1997). The end of certainty: Time, chaos and the new laws of nature. New York: Free Press.
Singleton, D., Aronin, L., & Carson, L. (2013). Minority language use in Ireland: The time dimension. In D. Singleton, J. Fishman, L. Aronin, & M. O. Laoire (Eds.), Current multilingualism: A new linguistic dispensation (pp. 121–138). Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
Sklair, L. (1999). Competing conceptions of globalization. Journal of World-Systems Research, 5, 143–162.
Slevin, J. (2007). Time-space. Blackwell encyclopedia of sociology, doi:10.1111/b.9781405124331.2007.x
Urry, J. (2003). Global complexity. Cambridge: Polity Press.
Urry, J. (2005). The complexity turn. Theory, Culture and Society, 22, 1–14.
Zerubavel, E. (1979). Private time and public time: The temporal structure of social accessibility and professional commitments. Social Forces, 58, 38–58.
Zerubavel, E. (1989). The seven-day circle: The history and meaning of the week. Chicago and London: University of Chicago Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Aronin, L., Jessner, U. (2016). Spacetimes of Multilingualism. In: Gałajda, D., Zakrajewski, P., Pawlak, M. (eds) Researching Second Language Learning and Teaching from a Psycholinguistic Perspective. Second Language Learning and Teaching. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31954-4_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31954-4_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31953-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31954-4
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)