Skip to main content

Digital Maps for Driving Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving

  • Chapter
  • First Online:

Abstract

Modern passenger vehicles increasingly incorporate perception systems that allow the deployment of advanced driving assistance systems which in turn shall led to highly automated systems and ultimately to autonomous vehicles. Despite the numerous advances in sensors and communications technologies applied to passenger vehicles, perception remains a major challenge due to the complexity of the task, the vehicle geometric constraints and cost. Digital navigation maps have proven themselves to be essential for driver guidance and have replaced paper maps. They store the geometric description of roads and associated features. Due to the limits of perception systems, errors occur on the understanding and relevance of the detected objects, when using multiple sensors discordances occur that lead to unknowns. By projecting sensor information from the perceived environment into digital navigation maps, information can be contextualized. The resulting representation of the world is much easier to interpret by a machine, but also to ensure the coherence of the perceived information.

This article deals with two aspects of perception: situation understanding and the detection of errors in maps. One goal is to demonstrate how contextualized information can be used to facilitate situation understanding, that is to provide meaning to the spatio-temporal relationship between perceived objects, road features, and the subject vehicle. Situation understanding is a fundamental feature for a machine to take decisions in an appropriate manner, particularly, if the navigation of the vehicle is to be governed by it. The approach is based on the application of ontologies to facilitate contextual descriptions by enabling the formalization of information in a semantic manner. The digital map on board the vehicle stores a priori knowledge about the environment, that is the underlying structure and static context. Digital maps contain different errors, particularly regarding road geometry. In case of errors, the association between the perceived objects and maps for situation understanding will be wrong. This will propagate through the system and lead to hazardous situations. The chapter is thus completed by introducing a mathematical formalism that allows for the detection of geometric map errors in real time. The uniqueness of this formalism is that it uses production type components, namely GNSS receivers and vehicle state data. The approach includes a mechanism that allows for the identification of the error, which could be in the digital map itself or due to errors in the position estimates of the vehicle.

The chapter combines theoretical developments with experimental data, as the proposed solutions were tested in public road networks using purposely equipped vehicles to demonstrate the viability and advantages of the theoretical developments.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

References

  1. S. Abburu, A survey on ontology reasoners and comparison. Int. J. Comput. Appl. 57 (17), 33–39 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A. Armand, D. Filliat, J. Ibañez-Guzmán, Modelling stop intersection approaches using gaussian processes, in Proceedings of the 16th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems-ITSC (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  3. F. Baader, The Description Logic Handbook: Theory, Implementation, and Applications (Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2003)

    Google Scholar 

  4. M. Basseville, I.V. Nikiforov, Detection of Abrupt Changes: Theory and Application (Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1993)

    Google Scholar 

  5. D.J. Buckley, The GIS primer an introduction to geographic information systems. Technical Report, Innovative, 1997

    Google Scholar 

  6. K. Dentler, R. Cornet, A.T. Teije, N. De Keizer, Comparison of reasoners for large ontologies in the OWL 2 EL profile. Semantic Web 2 (2), 71–87 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. S. Geyer, M. Baltzer, B. Franz, S. Hakuli, M. Kauer, M. Kienle, S. Meier, T. Weißgerber, K. Bengler, R. Bruder et al., Concept and development of a unified ontology for generating test and use-case catalogues for assisted and automated vehicle guidance. IET Intell. Transp. Syst. 8 (3), 183–189 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. P.-Y. Gilliéron, H. Gontran, B. Merminod, Cartographie routière précise pour les systèmes d’́assistance à la conduite, in Proceedings of the GIS-SIT Conference. TOPO-CONF-2006-015 (2006)

    Google Scholar 

  9. T.R. Gruber, Toward principles for the design of ontologies used for knowledge sharing? Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 43 (5), 907–928 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Gruber, Ontology, in The Encyclopedia of Database Systems, ed. by L. Liu, M.T. Özsu (Springer, Berlin, 2009)

    Google Scholar 

  11. P.J. Hayes, The second naive physics manifesto, Formal Theories of the Commonsense World (1985), pp. 1–36

    Google Scholar 

  12. M. Horridge, S. Bechhofer, The OWL API: a java API for OWL ontologies. Semantic Web 2 (1), 11–21 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. M. Horridge, S. Jupp, G. Moulton, A. Rector, R. Stevens, C. Wroe, A practical guide to building OWL ontologies using protégé 4 and CO-ODE tools edition 1. 2. The University of Manchester (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  14. I. Horrocks, P.F. Patel-Schneider, H. Boley, S. Tabet, B Grosof, M. Dean et al., Swrl: a semantic web rule language combining OWL and RuleML. W3C Member Submission 21, 79 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  15. M. Hulsen, J.M. Zollner, N. Haeberlen, C. Weiss, Asynchronous real-time framework for knowledge-based intersection assistance, in 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, New York, 2011), pp. 1680–1685

    Google Scholar 

  16. M. Hulsen, J.M. Zollner, C. Weiss, Traffic intersection situation description ontology for advanced driver assistance, in 2011 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (IEEE, New York, 2011), pp. 993–999

    Google Scholar 

  17. Hummel, W. Thiemann, I. Lulcheva, Scene understanding of urban road intersections with description logic, in Dagstuhl Seminar Proceedings (Schloss Dagstuhl-Leibniz-Zentrum fr Informatik, Dagstuhl, 2008)

    Google Scholar 

  18. C.G. Keller, C. Sprunk, C. Bahlmann, J. Giebel, G. Baratoff, Real-time recognition of U.S. speed signs, in 2008 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2008), pp. 518–523

    Google Scholar 

  19. R. Kohlhaas, T. Bittner, T. Schamm, J.M. Zollner, Semantic state space for high-level maneuver planning in structured traffic scenes, in 2014 IEEE 17th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, New York, 2014), pp. 1060–1065

    Google Scholar 

  20. L. Lamard, R. Chapuis, J.-P. Boyer, Multi target tracking with CPHD filter based on asynchronous sensors, in 2013 16th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (IEEE, New York, 2013), pp. 892–898

    Google Scholar 

  21. D. Maquin, J. Ragot, Diagnostic des systèmes linéaires (Lavoisier, Paris, 2000)

    Google Scholar 

  22. D.L McGuinness, F. Van Harmelen et al., Owl web ontology language overview. W3C Recommendation 10 (10), 2004 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  23. B. Motik, R. Shearer, I. Horrocks, Optimized reasoning in description logics using hypertableaux, in Automated Deduction–CADE-21 (Springer, Berlin, 2007), pp. 67–83

    Google Scholar 

  24. F. Moutarde, A. Bargeton, A. Herbin, L. Chanussot, Robust on-vehicle real-time visual detection of American and European speed limit signs, with a modular traffic signs recognition system, in 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (2007), pp. 1122–1126

    Google Scholar 

  25. M. Platho, J. Eggert, Deciding what to inspect first: incremental situation assessment based on information gain, in 2012 15th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, New York, 2012), pp. 888–893

    Google Scholar 

  26. M. Platho, H.-M. Gros, J. Eggert, Predicting velocity profiles of road users at intersections using configurations, in 2013 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IV) (IEEE, New York, 2013), pp. 945–951

    Google Scholar 

  27. E. Pollard, P. Morignot, F. Nashashibi, An ontology-based model to determine the automation level of an automated vehicle for co-driving, in 2013 16th International Conference on Information Fusion (FUSION) (IEEE, New York, 2013), pp. 596–603

    Google Scholar 

  28. V. Popovic, B. Vasic, Review of hazard analysis methods and their basic characteristics. FME Trans. 36 (4), 181–187 (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  29. Protégé website, http://protege.stanford.edu/. Accessed 29 April 2015

  30. Protégé Wiki website, http://protegewiki.stanford.edu/wiki/webprotege. Accessed 29 April 2015

  31. Protobuf Website, https://developers.google.com/protocol-buffers/. Accessed 29 April 2015

  32. R. Regele, Using ontology-based traffic models for more efficient decision making of autonomous vehicles, in Fourth International Conference on Autonomic and Autonomous Systems, 2008. ICAS 2008 (IEEE, New York, 2008), pp. 94–99

    Google Scholar 

  33. R.A. Retting, B.N. Persaud, P.E. Garder, D. Lord, Crash and injury reduction following installation of roundabouts in the united states. Am. J. Public Health 91 (4), 628–631 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. T. Schamm, J.M. Zollner, A model-based approach to probabilistic situation assessment for driver assistance systems, in 2011 14th International IEEE Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC) (IEEE, New York, 2011), pp. 1404–1409

    Google Scholar 

  35. L. Serafini, A. Tamilin, Local tableaux for reasoning in distributed description logics, in Proceedings of the International Workshop on Description Logics, DL, vol. 4 (2004), pp. 100–109

    Google Scholar 

  36. R.M. Smullyan, First-Order Logic (Courier Corporation, North Chelmsford, MA, 1995)

    Google Scholar 

  37. S. Vacek, T. Gindele, J.M. Zollner, R. Dillmann, Situation classification for cognitive automobiles using case-based reasoning, in 2007 IEEE Intelligent Vehicles Symposium (IEEE, New York, 2007), pp. 704–709

    Google Scholar 

  38. R. Wang, H.J. Ruskin, R. Wang, H.J. Ruskin, Modeling traffic flow at a single lane urban roundabout. Comput. Phys. Commun. 147, 570–576 (2002). Proceedings of the Europhysics Conference on Computational Physics Computational Modeling and Simulation of Complex Systems

    Google Scholar 

  39. L. Zhao, R. Ichise, S. Mita, Y. Sasaki, An ontology-based intelligent speed adaptation system for autonomous cars, in Semantic Technology (Springer, Berlin, 2014), pp. 397–413

    Google Scholar 

  40. C. Zinoune, P. Bonnifait, J. Ibanez-Guzman, Sequential FDIA for autonomous integrity monitoring of navigation maps on board vehicles. IEEE Trans. Intell. Transp. Syst. 17 (1), 143–155 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alexandre Armand .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Armand, A., Ibanez-Guzman, J., Zinoune, C. (2017). Digital Maps for Driving Assistance Systems and Autonomous Driving. In: Watzenig, D., Horn, M. (eds) Automated Driving. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31895-0_9

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31895-0_9

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31893-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31895-0

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics