Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The New Spirit of Managerialism

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
The Changing Epistemic Governance of European Education

Part of the book series: Educational Governance Research ((EGTU,volume 3))

Abstract

This chapter ‘The New Spirit of Managerialism’ focuses on the effects of European governance technologies on the academic profession. These technologies, whether they concern knowledge production, quality standards or evidence, support the development of a new spirit of academic capitalism which penetrates the academic world through New Public Management. This new managerial regime shifts the trials instituted by the academic tradition by drawing the figures of a new professionalism and promoting two ideal types: the expert and the entrepreneur. These new academic work conventions, elaborated from the criticism addressed to the profession, give rise to trends which undermine the collegial and corporatist model considered as unadjusted to a global world.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Abreu, M., Grinevich, V., Hughes, A., & Kitson, M. (2009). Knowledge exchange between academics and the business. Public and Third Sectors UK Innovation Research Centre. http://eprints.soton.ac.uk/357117/1/AcademicSurveyReport.pdf

  • Arbo, P., & Benneworth, P. (2007). Understanding the regional contribution of higher education institutions: A literature review (OECD education working papers, Vol. 9). Paris: OECD Publishing.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baldini, N., Grimaldi, R., & Sobrero, M. (2006). Institutional changes and the commercialization of academic knowledge: A study of Italian universities’ patenting activities between 1965 and 2002. Research Policy, 35, 518–532.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2008). New philanthropy, new networks and new governance in education. Political Studies, 56(4), 747–765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ball, S. J. (2012). Global Education Inc.: New policy networks and the neo-liberal imaginary. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Barsony, J. (2003). Towards the entrepreneurial university. In SEFI 2003 conference-global engineer: Education and training for mobility. European Society for Engineering Education. http://www.sefi.be/wp-content/papers2003/sefi-f57.pdf

  • Bass, B., & Riggio, R. E. (2008). Transformational leadership. London: Taylor and Francis.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, D. (1960). The end of ideology (Vol. 3). New York: Free Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Benner, M., & Sandström, U. (2000). Institutionalizing the triple helix: Research funding and norms in the academic system. Research Policy, 29(2), 291–301.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blackmore, P., & Blackwell, R. (2006). Strategic leadership in academic development. Studies in Higher Education, 31(03), 373–387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I. (2005). Organizing higher education in a knowledge society. Higher Education, 49(1–2), 31–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Henkel, M. (2005). Governing knowledge (Vol. 9). London: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Lange, S. (2010). Competition and leadership as drivers in German and Norwegian university reforms. Higher Education Policy, 23(2), 173–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., & Michelsen, S. (2013). Comparing HE policies in Europe. Higher Education, 65(1), 113–133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bleiklie, I., Enders, J., Lepori, B., & Musselin, C. (2011). New public management, network governance and the university as a changing professional organization. The Ashgate Research Companion to New Public Management, 16, 161–176.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boer, H. de., & Goedegebuure, L. (2009). The changing nature of the academic deanship. Leadership, 5(3), 347–364.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2008). Tensions in higher education leadership: Towards a multi-level model of leadership practice. Higher Education Quarterly, 62(4), 19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolden, R., Petrov, G., & Gosling, J. (2009). Distributed leadership in higher education: Rhetoric and reality. Educational Management Administration Leadership, 37(2), 257–277.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Chiapello, E. (2005). The new spirit of capitalism. London: Verso.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2006). On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boucher, G., Conway, C., & Van der Meer, E. (2003). Tiers of engagement by universities in their region’s development. Regional Studies, 37, 887–897.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo academicus. Stanford: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Braun, G., & Diensberg, C. (Eds.), (2007). Cultivating entrepreneurial regions-cases and studies from the network project’ baltic entrepreneurship partners’ (BEPART). Rostock: Univ.-Bibliothek, Schriftentausch.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bryman, A. (2009). Effective leadership in higher education. London: Leadership Foundation for Higher Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burgoyne, J., Mackness, J., & Williams, S. (2009). Literature review: Baseline study of leadership development in higher education. Lancaster: Lancaster University.

    Google Scholar 

  • CEL. (2006). World-class leadership for global excellence. CEL http://www.centreforexcellence.org.uk

  • CEL. (2007). Leadership kills for governance. 2008–2009, programme and support guide. CEL http://www.centreforexcellence.org.uk

  • CEL. (2008). Research on diversity and governance in the FE sector recommendations and action plan. CEL http://www.centreforexcellence.org.uk.

  • Chapple, W., Lockett, A., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2004) Assessing the relative performance of UK university technology transfer offices: Parametric and non-parametric evidence. Department of economics, rensselaer polytechnic institute. Working papers in economics, No 0423. Source: http://www.rpi.edu/dept/economics/www/workingpapers

  • Charles, D. (2003). Universities and territorial development: Reshaping the regional role of UK universities. Local Economy, 18(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, D. (2006). Universities as key knowledge infrastructures in regional innovation systems. Innovation, 19(1), 117–130.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chitty, C. (1989). Towards a new education system: The victory of the new right? London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1983). The contradictions of change in academic systems [1]. Higher Education, 12(1), 101–116.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (1998). Creating entrepreneurial universities: Organizational pathways of transformation. Issues in higher education. New York: Elsevier Science.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark, B. R. (2004). Sustaining change in universities: Continuities in case studies and concepts. Maidenhead: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., & Newman, J. (1997). The managerial state. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Clarke, J., Gewirtz, S., & McLaughlin, E. (Eds.). (2000). New managerialism, new welfare? London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Collinson, D., & Collinson, M. (2009). ‘Blended Leadership’: Employee perspectives on effective leadership in the UK further education sector. Leadership, 5(3), 365–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Communication from the European Commission. (2003). The role of the universities in the Europe of knowledge (pp. 58). Brussels: COM (2003).

    Google Scholar 

  • Communication from the Commission. (2005). Mobilising the brainpower of Europe: Enabling universities to make their full contribution to the Lisbon strategy. Brussels: European Commission.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daumard, P. (2001). Enterprise culture and university culture. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 67–75 OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davies, J. L. (2001). The emergence of entrepreneurial cultures in European Universities. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 25–45 OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (1998). “New managerialism” and higher education: The management of performances and cultures in universities in the United Kingdom. International Studies in Sociology of Education, 8(1), 47–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R. (2001). Globalisation, new managerialism, academic capitalism and entrepreneurialism in universities: Is the local dimension still important? Comparative Education, 37(1), 7–20.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., & Brehony, K. J. (2005). Management as ideology: The case of ‘new managerialism’ in higher education. Oxford Review of Education, 31(2), 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deem, R., Hillyard, S., & Reed, M. (2007). Knowledge, higher education, and the new managerialism: The changing management of UK universities. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Dooley, L., & Kirk, D. (2007). University-industry collaboration: Grafting the entrepreneurial paradigm onto academic structures. European Journal of Innovation Management, 10(3), 316–332.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dulewicz, V. (2000). Emotional intelligence. The key to successful corporate leadership. Journal of General Management, 25, 1–15.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunleavy, P., & Hood, C. (1994). From old public administration to new public management. Public Money and Management, 14(3), 9–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elias, N. (1983). The court society (E. Jephcott, Trans.). New York: Pantheon Books, 8, 55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Epitropaki, O. (2001). What is transformational leadership. Sheffield: Institute of Work Psychology.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (1997). The entrepreneurial university and the emergence of democratic corporatism. In H. Etzkowitz & L. Leydesdorff (Eds.), Universities and the global knowledge economy: A triple helix of university-industry-government relations (pp. 141–152). London: Cassell.

    Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2004). The evolution of the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Technology and Globalisation, 1(1), 64–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzkowitz, H. (2008). The triple helix. University– industry – Government, innovation in action. London: Routledge.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • European Commission. (2006). Delivering on the modernisation agenda for universities: Education, research and innovation. Communication from the commission to the council and the European Parliament, COM (2006) 208 Final.

    Google Scholar 

  • European Union. (2010). The EU contribution to the European higher education area. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2003). The sociological analysis of professionalism occupational change in the modern world. International Sociology, 18(2), 395–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2009). New professionalism and new public management: Changes, continuities and consequences. Comparative Sociology, 8(2), 247–266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evetts, J. (2011). A new professionalism? Challenges and opportunities. Current Sociology, 59(4), 406–422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferlie, E., Musselin, C., & Andresani, G. (2008). The steering of higher education systems: A public management perspective. Higher Education, 56(3), 325–348.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., & Hannon, P. (2006). Towards the entrepreneurial university. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 4(1), 73–110.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibb, A., Haskins, G., & Robertson, I. (2009). Leading the entrepreneurial university. The paper published in cooperation with NCGE & Oxford University’s Said Business School.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gibbons, M., Limoges, C., Nowotny, H., Schwartzman, S., Scott, P., & Trow, M. (1994). The new production of knowledge, the dynamics of science and research in contemporary societies. London: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffee, R., & Jones, G. (2007). Leading clever people. Harvard Business Review, Reprint R0703D.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gonzales, L. D., & Núñez, A. M. (2014). Ranking regimes and the production of knowledge in academia: (Re) shaping faculty work? Education Policy Analysis Archives, 22, 31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gronn, P. (2009). Leadership configurations. Leadership, 5(3), 381–394.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta, V., MacMillan, I. C., & Surie, G. (2004). Entrepreneurial leader leadership; developing and measuring a cross-cultural construct. Journal of Business Venture, 19, 241–260.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackett, S. M., & Dilts, D. M. (2004). A systematic review of business incubation research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 29(1), 55–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. (1970). Exit, voice and loyalty: Responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman, A. O. (1991). The rhetoric of reaction. Perversity. Futility, jeopardy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. (1991). A public management for all seasons. Public Administration, 69(1), 3–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C. C., & Margetts, H. Z. (2007). The tools of government in the digital age. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hood, C., & Peters, G. (2004). The middle aging of new public management: Into the age of paradox? Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 14(3), 267–282.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hughes, A. (2003). Knowledge transfer, entrepreneurship and economic growth: Some reflections and implications for policy in the Netherlands. ESRC Centre for Business Research, University of Cambridge.

    Google Scholar 

  • IHEP. (2007). Regional universities and civil society development. A symposium and study tour. Washington, DC: IHEP.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, M., Lundqvist, M., & Hellsmark, H. (2003). Entrepreneurial transformations in the Swedish University system: The case of Chalmers University of technology. Research Policy, 32(2003), 1555–1568.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jongbloed, B., Enders, J., & Salerno, C. (2008). Higher education and its communities: Interconnections, interdependencies and a research agenda. Higher Education, 56(3), 303–324.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kauppinen, I. (2012). Towards transnational academic capitalism. Higher Education, 64(4), 543–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kilgour, F. G. (1992, Winter). Entrepreneurial leadership. Library Trends, 40(3), 457–744.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby, D. A. (2006). Creating entrepreneurial universities in the UK: Applying entrepreneurship theory to practice. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 31(5), 599–603.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuratko, D. F., & Hornsby, J. S. (1999). Corporate entrepreneurial leadership for the 21st century. Journal of Leadership and Organisational Studies, 5(2), 27–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kweik, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurship vs. changing governance and institutional management, structures at European Universities. Policy Futures in Education, 6(6), 757–770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laredo, P. (2007). Revisiting the third mission of universities: Toward a renewed categorization of university activities? Higher Education Policy, 20(4), 441–456.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeroni, M., & Piccaluga, A. (2003). Towards the entrepreneurial university. Local Economy, 18(1), 38–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Y. S. (1996). Technology transfer and the research university: A search for the boundaries of university-industry collaboration. Research Policy, 25(1996), 843–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewis, T., Marginson, S., & Snyder, I. (2005). The network university? Technology, culture and organisational complexity in contemporary higher education. Higher Education Quarterly, 59(1), 56–75.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leydesdorff, L., & Meyer, M. (2003). The triple helix of university-industry-government relations. Scientometrics, 58(2), 191–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Link, A. N., & Scott, J. T. (2006). US university research parks. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 25(1–2), 43–55.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S. (2006). Dynamics of national and global competition in higher education. Higher Education, 52(1), 1–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Considine, M. (2000). The enterprise universities: Power, governance and reinvention in Australia. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marginson, S., & Rhoades, G. (2002). Beyond national states, markets, and systems of higher education: A glonacal agency heuristic. Higher Education, 43(3), 281–309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McInnis, C. (2001). Promoting academic expertise and authority in an entrepreneurial culture. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 45–57. OECD.

    Google Scholar 

  • McLaughlin, K., Osborne, S. P., & Ferlie, E. (2002). New public management: Current trends and future prospects. London: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mendoza, P., & Berger, J. B. (2005). Patenting productivity and intellectual property policies at research I universities: An exploratory comparative study. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 13(4). http://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ846515.pdf

  • Middlehurst, R., Goreham, H., & Woodfield, S. (2009). Why research leadership in higher education? Exploring contributions from the UK’s leadership foundation for higher education. Leadership, 5(3), 311–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mohrman, K., Ma, W., & Baker, D. (2008). The research university in transition: The emerging global model. Higher Education Policy, 21(1), 5–27.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mollas-Gallart, J., Salter, A., Patel, P., Scott, A., & Duran, X. (2002). Measuring third stream activities: Final report to the Russell Group of Universities. Brighton: SPRU. Available at http://www2.lse.ac.uk/economicHistory/Research/CCPN/pdf/russell_report_thirdStream.Pdf

  • Musselin, C. (2013). Redefinition of the relationships between academics and their university. Higher Education, 65(1), 25–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newble, D., & Cannon, R. (2013). Handbook for teachers in universities and colleges. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicolaou, N., & Birley, S. (2003). Social networks in organizational emergence: The university spinout phenomenon. Management Science, 49(12), 1702–1725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nowotny, H., Scott, P., & Gibbons, M. (2003). Mode 2 revisited: The new production of knowledge. Minerva, 41, 179–194.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Shea, R. P., Allen, T. J., Morse, K. P., O’Gorman, C., & Roche, F. (2007). Delineating the anatomy of an entrepreneurial university: The Massachusetts Institute of Technology experience. R&d Management, 37(1), 1–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • OECD. (2004, August). The internationalisation of higher education. Policy Brief. Cambridge, MA: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paradeise, C., Reale, E., Bleiklie, I., & Ferlie, E. (Eds.). (2009). University governance. The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollitt, C., & Bouckaert, G. (2004). Public management reform: A comparative analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1994). The audit explosion. London: Demos.

    Google Scholar 

  • Power, M. (1997). The audit society: Rituals of verification. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rhoades, G. (1998). Managed professionals: Unionized faculty and restructuring academic labor. Albany: SUNY Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rothaermel, F. T., & Hess, A. M. (2007). Building dynamic capabilities: Innovation driven by individual-, firm-, and network-level effects. Organization Science, 18(6), 898–921.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schein, E. H. (1992). Organisational culture and leadership. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development: An inquiry into profits, capital, credit, interest, and the business cycle (Vol. 55). New Brunswick: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, G., Coates, H., & Anderson, M. (2008). Academic leadership capabilities for Australian higher education. Sydney: Australian Learning and Teaching Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Segal, N. S. (1985). The Cambridge phenomenon. Regional Studies, 19(6), 563–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2000). Strategic management in European universities in an age of increasing institutional self-reliance. Tertiary Education Management, 6, 93–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shattock, M. (2010). Managing successful universities. Maidenhead: McGraw-Hill Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shinn, T. (2002). The triple helix and new production of knowledge: Prepackaged thinking on science and technology. Social Studies of Sciences, 32, 599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shore, C., & Wright, S. (1999). Audit culture and anthropology: Neoliberalism in British higher education. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 5(4), 557–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Siegel, D. S., Waldman, D., & Link, A. (2003). Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: An exploratory study. Research Policy, 32(1), 27–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Cantwell, B. (2011). Transatlantic moves to the market: The United States and the European Union. Higher Education, 63(5), 583–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Leslie, L. L. (1997). Academic capitalism. Politics, policies and the Entrepreneurial University. London: John Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slaughter, S., & Rhoades, G. (2004). Academic capitalism and the new economy: Markets, state, and higher education. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith, H. L. (2007). Universities, innovation, and territorial development: A review of the evidence. Environment and Planning C, 25(1), 98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solé-Parellada, F., Coll-Bertran, J., & Navarro-Hernández, T. (2001). University design and development. Higher Education in Europe, 26(3), 341–350.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Soley, L. C. (1995). Leasing the ivory tower: The corporate takeover of academia. Boston: South End Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strathern, M. (2000). Audit cultures: Anthropological studies in accountability, ethics, and the academy. London: Psychology Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Todorovic, W. Z., McNaughton, R. B., & Guild, P. D. (2005). Making university departments more entrepreneurial: The perspective from within. The International Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation, 6(2), 115–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. A. (1989). Creating innovations in higher education. European Journal of Education, 24(3), 249–270.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van Vught, F. A., & Westerheijden, D. F. (1994). Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education. Higher Education, 28(3), 355–371.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchio, R. P. (2003). Entrepreneurship and leadership: Common trends and common threads. Human Resources Management Review, 13(2003), 303–327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wasser, H. (1990). Changes in the European university: From traditional to entrepreneurial. Higher Education Quarterly, 44(2), 110–122.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weber, M. (2002). The protestant ethic and the spirit of capitalism: And other writings. London: Penguin Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice: Learning, meaning and identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, P. K., Ho, Y. P., & Singh, A. (2007). Towards an “entrepreneurial university” model to support knowledge-based economic development: The case of the National University of Singapore. World Development, 35(6), 941–958.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ylinenpää, H. (2001). Science parks, clusters and regional development. Luleå University of Technology; Department of Business Administration and Social Sciences, Division of Industrial Organization & Small Business Academy. Luleå University of Technology: AR 2001: 48. Paper presented at 31st European small business seminar in Dublin, 12–14 September.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zaharia, S. E., & Gibert, E. (2005). The entrepreneurial university in the knowledge society. Higher Education in Europe, 30(1), 31–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, C. (2008). Emergence of the entrepreneurial university in evolution of the triple helix. Journal of Technology and Management of China, 3(1), 109–126.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Research Unit CNRS SAGE, University of Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France

    Romuald Normand

Authors
  1. Romuald Normand
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Normand, R. (2016). The New Spirit of Managerialism. In: The Changing Epistemic Governance of European Education. Educational Governance Research, vol 3. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31776-2_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31776-2_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31774-8

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31776-2

  • eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation