Abstract
This chapter provides an overview of recent findings showing that stereotypical gendered beliefs about leadership underlie the glass cliff phenomenon. We summarise a series of studies demonstrating that the availability of social resources (i.e., social support from higher management and relevant stakeholders) during an organisational crisis impacts on the salience of these gendered leadership beliefs. In consequence, the availability of such resources contribute to the appointment of women into leadership positions, the precariousness of these positions, and the way men and women themselves evaluate the positions. Moreover, we review the literature on the appointment of women into precarious leadership positions across national cultures that differ in their endorsement of gendered leadership beliefs. This literature suggests that the glass cliff phenomenon is observed globally, yet is complex, subtle and multiple-determined.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abrams, D., de Moura, G. R., Marques, J., & Hutchison, P. (2008). Innovation credit: When can leaders oppose their group’s norms? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 662–678. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.95.3.662.
Acker, J. (2009). From glass ceiling to inequality regimes. Sociologie du Travail, 51, 199–217. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.soctra.2009.03.004.
Barreto, M., Ryan, M., & Schmitt, M. (2009). The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Brown, E. R., Diekman, A. B., & Schneider, M. C. (2011). A change will do us good: Threats diminish typical preferences for male leaders. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 37, 930–941. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0146167211403322.
Bruckmüller, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2010). The glass cliff: When and why women are selected as leaders in crisis contexts. British Journal of Social Psychology, 49, 433–451. http://dx.doi.org/10.1348/014466609X466594.
Bruckmüller, S., Ryan, M. K., Rink, F., & Haslam, A. (2014). Beyond the glass ceiling: Exploring and explaining the glass cliff in order to inform organizational policy. Social Issues and Policy Review, 8, 202–232. doi:10.1111/sipr.12006.
Carli, L. L. (1990). Gender, language, and influence. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 59, 941–951. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0022-3514.59.5.941.
Cartwright, S., & Gale, A. (1995). Project management: Different gender, different culture? A discussion on gender and organizational culture – Part 2. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 16, 12–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/01437739510089058.
Desvaux, G., Devillard-Hoellinger, S., & Baumgarten, P. (2007). Women matter: Gender diversity, a corporate performance driver. New York: McKinsey & Company.
Devillard, S., Sancier, S., Werner, C., Maller, I., & Kossoff, C. (2013). Women matter 2013. Gender diversity in top management: Moving corporate culture, moving boundaries. Paris: McKinsey & Company.
Diekman, A. B., & Eagly, A. H. (2000). Stereotypes as dynamic constructs: Women and men of the past, present, and future. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 26, 1171–1188. doi:10.1177/0146167200262001.
Eagly, A. H., & Karau, S. J. (2002). Role congruity theory of prejudice toward female leaders. Psychological Review, 109, 573–598. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037//0033-295X.109.3.573.
Eagly, A. H., & Sczesny, S. (2009). Stereotypes about women, men, and leaders: Have times changed? In M. Barreto, M. K. Ryan, & M. T. Schmitt (Eds.), The glass ceiling in the 21st century: Understanding barriers to gender equality (pp. 21–48). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Elacqua, T. C., Beehr, T. A., Hansen, C. P., & Webster, J. (2009). Managers’ beliefs about the glass ceiling: Interpersonal and organizational factors. Psychology of Women Quarterly, 33, 285–294. doi:10.1111/j.1471-6402.2009.01501.x.
Ellemers, N., Rink, F., Derks, B., & Ryan, M. K. (2012). Women in high places: When and why promoting women into top positions can harm them individually or as a group (and how to prevent this). Research in Organizational Behavior, 32, 163–187. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.riob.2012.10.003.
Friedman, S. D., & Saul, K. (1991). A leader’s wake: Organizational members’ reactions to CEO succession. Journal of Management, 17, 619–643. doi:10.1177/014920639101700306.
Gartzia, L., Ryan, M. K., Balluerka, N., & Aritzeta, A. (2012). Think crisis-think female: Further evidence. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 21, 603–628.
Hargie, O., Stapleton, K., & Tourish, D. (2010). Interpretations of CEO public apologies for the banking crisis: Attributions of blame and avoidance of responsibility. Organization, 17, 721–742. doi:10.1177/1350508410367840.
Haslam, S. A., Reicher, S. D., & Platow, M. J. (2011). The new psychology of leadership: Identity, influence, and power. New York: Psychology Press.
Haslam, S. A., & Ryan, M. K. (2008). The road to the glass cliff: Differences in the perceived suitability of men and women for leadership positions in succeeding and failing organizations. Leadership Quarterly, 19, 530–546. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2008.07.011.
Heilman, M. E. (2001). Description and prescription: How gender stereotypes prevent women’s ascent up the organizational ladder. Journal of Social Issues, 57, 657–674. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00234.
Hofstede, G. (1998). Masculinity and femininity: The taboo dimension of national cultures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G. (2000). Whatever happened to masculinity and femininity? Cross-Cultural Psychology Bulletin, 34, 14–19.
Hofstede, G. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions and organizations across nations (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Hofstede, G., Hofstede, G. J., & Minkov, M. (2010). Cultures and organizations: Software of the mind: Intercultural cooperation and its importance for survival. London: McGraw-Hill.
Ibarra, H., Carter, N. M., & Silva, C. (2010). Why men still get more promotions then women. Harvard Business Review, 88, 80–85.
Jarrett, C. (2010, September 15). Why are women chosen to lead organizations in a crisis? The British Psychological Society. Retrieved from http://bps-research-digest.blogspot.com/2010/09/why-are-women-chosen-to-lead.html
Judge, E. (2003, November 11). Women on board: Help or hindrance? The Times, 21.
Kaplan, S., & Minton, B. (1994). Appointments of outsiders to Japanese boards: Determinants and implications for managers. Administrative Science Quarterly, 37, 282–301. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(94)90025-6.
Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2005). Stereotype threat in men on a test of social sensitivity. Sex Roles, 52, 489–496. doi:10.1007/s11199-005-3714-x.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557.
Lam, K. C. K., McGuinness, P. B., & Vieito, J. P. (2014). CEO gender, executive compensation and firm performance in Chinese‐listed enterprises. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal , 21, 1136fic-B. doi:10.1016/j.pacfin.2012.08.006
Lampitoc, R. R., & Ignacio, L. B. R. (2014). Women in local legislation, Antorcha, 1, open access.
Liff, S., & Ward, K. (2001). Distorted views through the glass ceiling: The construction of women’s understandings of promotion and senior management positions. Gender, Work and Organization, 8, 19–36. doi:10.1111/1468-0432.00120.
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A metaanalysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137, 616–642. doi:10.1037/a0023557.
Mulcahy, M., & Linehan, C. (2013). Females and precarious board positions: Further evidence of the glass cliff. British Journal of Management, 4, 1–14. doi:10.1111/1467-8551.12046.
Pearson, C. M., & Clair, J. A. (1998). Reframing crisis management. The Academy of Management Review, 23, 59–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/259099.
Pillai, R. (1996). Crisis and the emergence of charismatic leadership in groups: An experimental investigation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 26, 543–562. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1559-1816.1996.tb02730.x.
Rink, F., Kane, A., Ellemers, N., & Van der Vegt, G. S. (2013). Team receptivity to newcomers: Five decades of evidence and future research themes. The Academy of Management Annals, 7, 1–47. doi:10.1080/19416520.2013.766405.
Rink, F., Ryan, M. K., & Stoker, J. I. (2012). Influence in times of crisis: Exploring how social and financial resources affect men’s and women’s evaluations of glass cliff positions. Psychological Science, 23, 1306–1313. doi:10.1177/0956797612453115.
Rink, F., Ryan, M. K., & Stoker, J. I. (2013). Social resources at a time of crisis: How gender stereotypes inform gendered leader evaluations. European Journal of Social Psychology, 43(5), 381–392. doi:10.1002/ejsp.1954.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. (2007). The glass cliff: Exploring the dynamics surrounding the appointment of women to precarious leadership positions. The Academy of Management Review, 32, 549–572. doi:10.2307/20159315.
Ryan, M. K., & Haslam, S. A. (2005). The glass cliff: Evidence that women are over-represented in precarious leadership positions. British Journal of Management, 16, 81–90. doi:10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00433.x.
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., Kulich, C., & Atkins, C. (2007). Opting out or pushed off the edge? The glass cliff and the precariousness of women’s leadership positions. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 266–279. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1751-9004.2007.00007.x.
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., Hersby, M. D., & Bongiorno, R. (2011). Think crisis-think female: Glass cliffs and contextual variation in the think manager-think male stereotype. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96, 470–484. doi:10.1037/a0022133.
Ryan, M. K., Haslam, S. A., & Postmes, T. (2007). Reactions to the glass cliff: Gender differences in the explanations for the precariousness of women's leadership positions. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 20, 182–197. doi:10.1108/09534810710724748.
Schein, V. E. (1973). The relationship between sex role stereotypes and requisite management characteristics. Journal of Applied Psychology, 57, 95–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/h0037128.
Stoker, J. I. (2007). Sekse en leiderschap: Over het feminiene voordeel en het masculiene vooroordeel. M&O, 1, 5–17.
Trop, J. (2014, April 30). Is Mary Barra standing on a glass cliff? The New Yorker. Retrieved from http://www.newyorker.com/online/blogs/currency/2014/04/mary-barra-general-motors-ceo-glass-cliff.html
Van den Brink, M., Benschop, Y., & Jansen, W. (2010). Transparency in academic recruitment: A problematic tool for gender equality? Organizational Studies, 31, 1459–1483.
Van Oostrum, J., & Rabbie, J. M. (1995). Intergroup competition and cooperation within autocratic and democratic management regimes. Small Group Research, 26, 269–294. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1046496495262006.
Van Vugt, M., De Cremer, D., & Janssen, D. P. (2007). Gender differences in cooperation and competition: The male-warrior hypothesis. Psychological Science, 18, 19–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2007.01842.x.
Ward, K. B., & Mueller, C. W. (1985). Sex differences in earnings: The influence of industrial sector, authority hierarchy, and human capital variables. Work and Occupations, 12, 437–463. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0730888485012004003.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Rink, F., Ryan, M.K., Stoker, J.I. (2016). Understanding the Precariousness of the Glass Cliff: An Examination of Social Resources and Global Context. In: Gervais, R., Millear, P. (eds) Exploring Resources, Life-Balance and Well-Being of Women Who Work in a Global Context. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31736-6_6
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31736-6_6
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31734-2
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31736-6
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)