Advertisement

Basic Ideas in Efficiency Measurement for Network Systems

  • Chiang Kao
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 240)

Abstract

In measuring the efficiency of a DMU one can consider it as a closed plant, and the evaluator stands outside of the plant counting the quantity of materials and number of workers entering to manufacture products. After a period of time, the evaluator counts the quantity of products sent out of the plant. From the inputs consumed and the outputs produced, the evaluator is able to measure the relative efficiency of this plant compared to other similar plants via the conventional DEA technique. The plant in this case is treated as a black box, in that how the materials are converted into outputs inside the plant is not known.

References

  1. Avkiran NK, McCrystal A (2012) Sensitivity analysis of network DEA: NSBM versus NRAM. Appl Math Comput 218:11226–11239Google Scholar
  2. Castelli L, Pesenti R, Ukovich W (2010) A classification of DEA models when the internal structure of the decision making units is considered. Ann Oper Res 173:207–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1962) Programming with linear fractionals. Nav Res Logist Q 9:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen Y, Cook WD, Kao C, Zhu J (2013) Network DEA pitfalls: divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. Eur J Oper Res 226:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cook WD, Zhu J, Bi GB, Yang F (2010a) Network DEA: additive efficiency decomposition. Eur J Oper Res 207:1122–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cook WD, Liang L, Zhu J (2010b) Measuring performance of two-stage network structures by DEA: a review and future perspective. Omega 38:423–430CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996a) Intertemporal production frontiers: with dynamic DEA. Kluwer, BostonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Färe R, Grosskopf S (1996b) Productivity and intermediate products: a frontier approach. Econ Lett 50:65–70CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Socio Econ Plan Sci 34:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G (2007) Network DEA. In: Zhu J, Cook WD (eds) Modeling data irregularities and structural complexities in data envelopment analysis. Springer, New York, pp 209–240CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Färe R, Grosskopf S, Whittaker G (2014) Network DEA II. In: Cook WD, Zhu J (eds) Data envelopment analysis: a handbook on the modeling of internal structures and networks. Springer, New York, pp 307–327CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Färe R, Whittaker G (1995) An intermediate input model of dairy production using complex survey data. J Agric Econ 46:201–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fukuyama H, Mirdehghan SM (2012) Identifying the efficiency status in network DEA. Eur J Oper Res 220:85–92CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kao C (2009) Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis: a relational model. Eur J Oper Res 192:949–962CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Kao C (2013) Dynamic data envelopment analysis: a relational analysis. Eur J Oper Res 227:325–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kao C (2014a) Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis. In: Cook WD, Zhu J (eds) Data envelopment analysis: a handbook on the modeling of internal structures and networks. Springer, New York, pp 55–77CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Kao C (2014b) Efficiency decomposition in network data envelopment analysis with slacks-based measure. Omega 45:1–6CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Kao C (2014c) Network data envelopment analysis: a review. Eur J Oper Res 239:1–16CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kao C, Hwang SN (2010) Efficiency measurement for network systems: IT impact on firm performance. Decis Support Syst 48:437–446CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Lozano S (2015) Alternative SBM model for network DEA. Comput Ind Eng 82:33–40CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Manag Sci 45:1270–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Sexton TR, Lewis HF (2003) Two-stage DEA: an application to Major League Baseball. J Prod Anal 19:227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tone K, Tsutsui M (2009) Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur J Oper Res 197:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tone K, Tsutsui M (2014a) Dynamic DEA with network structure: a slacks-based measure approach. Omega 42:124–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Tone K, Tsutsui M (2014b) Slacks-based network DEA. In: Cook WD, Zhu J (eds) Data envelopment analysis: a handbook on the modeling of internal structures and networks. Springer, New York, pp 231–259CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Wang CH, Gopal S, Zionts S (1997) Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Ann Oper Res 73:191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiang Kao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Information ManagementNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations