Abstract
The DEA technique measures efficiency in a relative manner, in that the performances of the DMUs in a group are compared with each other. The efficient ones may not be efficient when compared with the DMUs of other groups. Similarly, the inefficient ones may become efficient when compared with those of other groups. The efficiency measures for DMUs of different groups are thus not comparable.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Abate M, Lijesen M, Pels E, Roelevelt A (2013) The impact of reliability on the productivity of railroad companies. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 51:41–49
Afsharian M, Heinz A (2015) The overall Malmquist index: a new approach for measuring productivity changes. Ann Oper Res 226:1–27
Aparicio J, Pastor JT, Zofio JL (2013) On the inconsistency of the Malmquist-Luenberger index. Eur J Oper Res 229:738–742
Arabi B, Munisamy S, Emrouznejad A (2015) A new slacks-based measure of Malmquist-Luenberger index in the presence of undesirable outputs. Omega 51:29–37
Asmild M, Tam F (2007) Estimating global frontier shifts and global Malmquist indices. J Prod Anal 27:137–148
Brennan S, Haelermans C, Ruggiero J (2014) Nonparametric estimation of education productivity incorporating nondiscretionary inputs with an application to Dutch schools. Eur J Oper Res 234:809–818
Briec W, Kerstens K (2009) Infeasibility and directional distance functions with application to the determinateness of the Luenberger productivity indicator. J Optim Theory Appl 141:55–73
Caves DW, Christensen LR, Diewert WE (1982) The economic theory of index numbers and the measurement of input, output, and productivity. Econometrica 50:1393–1414
Chambers RG, Chung Y, Färe R (1996) Benefit and distance functions. J Econ Theory 70:407–419
Chambers RG, Pope RD (1996) Aggregate productivity measures. Am J Agric Econ 78:1360–1365
Chang H, Choy HL, Cooper WW, Ruefli TW (2009) Using Malmquist indexes to measure changes in the productivity and efficiency of US accounting firms before and after the Sarbanes-Oxley Act. Omega 37:951–960
Chen Y, Du J, Huo J (2013) Super-efficiency based on a modified directional distance function. Omega 41:621–625
Chou YC, Shao BBM (2014) Total factor productivity growth in information technology services industries: a multi-theoretical perspective. Decis Support Syst 62:106–118
Chung YH, Färe R, Grosskopf S (1997) Productivity and undesirable outputs: a directional distance production approach. J Environ Manag 51:229–240
Färe R, Grosskopf S, Norris M, Zhang Z (1994) Productivity growth, technical progress, and efficiency change in industrialized countries. Am Econ Rev 84:66–83
Färe R, Primont D (2003) Luenberger productivity indicators: aggregation across firms. J Prod Anal 20:425–435
Ghulam Y, Jaffry S (2015) Efficiency and productivity of the cement industry: Pakistani experience of deregulation and privatization. Omega 54:101–115
Guzman I, Morrow S (2007) Measuring efficiency and productivity in professional football teams: evidence from the English Premier League. CEJOR 15:309–328
Iliyasu A, Mohamed ZA, Hashim M (2015) Productivity growth, technical change and efficiency change of the Malaysian cage fish farming: an application of Malmquist productivity index approach. Aquac Int 23:1013–1024
Johidi G, Razavyan S, Tohidnia S (2012) A global Malmquist productivity index using data envelopment analysis. J Oper Res Soc 63:72–78
Kao C (2000) Measuring the performance improvement of Taiwan forests after reorganization. For Sci 46:577–584
Kao C (2010) Malmquist productivity index based on common-weights DEA: the case of Taiwan forests after reorganization. Omega 38:484–491
Kao C, Liu ST (2014) Multi-period efficiency measurement in data envelopment analysis: the case of Taiwanese commercial banks. Omega 47:90–98
Kapelko M, Horta IM, Camanho AS, Lansink AO (2015) Measurement of input-specific productivity growth with an application to the construction industry in Spain and Portugal. Int J Prod Econ 166:64–71
Kapelko M, Lansink AO (2015) An international comparison of productivity change in the textile and clothing industry: a bootstrapped Malmquist index approach. Empir Econ 48:1499–1523
Kittelsen SAC, Winsnes BA, Anthun KS, Goude F, Hope O, Hakkinen U, Kalseth B, Kilsmark J, Medin E, Rehnberg C, Ratto H (2015) Decomposing the productivity differences between hospitals in the Nordic countries. J Prod Anal 43:281–293
Lansink AO, Stefanou S, Serra T (2015) Primal and dual dynamic Luenberger productivity indicators. Eur J Oper Res 241:555–563
Lee BL (2013) Productivity, technical and efficiency change in Singapore’s services sector, 2005 to 2008. Appl Econ 45:2023–2029
Lee CY, Johnson AL (2011) A decomposition of productivity change in the semiconductor manufacturing industry. Int J Prod Res 49:4761–4785
Luenberger DG (1992) Benefit functions and duality. J Math Econ 21:461–481
Mahlberg B, Sahoo BK (2011) Radial and non-radial decompositions of Luenberger productivity indicator with an illustrative application. Int J Prod Econ 131:721–726
Malmquist S (1953) Index numbers and indifference curves. Trabajos de Estatistica 4:209–242
Oh DH (2010) A global Malmquist-Luenberger productivity index. J Prod Anal 34:183–197
Pastor JT, Lovell CAK (2005) A global Malmquist productivity index. Econ Lett 88:266–271
Pastor JT, Lovell CAK (2007) Circularity of the Malmquist productivity index. Economic Theory 33:591–599
Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJ
Sun JR, Zhang J, Zhang JH, Ma JH, Zhang YL (2015) Total factor productivity assessment of tourism industry: evidence from China. Asia Pac J Tourism Res 20:280–294
Zhang N, Choi Y (2013) Total factor carbon emission performance of fossil fuel power plants in China: a metafrontier non-radial Malmquist index analysis. Energ Econ 40:549–559
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kao, C. (2017). Changes of Efficiency Over Time. In: Network Data Envelopment Analysis. International Series in Operations Research & Management Science, vol 240. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31718-2_8
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31718-2_8
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31716-8
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31718-2
eBook Packages: Business and ManagementBusiness and Management (R0)