Advertisement

Basic Two-Stage Systems

  • Chiang Kao
Chapter
Part of the International Series in Operations Research & Management Science book series (ISOR, volume 240)

Abstract

The simplest network structure is that of two divisions, in that the operations of the system are divided into two parts, performed by the two divisions. This type of system was first noticed by Charnes et al. (1986) in studying the performance of US Army recruitment. They found that army recruitment actually had two stages, creating awareness through advertising and signing contracts. To assess the impact of an input on the performance of the system, it is necessary to know the division that this input is associated with, so that the true effect of this input can be identified.

Keywords

Intermediate Product System Efficiency Constant Return Variable Return Scale Efficiency 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Akther S, Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2013) Estimating two-stage network slacks-based inefficiency: an application to Bangladesh banking. Omega 41:88–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Azadi M, Shabani A, Khodakarami M, Saen RF (2014) Planning in feasible region by two-stage target-setting DEA methods: an application in green supply chain management of public transportation service providers. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 70:324–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Cao X, Yang F (2011) Measuring the performance of Internet companies using a two-stage data envelopment analysis model. Enterprise Inform Syst 5:207–217CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Charnes A, Cooper WW (1962) Programming with linear fractionals. Nav Res Logist Q 9:181–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Charnes A, Cooper WW, Golany B, Halek R, Klopp G, Schmitz E, Thomas D (1986) Two-phase data envelopment analysis approaches to policy evaluation and management of army recruiting activities: tradeoffs between joint services and army advertising. Research Report CCS #532. Center for Cybernetic Studies, University of Texas-Austin, Austin, TXGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C, Zhu J, Yu JY, Noori H (2012) A new methodology for evaluating sustainable product design performance with two-stage network data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 221:348–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chen Y, Cook WD, Kao C, Zhu J (2013) Network DEA pitfalls: divisional efficiency and frontier projection under general network structures. Eur J Oper Res 226:507–515CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chen Y, Cook WD, Li N, Zhu J (2009a) Additive efficiency decomposition in two-stage DEA. Eur J Oper Res 196:1170–1176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen Y, Cook WD, Zhu J (2010) Deriving the DEA frontier for two-stage processes. Eur J Oper Res 202:138–142CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chen Y, Liang L, Zhu J (2009b) Equivalence in two-stage DEA approaches. Eur J Oper Res 193:600–604CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chen Y, Zhu J (2004) Measuring information technology’s indirect impact on firm performance. Inf Technol Manag 5:9–22CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chilingerian JA, Sherman DH (2004) Health care applications: from hospitals to physicians, from productive efficiency to quality frontiers. In: Cooper WW, Seiford LM, Zhu J (eds) Handbook of data envelopment analysis. Springer, Boston, pp 481–537Google Scholar
  13. Chiou YC, Lan LW, Yen BTH (2010) A joint measurement of efficiency and effectiveness for non-storable commodities: integrated data envelopment analysis approaches. Eur J Oper Res 201:477–489CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Chiu YH, Huang CW (2011) Evaluating the optimal occupancy rate, operational efficiency, and profitability efficiency of Taiwan’s international tourist hotels. Serv Ind J 31:2145–2163CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cron W, Sobol M (1983) The relationship between computerization and performance: a strategy for maximizing economic benefits of computerization. Inform Manag 6:171–181CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Du J, Liang L, Chen Y, Cook WD, Zhu J (2011) A bargaining game model for measuring performance of two-stage network structures. Eur J Oper Res 210:390–397CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Färe R, Grosskopf S (2000) Network DEA. Socio Econ Plan Sci 34:35–49CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Fukuyama H, Weber WL (2010) A slacks-based inefficiency measure for a two-stage system with bad outputs. Omega 38:398–409CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Ho CTB, Oh KB (2008) Measuring online stockbroking performance. Ind Manag Data Syst 108:988–1004CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Holod D, Lewis HF (2011) Resolving the deposit dilemma: a new DEA bank efficiency model. J Bank Financ 35:2801–2810CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Kao C, Hwang SN (2008) Efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis: an application to non-life insurance companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 185:418–429CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kao C, Hwang SN (2011) Decomposition of technical and scale efficiencies in two-stage production systems. Eur J Oper Res 211:515–519CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kao C, Hwang SN (2014) Multi-period efficiency and Malmquist productivity index in two-stage production systems. Eur J Oper Res 232:512–521CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kao C, Liu ST (2011) Efficiencies of two-stage systems with fuzzy data. Fuzzy Sets Syst 176:20–35CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keh HT, Chu SF (2003) Retail productivity and scale economies at the firm level: a DEA approach. Omega 31:75–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Keh HT, Chu SF, Xu JY (2006) Efficiency, effectiveness and productivity of marketing in services. Eur J Oper Res 170:265–276CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Lewis HF, Mallikarjun S, Sexton TR (2013) Unoriented two-stage DEA: the case of the oscillating intermediate products. Eur J Oper Res 229:529–539CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Liang L, Cook WD, Zhu J (2008) DEA models for two-stage processes: game approach and efficiency decomposition. Nav Res Logist 55:643–653CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lim S, Zhu J (2013) Integrated data envelopment analysis: global vs. local optimum. Eur J Oper Res 229:276–278CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Liu JS, Lu WM (2012) Network-based method for ranking of efficient units in two-stage DEA models. J Oper Res Soc 63:1153–1164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liu JS, Lu WM, Lin BJY (2010) DEA and ranking with the network-based approach: a case of R&D performance. Omega 38:453–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Liu ST (2011) A note on efficiency decomposition in two-stage data envelopment analysis. Eur J Oper Res 212:606–608CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Liu ST, Wang RT (2009) Efficiency measures of PCB manufacturing firms using relational two-stage data envelopment analysis. Expert Syst Appl 36:4935–4939CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liu WB, Zhou ZB, Ma CQ, Liu DB, Shen WF (2015) Two-stage DEA models with undesirable input-intermediate-outputs. Omega 56:74–87CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Lo SF (2010) Performance evaluation for sustainable business: a profitability and marketability framework. Corp Soc Responsib Environ Manag 17:311–319CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lo SF, Lu WM (2006) Does size matter? Finding the profitability and marketability benchmark of financial holding companies. Asia Pac J Oper Res 23:229–246CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lo SF, Lu WM (2009) An integrated performance evaluation of financial holding companies in Taiwan. Eur J Oper Res 198:341–350CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Lu WC (2009) The evolution of R&D efficiency and marketability: evidence from Taiwan’s IC‐design Industry. Asian J Tech Innovat 17:1–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Lu WM, Hung SW (2009) Evaluating profitability and marketability of Taiwan’s IC fabless firms: a DEA approach. J Sci Ind Res 68:851–857Google Scholar
  40. Lu WM, Kweh QL, Huang CL (2014) Intellectual capital and national innovation systems performance. Knowl-Based Syst 71:201–210CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lu WM, Wang WK, Hung SW, Lu ET (2012) The effects of corporate governance on airline performance: production and marketing efficiency perspectives. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 48:529–544CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Luo XM (2003) Evaluating the profitability and marketability efficiency of large banks: an application of data envelopment analysis. J Bus Res 56:627–635CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Narasimhan R, Talluri S, Das A (2004) Exploring flexibility and execution competencies of manufacturing firms. J Oper Manag 22:91–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Nash JF (1950) The bargaining problem. Econometrica 18:155–162CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Nash JF (1953) Two-person cooperative games. Econometrica 21:128–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Pastor JT, Ruiz JL, Sirvent I (1999) An enhanced DEA Russell graph efficiency measure. Eur J Oper Res 115:596–607CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rho S, An J (2007) Evaluating the efficiency of a two-stage production process using data envelopment analysis. Int Trans Oper Res 14:395–410CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sahoo BK, Zhu J, Tone K, Klemen BM (2014) Decomposing technical efficiency and scale elasticity in two-stage network DEA. Eur J Oper Res 233:584–594CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Saranga H, Moser R (2010) Performance evaluation of purchasing and supply management using value chain DEA approach. Eur J Oper Res 207:197–205CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Seiford LM, Zhu J (1999) Profitability and marketability of the top 55 US commercial banks. Manag Sci 45:1270–1288CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sexton TR, Lewis HF (2003) Two-stage DEA: an application to Major League Baseball. J Prod Anal 19:227–249CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Sheth C, Triantis K, Teodorović D (2007) Performance evaluation of bus routes: a provider and passenger perspective. Transport Res E Logist Transport Rev 43:453–478CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Shephard RW (1970) Theory of cost and production functions. Princeton University Press, Princeton, NJGoogle Scholar
  54. Tone K, Tsutsui M (2009) Network DEA: a slacks-based measure approach. Eur J Oper Res 197:243–252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Tsai HY, Wang AS (2010) The efficiency analysis of life insurance company in Taiwan: two-stage data envelopment analysis. J Test Eval 38:283–290Google Scholar
  56. Tsolas IE (2011) Relative profitability and stock market performance of listed commercial banks on the Athens Exchange: a non-parametric approach. IMA J Manag Math 22:323–342CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Tsolas IE (2013) Modeling profitability and stock market performance of listed construction firms on the Athens Exchange: two-stage DEA approach. J Constr Eng Manag 139:111–119CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wang CH, Gopal S, Zionts S (1997) Use of data envelopment analysis in assessing information technology impact on firm performance. Ann Oper Res 73:191–213CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wang K, Huang W, Wu J (2014) Efficiency measures of the Chinese commercial banking system using an additive two-stage DEA. Omega 44:5–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Wang YM, Chin KS (2010) Some alternative DEA models for two-stage process. Expert Syst Appl 37:8799–8808CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Yang C, Liu HM (2012) Managerial efficiency in Taiwan bank branches: a network DEA. Econ Model 29:450–461CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Yang F, Wu D, Liang L, Bi G, Wu DD (2011) Supply chain DEA: production possibility set and performance evaluation model. Ann Oper Res 185:195–211CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Yang Z (2006) A two-stage DEA model to evaluate the overall performance of Canadian life and health insurance companies. Math Comput Model 43:910–919CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Yu MM (2012) Performance assessment of transport services with the ERM-NDEA model: evidence from a domestic airline in Taiwan. Transp Plan Technol 35:697–714CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Zhou Z, Sun L, Yang W (2013) A bargaining game model for efficiency decomposition in the centralized model of two-stage systems. Comput Ind Eng 64:103–108CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhu J (2000) Multi-factor performance measure model with an application to Fortune 500 companies. Eur J Oper Res 123:105–124CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Zhu Z, Wang K, Zhang B (2014) Applying a network data envelopment analysis model to quantify the eco-efficiency of products: a case study of pesticides. J Clean Prod 69:67–73CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  • Chiang Kao
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Industrial and Information ManagementNational Cheng Kung UniversityTainanTaiwan

Personalised recommendations