Skip to main content

Tri-Generation at Big Box Stores and Warehouses

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Stopping Climate Change: the Case for Hydrogen and Coal

Part of the book series: Lecture Notes in Energy ((LNEN,volume 35))

  • 826 Accesses

Abstract

Building hydrogen fueling stations for fuel cell electric vehicles (FCEVs) will be challenging initially, before there are enough FCEVs on the road to make these fueling stations profitable. One solution to overcome this “chicken and egg” dilemma is to build distributed generation stations at big box stores or warehouses that supply three fuels: hydrogen, electricity and heat. These “Tri-Gen” stations can be profitable without any FCEVs in the neighborhood primarily by providing electricity and to the stores (heat revenues are minimal), thereby cutting fuel costs to pay for the station. Some stores and warehouses have also converted from battery-powered forklift trucks to fuel cell trucks powered by hydrogen. These forklift trucks consume more hydrogen than FCEVs, providing another source of income to early Tri-Gen stations. Many tens of warehouses already have enough fuel cell lift trucks to make Tri-Gen stations profitable; we do not have to wait for large-scale FCEV sales to begin large scale production of Tri-Gen stations. And even if building Tri-Gen stations at remote warehouses with fuel cell fork lift trucks are not close to clusters of early FCEVs, these warehouse Tri-Gen stations will reduce the cost of station components by increasing production volumes and traveling down the cost “learning curve” as more systems are built, enhancing the economics of Tri-Gen stations in metropolitan areas with more FCEVs. In addition, hydrogen produced profitably at remote warehouses with fuel cell forklift trucks can be shipped to satellite hydrogen fueling stations near large concentrations of FCEVs

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    Although some fuel cell lift truck owners have installed on-site generated hydrogen by reforming natural gas.

  2. 2.

    For material handling equipment (MHE) such as fork lift trucks, the refrigeration is not needed, and the MHE trucks store hydrogen at 300-bar, lower than the 700-bar currently used on FCEVs, so the compressor can be lower power for MHE.

  3. 3.

    The average Walmart store is 105,000 square feet.

  4. 4.

    We use industrial natural gas prices since the Tri-Gen system will consume enough natural gas to qualify for lower rates; for example, Washington Gas in Virginia offers reduced rates of 25.8 cents/therm for consumption above 125 therms and 19.7 cents/therm for consumption above 875 therms, compared to 31.6 cents/therm for small quantities of consumption. For a Tri-Gen station consuming above 17,000 therms/month the natural gas charge is approximately $6.89 per MBTU, which is much closer to the EIA “industrial rate” of $6.43/MBTU than to the “commercial rate” of $9.17/MBTU for Virginia.

  5. 5.

    Gasoline prices will not affect the rates of return for MHE such as those shown in Fig. 7.1.

  6. 6.

    We use gasoline-powered hybrid electric vehicles (HEVs) as the reference gasoline car since automakers will have to sell primarily HEVs to meet the new US fuel economy standards.

  7. 7.

    We assume that hydrogen would be exempted from taxes initially as an ultra-clean fuel.

  8. 8.

    FedEx is developing fuel cell powered delivery trucks to increase the range of their battery-operated delivery trucks.

  9. 9.

    From Table 7.1, there are already at least 26 warehouses or distribution centers with more than 100 fuel cell lift trucks in operation.

  10. 10.

    DFMA = Design for Manufacturing and Assembly, a trademark of Boothroyd and Dewhurst.

  11. 11.

    The logarithmic curve fit shown on Fig. 7.8 goes negative for less than 60 kg/day capacity, so a separate polynomial curve fit had to be developed for small SMR systems.

  12. 12.

    While the hydrogen storage tanks on fuel cell forklift trucks are generally lower pressure (350-bar), we include the higher pressure (700-bar) cascade storage system to accommodate FCEVs.

  13. 13.

    We compared the ANL compressor cost estimates with three vendors and two other national laboratories. In all cases the ANL price estimates were higher than the others.

References

  1. Department of Energy Electricity Table Browser. Available at:http://www.eia.gov/electricity/data/browser/#/topic/7?agg=0,1&geo=vvvvvvvvvvvvo&endsec=vg&linechart=ELEC.PRICE.US-ALL.A&columnchart=ELEC.PRICE.US-ALL.A&map=ELEC.PRICE.US-ALL.A&freq=A&ctype=linechart&ltype=pin&rtype=s&pin=&rse=0&maptype=0

  2. Natural Gas prices by state, U.S. Energy Information Administration. Available at: http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/ng_pri_sum_a_EPG0_PEU_DMcf_a.htm

  3. Edelstein S (2014) FedEx follows French Lead, Tests hydrogen fuel-cell range extenders. Green Car Reports, 27 Jan 2014. Available at: http://www.greencarreports.com/news/1089920_fedex-follows-french-lead-tests-hydrogen-fuel-cell-range-extenders

  4. Bonnema E et al (2013) Development of the advanced energy design guide for medium to big box retail buildings—50 % energy savings. The National Renewable Energy Laboratory, NREL/TP-5500-52589, June 2013

    Google Scholar 

  5. James BD et al (2012) Manufacturing cost analysis of stationary fuel cell systems, Rev 4. Strategic Analysis, Inc., Arlington, Virginia, September 7, 2012. Available at: https://www.sainc.com/service/SA%202012%20Manufacturing%20Cost%20Analysis%20of%20Stationary%20Fuel%20Cell%20Systems.pdf

  6. James BD (2016) private communication, 5/9/2016

    Google Scholar 

  7. Schjolberg I et al (2012) Small-scale reformers for on-site hydrogen supply. Energy Procedia 29:559–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Reddi K et al (2014) the Argonne National Laboratory. Hydrogen refueling station compression and storage optimization with tube-trailer deliveries. Int J Hydrogen Energy (39):pgs 19169–191181

    Google Scholar 

  9. Elgowainy A et al (2012) Hydrogen delivery and infrastructure analysis, DOE Hydrogen program review, May 17, 2012. Available at: https://www.hydrogen.energy.gov/pdfs/review12/pd014_mintz_2012_o.pdf

  10. Parks G et al (2014) DOE Independent Review Team. Hydrogen station compression, storage and dispensing technical status and costs. NREL/BK-6A10-58562, May 2014

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. E. (Sandy) Thomas .

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Thomas, C.E.(. (2017). Tri-Generation at Big Box Stores and Warehouses. In: Stopping Climate Change: the Case for Hydrogen and Coal. Lecture Notes in Energy, vol 35. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31655-0_7

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31655-0_7

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31654-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31655-0

  • eBook Packages: EnergyEnergy (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics