Skip to main content

Comparison of Backstepping-Based Sliding Mode and Adaptive Backstepping for a Robust Control of a Twin Rotor Helicopter

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Variable-Structure Approaches

Part of the book series: Mathematical Engineering ((MATHENGIN))

Abstract

In this contribution, two robust MIMO backstepping control approaches for a twin rotor aerodynamic system (TRAS) test-rig are considered. The TRAS represents a nonlinear system with significant couplings. A nonlinear multibody model of the TRAS with lumped unknown disturbance torques is derived using Lagrange’s equations. Herewith, both a backstepping-based sliding mode control and an adaptive backstepping control are designed to track desired trajectories for the azimuth angle and the pitch angle. An explicit expression is derived for the reaching time in the case of the backstepping-based sliding mode control. In order to estimate immeasurable angular velocities and unknown disturbance torques for the backstepping-based sliding mode control, a discrete-time extended Kalman filter (EKF) is employed. For the adaptive backstepping, a robust sliding mode differentiator is used instead to estimate the angular velocities. Moreover, in the adaptive backstepping control approach, the disturbance compensation is realised with the help of additional adaptive control parts driven by the tracking errors of the controlled variables. The overall stability of the proposed controllers in combination with the corresponding estimator is investigated thoroughly by simulations. Furthermore, in order to validate the proposed control schemes, experiments are performed on the dedicated test-rig and a comparison of the two proposed control structures is provided as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Ahmad S, Chipperfield A, Tokhi M (2000) Dynamic modeling and optimal control of a twin rotor MIMO system. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on national aerospace and electronics (NAECON), pp 391–398

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ahmad S, Shaheed M, Chipperfield A, Tokhi M (2000) Nonlinear modelling of a twin rotor MIMO system using radial basis function networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE conference on national aerospace and electronics (NAECON), pp 313–320

    Google Scholar 

  3. Ahmed Q, Bhatti A, Iqbal S (2009) Nonlinear robust decoupling control design for twin rotor system. In: Proceedings of the 7th Asian Control Conference (ASCC), pp 937–942

    Google Scholar 

  4. Butt SS, Prabel R, Aschemann H (2014) Multi-variable flatness-based control of a two degrees of freedom helicopter. In: Proceedings of the international conference on control, decision and information technologies (CoDIT), pp 321–326

    Google Scholar 

  5. Butt SS, Prabel R, Aschemann H (2015) Multi-variable sliding mode control of a two degrees of freedom helicopter. In: Proceedings of the Vienna conference on mathematical modelling, (MATHMOD), pp 802–807

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chawda V, Celik O, O’Malley M (2011) Application of Levant’s differentiator for velocity estimation and increased Z-width in haptic iinterfaces. In: Proceedings of the IEEE world haptics conference (WHC), pp 403–408

    Google Scholar 

  7. Darus I, Aldebrez F, Tokhi M (2004) Parametric modelling of a twin rotor system using genetic algorithms. In: Proceedings of the first international symposium on control, communications and signal processing, pp 115–118

    Google Scholar 

  8. Dutka A, Ordys A, Grimble M (2003) Non-linear predictive control of 2 DOF helicopter model. In: Proceedings of the 42nd IEEE conference on decision and control (CDC), vol 4, pp 3954–3959

    Google Scholar 

  9. Goldstein H, Poole P, Safko J (2002) Classical mechanics. Addison Wesley, San Francisco

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. INTECO (2013) Two rotor aero-dynamical system user’s manual

    Google Scholar 

  11. Jung-Hua Y, Wen-Chun H (2009) Adaptive backstepping control for electrically driven unmanned helicopter. Control Eng Pract 17(8):903–913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Khalil HK (1996) Nonlinear systems. Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River

    Google Scholar 

  13. Levant A (1998) Robust exact differentiation via sliding mode technique. Automatica 34(3):379–384

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. Levant A (2003) Higher-order sliding modes, differentiation and output-feedback control. Int J Control 76(9):924–941

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Lopez-Martinez M, Ortega M, Rubio F (2003) An H\(_\infty \) controller for a double rotor system. In: IEEE conference on emerging technologies and factory automation (ETFA), vol 1, pp 253–259

    Google Scholar 

  16. Lopez-Martinez M, Diaz JM, Ortega M, Rubio F (2004) Control of a laboratory helicopter using switched 2-step feedback linearization. In: Proceedings of the American control conference (ACC), vol. 5, pp 4330–4335

    Google Scholar 

  17. Lopez-Martinez M, Vivas C, Ortega M (2005) A multivariable nonlinear H\(_\infty \) controller for a laboratory helicopter. In: Proceedings of the 44th IEEE conference on decision and control, European control conference (CDC-ECC), pp 4065–4070

    Google Scholar 

  18. Rahideh A, Shaheed MH (2007) Mathematical dynamic modelling of a twin-rotor multiple input-multiple output system. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part I: J Syst Control Eng 221(1):89–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Shaheed M (2004) Performance analysis of 4 types of conjugate gradient algorithms in the nonlinear dynamic modelling of a TRMS using feedforward neural networks. In: Proceedings of the IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics, vol 6, pp 5985–5990

    Google Scholar 

  20. Slotine J, Li W (1991) Applied nonlinear control. Prentice-Hall Inc, Upper Saddle River

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Stengel R (1994) Optimal control and estimation. Dover Publications Inc, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Utkin VI, Guldner J, Shi J (1999) Sliding mode control in electromechanical systems. The Taylor & Francis systems and control book series. Taylor & Francis, London

    Google Scholar 

  23. Young K, Utkin V, Ozguner U (1999) A control engineer’s guide to sliding mode control. IEEE Trans Control Syst Technol 7(3):328–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hao Sun .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Butt, S.S., Sun, H., Aschemann, H. (2016). Comparison of Backstepping-Based Sliding Mode and Adaptive Backstepping for a Robust Control of a Twin Rotor Helicopter. In: Rauh, A., Senkel, L. (eds) Variable-Structure Approaches. Mathematical Engineering. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31539-3_1

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31539-3_1

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31537-9

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31539-3

  • eBook Packages: EngineeringEngineering (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics