Advertisement

Associations

  • Carl Wellman
Chapter
  • 207 Downloads
Part of the Law and Philosophy Library book series (LAPS, volume 115)

Abstract

This chapter provides a critical examination of the reasons for and against several actual or proposed constitutional rights of associations of private persons. These are the rights of Indian Tribes to partial sovereignty, of political parties to closed primaries, of labor unions to closed shops, of business corporations to spend funds for political purposes, of private clubs to deny membership because of race or sex, of universities to take affirmative action for African-Americans in admissions, and of the press to publish the content of classified government documents. Such reasons concern either the members of the association or the association as a whole.

Keywords

Political Party Affirmative Action Racial Discrimination Closed Primary Labor Union 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Aaron, Benjamin (1987). Rights of Individual Employees Under the act. In American Labor Policy: A Critical Appraisal of the National Labor Relations Act, Charles J. Morris (ed.). Bureau of National Affairs. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  2. Annals of Congress (1789). 1:434.Google Scholar
  3. Cohen, Carl and Sterba, James P. (2003). Affirmative Action and Racial Preference: A Debate. Oxford University Press. New York & Oxford.Google Scholar
  4. Deloria, Jr., Vine and Lytle, Clifford M. (1983). American Indians, American Justice. University of Texas Press. Austin TX.Google Scholar
  5. Dunn, Stephen and Gennard, John (1984). The Closed Shop in British Industry. Macmillan. London.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Gierzynski, Anthony (2000). Money Rues: Financing Elections in America. Westview Press. Boulder CO.Google Scholar
  7. Green, Mark (2002). Selling Out” How Big Corporate Money Buys Elections, Rams Through Legislation, and Betrays Our Democracy. Harper Collins. New York.Google Scholar
  8. Halperin, Morton H. nd Hoffman, Daniel N, (1977). Top Secret: National security and the Right to Know. New Republic Books. Washington DC.Google Scholar
  9. Hanson, Charles et. al. (1988). The Closed Shop: A Comparative Study in Public Policy and Trade Union Security in Britain, the USA and West Germany. St. Martin’s Press. New York.Google Scholar
  10. Kekes, John (1995). The Injustice of Affirmative Action Involving Preferential Treatment. In The Affirmative Action Debate, Steven M. Cahn (ed.). Routledge. New York & London.Google Scholar
  11. Macklem, Patrick (1993). Distributing Sovereignty: Indian Nations and Equality of Peoples. Stanford Law Review 45:1311–1368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. McCarthy, W. E. J. (1964). The Closed Shop in Britain. University of California Press. Berkeley CA.Google Scholar
  13. McKenna, Lois M. (1989). Freedom of Association or Gender Discrimination? New York State Club Association v. City of New York. The /American University Law Review 38:1061–1092.Google Scholar
  14. Nickel, James W. (1975). Preferential Policies in Hiring and Admissions: A Jurisprudential Approach. Columbia Law Review 75:534–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Rehnquist, William (1971). Executive Privilege. Statement Before the Subcommittee on Separation of Powers of the Committee on the Judiciary, U. S. Senate, 92nd Cong. 1st sess, July 1971.Google Scholar
  16. Rhode, Deborah I. (2010). Association and Assimilation. In the First Amendment Freedom of Assembly and Petition: Its Constitutional History and the Contemporary Debate, Margaret M. Russell (ed.). Prometheus Books. Amherst NY.Google Scholar
  17. Richardson, James (1897). A Compilation of the Messages and Papers of the Presidents, vol. 1. Bureau of National Literature. New York.Google Scholar
  18. Rogers, Barbara (1988). Men Only: An Investigation into Men’s Organizations. Pandora Press. London.Google Scholar
  19. Rozell, Mark J. (2010). Executive Privilege: Presidential Power, Secrecy, and Accountability, 3rd edition. University of Kansas Press. Lawrence KS.Google Scholar
  20. Samples, John (2006). The Fallacy of Campaign Finance Reform. University of Chicago Press. Chicago.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Sawyer, Thomas H. (1993). Private Golf Clubs: Freedom of Expression and the Rights of Privacy. Marquette Sports Law Review 3:187–214.Google Scholar
  22. Stone, Geoffrey R. (2007). Top Secret: When Our Government Keeps Us in the Dark. Rowman & Littlefield. Lanham MD.Google Scholar
  23. Supreme Court (1831). The Cherokee Nation v. The State of Georgia. 30 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  24. Supreme Court (1832). Worcester v. Georgia. 31 U.S. 575.Google Scholar
  25. Supreme Court (1886). United States v. Kagama. 118 U.S. 375.Google Scholar
  26. Supreme Court (1937). NLRB v. Jones. 301 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  27. Supreme Court (1964). Bell V. Maryland. 378 U.S. 226.Google Scholar
  28. Supreme Court (1971). New York Times v. United States. 403 U.S. 713.Google Scholar
  29. Supreme Court (1974). United States v. Nixon. 418 U.S. 683).Google Scholar
  30. Supreme Court (1976). Buckley v. Valeo. 424 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  31. Supreme Court (1978). University of California Regents v. Bakke. 438 U.S. 265.Google Scholar
  32. Supreme Court (1986). Tashjian v. Republican Party of Connecticut. 479 U.S. 208.Google Scholar
  33. Supreme Court (1987). Board of Directors of Rotary International v. Rotary Club. 481 U.S. 537.Google Scholar
  34. Supreme Court (1988a). New York State Club Association v. New York City. 487 U.S. 1.Google Scholar
  35. Supreme Court (1988b). Communication Workers of America v. Beck. 487 U.S. 735.Google Scholar
  36. Supreme Court (1990). Austin v. Mich. Chamber of Commerce. 494 U.S. 652.Google Scholar
  37. Supreme Court (2002). California Democratic Party v. Jones. 530 U.S. 567 slip opinion.Google Scholar
  38. Supreme Court (2003). Grutter v. Bollinger. 539 U.S.___ slip opinion.Google Scholar
  39. Supreme Court (2004). Cheney v. United States Dist. Court for D.C. 542 U.S.___ slip opinion.Google Scholar
  40. Supreme Court (2010). Citizens United v. Federal Elections Commission. 558 U.S. 310 slip opinion.Google Scholar
  41. Wasserstrom, Richard (1995) Preferential Treatment, Color-Blindness, and the Evils of Racism and Racial Discrimination. In the Affirmative Action Debate, Steven M, Cahn (ed.). Routledge. New York & London.Google Scholar
  42. Wellman, Carl (1982). Welfare Rights. Rowman and Littlefield. Totowa NJ.Google Scholar
  43. Wellman, Carl (1990). Equal Opportunity. Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 21:26–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. White, Stuart (1998). Trade Unionism in a Liberal State. In Freedom of Association, Amy Gutmann (ed.). Princeton University Press. Princeton NJ.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Carl Wellman
    • 1
  1. 1.Philosophy DepartmentWashington University in Saint LouisSaint LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations