Skip to main content

Head and Neck Cancer

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Book cover Skin Care in Radiation Oncology

Abstract

Skin reactions are considered among the dose-limiting toxicities of radiation treatment for head and neck cancer (HNC), and these effects have a major impact on the level of acute pain and the duration of recovery experienced by the patient during the treatment course. Moreover, it is probable that the true impact of skin toxicity has been underestimated in prospective studies due to the relative insensitivity and non-specificity of the commonly used grading scales.

The usual course of HNC radiation-induced skin toxicity begins with erythema, followed by dry desquamation, hyperpigmentation, and then sometimes moist desquamation and necrosis of underlying soft tissues. Acute skin reactions may predispose for an increased risk of late toxicity, which can include aging of skin, alopecia, telangiectasia, superficial fibrosis, and changes in pigmentation.

Patient-related factors affecting acute skin toxicity can include age, nutrition, ethnicity, coexisting rheumatologic or other chronic medical conditions, obesity, and prior UV damage or reirradiation. Treatment-related factors can include location and volume of irradiated tissue, dose and fraction size, surgery, and interaction with systemic therapy.

Early prevention of reactions in intact skin is based on the dual principles of maintenance of skin integrity and protection of the skin from trauma or environmental stress or exposure. Management of dry desquamation can include the use of moisturizing emollient, as well as manual, enzymatic, or autolytic debridement. Management of moist desquamation can include daily debridement and wound cleansing, topical dressings, prevention of infection, and promotion of a wound-healing environment with optimal moisture level.

Re-epithelization should occur within 2 weeks after the last dose of radiation. Healing can be impaired by poor nutrition, concomitant medications, infection, or compromised vascularity resulting from hypertension, diabetes, or smoking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 89.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 119.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Parkin DM, Stjernsward J, Muir CS. Estimates of the worldwide frequency of twelve major cancers. Bull World Health Organ. 1984;62:163–82.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Joshi P, Dutta S, Chaturvedi P, Nair S. Head and neck cancers in developing countries. Rambam Maimonides Med J. 2014;5, e0009. doi:10.5041/RMMJ.10143.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Cancer Facts and Figures 2015. American Cancer Society. 2015. http://www.cancer.org/acs/groups/content/@editorial/documents/document/acspc-044552.pdf. Accessed 29 Apr 2015.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Chaturvedi AK, Engels EA, Pfeiffer RM, Hernandez BY, Xiao W, Kim E, et al. Human papillomavirus and rising oropharyngeal cancer incidence in the United States. J Clin Oncol. 2011;29:4294–301. doi:10.1200/JCO.2011.36.4596.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Mariotto AB, Yabroff KR, Shao Y, Feuer EJ, Brown ML. Projections of the cost of cancer care in the United States: 2010–2020. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011;103:117–28. doi:10.1093/jnci/djq495.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Rogers HW, Weinstock MA, Harris AR, Hinckley MR, Feldman SR, Fleischer AB, et al. Incidence estimate of nonmelanoma skin cancer in the United States, 2006. Arch Dermatol. 2010;146:283–7. doi:10.1001/archdermatol.2010.19.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Yom SS. Radiation treatment of head and neck cancer. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2015;24:423–36. doi:10.1016/j.soc.2015.03.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Trotti A, Pajak TF, Gwede CK, Paulus R, Cooper J, Forastiere A, et al. TAME: development of a new method for summarising adverse events of cancer treatment by the Radiation Therapy Oncology Group. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:613–24. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70144-4.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stevens CM, Huang SH, Fung S, Bayley AJ, Cho JB, Cummings BJ, et al. Retrospective study of palliative radiotherapy in newly diagnosed head and neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;81:958–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.06.055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Trotti 3rd A, Zhang Q, Bentzen SM, Emami B, Hammond ME, Jones CU, et al. Randomized trial of hyperfractionation versus conventional fractionation in T2 squamous cell carcinoma of the vocal cord (RTOG 9512). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;89:958–63. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.04.041.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Forastiere AA, Goepfert H, Maor M, Pajak TF, Weber R, Morrison W, et al. Concurrent chemotherapy and radiotherapy for organ preservation in advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2003;349:2091–8. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa031317.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Forastiere AA, Zhang Q, Weber RS, Maor MH, Goepfert H, Pajak TF, et al. Long-term results of RTOG 91–11: a comparison of three nonsurgical treatment strategies to preserve the larynx in patients with locally advanced larynx cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:845–52. doi:10.1200/JCO.2012.43.6097.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Cooper JS, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Campbell BH, Saxman SB, et al. Postoperative concurrent radiotherapy and chemotherapy for high-risk squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2004;350:1937–44. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa032646.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Cooper JS, Zhang Q, Pajak TF, Forastiere AA, Jacobs J, Saxman SB, et al. Long-term follow-up of the RTOG 9501/intergroup phase III trial: postoperative concurrent radiation therapy and chemotherapy in high-risk squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012;84:1198–205. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2012.05.008.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Fakhry C, Zhang Q, Nguyen-Tan PF, Rosenthal D, El-Naggar A, Garden AS, et al. Human papillomavirus and overall survival after progression of oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:3365–73. doi:10.1200/JCO.2014.55.1937.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Eisbruch A, Harris J, Garden AS, Chao CK, Straube W, Harari PM, et al. Multi-institutional trial of accelerated hypofractionated intensity-modulated radiation therapy for early-stage oropharyngeal cancer (RTOG 00–22). Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;76:1333–8. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.04.011.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Ang KK, Zhang Q, Rosenthal DI, Nguyen-Tan PF, Sherman EJ, Weber RS, et al. Randomized phase III trial of concurrent accelerated radiation plus cisplatin with or without cetuximab for stage III to IV head and neck carcinoma: RTOG 0522. J Clin Oncol. 2014;32:2940–50. doi:10.1200/JCO.2013.53.5633.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee N, Harris J, Garden AS, Straube W, Glisson B, Xia P, et al. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy with or without chemotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma: radiation therapy oncology group phase II trial 0225. J Clin Oncol. 2009;27:3684–90. doi:10.1200/JCO.2008.19.9109.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee NY, Zhang Q, Pfister DG, Kim J, Garden AS, Mechalakos J, et al. Addition of bevacizumab to standard chemoradiation for locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (RTOG 0615): a phase 2 multi-institutional trial. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13:172–80. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70303-5.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kaanders JH, Ang KK. Early reactions as dose-limiting factors in radiotherapy. Semin Radiat Oncol. 1994;4:55–67. doi:10.1053/SRAO00400055.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Cohen RB, Jones CU, Sur RK, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for locoregionally advanced head and neck cancer: 5-year survival data from a phase 3 randomised trial, and relation between cetuximab-induced rash and survival. Lancet Oncol. 2010;11:21–8. doi:10.1016/S1470-2045(09)70311-0.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Gotlib V, Khaled S, Lapko I, Mar N, Saif MW. Skin rash secondary to bevacizumab in a patient with advanced colorectal cancer and relation to response. Anticancer Drugs. 2006;17:1227–9. doi:10.1097/01.cad.0000231481.07654.fc.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saif MW, Longo WL, Israel G. Correlation between rash and a positive drug response associated with Bevacizumab in a patient with advanced colorectal cancer. Clin Colorectal Cancer. 2008;7:144–8. doi:10.3816/CCC.2008.n.020.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. West CM, Barnett GC. Genetics and genomics of radiotherapy toxicity: towards prediction. Genome Med. 2011;3:52. doi:10.1186/gm268.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Wong RK, Bensadoun RJ, Boers-Doets CB, Bryce J, Chan A, Epstein JB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of acute and late radiation reactions from the MASCC Skin Toxicity Study Group. Support Care Cancer. 2013;21:2933–48. doi:10.1007/s00520-013-1896-2.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Lee N, Chuang C, Quivey JM, Phillips TL, Akazawa P, Verhey LJ, et al. Skin toxicity due to intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head-and-neck carcinoma. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2002;53:630–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Rosenthal DI, Chambers MS, Fuller CD, Rebueno NC, Garcia J, Kies MS, et al. Beam path toxicities to non-target structures during intensity-modulated radiation therapy for head and neck cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2008;72:747–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2008.01.012.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Porock D, Kristjanson L, Nikoletti S, Cameron F, Pedler P. Predicting the severity of radiation skin reactions in women with breast cancer. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1998;25:1019–29.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Nayel H, el-Ghoneimy E, el-Haddad S. Impact of nutritional supplementation on treatment delay and morbidity in patients with head and neck tumors treated with irradiation. Nutrition. 1992;8:13–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Fogarty GB, Muddle R, Sprung CN, Chen W, Duffy D, Sturm RA, et al. Unexpectedly severe acute radiotherapy side effects are associated with single nucleotide polymorphisms of the melanocortin-1 receptor. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2010;77:1486–92. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.07.1690.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Ryan JL, Bole C, Hickok JT, Figueroa-Moseley C, Colman L, Khanna RC, et al. Post-treatment skin reactions reported by cancer patients differ by race, not by treatment or expectations. Br J Cancer. 2007;97:14–21. doi:10.1038/sj.bjc.6603842.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  32. Lin A, Abu-Isa E, Griffith KA, Ben-Josef E. Toxicity of radiotherapy in patients with collagen vascular disease. Cancer. 2008;113:648–53. doi:10.1002/cncr.23591.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Porock D. Factors influencing the severity of radiation skin and oral mucosal reactions: development of a conceptual framework. Eur J Cancer Care. 2002;11:33–43.

    Google Scholar 

  34. McQuestion M. Evidence-based skin care management in radiation therapy: clinical update. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2011;27:e1–17. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2011.02.009.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. McNees P. Skin and wound assessment and care in oncology. Semin Oncol Nurs. 2006;22:130–43. doi:10.1016/j.soncn.2006.04.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Herst PM. Protecting the radiation-damaged skin from friction: a mini review. J Med Radiat Sci. 2014;61:119–25. doi:10.1002/jmrs.46.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lawenda BD, Kelly KM, Ladas EJ, Sagar SM, Vickers A, Blumberg JB. Should supplemental antioxidant administration be avoided during chemotherapy and radiation therapy? J Natl Cancer Inst. 2008;100:773–83. doi:10.1093/jnci/djn148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Sitton E. Early and late radiation-induced skin alterations. Part II: nursing care of irradiated skin. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1992;19:907–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Porock D, Nikoletti S, Cameron F. The relationship between factors that impair wound healing and the severity of acute radiation skin and mucosal toxicities in head and neck cancer. Cancer Nurs. 2004;27:71–8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Belum VR, Hill A, Matros E, Lacouture ME, Barker CA. Differential radiation dermatitis in native skin and an autologous transplanted myocutaneous flap. JAMA Dermatol. 2014;150:1365–7. doi:10.1001/jamadermatol.2014.888.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Payne AS, James WD, Weiss RB. Dermatologic toxicity of chemotherapeutic agents. Semin Oncol. 2006;33:86–97. doi:10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.11.004.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Bonner JA, Harari PM, Giralt J, Azarnia N, Shin DM, Cohen RB, et al. Radiotherapy plus cetuximab for squamous-cell carcinoma of the head and neck. N Engl J Med. 2006;354:567–78. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa053422.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Giro C, Berger B, Bolke E, Ciernik IF, Duprez F, Locati L, et al. High rate of severe radiation dermatitis during radiation therapy with concurrent cetuximab in head and neck cancer: results of a survey in EORTC institutes. Radiother Oncol. 2009;90:166–71. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2008.09.007.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Cante D, La Porta MR, Franco P, Sciacero P, Girelli GF, Marra A, et al. Management of ‘in-field’ skin toxicity in head and neck cancer patients treated with combined cetuximab and radiotherapy. Oncology. 2013;85:257–61. doi:10.1159/000355579.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Chung CH, Mirakhur B, Chan E, Le QT, Berlin J, Morse M, et al. Cetuximab-induced anaphylaxis and IgE specific for galactose-alpha-1,3-galactose. N Engl J Med. 2008;358:1109–17. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa074943.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  46. Lacouture ME, Maitland ML, Segaert S, Setser A, Baran R, Fox LP, et al. A proposed EGFR inhibitor dermatologic adverse event-specific grading scale from the MASCC skin toxicity study group. Support Care Cancer. 2010;18:509–22. doi:10.1007/s00520-009-0744-x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Lacouture ME, Anadkat MJ, Bensadoun RJ, Bryce J, Chan A, Epstein JB, et al. Clinical practice guidelines for the prevention and treatment of EGFR inhibitor-associated dermatologic toxicities. Support Care Cancer. 2011;19:1079–95. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1197-6.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  48. Bernier J, Bonner J, Vermorken JB, Bensadoun RJ, Dummer R, Giralt J, et al. Consensus guidelines for the management of radiation dermatitis and coexisting acne-like rash in patients receiving radiotherapy plus EGFR inhibitors for the treatment of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Ann Oncol. 2008;19:142–9. doi:10.1093/annonc/mdm400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Lacouture ME, Wolchok JD, Yosipovitch G, Kahler KC, Busam KJ, Hauschild A. Ipilimumab in patients with cancer and the management of dermatologic adverse events. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2014;71:161–9. doi:10.1016/j.jaad.2014.02.035.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Vogler BK, Ernst E. Aloe vera: a systematic review of its clinical effectiveness. Br J Gen Pract. 1999;49:823–8.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  51. Richardson J, Smith JE, McIntyre M, Thomas R, Pilkington K. Aloe vera for preventing radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic literature review. Clin Oncol. 2005;17:478–84.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Boot-Vickers M, Eaton K. Skin care for patients receiving radiotherapy. Prof Nurse. 1999;14:706–8.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Abbas H, Bensadoun RJ. Trolamine emulsion for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. Support Care Cancer. 2012;20:185–90. doi:10.1007/s00520-011-1110-3.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Elliott EA, Wright JR, Swann RS, Nguyen-Tan F, Takita C, Bucci MK, et al. Phase III Trial of an emulsion containing trolamine for the prevention of radiation dermatitis in patients with advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: results of Radiation Therapy Oncology Group Trial 99–13. J Clin Oncol. 2006;24:2092–7. doi:10.1200/JCO.2005.04.9148.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Liguori V, Guillemin C, Pesce GF, Mirimanoff RO, Bernier J. Double-blind, randomized clinical study comparing hyaluronic acid cream to placebo in patients treated with radiotherapy. Radiother Oncol. 1997;42:155–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Chan RJ, Mann J, Tripcony L, Keller J, Cheuk R, Blades R, et al. Natural oil-based emulsion containing allantoin versus aqueous cream for managing radiation-induced skin reactions in patients with cancer: a phase 3, double-blind, randomized, controlled trial. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2014;90:756–64. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2014.06.034.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Aygenc E, Celikkanat S, Kaymakci M, Aksaray F, Ozdem C. Prophylactic effect of pentoxifylline on radiotherapy complications: a clinical study. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004;130:351–6. doi:10.1016/j.otohns.2003.08.015.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Salvo N, Barnes E, van Draanen J, Stacey E, Mitera G, Breen D, et al. Prophylaxis and management of acute radiation-induced skin reactions: a systematic review of the literature. Curr Oncol. 2010;17:94–112.

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  59. Lievens Y, Haustermans K, Van den Weyngaert D, Van den Bogaert W, Scalliet P, Hutsebaut L, et al. Does sucralfate reduce the acute side-effects in head and neck cancer treated with radiotherapy? A double-blind randomized trial. Radiother Oncol. 1998;47:149–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Wells M, Macmillan M, Raab G, MacBride S, Bell N, MacKinnon K, et al. Does aqueous or sucralfate cream affect the severity of erythematous radiation skin reactions? A randomised controlled trial. Radiother Oncol. 2004;73:153–62. doi:10.1016/j.radonc.2004.07.032.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Pommier P, Gomez F, Sunyach MP, D’Hombres A, Carrie C, Montbarbon X. Phase III randomized trial of Calendula officinalis compared with trolamine for the prevention of acute dermatitis during irradiation for breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2004;22:1447–53. doi:10.1200/JCO.2004.07.063.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Sharp L, Finnila K, Johansson H, Abrahamsson M, Hatschek T, Bergenmar M. No differences between Calendula cream and aqueous cream in the prevention of acute radiation skin reactions—results from a randomised blinded trial. Eur J Oncol Nurs. 2013;17:429–35. doi:10.1016/j.ejon.2012.11.003.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Schneider F, Danski MT, Vayego SA. Usage of Calendula officinalis in the prevention and treatment of radiodermatitis: a randomized double-blind controlled clinical trial. Rev Esc Enferm USP. 2015;49:221–8. doi:10.1590/S0080-623420150000200006.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Miller RC, Schwartz DJ, Sloan JA, Griffin PC, Deming RL, Anders JC, et al. Mometasone furoate effect on acute skin toxicity in breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy: a phase III double-blind, randomized trial from the North Central Cancer Treatment Group N06C4. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011;79:1460–6. doi:10.1016/j.ijrobp.2010.01.031.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  65. Fisher DA. Adverse-effects of topical corticosteroid use. Western J Med. 1995;162:123–6.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  66. Ference JD, Last AR. Choosing topical corticosteroids. Am Fam Physician. 2009;79:135–40.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. Renfro L, Snow JS. Ocular effects of topical and systemic steroids. Dermatol Clin. 1992;10:505–12.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Sperduti A, Cashell A, Rocca C, Hirji A, Billingsley S, Waldron J, et al. A feasibility study of an internal control methodology using hydrocortisone cream for the management of skin reactions in patients receiving radical radiation therapy for cancers of the head and neck. J Radiother Pract. 2006;5:211–8. doi:10.1017/S1460396906000306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  69. Shafik A. Polyester but not cotton or wool textiles inhibit hair growth. Dermatology. 1993;187:239–42.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  70. Zhong WH, Tang QF, Hu LY, Feng HX. Mepilex Lite dressings for managing acute radiation dermatitis in nasopharyngeal carcinoma patients: a systematic controlled clinical trial. Med Oncol. 2013;30:761. doi:10.1007/s12032-013-0761-y.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  71. Thomas S. Current practices in the management of fungating lesions and radiation damaged skin. Bridgend, South Wales: Surgical Materials Testing Laboratory; 1992.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Mak SS, Molassiotis A, Wan WM, Lee IY, Chan ES. The effects of hydrocolloid dressing and gentian violet on radiation-induced moist desquamation wound healing. Cancer Nurs. 2000;23:220–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  73. Mak SS, Zee CY, Molassiotis A, Chan SJ, Leung SF, Mo KF, et al. A comparison of wound treatments in nasopharyngeal cancer patients receiving radiation therapy. Cancer Nurs. 2005;28:436–45.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  74. Winter GD. Formation of the scab and the rate of epithelization of superficial wounds in the skin of the young domestic pig. Nature. 1962;193:293–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  75. Gerhardt LC, Strassle V, Lenz A, Spencer ND, Derler S. Influence of epidermal hydration on the friction of human skin against textiles. J R Soc Interface. 2008;5:1317–28. doi:10.1098/rsif.2008.0034.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  76. Cowan LJ, Stechmiller J. Prevalence of wet-to-dry dressings in wound care. Adv Skin Wound Care. 2009;22:567–73. doi:10.1097/01.ASW.0000363469.25740.74.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  77. Jones V, Grey JE, Harding KG. Wound dressings. BMJ. 2006;332:777–80. doi:10.1136/bmj.332.7544.777.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  78. Caruso DM, Foster KN, Blome-Eberwein SA, Twomey JA, Herndon DN, Luterman A, et al. Randomized clinical study of Hydrofiber dressing with silver or silver sulfadiazine in the management of partial-thickness burns. J Burn Care Res. 2006;27:298–309. doi:10.1097/01.BCR.0000216741.21433.66.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  79. Muangman P, Pundee C, Opasanon S, Muangman S. A prospective, randomized trial of silver containing hydrofiber dressing versus 1% silver sulfadiazine for the treatment of partial thickness burns. Int Wound J. 2010;7:271–6. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2010.00690.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  80. Silverstein P, Heimbach D, Meites H, Latenser B, Mozingo D, Mullins F, et al. An open, parallel, randomized, comparative, multicenter study to evaluate the cost-effectiveness, performance, tolerance, and safety of a silver-containing soft silicone foam dressing (intervention) vs silver sulfadiazine cream. J Burn Care Res. 2011;32:617–26. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e318236fe31.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  81. Vavassis P, Gelinas M, Chabot Tr J, Nguyen-Tan PF. Phase 2 study of silver leaf dressing for treatment of radiation-induced dermatitis in patients receiving radiotherapy to the head and neck. J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2008;37:124–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  82. Glat PM, Kubat WD, Hsu JF, Copty T, Burkey BA, Davis W, et al. Randomized clinical study of SilvaSorb gel in comparison to Silvadene silver sulfadiazine cream in the management of partial-thickness burns. J Burn Care Res. 2009;30:262–7. doi:10.1097/BCR.0b013e318198a2e8.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  83. Jurczak F, Dugre T, Johnstone A, Offori T, Vujovic Z, Hollander D, et al. Randomised clinical trial of Hydrofiber dressing with silver versus povidone-iodine gauze in the management of open surgical and traumatic wounds. Int Wound J. 2007;4:66–76. doi:10.1111/j.1742-481X.2006.00276.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sue S. Yom MD, PhD .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Yom, S.S., Yuen, F., Tang, J. (2016). Head and Neck Cancer. In: Fowble, B., Yom, S., Yuen, F., Arron, S. (eds) Skin Care in Radiation Oncology. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31460-0_5

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31460-0_5

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31458-7

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31460-0

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics