Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Can Engagement in Environmentally-Friendly Behavior Increase Well-Being?

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research

Part of the book series: International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life ((IHQL))

Abstract

The transition to a sustainable society is an important goal in the coming years. For this transition individual behavior change is necessary. However, engagement in environmentally-friendly behavior may entail some level of discomfort or may involve giving up certain things. Consequently, it is often assumed that people see acting in an environmentally-friendly way as something that would decrease their quality of life. We argue that there is also a brighter view on environmentally-friendly behavior – a view in which engagement may even increase quality of life. In this chapter, we discuss the relationship between environmentally-friendly behavior and quality of life, and give several explanations for why positive and negative relationships might exist. Most importantly, we make a distinction between environmentally-friendly behavior as giving pleasure, and environmentally-friendly behavior as giving meaning, which both have implications for quality of life. Furthermore, we introduce the self-concept as a possible explanation for why engagement in environmentally-friendly behavior could increase quality of life, and discuss autonomy, individual values and the perceived environmental impact of the behavior as factors influencing when engagement could increase quality of life. Finally, we mention practical implications making the distinction between environmentally-friendly behavior as giving pleasure versus giving meaning may have.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 259.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 329.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Aknin, L. B., Dunn, E. W., & Norton, M. I. (2012). Happiness runs in a circular motion: Evidence for a positive feedback loop between prosocial spending and happiness. Journal of Happiness Studies, 13(2), 347–355. doi:10.1007/s10902-011-9267-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1989). Giving with impure altruism: Applications to charity and ricardian equivalence. Journal of Political Economy, 97(6), 1447–1458.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andreoni, J. (1990). Impure altruism and donations to public goods: A theory of warm-glow giving. The Economic Journal, 100(401), 464–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolderdijk, J. W., Steg, L., Geller, E. S., Lehman, P. K., & Postmes, T. (2013). Comparing the effectiveness of monetary versus moral motives in environmental campaigning. Nature Climate Change, 3, 413–416. doi:10.1038/nclimate1767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown, K. W., & Kasser, T. (2005). Are psychological and ecological well-being compatible? The role of values, mindfulness, and lifestyle. Social Indicators Research, 74(2), 349–368. doi:10.1007/s11205-004-8207-8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornelissen, G., Pandelaere, M., Warlop, L., & Dewitte, S. (2008). Positive cueing: Promoting sustainable consumer behavior by cueing common environmental behaviors as environmental. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(1), 46–55. doi:10.1016/j.ijresmar.2007.06.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2008). Value orientations to explain beliefs related to environmental significant behavior: How to measure egoistic, altruistic, and biospheric value orientations. Environment and Behavior, 40(3), 330–354. doi:10.1177/0013916506297831.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2009). Mean or green: Which values can promote stable pro-environmental behavior? Conservation Letters, 2(2), 61–66. doi:10.1111/j.1755-263X.2009.00048.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Groot, J. I. M., & Steg, L. (2010). Relationships between value orientations, self-determined motivational types and pro-environmental behavioural intentions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 30(4), 368–378. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2010.04.002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Young, R. (1990–1991). Some psychological aspects of living lightly: Desired lifestyle patterns and conservation behavior. Journal of Environmental Systems, 20(3), 215–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Hedonia, eudaimonia, and well-being: An introduction. Journal of Happiness Studies, 9(1), 1–11. doi:10.1007/s10902-006-9018-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diener, E., Lucas, R. E., & Scollon, C. N. (2006). Beyond the hedonic treadmill: Revising the adaptation theory of well-being. American Psychologist, 61(4), 305–314. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.61.4.305.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dogan, E., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). Making small numbers count: Environmental and financial feedback in promoting eco-driving behaviours. Journal of Consumer Policy, 37(3), 413–422. doi:10.1007/s10603-014-9259-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DuNann Winter, D., & Koger, S. M. (2004). The psychology of environmental problems. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunn, E. W., Aknin, L. B., & Norton, M. I. (2008). Spending money on others promotes happiness. Science, 319(5870), 1687–1688. doi:10.1126/science.1150952.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dunning, D. (2007). Self-image motives and consumer behavior: How sacrosanct self-beliefs sway preferences in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 17(4), 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, D., & Jackson, T. (2008). Sustainable consumption: Perspectives from social and cultural theory (Working Paper No. RESOLVE Working Paper 05–08). Guildford: University of Surrey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Evans, L., Maio, G. R., Corner, A., Hodgetts, C. J., Ahmed, S., & Hahn, U. (2013). Self-interest and pro-environmental behaviour. Nature Climate Change, 3, 122–125. doi:10.1038/nclimate1662.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fitzpatrick, G., & Smith, G. (2009). Technology-enabled feedback on domestic energy consumption: Articulating a set of design concerns. Pervasive Computing IEEE, 8(1), 37–44. doi:10.1109/MPRV.2009.17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardner, G. T., & Stern, P. C. (2002). Environmental problems and human behavior. Boston: Pearson Custom Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gifford, R., Kormos, C., & McIntyre, A. (2011). Behavioral dimensions of climate change: Drivers, responses, barriers, and interventions. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews: Climate Change, 2(6), 801–827. doi:10.1002/wcc.143.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Campbell, E. M. (2007). Doing good, doing harm, being well and burning out: The interactions of perceived prosocial and antisocial impact in service work. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 80(4), 665–691. doi:10.1348/096317906X169553.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, A. M., & Sonnentag, S. (2010). Doing good buffers against feeling bad: Prosocial impact compensates for negative task and self-evaluations. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 111(1), 13–22. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2009.07.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hackmann, H., Moser, S. C., & St. Clair, A. L. (2014). The social heart of global environmental change. Nature Climate Change, 4, 653–655. doi:10.1038/nclimate2320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., & Rottenstreich, Y. (2004). Music, pandas, and muggers: On the affective psychology of value. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 133(1), 23–30. doi:10.1037/0096-3445.133.1.23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsee, C. K., Rottenstreich, Y., & Xiao, Z. (2005). When is more better? On the relationship between magnitude and subjective value. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 14(5), 234–237. doi:10.1111/j.0963-7214.2005.00371.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC. (2014). Climate change 2014: Mitigation of climate change. Contribution of working group III to the fifth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jain, R. K., Taylor, J. E., & Culligan, P. J. (2013). Investigating the impact eco-feedback information representation has on building occupant energy consumption behavior and savings. Energy and Buildings, 64, 408–414. doi:10.1016/j.enbuild.2013.05.011.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kashdan, T. B., Biswas-Diener, R., & King, L. A. (2008). Reconsidering happiness: The costs of distinguishing between hedonics and eudaimonia. The Journal of Positive Psychology, 3(4), 219–233. doi:10.1080/17439760802303044.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kasser, T., & Sheldon, K. M. (2002). What makes for a Merry Christmas? Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(4), 313–329. doi:10.1023/A:1021516410457.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Losier, G. F., & Koestner, R. (1999). Intrinsic versus identified regulation in distinct political campaigns: The consequences of following politics for pleasure versus personal meaningfulness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 25(3), 287–298. doi:10.1177/0146167299025003002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Noppers, E. H., Keizer, K., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2014). The adoption of sustainable innovations: Driven by symbolic and environmental motives. Global Environmental Change, 25, 52–62. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.01.012.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nordahl, D. (2012). Making transit fun! How to entice motorists from their cars (and onto their feet, a bike, or bus). Washington, DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nordlund, A. M., & Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness, and personal norms on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23(4), 339–347. doi:10.1016/S0272-4944(03)00037-9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norwegian Ministry of the Environment. (1994). Symposium: Sustainable consumption. 19–20 January 1994, Oslo, Norway. Oslo: Norwegian Ministry of the Environment.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Park, N., & Seligman, M. E. P. (2005). Orientations to happiness and life satisfaction: The full life versus the empty life. Journal of Happiness Studies, 6(1), 25–41. doi:10.1007/s10902-004-1278-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sachdeva, S., Iliev, R., & Medin, D. L. (2009). Sinning saints and saintly sinners: The paradox of moral self-regulation. Psychological Science, 20(4), 523–528.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values: Theoretical advances and empirical tests in 20 countries. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology (pp. 1–65). Orlando: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Houser-Marko, L. (2001). Self-concordance, goal attainment, and the pursuit of happiness: Can there be an upward spiral? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 80(1), 152–165. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.80.1.152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheldon, K. M., & Krieger, L. S. (2014). Walking the talk: Value importance, value enactment, and well-being. Motivation and Emotion, 38(5), 609–619. doi:10.1007/s11031-014-9424-3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Small, D. A., Loewenstein, G., & Slovic, P. (2007). Sympathy and callousness: The impact of deliberative thought on donations to identifiable and statistical victims. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 102(2), 143–153. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2006.01.005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steg, L., & De Groot, J. I. M. (2012). Environmental values. In S. Clayton (Ed.), The Oxford handbook of environmental and conservation psychology (pp. 81–92). New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taufik, D., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2015). Acting green elicits a literal ‘warm-glow’. Nature Climate Change, 5, 37–40. doi:10.1038/nclimate2449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J., & Crompton, T. (2009). Simple and painless? The limitations of spillover in environmental campaigning. Journal of Consumer Policy, 32(2), 141–163. doi:10.1007/s10603-009-9101-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014a). I am what I am, by looking past the present. The influence of biospheric values and past behavior on environmental self-identity. Environment and Behavior, 46(5), 626–657. doi:10.1177/0013916512475209.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Van der Werff, E., Steg, L., & Keizer, K. (2014b). Follow the signal: When past environmental actions signal who you are. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 273–282. doi:10.1016/j.jenvp.2014.07.004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vassileva, I., Odlare, M., Wallin, F., & Dahlquist, E. (2012). The impact of consumers’ feedback preferences on domestic electricity consumption. Applied Energy, 93, 575–582. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2011.12.067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Venhoeven, L. A., Bolderdijk, J. W., & Steg, L. (2013). Explaining the paradox: How pro-environmental behaviour can both thwart and foster well-being. Sustainability, 5, 1372–1386. doi:10.3390/su5041372.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vlek, C., & Steg, L. (2007). Human behavior and environmental sustainability: Problems, driving forces and research topics. Journal of Social Issues, 63(1), 1–19. doi:10.1111/j.1540-4560.2007.00493.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Volkswagen. (2011). The fun theory. Retrieved from http://www.thefuntheory.com/

  • Weaver, C. P., Mooney, S., Allen, D., Beller-Simms, N., Fish, T., Grambsch, A. E., et al. (2014). From global change science to action with social sciences. Nature Climate Change, 4, 656–659. doi:10.1038/nclimate2319.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, J. J., & Li, H. (2011). Sustainable consumption and life satisfaction. Social Indicators Research, 104(2), 323–329.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zapico, J. L., Guath, M., & Turpeinen, M. (2011). Kilograms or cups of tea: Comparing footprints for better CO2 understanding. PsychNology Journal, 9(1), 43–54.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands

    Leonie Venhoeven, Linda Steg & Jan Willem Bolderdijk

Authors
  1. Leonie Venhoeven
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Linda Steg
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Jan Willem Bolderdijk
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Leonie Venhoeven .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Faculty of Psychology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France

    Ghozlane Fleury-Bahi

  2. Department of Social Psychology, University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain

    Enric Pol

  3. Faculty of Psychology, University of Nantes, Nantes, France

    Oscar Navarro

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Venhoeven, L., Steg, L., Bolderdijk, J.W. (2017). Can Engagement in Environmentally-Friendly Behavior Increase Well-Being?. In: Fleury-Bahi, G., Pol, E., Navarro, O. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_13

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_13

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31414-3

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31416-7

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation