Abstract
Behavior is thought to be intrinsically motivated when it helps an actor attain a goal that has arisen from within the actor him/herself. In this chapter, we argue that two identical formal attributes—(a) behavioral means-goal correspondence and (b) degree of intentionality—designate the intensity with which a person both is intrinsically motivated and embraces an attitude to protect the environment. We suggest that the intrinsic motivation to protect the environment be conceptualized as an attitude that can be directly derived from verbal acts (e.g., self-reports of past environmentally protective behavior) as this will ensure that the assumptions that are made can be tested statistically. As presumed, people who are determined to protect the environment will claim to engage in increasingly more activities as well as more demanding ones aimed at the environmental protection goal. This presumed link between a person’s inherent determination or intentionality and the behaviors he/she reports can be formally captured with the Rasch model. A Rasch-model test is, as we argue, preferable to self-reflection-based assessments of the self-embedment of people’s reasons for protecting the environment. As one would expect of a measure that is supposed to reflect a person’s inherent intention to protect the environment, it largely overlaps with conventional intention measures and is durable over time. Moreover, as one would hope, it shows in actual environmentally protective behavior and in the overall electricity consumption of individuals. Thus, when lasting change toward more self-determined, ecologically sustainable individual ways of life is the target, strategies that help advance people’s intrinsic motivation to protect the environment are essential.
Author Note This chapter was written as part of the Helmholtz Alliance ENERGY-TRANS with a grant from the Helmholtz Society and the German State of Saxony-Anhalt. We wish to thank Jane Zagorski for her language support and Christina Werker, Franziska Körner, Madeleine Breitkreutz, Franz X. Bogner, and Christoph Fricke for their comments on earlier versions of this chapter. The section on “Promoting Intrinsic Motivation to Protect the Environment” is adapted with permission from: Otto et al. (2014). doi: 10.1027/1016-9040/a000182. © 2014 Hogrefe Publishing (www.hogrefe.com). All rights reserved.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Andrich, D., & Styles, I. M. (1998). The structural relationship between attitude and behavior statements from the unfolding perspective. Psychological Methods, 3, 454–469.
Arnold, O., Kibbe, A., Hartig, T., Kaiser, F. G. (2015). Capturing the environmental impact of individual lifestyles: Evidence of the criterion validity of the general ecological behavior scale. Manuscript submitted for publication.
Bolderdijk, J. W., Knockaert, J., Steg, E. M., & Verhoef, E. T. (2011). Effects of pay-as-you-drive vehicle insurance on young drivers’ speed choice: Results of a Dutch field experiment. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 43, 1181–1186.
Byrka, K. (2009). Attitude-behavior consistency: Campbell’s paradigm in environmental and health domains. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Eindhoven University of Technology, Eindhoven, the Netherlands.
Campbell, D. T. (1963). Social attitudes and other acquired behavioral dispositions. In S. Koch (Ed.), Psychology: A study of a science (Vol. 6, pp. 94–172). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Corral Verdugo, V. (2012). The positive psychology of sustainability. Environment, Development and Sustainability, 14, 651–666.
De Young, R. (1985–1986). Encouraging environmentally appropriate behavior: The role of intrinsic motivation. Journal of Environmental Systems, 15(4), 281–292.
De Young, R. (2000). Expanding and evaluating motives for environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Social Issues, 56, 509–526.
Deci, E. D., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York: Plenum.
Dickerson, C. A., Thibodeau, R., Aronson, E., & Miller, D. (1992). Using cognitive dissonance to encourage water conservation. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22, 841–854.
Geller, E. S. (2002). The challenge of increasing pro-environmental behavior. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 525–540). New York: Wiley.
Goldstein, N. J., Cialdini, R. B., & Griskevicius, V. (2008). A room with a viewpoint: Using social norms to motivate environmental conservation in hotels. Journal of Consumer Research, 35, 472–482.
Green-Demers, I., Pelletier, L. G., & Ménard, S. (1997). The impact of behavioural difficulty on the saliency of the association between self-determined motivation and environmental behaviours. Canadian Journal of Behavioural Science, 29(3), 157–166.
Guttman, L. (1944). A basis for scaling qualitative data. American Sociological Review, 9, 139–150.
Jakobsson, C., Fujii, S., & Gärling, T. (2002). Effects of economic disincentives on private car use. Transportation, 29, 349–370.
Joule, R.-V., Girandola, F., & Bernard, F. (2007). How can people be induced to willingly change their behavior? The path from persuasive communication to binding communication. Social and Personality Psychology Compass, 1, 493–505.
Kaiser, F. G., & Byrka, K. (2015). The Campbell paradigm as a conceptual alternative to the expectation of hypocrisy in contemporary attitude research. The Journal of Social Psychology, 155, 12–29.
Kaiser, F. G., & Wilson, M. (2004). Goal-directed conservation behavior: The specific composition of a general performance. Personality and Individual Differences, 36, 1531–1544.
Kaiser, F. G., Hübner, G., & Bogner, F. X. (2005). Contrasting the theory of planned behavior with the value-belief-norm model in explaining conservation behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 35, 2150–2170.
Kaiser, F. G., Schultz, P. W., & Scheuthle, H. (2007). The theory of planned behavior without compatibility? Beyond method bias and past trivial associations. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 37, 1522–1544.
Kaiser, F. G., Byrka, K., & Hartig, T. (2010). Reviving Campbell’s paradigm for attitude research. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14, 351–367.
Kaiser, F. G., Hartig, T., Brügger, A., & Duvier, C. (2013). Environmental protection and nature as distinct attitudinal objects: An application of the Campbell paradigm. Environment and Behavior, 45, 369–398.
Kaiser, F. G., Brügger, A., Hartig, T., Bogner, F. X., & Gutscher, H. (2014). Appreciation of nature and appreciation of environmental protection: How stable are these attitudes and which comes first? European Review of Applied Psychology [Revue Européenne de Psychologie Appliquée], 64, 269–277.
Klöckner, C. A., Nayum, A., & Mehmetoglu, M. (2013). Positive and negative spillover effects from electric car purchase to car use. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 21, 32–38.
Lehman, P. K., & Geller, E. S. (2004). Behavioural analysis and environmental protection: Accomplishments and potential for more. Behavioural and Social Issues, 13, 13–24.
Otto, S., & Kaiser, F. G. (2014). Ecological behavior across the lifespan: Why environmentalism increases as people grow older. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, 331–338.
Otto, S., Kaiser, F. G., & Arnold, O. (2014). The critical challenge of climate change for psychology: Preventing rebound and promoting more individual irrationality. European Psychologist, 19, 96–106.
Pelletier, L. G., & Sharp, E. (2008). Persuasive communication and proenvironmental behaviours: How message tailoring and message framing can improve the integration of behaviours through self-determination. Canadian Psychology, 49, 210–217.
Pelletier, L. G., Tuson, K. M., Green-Demers, I., Noels, K., & Beaton, A. M. (1998). Why are you doing things for the environment? The Motivation Toward the Environment Scale (MTES). Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28, 437–468.
Rasch, G. (1960/1980). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: University of Chicago Press (Original work published 1960).
Roczen, N., Kaiser, F. G., Bogner, F. X., & Wilson, M. (2014). A competence model for environmental education. Environment and Behavior, 46, 972–992.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. D. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78.
Schultz, P. W. (1999). Changing behavior with normative feedback interventions: A field experiment on curbside recycling. Basic and Applied Social Psychology, 21, 25–36.
Schultz, P. W. (2014). Strategies for promoting proenvironmental behavior: Lots of tools but few instructions. European Psychologist, 19, 107–117.
Schultz, P. W., Khazian, A. M., & Zaleski, A. C. (2008). Using normative social influence to promote conservation among hotel guests. Social Influence, 3, 4–23.
Steg, L., & Vlek, C. (2009). Encouraging pro-environmental behaviour: An integrative review and research agenda. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 29, 309–317.
Thøgersen, J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20, 53–81.
Thøgersen, J. (2014). Unsustainable consumption: Basic causes and implications for policy. European Psychologist, 19, 84–95.
Villacorta, M., Koestner, R., & Lekes, N. (2003). Further validation of the Motivation Toward the Environment Scale. Environment and Behavior, 35, 486–505.
Vining, J., & Ebreo, A. (2002). Emerging theoretical and methodological perspectives on conservation behavior. In R. B. Bechtel & A. Churchman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 541–558). New York: Wiley.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2017 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Kaiser, F.G., Kibbe, A., Arnold, O. (2017). Self-Determined, Enduring, Ecologically Sustainable Ways of Life: Attitude as a Measure of Individuals’ Intrinsic Motivation. In: Fleury-Bahi, G., Pol, E., Navarro, O. (eds) Handbook of Environmental Psychology and Quality of Life Research. International Handbooks of Quality-of-Life. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_10
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31416-7_10
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31414-3
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31416-7
eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)