Advertisement

Introduction

  • Mario Peucker
Chapter
Part of the Palgrave Politics of Identity and Citizenship Series book series ( CAL)

Abstract

‘Democracy depends on all of us: the price of liberty is not just eternal vigilance, but eternal activity’, said Abraham Lincoln. This is how British political theorist Sir Bernard Crick (2008: 18) underscored the vital importance of citizens’ active participation in liberal democratic societies. While this view is widely shared by scholars and policymakers in the West, there is also a broad consensus about the general decline of citizens’ interest in politics and the ‘disinclination on the part of growing sectors of the citizenry to become involved in political and civic life’ (Kivisto and Faist 2007: 136). A seemingly increasing proportion of the population in Western societies are neither vigilant nor active in the political sphere, and their willingness to commit and contribute to their community and become actively engaged in the public space has been dwindling. The ‘bowling alone’ diagnosis of Robert Putnam (2000) illustratively captures this alleged civic passivity, which, as he claims, weakens collective solidarity and mutual trust, and aggravates processes of social isolation and fragmentation.

Keywords

Civil Society Political Participation Muslim Community Active Citizenship Political Engagement 
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.

References

  1. Crick, B. (2008). Democracy. In J. Arthur, I. Davis, & C. Hahn (Eds.), SAGE handbook of education for citizenship and democracy (pp. 13–19). London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Forrest, R., & Kearns, A. (2001). Social cohesion, social capital and the neighbourhood. Urban Studies, 38(12), 2125–2143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Hoskins, B. L., & Mascherini, M. (2009). Measuring active citizenship through the development of a composite indicator. Social Indicators Research, 90(3), 459–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Humphrey, M. (2009). Securitisation and domestication of Diaspora Muslims and Islam: Turkish immigrants in Germany and Australia. International Journal on Multicultural Societies, 11(2), 136–154.Google Scholar
  5. Kivisto, P., & Faist, T. (2007). Citizenship. Discourse, theory, and transnational prospects. Malden: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  6. Maira, S. (2009). Citizenship and dissent: South Asian Muslim youth in the US after 9/11. South Asian Popular Cultures, 8(1), 31–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. March, A. F. (2007). Reading Tariq Ramadan: Political liberalism, Islam, and “overlapping consensus”. Ethics & International Affairs, 21(4), 399–413.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. March, A. F. (2009). Islam and liberal citizenship. The search for an overlapping consensus. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. O’Loughlin, B., & Gillespie, M. (2012). Dissenting citizenship? Young people and political participation in the media-security nexus. Parliamentary Affairs, 65(1), 115–137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Peucker, M., & Akbarzadeh, S. (2012). The vicious cycle of stereotyping: Muslims in Europe and Australia. In F. Mansouri & V. Marotta (Eds.), Muslims in the West and the challenges of belonging (pp. 171–197). Carlton: Melbourne University Press.Google Scholar
  11. Poynting, S., Noble, G., Tabar, P., & Collins, J. (2004). Bin Laden in the suburbs: Criminalising the Arab other. Sydney: Sydney Institute of Criminology.Google Scholar
  12. Putnam, R. D. (2000). Bowling alone: The collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon and Schuster.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramadan, T. (1999). To be a European Muslim. Leicester: Islamic Foundation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© The Author(s) 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mario Peucker
    • 1
  1. 1.Centre for Cultural Diversity and WellbeingVictoria UniversityMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations