Advertisement

Critical Components of Phonemic Awareness Instruction and Intervention: Recommendations for Teacher Training and for Future Research

  • Stephanie Al OtaibaEmail author
  • Jill Allor
  • Krystal L. Werfel
  • Nathan Clemens
Chapter
  • 1.6k Downloads
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 13)

Abstract

The purpose of this chapter is to describe critical components of phonemic awareness instruction and intervention for students in pre-k through second grade who have language delays, reading disabilities, or who are at-risk for future reading problems. First, we describe our theoretical framework. Second, we describe existing assessments for screening, progress monitoring, intervention design. Third, we describe four evidence-based intervention programs that range from Tier 1 to more intensive interventions and we provide links to websites that review additional interventions. Finally, we conclude with directions for future research related to phonemic awareness instruction and intervention for students with language impairments or reading disabilities.

Keywords

Early literacy Teacher training Phonemic awareness 

References

  1. Al Otaiba, S., Clemens, N., & Rivas, B. (2015). Varying trajectories of literacy skills growth of at-risk kindergarteners: A cautionary tale. Poster presented at the annual conference of the Society for the Scientific Study of Reading.Google Scholar
  2. Al Otaiba, S., Connor, C. M., Folsom, J. S., Wanzek, J., Greulich, L., Schatschneider, C., et al. (2014). To wait in tier 1 or intervene immediately: A randomized experiment examining first grade response to intervention (RTI) in reading. Exceptional Children, 81(1), 11–27. doi: 10.1177/0014402914532234.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2002). Characteristics of children who are unresponsive to early literacy intervention: A review of the literature. Remedial and Special Education, 23(5), 300–316.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Al Otaiba, S., & Fuchs, D. (2006). Who are the young children for whom best practices in reading are ineffective? An experimental and longitudinal study. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 39, 414–431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Al Otaiba, S., Kim, Y. S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., & Wagner, R. K. (2014). Effects of two models of first grade multi-tier intervention: Examining second and third grade outcomes and comparing outcomes based on first grade response status. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7(3), 250–267. doi: 10.1080/19345747.2014.906692.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Al Otaiba, S., Kosanovich, M., & Torgesen, J. (2012). Assessment and instruction in phonemic awareness and word recognition skills. In A. G. Kamhi & H. W. Catts (Eds.), Language basis of reading disabilities (3rd ed., pp. 113–145). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson.Google Scholar
  7. Allor, J., Mathes, P., Roberts, J. K., Cheatham, J., & Al Otaiba, S. (2014). Is scientifically based reading instruction effective for students with below-average IQs? Exceptional Children, 80, 287–306. doi: 10.1177/0014402914522208.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Allor, J. H., Gansle, K. A., & Denny, R. K. (2006). The stop and go phonemic awareness game: Providing modeling, practice, and feedback. Preventing School Failure, 50(4), 23–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Anthony, J., & Lonigan, C. (2004). The nature of phonological awareness: Converging evidence from four studies of preschool and early grade school children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 43–55. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.96.1.43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Apel, K., Masterson, J., & Hart, P. (2004). Integration of language components in spelling: Instruction that maximizes students’ learning. In E. Silliman & L. Wilkinson (Eds.), Language and literacy learning in schools. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  11. Ardoin, S. P., & Christ, T. J. (2008). Evaluating curriculum-based measurement slope estimates using data from triannual universal screenings. School Psychology Review, 37(1), 109–125.Google Scholar
  12. Ball, E., & Blachman, B. (1991). Does phoneme awareness training in kindergarten make a difference in early word recognition and developmental spelling? Reading Research Quarterly, 26, 49–66.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berninger, V. W., Garcia, N. P., & Abbott, R. D. (2009). Multiple processed that matter in writing instruction and assessment. In G. A. Troia (Ed.), Instruction and assessment for struggling writers: Evidence-based practices (pp. 15–51). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  14. Blachman, B. A. (2000). Phonological awareness. In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. III, pp. 483–502). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Boyer, N., & Ehri, L. C. (2011). Contribution of phonemic segmentation instruction with letters and articulation pictures to word reading and spelling in beginners. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(5), 440–470. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2010.52077.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Catts, H. W., Wilcox, K. A., Wood-Jackson, C., Larrivee, L. S., & Scott, V. G. (1997). Toward an understanding of phonological awareness. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Cross-language studies of learning to read and spell: Phonologic and orthographic processing. Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Press.Google Scholar
  17. Catts, H. W., Petscher, Y., Schatschneider, C., Bridges, M. S., & Mendoza, K. (2009). Floor effects associated with universal screening and their impact on the early identification of reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(2), 163–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chall, J. S. (1996). Stages of reading development (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.Google Scholar
  19. Clemens, N. H., Hilt-Panahon, A., Shapiro, E. S., & Yoon, M. (2012). Tracing student responsiveness to intervention with early literacy skills indicators: Do they reflect growth toward text reading outcomes? Reading Psychology, 33(1–2), 47–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Clemens, N. H., Shapiro, E. S., & Thoemmes, F. (2011). Improving the efficacy of first grade reading screening: An investigation of word identification fluency with other early literacy indicators. School Psychology Quarterly, 26(3), 231–244.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Coyne, M. D., Kame’enui, E. J., & Simmons, D. C. (2001). Prevention and intervention in beginning reading: Two complex systems. Learning Disabilities: Research & Practice, 16(2), 62–73.Google Scholar
  22. Cunningham, A. E. (1990). Explicit versus implicit instruction in phonemic awareness. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 50(3), 429–444.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ehri, L. C. (2000). Learning to read and learning to spell: Two sides of a coin. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 19–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ehri, L. C. (2005). Learning to read words: Theory, findings, and issues. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9(2), 167–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ehri, L. C., Nunes, S. R., Willows, D. M., Schuster, B. V., Yaghoub-Zadeh, Z., & Shanahan, T. (2001). Phonemic awareness instruction helps children learn to read: Evidence from the national reading panel’s meta-analysis. Reading Research Quarterly, 36(3), 250–287.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Engelmann, S., & Carnine, D. (1982). Theory of instruction: Principles and applications. New York, NY: Irvington Publishers.Google Scholar
  27. FastBridge Learning (2015). Adaptive reading. Minneapolis, MN: Author. Available: http://www.fastbridge.org/areading/
  28. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Al Otaiba, S., Thompson, A., Yen, L., McMaster, K., … Yang, N. (2001a). K-PALS: Helping kindergartners with reading readiness: Teachers and researchers in partnerships. Teaching Exceptional Children, 33, 76–80.Google Scholar
  29. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., … O’Connor, R. (2001b). Is reading important in reading-readiness programs? A randomized field trial with teachers as program implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 251–267.Google Scholar
  30. Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L., Thompson, A., Al Otaiba, S., Yen, L., Yang, N., … O’Connor, R. (2002). Exploring the importance of reading programs for kindergartners with disabilities in mainstream classrooms. Exceptional Children, 68, 295–311.Google Scholar
  31. Gersten, R., Darch, C., & Gleason, M. (1988). Effectiveness of a direct instruction academic kindergarten for lowincome students. The Elementary School Journal, 89, 227–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gersten, R., Compton, D., Connor, C. M., Dimino, J., Santoro, L., Linan-Thompson, S., & Tilly, W. D. (2009). Assisting students struggling with reading: Response to intervention and multitier intervention for reading in the primary grades. A practice guide (NCEE 2009-4045). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  33. Goffreda, C. T., & DiPerna, J. C. (2010). An empirical review of psychometric evidence for the dynamic indicators of basic early literacy skills. School Psychology Review, 39(3), 463–483.Google Scholar
  34. Goffreda, C. T., Diperna, J. C., & Pedersen, J. A. (2009). Preventive screening for early readers: Predictive validity of the Dynamic Indicators of Basic Early Literacy Skills (DIBELS). Psychology in the Schools, 46(6), 539–552.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Good, R. H., Simmons, D. C., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2001). The importance and decision-making utility of a continuum of fluency-based indicators of foundational reading skills for third-grade high-stakes outcomes. Scientific Studies of Reading, 5, 257–288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Good, R. H., Wallin, J., Simmons, D. C., Kame’enui, E. J., & Kaminski, R. A. (2002). System-wide percentile ranks for DIBELS benchmark assessment (Technical Report 9). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  37. Good, R. H., Simmons, D., Kame’enui, E., Kaminski, R. A., & Wallin, J. (2002). Summary of decision rules for intensive, strategic, and benchmark instructional recommendations in kindergarten through third grade (Technical Report No. 11). Eugene, OR: University of Oregon.Google Scholar
  38. Hoien, T., Lundberg, L., Stanovich, K. E., & Bjaalid, I. K. (1995). Components of phonological awareness. Reading and Writing, 7, 171–188.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Hoover, W. A., & Gough, P. B. (1990). The simple view of reading. Reading and Writing, 2, 127–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jenkins, J., Peyton, J., Sanders, E., Vadasy, P., & Vadasy, P. (2004). Effects of reading decodable texts in supplemental first-grade tutoring. Scientific Studies of Reading, 8, 53–85. doi: 10.1207/s1532799xssr0801_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Johnson, E. S., Jenkins, J. R., Petscher, Y., & Catts, H. W. (2009). How can we improve the accuracy of screening instruments? Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 24(4), 174–185.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. (2014). Kaufman test of educational achievement (3rd ed.). San Antonio, TX: Pearson.Google Scholar
  44. Keller-Margulis, M. A., Mercer, S. H., & Shapiro, E. S. (2014). Differences in growth on math curriculum-based measures using triannual benchmarks. Assessment for Effective Intervention, 39(3), 146–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Keller-Margulis, M. A., Payan, A., Jaspers, K., Brewton, C. (2016). Validity and diagnostic accuracy of written-expression curriculum-based measurement for students with diverse language backgrounds. Reading and Writing Quarterly: Overcoming Learning Difficulties, 32(2), 174–198Google Scholar
  46. Kim, Y.-S., Petscher, Y., Foorman, B. R., & Zhou, C. (2010). The contributions of phonological awareness and letter-name knowledge to letter-sound acquisition – a cross-classified multilevel model approach. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(2), 313–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kuder, S. J. (1997). Teaching students with language and communication disabilities. Needham Heights, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  48. Lam, E. A., & McMaster, K. L. (2014). Predictors of responsiveness to early literacy intervention: A 10-year update. Learning Disability Quarterly, 37(3), 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Landry, Assel, Gunnewig, & Swank. (2005). www.amplify.com/assessment/ mclass-circle
  50. Lonigan, C. J., Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. (2007). The test of preschool early literacy. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  51. Mathes, P. G., & Torgesen, J. (2005). Early interventions in reading. Columbus, OH: SRA/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  52. Mathes, P., Denton, C., Fletcher, J., Anthony, J., Francis, D., & Schatschneider, C. (2005). The effects of theoretically different instruction and student characteristics on the skills of struggling readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 40, 148–192. doi: 10.1598/RRQ.40.2.2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mathes, Torgesen, & Herron. (2014). https://www.istation.com/Assessment/ISIPEarlyReading
  54. National Early Literacy Panel. (2008). Developing early literacy: Report of the National Early Literacy Panel. Washington, DC: National Institute for Literacy.Google Scholar
  55. National Institute of Child Health and Human Development. (2000). Report of the National Reading Panel: Teaching children to read. (NIH Publication No. 00-4769). Washington, DC: Government Printing Office. Available: www.nichd.nih.gov/publications/nrp/smallbook.pdf
  56. Northwest Evaluation Association. (2013). Measures of academic progress. Retrieved from www.nwea.org.
  57. O’Connor, R. E. (2007). Teaching word recognition: Effective strategies for students with learning difficulties. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  58. O’Connor, R. E., Fulmer, D., Harty, K. R., & Bell, K. M. (2005). Layers of reading intervention in kindergarten through third grade: Changes in teaching and student outcomes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38(5), 440–455.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Connor, R. E., Jenkins, J. R., & Slocum, T. A. (1995). Transfer among phonological tasks in kindergarten: Essential instructional content. Journal of Educational Psychology, 2, 202–217.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. O’Connor, R. E., Bocian, K. M., Beach, K. D., Sanchez, V., & Flynn, L. (2013). Special education in a four-year response to intervention (RtI) environment: Characteristics of students with learning disability and grade of identification. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 28, 98–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Perfetti, C. A., Landi, N., & Oakhill, J. (2005). The acquisition of reading comprehension skill. In M. J. Snowling & C. Hulme (Eds.), The science of reading: A handbook (pp. 227–247). Oxford, UK: Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Puranik, C., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., Catts, H., & Lonigan, C. (2008). Development of oral reading fluency in children with speech or language impairments: A growth curve analysis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(6), 545–560. NIHMS ID: P18625782. PMID: 18625782 Medline.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Renaissance Learning (2015). STAR Early Literacy. Wisconsin Rapids, WI: Author. Available: http://www.renaissance.com/products/star-assessments/star-early-literacy.
  64. Riccio, C. A., Imhoff, B., Hasbrouck, J. E., & Davis, G. N. (2004). TPAS: Test of phonological awareness in Spanish. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed. 70 PP.Google Scholar
  65. Ritchey, K. D., & Speece, D. L. (2006). From letter names to word reading: The nascent role of sublexical fluency. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 31(3), 301–327.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Robertson, C., & Salter, W. (2007). The phonological awareness test (2nd ed.). East Moline, IL: LinguiSystems.Google Scholar
  67. Ryder, J. F., Tunmer, W. E., & Greaney, K. T. (2008). Explicit instruction in phoneme awareness and phonemically based decoding skills as an intervention strategy for struggling readers in whole language classrooms. Reading and Writing, 21, 349–369.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sáez, L., Folsom, J. S., Al Otaiba, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). Relationships among student attention behaviors, teacher practices, and beginning word reading skill. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 45(5), 418–432.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Schuele, C. M., & Boudreau, D. (2008). Phonological awareness intervention: Beyond the basics. Language, Speech, & Hearing Services in Schools, 39, 3–20. doi: 0161-1461/08/3901-0003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Schuele, C. M., & Dayton, N. (2014). The Intensive Phonological Awareness (IPA) program. Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  71. Schuele, C. M., Justice, L., Cabell, S., Knighton, K., Kingery, B., & Lee, M. (2008). Field-based evaluation of two-tiered instruction for enhancing kindergarten phonological awareness. Early Education and Development, 19, 726–752.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Simmons, D. C., Coyne, M. D., Kwok, O., McDonagh, S., Harn, B. A., & Kame’enui, E. J. (2008). Indexing response to intervention: A longitudinal study of reading risk from kindergarten through third grade. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 41(2), 158. doi: 10.1177/002221940731358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Slavin, R. (1980). Cooperative learning. Review of Educational Research, 50, 315–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Texas Education Agency & University of Texas System (2013). TPRI Early Reading Assessment. Houston, TX: Children’s Learning Institute at UTHealth. Available: https://www.tpri.org/index.html
  75. Torgesen, J. K., & Bryant, B. (1993). Phonological awareness training for reading. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed Publishers.Google Scholar
  76. Torgesen, J. K., & Morgan, S. (1990). Phonological synthesis tasks: A developmental, functional, and componential analysis. In H. L. Swanson & B. Keogh (Eds.), Learning disabilities: Theoretical and research issues. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum Assoc.Google Scholar
  77. Vadasy, P., Sanders, E., & Peyton, J. (2006). Code-oriented instruction for kindergarten students at risk for reading difficulties: A randomized field trial with paraeducator implementers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 508–528. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.98.3.508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Vadasy, P. F., & Sanders, E. A. (2011). Efficacy of supplemental phonics-based instruction for low-skilled first graders: How language minority status and pretest characteristics moderate treatment response. Scientific Studies of Reading, 15(6), 471–497. doi: 10.1080/10888438.2010.50109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Vadasy, P. F., Wayne, S., O’Connor, R., Jenkins, J., Pool, K., Firebaugh, M., et al. (2005). Sound partners: A tutoring program in phonic-based early reading. Longmont, CO: Sopris West.Google Scholar
  80. Vaughn, S., Mathes, P., Linan-Thompson, S., Cirino, P., Carlson, C., Pollard-Durodola, S., … Francis, D. (2006). Effectiveness of an English intervention for first-grade English language learners at risk for reading problems. The Elementary School Journal, 107(2), 153–181.Google Scholar
  81. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., Rashotte, C. A., & Pearson, N. (2013). The comprehensive test of phonological processing (CTOPP) (2nd ed.). Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  82. Werfel, K., & Schuele, C. M. (2014). Improving initial sound segmentation skills of preschool children with severe to profound hearing loss: An exploratory investigation. Volta Review, 2, 113–134.Google Scholar
  83. Woodcock, R. W. (2011). Woodcock reading mastery test (3rd ed.). Minneapolis, MN: Pearson.Google Scholar
  84. Yeh, S. S., & Connell, D. B. (2008). Effects of rhyming, vocabulary, and phoneme awareness instruction on phoneme awareness. Journal of Research on Reading, 31, 243–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Stephanie Al Otaiba
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jill Allor
    • 1
  • Krystal L. Werfel
    • 2
  • Nathan Clemens
    • 3
  1. 1.Simmons College of EducationSouthern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA
  2. 2.Department of Communication Sciences and DisordersUniversity of South CarolinaColumbiaUSA
  3. 3.College of Education & Human DevelopmentTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations