Advertisement

A Research-Validated Program for Improving At-Risk Students’ Fraction Magnitude Understanding, Word-Problem Solving, and Explanations

  • Amelia S. MaloneEmail author
  • Lynn S. Fuchs
  • Douglas Fuchs
Chapter
  • 1.4k Downloads
Part of the Literacy Studies book series (LITS, volume 13)

Abstract

In this chapter, we describe a research-validated Tier II intervention program designed to prevent at-risk students from developing significant difficulty with fractions. We provide an overview of the instructional strategies used to improve at-risk students’ fraction magnitude understanding (i.e., comparing fractions, ordering fractions, and placing fractions on the number line), word-problem solving (i.e., multiplicative reasoning), and explanations (i.e., verbally explaining how to compare fraction magnitudes). We discuss each instructional strategy incorporated within the program to enhance these outcomes and explain how they can be effectively implemented to improve students’ understanding of fractions. We conclude by discussing results from 4 years of intervention research testing the efficacy of the program. At-risk students who participated in the intervention program outperformed at-risk classmates receiving fraction instruction in the general education classroom on assessments of fraction magnitude understanding (i.e., number line estimation), calculations, released fraction items from the National Assessment of Educational Progress, multiplicative-reasoning word problems, and verbal explanations of magnitude comparisons.

Keywords

Response-to-intervention Tier II intervention Mathematics Fractions Learning difficulties 

References

  1. Archer, A. L., & Hughes, C. A. (2011). Explicit instruction: Effective and deficient teaching. New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  2. Brown, G., & Quinn, R. J. (2007). Investigating the relationship between fraction proficiency and success in Algebra. The Australian Mathematics Teacher, 63, 8–15.Google Scholar
  3. Butler, F. M., Miller, S. P., Crehan, K., Beatrice, B., & Thomas, P. (2003). Fraction instruction for students with mathematics disabilities: Comparing two teaching sequences. Learning Disabilities Research and Practice, 18, 99–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cramer, K. A., Monson, D. S., Wyberg, T., Leavitt, S., & Whitney, S. B. (2009). Models for initial decimal ideas. Teaching Children Mathematics, 16, 106–117.Google Scholar
  5. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles for effective practice. Learning Disability Quarterly, 31, 79–92.Google Scholar
  6. Fuchs, L. S., Malone, A. S., Schumacher, R. F., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Jordan, N. C., et al. (2015). Teaching children to provide sound explanations within a multi-component fraction intervention. Journal of Educational Psychology. Advanced online publication.Google Scholar
  7. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Cirino, P. T., et al. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A. S., Wang, A., et al. (in press). Effects of intervention to improve at-risk fourth graders’ understanding, calculations, and word problems with fractions. Elementary School Journal. Google Scholar
  9. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Malone, A. S., & Fuchs, D. (2015). Fraction Face-Off! Available from L. S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN, 37203.Google Scholar
  10. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Sterba, S. K., Long, J., Namkung, J., Malone, A. S., et al. (2014). Does working memory moderate the effects of fraction intervention? An aptitude-treatment interaction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 499–514.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Geary, D. C., Hoard, M. K., Nugent, L., & Byrd-Craven, J. (2008). Development of number line representations in children with mathematics learning disability. Developmental Neuropsychology, 33, 277–299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Gersten, R., Beckmann, S., Clarke, B., Foegen, A., Marsh, L., Star, J. R., et al. (2009). Assisting students struggling with mathematics: Response to Intervention (RtI) for elementary and middle schools (NCEE 2009–4060). Washington, DC: National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance, Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved from http://ies.ed.gov/ncee/wwc/publications/practiceguides/.Google Scholar
  13. Hamlett, C. L., Schumacher, R. F., & Fuchs, L. S. (2011). 2011 Number line adapted from Siegler et al. (2011). Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.Google Scholar
  14. Hecht, S. A., & Vagi, K. J. (2010). Sources of group and individual differences in emerging fraction skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 843–859. doi: 10.1037/a0019824.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Hecht, S. A., Close, L., & Santisi, M. (2003). Sources of individual differences in fraction skills. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 86, 277–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Kilpatrick, J., Swafford, J., & Findell, B. (Eds.). (2001). Adding it up: Helping children learn mathematics. Washington, DC: National Academy Press (by the Mathematics Learning Study Committee/National Research Council).Google Scholar
  17. National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, & Council of Chief State School Officers. (2013). Common core state standards (Mathematics Standards. Washington, DC: National Governors Association Center for Best Practices, Council of Chief State School Officers.Google Scholar
  18. National Mathematics Advisory Panel. (2008). Foundations for success: Final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Education.Google Scholar
  19. Rashotte, C., Torgesesn, J. K., & Wagner, R. (1999). Test of word reading efficiency. New York, NY: Pearson Assessment.Google Scholar
  20. Rittle- Johnson, B., & Alibali, R. M. (1999). Conceptual and procedural knowledge of mathematics: Does one lead to another? Journal of Educational Psychology, 91, 175–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Rittle-Johnson, B., & Siegler, R. S. (1998). The relations between conceptual and procedural knowledge in learning mathematics: A review. In C. Donlan (Ed.), The development of mathematical skill (pp. 75–110). Hove, UK: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  22. Rittle-Johnson, B., Siegler, R. S., & Alibali, M. W. (2001). Developing conceptual understanding and procedural skill in mathematics: An iterative process. Journal of Educational Psychology, 93, 346–362. doi: 10.1037/0022-0663.93.2.346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Schumacher, R. F., Namkung, J. M., Malone, A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2012). 2012 Fraction battery. Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.Google Scholar
  24. Schumacher, R. F., Namkung, J. M., Malone, A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2013). 2013 Fraction battery. Available from L.S. Fuchs, 228 Peabody, Vanderbilt University, Nashville, TN 37203.Google Scholar
  25. Siegler, R. S., Thompson, C. A., & Schneider, M. (2011). An integrated theory of whole number and fractions development. Cognitive Psychology, 62, 273–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. U.S. Department of Education. (2008). Foundations for success: The final report of the National Mathematics Advisory Panel. Washington, DC: Author.Google Scholar
  27. U.S. Department of Education. (1990–2009). National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP): NAEP questions tool. Retrieved from http://nces.ed.gov/nationsreportcard/itmrlsx/search.aspx?subject_mathematics
  28. Wechsler, D. (1999). Wechsler abbreviated scale of intelligence. San Antonio, TX: Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  29. Wilkinson, G. S. (2008). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Wilmington, DE: Wide Range.Google Scholar
  30. Woodcock, R. W. (1997). Woodcock diagnostic reading battery. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  31. Wu, H. (2001). How to prepare students for algebra. American Educator, 25(2), 10–17.Google Scholar
  32. Wu, H. (2008). Fractions, decimals, and rational numbers. Berkeley, CA: Author.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • Amelia S. Malone
    • 1
    Email author
  • Lynn S. Fuchs
    • 1
  • Douglas Fuchs
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Special EducationVanderbilt UniversityNashvilleUSA

Personalised recommendations