Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Theorizing from the Mmogo-method: Self-Interactional Group Theory (SIGT) to Explain Relational Interactions

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Understanding Relational and Group Experiences through the Mmogo-Method®

Abstract

This chapter sets out to demonstrate how data obtained from the Mmogo-method, in combination with the Intergenerational Group Reflecting Technique, were used to develop the Self-Interactional Group Theory (SIGT). SIGT explains the relational/interactional nature of intergenerational relations. Relationships are viewed as the reciprocal, continuous communicative interactions between members of different generations. Thus, from a pragmatic perspective, focus or punctuation enables observation and description of different units of the relational interactions, namely the intra-individual, inter-individual, and group units of analysis. The intra-individual unit of analysis encompasses individuals’ subjective experiences (emotions/feelings), and the problems or meaningfulness associated with the interactions between people. The intra-individual unit of analysis gives an indication of what takes place in the inter-individual and group units of analysis. The inter-individual unit of analysis involves (1) the context in which the interactions take place; (2) the definition of the relationship; (3) relational qualities (observable behaviour); (4) the motivation (social goals/needs) for interactions between people; and the (5) interactional processes. The group unit of analysis describes intra- and intergroup group behaviour. These units of analysis, which occur simultaneously and reciprocally, are embedded in the broader social, cultural, political and economic environments which informed them.

‘The Mmogo-method®’ is a registered South African trademark of the North-West University.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • Altman, M., Mokomane, Z., & Wright, G. (2014). Social security for young people amidst high poverty and unemployment: Some policy options for South Africa. Development Southern Africa, 31(2), 347–362. doi:10.1080/0376835X.2013.873346.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter, L. A. (Ed.). (2011). Voicing relationships: A dialogic perspective. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, L. C. (2013). Hard to get: Twenty-something women and the paradox of sexual freedom. London, UK: University of California Press, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., Haapala, I., & Lowenstein, A. (2011). Exploring generational intelligence as a model for examining the process of intergenerational relationships. Ageing & Society, 31(7), 1107–1124. doi:10.1017/S0144686X10000978.

    Google Scholar 

  • Biggs, S., & Lowenstein, A. (2011). Generational intelligence. A critical approach to age relations. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Blumer, H. (1969). Symbolic interactionism. Perspective and method. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Booysen, L. (2007). Societal power shifts and changing social identities in South Africa: Workplace implications: Management. South African Journal of Economic and Management Sciences, 10(1), 1–20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bronfenbrenner, U. (1994). Ecological models of human development. International Encyclopaedia of Education, 3(2), 1643–1647.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2008). Constructionism and the grounded theory method. In J. A. Holstein & J. F. Gubrium (Eds.), Handbook of constructionist research (pp. 397–412). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cherry, K. (2014). What is locus of control? Are you in control of your destiny? Retrieved from http://psychology.about.com/od/personalitydevelopment/fl/What-Is-Locus-of-Control.htm.

  • Chigeza, S., & Roos, V. (2012). An exploration of flexibility/rigidity as relational quality of African migrants in South Africa as new cultural and social environment. South African Journal of Psychology, 42(4), 576–585. doi:10.11771008124631204200411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chigeza, S., Roos, V., & Puren, K. (2013). “Here we help each other”: Sense of community of people subjected to forced removals. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(1), 97–100. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2013.10820599.

  • De Wet, A. A. (2005). The elimination of racial prejudice: Towards facilitating a corrective emotional experience. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behaviour. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227–268. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/1449618.

  • Denzin, N. K. (1992). The many faces of emotionality. Reading persona. In C. Ellis & M. G. Flaherty (Eds.), Investigating subjectivity. Research on lived experience (pp. 17–30). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy, 48(1), 43–49. doi:10.1037/a0022187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, E. H. (1963). Childhood and society (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fiskce, S. T., Cuddy, A. J. C., & Glick, P. (2002). A model of (often mixed) stereotype content: Competence and warmth respectively follow from perceived status and competition. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82(6), 878–902. doi:10.1037//0022-3514.82.6.878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • George, R. L., & Cristiani, T. L. (1995). Counselling: Theory and practice (4th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goldman, A. (2006). Simulating minds: The philosophy, psychology, and neuroscience of mindreading. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Grandin, T., & Barron, S. (2005). The unwritten rules of social relationships. Arlington, TX: Future Horizons.

    Google Scholar 

  • Greenberg, L. S., & Johnson, S. M. (1988). Emotionally focused therapy for couples. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haley, J. (1963). Strategies of psychotherapy. New York, NY: Grune & Stratton.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hargie, O. (2011). Skilled interpersonal communication. Research, theory and practice. New York, NY: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Harwood, J., Giles, H., & Ryan, E. B. (1995). Aging, communication, and intergroup theory: Social identity and intergenerational communication. In J. F. Nussbaum & J. Coupland (Eds.), Handbook of communication and ageing research (pp. 133–159). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, A., Watson, J., Rivers, D., & Joyce, M. (2007). Key themes in interpersonal communication. Berkshire, UK: Open University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogg, M. A. (2013). Intergroup relations. In J. DeLamater & A. Ward (Eds.), Handbook of sociology and social research (pp. 533–561). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howe, D. (2013). Empathy: What it is and why it matters. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hycner, R., & Jacobs, L. (1995). The healing relationship in Gestalt therapy: A dialogic/self-psychological approach. Highland, NY: Gestalt Journal Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson, D. D. (1965). The study of the family. Family Process, 4(1), 1–20. doi:10.1111/j.1545-5300.1965.00001.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Juujärvi, S. (2003). The ethic of care and its development. Helsinki, Finland: Department of Social Psychology, University of Helsinki.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitching, A. E. (2010). Conceptualizing a relationship-focused approach to the co-construction of enabling school communities. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lardén, M., Melin, L., Holst, U., & Långström, N. (2006). Moral judgement, cognitive distortions and empathy in incarcerated delinquent and community control adolescents. Psychology, Crime & Law, 12(5), 453–462. doi:10.1080/10683160500036855.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazarus, R. S. (2006). Emotions and interpersonal relationships: Towards a person-centred conceptualisation of emotions and coping. Journal of Personality, 74(1), 9–46. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6494.2005.00368.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell, S. A. (1988). Relational concepts in psychoanalysis. An integration. Massachusetts, NE: Harvard University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nortje, C. F., & Venter, C. A. (2006). The listening group technique as experienced by students from divorced and non-divorced families. The Social Work Practitioner-Researcher, 18(2), 212–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, C. R. (1957). The necessary and sufficient conditions of therapeutic personality change. Journal of Counselling Psychology, 21(2), 95–103. doi:10.103710033-3204.44.3.240.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, V. (2011). “The generational other”: The cultural appropriateness of an intergenerational group reflecting technique. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(1), 90–98. doi:10.1080/15350770.2011.544217.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, V. (2016a). Implementing the Mmogo-method®: A group of Setswana-speaking older people’s relational experiences in a rural setting. In V. Roos (Ed.), Understanding relational and group experiences through the Mmogo-method ® (Chap. 5, pp. 55–88). New York, NY: Springer.

  • Roos, V. (2016b). The Mmogo-method® and the Intergenerational Group Reflecting Technique to explore intergenerational interactions and textual data analysis. In V. Roos (Ed.), Understanding relational and group experiences through the Mmogo-method ® (Chap. 6, pp. 89–117). New York, NY: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Roos, V., & Du Toit, F. (2014). Perceptions of effective relationships in an institutional care setting for older people. SA Journal of Industrial Psychology, 40(1), 1–9. Retrieved from: http://dx.doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v40i1.113.

  • Roos, V., Kolobe, P. S., & Keating, N. (2014). (Re) creating community: Experiences of older women forcibly relocated during apartheid. Journal of Community & Applied Social Psychology, 24(1), 12–25. doi:10.1002/casp.2177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roos, V., & Malan, L. (2012). The role of context and the interpersonal experiences of loneliness of older people in a residential care facility. Global Health Action, 5(1), 18861. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.3402/gha/v10.1886.

  • Roos, V., & Wheeler, A. (2016). Older people’s experiences of giving and receiving empathy in relation to middle adolescents in rural South Africa. South African Journal of Psychology. doi:10.1177/0081246316638563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, C. E., & Mirowsky, J. (2002). Family relationships, social support and subjective life expectancy. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 43(4), 469–489. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3090238.

  • Segal, E. A. (2006). Welfare as we should know it: Social empathy and welfare reform. In K. M. Kilty & E. A. Segal (Eds.), The promise of welfare reform: Political rhetoric and the reality of poverty in the twenty-first century (pp. 265–274). Binghamton, NY: Haworth Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smith-Acuña, S. (2011). Systems theory in action: Application to individual, couple and family therapy. Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (2000). The emergence of knowledge in organization. Emergence, A Journal of Complexity Issues in Organizations and Management, 2(4), 23–39. doi:10.1207/S15327000EM0204_05.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (2001). Complex responsive processes in organizations: Learning and knowledge creation. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stacey, R. (2003). Complexity and group processes: A radically social understanding of individuals. London, UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/2695870.

  • Steyn, S. E. (2015). Exploring relational regulation through older persons’ mobile phone use. Unpublished master’s dissertation. North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • Suchman, A. L. (2006). A new theoretical foundation for relationship-centered care. Complex responsive processes of relating. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 21(1), 40–44. doi:10.1111/j.1525-1497.2006.00308x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swart, N., & Wiehahn, G. (1979). Interpersonal manoeuvres and behavioural change. Pretoria, South Africa: H & R Academia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (1981). Human groups and social categories. Studies in social psychology. New York, NY: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tajfel, H. (2010). Introduction. In H. Tajfel (Ed.), Social identity and intergroup relations (pp. 1–15). New York, NY: Cambridge Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Truax, C. B., & Carkhuff, R. R. (1967). Toward effective counselling and psychotherapy: Training and practice. Chicago, IL: Aldine.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bergh, L. (2008). Psychological well-being and interactional patterns of behaviour: An empirical investigation. Unpublished doctoral thesis. University of Limpopo, Polokwane, South Africa.

    Google Scholar 

  • VanderVen, K. (2011). The road to intergenerational theory is under construction: A continuing story. Journal of Intergenerational Relationships, 9(1), 22–36. doi:10.1080/105350770.2011.544206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vorster, C. (2011). Impact. The story of interactional therapy. Pretoria, South Africa: Satori Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vorster, C., Roos, V., & Beukes, M. (2013). A psycho-diagnostic tool for psychotherapy: Interactional Pattern Analysis (IPA). Journal of Psychology in Africa, 23(3), 163–170. doi:10.1080114330237.2013.10820663.

    Google Scholar 

  • Watzlawick, P., Bavelas, J. B., & Jackson, D. D. (2011). Pragmatics of human communication: A study of interactional patterns, pathologies, and paradoxes. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weimann, J. M., & Daly, J. A. (2011). Introduction: getting your own way. In J. A. Daly & J. M. Wiemann (Eds.), Strategic interpersonal communication (pp. 7–14). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc. Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, M. (2000). Reflections on narrative practice: Essays and interviews. Adelaide, Australia: Dulwich Centre Publications.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zafirovski, M. (2005). Social exchange theory under scrutiny: A positive critique of its economic-behaviorist formulations. Electronic Journal of Sociology, 2, 1–40. Retrieved from: http://www.sociology.org/content/2005/tier2/SETheory.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The Oxford Institute of Population Ageing is acknowledged for support in completing this chapter during June 2013. Ms A Wheeler is acknowledged for literature on empathy and intergenerational relations; and Ms L du Preez for literature on locus of control. Dr Alda de Wet is acknowledged for insights gained during discussions with her about the themes obtained from the data and for guiding my personal journey.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, North-West University, Private Bag X6001, Potchefstroom, 2520, South Africa

    Vera Roos

Authors
  1. Vera Roos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vera Roos .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Africa Unit for Transdisciplinary Health Research, North-West University, Potchefstroom, South Africa

    Vera Roos

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Roos, V. (2016). Theorizing from the Mmogo-method: Self-Interactional Group Theory (SIGT) to Explain Relational Interactions. In: Roos, V. (eds) Understanding Relational and Group Experiences through the Mmogo-Method®. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31224-8_8

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation