Abstract
This chapter introduces the Mmogo-method as a visual data-collection method. The method requires participants to construct visual representations by using open-ended or unstructured materials stimulated by an open-ended prompt in a group setting. The Mmogo-method developed from the Indingilize Structured Observation Technique (Indingilize). The Indingilize uses pre-determined categories for the study under investigation, researchers’ observations scored on four themes, and visual representations scored to generate quantitative data which are analyzed statistically. By contrast, researchers using the Mmogo-method adopt an onto-epistemological stance, assuming that people have developed unique and different perspectives (relativism), which they express verbally and visually in relation to a social reality that is not mind-dependent (realism). In applying the method, researchers create context for optimal participation and take an empathic position when probing and interpreting participants’ visual representations. They involve members of the group to obtain detailed data and recognize the importance of context. Context is distinguished in terms of the situatedness of collected data (which does not limit knowledge transfer). Multiple data sources are obtained, namely visual, textual and observational, to explore and describe social phenomena and to develop theory or interventions. The method is bound by ethical considerations and excludes anyone who has been traumatized or is struggling to deal with reality. It also has limitations in its application to those who prefer not to participate in a group or an experiential research activity, and in the choice of materials.
‘The Mmogo-method®’ is a registered South African trademark of the North-West University.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Beyers, C. (2012). Picture that: Supporting sexuality educators in narrowing the knowledge/practice gap. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 367–380.
Catterall, M., & Ibbotson, P. (2000). Using projective techniques in education research. British Educational Research Journal, 26(2), 245–256. doi:10.1080/01411920050000971.
Charmaz, K. (2006). Constructing grounded theory. A practical guide through qualitative analysis. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Chilisa, B. (2012). Indigenous research methodologies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Clark, A. M., Lissel, S. L., & Davis, C. (2008). Complex critical realism: Tenets and application in nursing research. Advances in Nursing Science, 31(4), 67–79. doi:10.1097/01.ANS.0000341421.34457.2a.
Clark, A. M., MacIntyre, P. D., & Cruickshank, J. (2007). A critical realist approach to understanding and evaluating heart health programmes. Health, 11(4), 513–539. doi:10.1177/1363459307080876.
Collier, M. (2001). Approaches to analysis in visual anthropology. In T. Van Leeuwen & C. Jewitt (Eds.), The handbook of visual analysis (pp. 35–60). London, UK: Sage.
De Lange, N. (2012). Editorial. Visual methodologies in educational research. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 1–3. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/saje/v32n4/01.pdf.
De Lange, N., & Geldenhuys, M. (2012). Youth envisioning safe schools: A participatory video approach. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 494–511. Retrieved from http://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/download/83111/73201.
Ebersöhn, L., Eloff, I., Finestone, M., Van Dullemen, I., Sikkema, K., & Forsyth, B. (2012). Drawing on resilience: Piloting the utility of the kinetic family drawing to measure resilience in children of HIV-positive mothers. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 331–348. Retrieved from http://www.scielo.org.za/pdf/saje/v32n4/02.pdf.
Fiedeldey-Van Dijk, C. (1993a). Differentiation as a basis for research methodology: Developing the indingilize structured observation technique. Unpublished doctoral thesis, Pretoria, South Africa: University of Pretoria.
Fiedeldey-Van Dijk, C. (1993b, July). The indingilize structured observation technique (patented): Research – and therapeutic applications. Paper presentation at the III European conference of psychology, Tampere, Finland.
Flick, U., & Foster, J. (2008). Social representations. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 195–214). London, UK: Sage.
Gilgun, J. F. (1999). Methodological pluralism and qualitative family research. In M. B. Sussman, S. K. Steinmetz, & G. W. Peterson (Eds.), Handbook of marriage and the family (pp. 219–261). New York, NY: Springer.
Harley, A. (2012). Picturing reality: Power, ethics, and politics in using photovoice. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 320–339. Retrieved from http://wigan-ojs.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/6030/14341.
Hermans, H. J. (2002). The dialogical self as a society of mind introduction. Theory & Psychology, 12(2), 147–160. doi:10.1177/0959354302122001.
Hinthorne, L. L. (2012a). Achieving participatory development communication through 3D model building. Retrieved from http://100thousandbricks.wordpress.com.
Hinthorne, L. L. (2012b). A picture is worth a thousand words: Using the visual interpretation narrative exercise to elicit non-elite perceptions of democracy. Field Methods, 14(2), 1–7. doi: 10.1177/1525822X12444065.
Hinthorne, L. L. (2013). Using digital and instant film photography for research documentation: A research note. Qualitative Research, 14(4), 1–12. doi:10.1177/1468794113488127.
Hogan, S. (2013). Peripheries and borders: Pushing the boundaries of visual research. International Journal of Art Therapy: Formerly Inscape, 18(2), 67–74. doi:10.1080/17454832.2013.797480.
Jackson, A. Y., & Mazzei, L. A. (2012). Thinking with theory in qualitative research. Viewing data across multiple perspectives. London, UK: Routledge.
Johnson, G. A., Pfister, A. E., & Vindrola-Padros, C. (2012). Drawings, photos and performances: Using visual methods with children. Visual Anthropology Review, 28(2), 164–178. doi:10.1111/j.1548-7458.2012.01122.x.
Joubert, I. (2012). Children as photographers: Life experiences and the right to be listened to. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 449–464. Retrieved from http://www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/view/83108.
Jung, C. G. (1961). Memories, dreams, reflections. New York, NY: Pantheon Books.
Keating, N., Eales, J., & Phillips, J. E. (2013). Age-friendly rural communities: Conceptualizing ‘best-fit’. Canadian Journal on Aging/La Revue canadienne du vieillissement, 32(4), 319–332. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S0714980813000408.
Keating, N., & Phillips, J. (2008). A critical human ecology perspective on rural ageing. In Rural ageing: A good place to grow old? (pp. 1–10). London, UK: Policy Press.
Kokk, G., & Jönsson, S. (2013). Visual research methods and the importance of analytical spaces. Management & Organizational History, 8(2), 174–184. doi:10.1080/17449359.2013.779148.
Lincoln, Y. (2009). Ethical practices in qualitative research. In D. M. Mertens & P. E. Ginsberg (Eds.), The handbook of social research ethics (pp. 150–169). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Literat, I. (2013). “A pencil for your thoughts”: Participatory drawing as a visual research method with children and youth. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 12, 84–98. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/11780/14875.
Mannay, D. (2010). Making the familiar strange: Can visual research methods render the familiar setting more perceptible? Qualitative Research, 10(1), 91–111. doi:10.1177/1468794109348684.
McNiff, S. (2013). Introduction: A critical focus on art-based research. Journal of Applied Arts and Health, 4(1), 5–12. doi:10.1386/jaah.4.1.5_1.
Mitchell, C. (2008). Getting the picture and changing the picture: Visual methodologies and educational research in South Africa. South African Journal of Education, 28(3), 365–383. Retrieved from www.ajol.info/index.php/saje/article/download/25163/4362.
Moen, T. (2006). Reflections on the narrative research approach. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 5(4), 1–11. Retrieved from http://wigan-ojs.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/4360/3489.
Nanackchand, V., & Berman, K. (2012). Visual graphics for human rights, social justice, democracy and the public good. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 465–478. Retrieved from http://www.ajol.info.nwulib.nwu.ac.za/index.php/saje/article/download/83109/73199.
Nelson, G., & Prilleltensky, I. (2005). Community psychology: In pursuit of liberation and well-being. London, UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
Pain, H. (2011). Visual methods in practice and research: A review of empirical support. International Journal of Therapy and Rehabilitation, 18(6), 343–350. http://dx.doi.org/10.12968/ijtr.2011.18.6.343.
Pain, H. (2013). A literature review to evaluate the choice and use of visual methods. International Journal of Qualitative Methods, 11(4), 303–319. Retrieved from http://ejournals.library.ualberta.ca/index.php/IJQM/article/view/10397/14340.
Pauwels, L. (2011). An integrated conceptual framework for visual social research. In E. Margolis & L. Paulwels (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 3–23). London, UK: Sage.
Pink, S. (2003). Interdisciplinary agendas in visual research: Re-situating visual anthropology. Visual Studies, 18(2), 179–192. doi:10.1080/14725860310001632029.
Pink, S. (2013). Doing visual ethnography. London, UK: Sage.
Prosser, J. (2007). Visual methods and the visual culture of schools. Visual Studies, 22(1), 13–30. doi:10.1080/14725860601167143.
Ravey, P., & Johnson, K. (2008). Visual approaches: Using and interpreting images. In C. Willig & W. Stainton-Rogers (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of qualitative research in psychology (pp. 296–314). London, UK: Sage.
Reason, P. (1994). Three approaches to participative inquiry. In N. K. Denzin & Y. S. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research (pp. 324–339). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
Rieger, J. H. (2011). Rephotography for documenting social change. In The SAGE handbook of visual research methods (pp. 132–149). London, UK: Sage.
Roos, V. (2008). Mmogo-methodTM: Discovering symbolic community interactions. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(4), 659–668. Retrieved from http://dspace.nwu.ac.za/handle/10394/2896.
Roos, V. (2012). The Mmogo-method®: An exploration of experiences through visual projections. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 9(3), 249–261. Retrieved from http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/14780887.2010.500356.
Roos, V., Maine, M. K., & Khumalo, I. P. (2008). Processes and functions in higher education students adjusting to a new learning environment: Applying the Mmogo-method®. Journal of Psychology in Africa, 18(2), 293–300. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14330237.2008.10820201.
Rose, G. (2013). On the relation between ‘visual research methods’ and contemporary visual culture. The Sociological Review, 62(1), 24–46. doi:10.1111/1467-954X.12109.
Rydzik, A., Pritchard, A., Morgan, N., & Sedgley, D. (2012). Mobility, migration and hospitality employment: Voices of central and eastern European women. Hospitality & Society, 2(2), 137–157. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/hosp.2.2.137_1.
Sayer, A. (2000). Realism and social science. New York, NY: Sage.
Singh, S., & Jones, C. (2012). Visual research methods. A novel approach to understanding the experiences of compulsive hoarders: A preliminary study. Journal of Cognitive-Behavioral Psychotherapy and Research, 1(1), 36–42. Retrieved from http://www.scopemed.org/?mno=18850.
Spencer, S. (2010). Visual research methods in the social sciences: Awakening visions. New York, NY: Routledge.
Stacey, R. (2003). Learning as an activity of interdependent people. The Learning Organization, 10(6), 325–331. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09696470310497159.
Stryker, S., & Vryan, K. D. (2006). The symbolic interactionist frame. In J. DeLamater (Ed.), Handbook of social psychology (pp. 3–28). New York, NY: Springer.
Theron, L. C. (2012). Does visual participatory research have resilience-promoting value? Teacher experiences of generating and interpreting drawings. South African Journal of Education, 32(4), 381–392. Retrieved from http://www.ajol.info.nwulib.nwu.ac.za/index.php/saje/article/view/83102/73192.
Thorne, S. (2000). Data analysis in qualitative research. Evidence Based Nursing, 3(3), 68–70. doi:10.1136/ebn.3.3.68.
Vorster, C. (2011). Impact. The story of interactional therapy. Pretoria, South Africa: Satori Publishers.
Wall, K., Higgins, S., Hall, E., & Woolner, P. (2013). ‘That’s not quite the way we see it’: The epistemological challenge of visual data. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 36(1), 3–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1743727X.2012.730278.
Wood, J. T. (1995). Relational communication. Continuity and change in personal relationships. Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Roos, V. (2016). Introducing the Mmogo-method as a Visual Data-Collection Method. In: Roos, V. (eds) Understanding Relational and Group Experiences through the Mmogo-Method®. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31224-8_1
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31224-8_1
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31222-4
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31224-8
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)