Skip to main content
  • 772 Accesses

Abstract

A novel diagnostic tool for assessment of the small bowel mucosal surface, capsule endoscopy (CE), is mostly indicated in cases of obscure gastrointestinal bleeding and in selected patients with chronic inflammatory diseases. Generally considered a safe procedure, CE may be occasionally complicated by bronchial aspiration or videocapsule retention. The latter occurrence is significantly more frequent in patients with inflammatory, neoplastic or postsurgical strictures and may require endoscopic or surgical removal. Plain abdominal radiographs are useful to detect and monitor the retained radio-opaque videocapsule and to detect signs of bowel obstruction or perforation. Conversely, the use of CT is hampered by beam-hardening artefacts originating from metallic parts of the videocapsule. A typical case of small bowel capsule retention in a patient with Crohn’s disease is presented. Recently, the availability of “patency test capsules” allowed patients with obstructive symptoms, suspected or established CD to safely undergo CE.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Rammohan A, Naidu RM (2011) Capsule endoscopy: new technology, old complication. J Surg Technol Case Rep 3:91–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Rondonotti E, Soncini M, Girelli C et al (2010) Small bowel capsule endoscopy in clinical practice: a multicenter 7-year survey. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol 22:1380–1386

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Van de Bruaene C, De Looze D, Hindryckx P (2015) Small bowel capsule endoscopy: where are we after almost 15 years of use? World J Gastrointest Endosc 7:13–36

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Annese V, Daperno M, Rutter MD et al (2013) European evidence based consensus for endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. J Crohns Colitis 7:982–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Figueiredo P, Almeida N, Lopes S et al (2010) Small-bowel capsule endoscopy in patients with suspected Crohn’s disease-diagnostic value and complications. Diagn Ther Endosc doi: 10.1155/2010/101285. Epub 2010 Aug 5

  6. Kopylov U, Seidman EG (2014) Role of capsule endoscopy in inflammatory bowel disease. World J Gastroenterol 20:1155–1164

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Van Assche G, Dignass A, Panes J et al (2010) The second European evidence-based consensus on the diagnosis and management of Crohn’s disease: definitions and diagnosis. J Crohns Colitis 4:7–27

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bakhshi GD, Tayade MB, Jadhav KV et al (2014) Retention of an endoscopic capsule. J Minim Access Surg 10:163–165

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Hoog CM, Bark LA, Arkani J et al (2012) Capsule retentions and incomplete capsule endoscopy examinations: an analysis of 2300 examinations. Gastroenterol Res Pract 2012:518718

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Karagiannis S, Faiss S, Mavrogiannis C (2009) Capsule retention: a feared complication of wireless capsule endoscopy. Scand J Gastroenterol 44:1158–1165

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Li F, Gurudu SR, De Petris G et al (2008) Retention of the capsule endoscope: a single-center experience of 1000 capsule endoscopy procedures. Gastrointest Endosc 68:174–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Sachdev MS, Leighton JA, Fleischer DE et al (2007) A prospective study of the utility of abdominal radiographs after capsule endoscopy for the diagnosis of capsule retention. Gastrointest Endosc 66:894–900

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Skovsen AP, Burcharth J, Burgdorf SK (2013) Capsule endoscopy: a cause of late small bowel obstruction and perforation. Case Rep Surg 2013:458108

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Gayer G, Petrovich I, Jeffrey RB (2011) Foreign objects encountered in the abdominal cavity at CT. Radiographics 31:409–428

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Shaish H, Gilet A, Gerard P (2015) “It’s all foreign to me”: how to decipher gastrointestinal intraluminal foreign bodies. Abdom Imaging, in press

    Google Scholar 

  16. Cheifetz AS, Lewis BS (2006) Capsule endoscopy retention: is it a complication? J Clin Gastroenterol 40:688–691

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Massimo Tonolini .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Tonolini, M. (2016). Complications of Small Bowel Capsule Endoscopy. In: Tonolini, M. (eds) Imaging Complications of Gastrointestinal and Biliopancreatic Endoscopy Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31211-8_16

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31211-8_16

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31209-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31211-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics