Skip to main content

Abstract

Optical colonoscopy carries a low but real risk for morbidity and mortality, which increases as endoscopy assumes a more therapeutic role. Adverse event rate is about 0.3 % and almost 85 % of serious complications occur in patients undergoing polypectomy. Perforation and haemorrhage, the commonest specific complications, may be unrecognised during the procedure. Furthermore, clinical symptoms and laboratory signs often develop late; therefore, prompt adequate imaging is mandatory in case of clinical suspicion. Plain radiographs have limited sensitivity in detection of pneumoperitoneum and extraperitoneal gas. Multidetector computed tomography (CT) represents the best technique to assess free air or fluid, colonic injuries and bleeding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

eBook
USD 16.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Committee ASoP, Fisher DA, Maple JT, Ben-Menachem T (2011) Complications of colonoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc 74:745–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Green J (2006) BSG guidelines in gastroenterology – complications of gastrointestinal endoscopy. http://www.bsg.org.uk/clinical-guidelines/endoscopy/guidelines-on-complications-of-gastrointestinal-endoscopyhtml

  3. Kim DH, Pickhardt PJ, Taylor AJ et al (2008) Imaging evaluation of complications at optical colonoscopy. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 37:165–177

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Blotiere PO, Weill A, Ricordeau P et al (2013) Perforations and haemorrhages after colonoscopy in 2010: a study based on comprehensive French health insurance data (SNIIRAM). Clin Res Hepatol Gastroenterol 38(1):112–117

    Google Scholar 

  5. Laing CJ, Tobias T, Rosenblum DI et al (2007) Acute gastrointestinal bleeding: emerging role of multidetector CT angiography and review of current imaging techniques. Radiograph: Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am 27:1055–1070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Wax BN, Katz DS, Badler RL et al (2006) Complications of abdominal and pelvic procedures: computed tomographic diagnosis. Curr Probl Diagn Radiol 35:171–187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Geffroy Y, Rodallec MH, Boulay-Coletta I et al (2011) Multidetector CT angiography in acute gastrointestinal bleeding: why, when, and how. Radiograph: Rev Publ Radiol Soc N Am 31:E35–E46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ishii N, Fujita Y (2015) Colonic diverticulitis after endoscopic band ligation performed for colonic diverticular hemorrhage. ACG Case Rep J 2:218–220

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Leffler DA, Kheraj R, Garud S et al (2010) The incidence and cost of unexpected hospital use after scheduled outpatient endoscopy. Arch Intern Med 170:1752–1757

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Hagel AF, Boxberger F, Dauth W et al (2012) Colonoscopy-associated perforation: a 7-year survey of in-hospital frequency, treatment and outcome in a German university hospital. Colorectal Dis 14:1121–1125

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lohsiriwat V (2010) Colonoscopic perforation: incidence, risk factors, management and outcome. World J Gastroenterol 16:425–430

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Hamdani U, Naeem R, Haider F et al (2013) Risk factors for colonoscopic perforation: a population-based study of 80118 cases. World J Gastroenterol 19:3596–3601

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Paspatis GA, Dumonceau JM, Barthet M et al (2014) Diagnosis and management of iatrogenic endoscopic perforations: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) Position Statement. Endoscopy 46:693–711

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Samalavicius NE, Kazanavicius D, Lunevicius R et al (2013) Incidence, risk, management, and outcomes of iatrogenic full-thickness large bowel injury associated with 56,882 colonoscopies in 14 Lithuanian hospitals. Surg Endosc 27:1628–1635

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Castellvi J, Pi F, Sueiras A et al (2011) Colonoscopic perforation: useful parameters for early diagnosis and conservative treatment. Int J Colorectal Dis 26:1183–1190

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Won DY, Lee IK, Lee YS et al (2012) The indications for nonsurgical management in patients with colorectal perforation after colonoscopy. Am Surg 78:550–554

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim JS, Kim BW, Kim JI et al (2013) Endoscopic clip closure versus surgery for the treatment of iatrogenic colon perforations developed during diagnostic colonoscopy: a review of 115,285 patients. Surg Endosc 27:501–504

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Tonolini M, Rigiroli F (2014) Iatrogenic colon perforation during operative colonoscopy: imaging triage {Online}. URL: http://www.eurorad.org/casephp?id=11594

  19. Kim HC, Yang DM, Kim SW et al (2014) Gastrointestinal tract perforation: evaluation of MDCT according to perforation site and elapsed time. Eur Radiol 24:1386–1393

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Falidas E, Anyfantakis G, Vlachos K et al (2012) Pneumoperitoneum, retropneumoperitoneum, pneumomediastinum, and diffuse subcutaneous emphysema following diagnostic colonoscopy. Case Rep Surg 2012:108791

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Campari .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Campari, A., Ravelli, A., Tonolini, M. (2016). Imaging Appearances of Post-colonoscopy Complications. In: Tonolini, M. (eds) Imaging Complications of Gastrointestinal and Biliopancreatic Endoscopy Procedures. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31211-8_12

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31211-8_12

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31209-5

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31211-8

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics