Advertisement

A Practice-Grounded Approach to ‘Engagement’ and ‘Motivation’ in Networked Learning

  • Nina Bonderup DohnEmail author
Chapter
Part of the Research in Networked Learning book series (RINL)

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to clarify and challenge contemporary views of motivation and engagement as they appear within the networked learning literature and to suggest an approach which takes into account the insights of the prevailing individualist-cognitivist and socio-cultural views whilst accommodating better to seemingly well-known everyday cases. This approach supplies a more adequate instrument for analysing networked learning activities in that it highlights the complex interplay of the socially negotiated and the self-directedly chosen in the determination of a person’s motivation and engagement. I identify two different metaphors of context—as ‘container’ and as ‘rope’—drawn on by the individualist approach and the socio-culturalist approach, respectively, and argue that we need both metaphors to analyse motivation and engagement in networked learning activities. Drawing on the concept of primary contexts, I argue for a practice-grounded intermediary position which makes it possible to investigate empirically how different practices take on the significance of ‘rope’ or ‘container’ to a person at different points in his/her life. The phenomena of motivation and engagement are characterised as a complex set of states and processes, anchored in the individual, but partly co-constituted through positioning and negotiation in social space. I illustrate how complexly these phenomena relate to practices regarded as ‘ropes’/‘containers’. Distinguishing between a level of discrimination between practices and a level of concrete actions, I pinpoint important questions to investigate when analysing networked learning. By way of concluding, I briefly consider some implications for the design of networked learning.

Keywords

Networked learning Motivation Engagement Context Practice 

Notes

Acknowledgement 

Research for this article has been partly funded by a research grant from The Danish Council for Independent Research, Humanities, Grant No. DFF-4180-00062.

References

  1. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, structures, and student motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84(3), 261–271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, T., Rourke, L., Garrison, D. R., & Archer, W. (2001). Assessing teaching presence in a computer conferencing context. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 5(2), 1–17.Google Scholar
  3. Ares, N. (2008). Cultural practices in networked classroom learning environments. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 3(3), 301–326.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  5. Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. New York, NY: Freeman.Google Scholar
  6. Basquill, J. (2014). Synchronous or asynchronous? That is the question: Are online classrooms the answer? In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014 (pp. 343–346). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  7. Brouns, F., & Hsiao, A. (2012). Social learning in learning networks through peer support: Research findings and pitfalls. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, & P. Sloep (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 18–25). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  8. Carson, M. (2014). Promoting a community of practice online: How important is social presence? In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014. Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  9. Dohn, N. B. (2013). “Viden i praksis” - Implikationer for it-baseret læring. Res Cogitans, 1, 94–128.Google Scholar
  10. Dohn, N. B. (2014). Implications for networked learning of the ‘practice’ side of social practice theories - A tacit-knowledge perspective. In V. Hodgson, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, & T. Ryberg (Eds.), The design, experience and practice of networked learning (pp. 29–49). Dordrecht: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dreier, O. (2008). Psychotherapy in everyday life. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Dreyfus, H. (1979). What computers still can’t do. New York, NY: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
  13. Dreyfus, H. (2001). Phenomenological description versus rational reconstruction. Revue Internationale de Philosophie, 55(2), 181–196.Google Scholar
  14. Dreyfus, H. (2002). Intelligence without representation–Merleau-Ponty’s critique of mental representation the relevance of phenomenology to scientific explanation. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences, 1(4), 367–383.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Engeström, Y. (1987). Learning by expanding: An activity-theoretical approach to developmental research. Helsinki: Orienta-Konsultit.Google Scholar
  16. Goodyear, P., Banks, S., Hodgson, V., & McConnell, D. (Eds.). (2004). Advances in research on networked learning. Dordrecht: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  17. Greeno, J. G. (1997). On claims that answer the wrong questions. Educational Researcher, 26(1), 5–17.Google Scholar
  18. Greeno, J. G., & Gresalfi, M. S. (2008). Opportunities to learn in practice and identity. In P. A. Moss, D. C. Pullin, J. P. Gee, E. H. Haertel, & L. J. Young (Eds.), Assessment, equity, and opportunity to learn (pp. 170–199). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Greeno, J. G., & Middle School Mathematics Through Applications Project Group. (1998). The situativity of knowing, learning, and research. American Psychologist, 53(1), 5–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greeno, J. G., & van de Sande, C. (2007). Perspectival understanding of conceptions and conceptual growth in interaction. Educational Psychologist, 42(1), 9–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Järvelä, S., Volet, S., & Järvenoja, H. (2010). Research on motivation in collaborative learning: Moving beyond the cognitive–situative divide and combining individual and social processes. Educational Psychologist, 45(1), 15–27. doi: 10.1080/00461520903433539.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Jarvis, P. (2007). Globalization, lifelong learning and the learning society: Sociological perspectives. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  23. Lave, J. (1993). The practice of learning. In J. Lave & S. Chaiklin (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 3–32). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning - Legitimate peripheral participation. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Martin, J. (2007). The selves of educational psychology: Conceptions, contexts, and critical considerations. Educational Psychologist, 42(2), 79–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. McDermott, R. (1993). The acquisition of a child by a learning disability. In J. Lave & S. Chaiklin (Eds.), Understanding practice: Perspectives on activity and context (pp. 269–305). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Nicolajsen, H. W. (2012). Changing the rules of the game-experiences with Web 2.0 learning in higher education. In V. Hodgson, C. Jones, M. de Laat, D. McConnell, T. Ryberg, & P. Sloep (Eds.), Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Networked Learning (pp. 551–558). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  28. Nielsen, K. (1999). Musical apprenticeship: Learning at the academy of music as socially situated. Ph.D. dissertation. Psykologisk Institut, Aarhus Univeristet, Aarhus.Google Scholar
  29. Nolen, S. B., & Ward, C. J. (2008). Sociocultural and situative approaches to studying motivation. In M. Maehr, S. Karabenick, & T. Urdan (Eds.), Social psychological perspectives on motivation and achievement. Advances in motivation and achievement (Vol. 15, pp. 428–460). London: Esmerald Group.Google Scholar
  30. Østerlund, C. (1997). Sales apprentices on the move. A multi-contextual perspective on situated learning. Nordisk Pedagogik, 17(3), 169–177.Google Scholar
  31. Packer, M. J., & Goicoechea, J. (2000). Sociocultural and constructivist theories of learning: Ontology, not just epistemology. Educational Psychologist, 35(4), 227–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Ponti, M. (2014). “Remember to hand out medals”: Value and peer rating in an online open study group. In S. Bayne, C. Jones, M. de Laat, T. Ryberg, & C. Sinclair (Eds.), Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Networked Learning 2014 (pp. 228–235). Lancaster: Lancaster University.Google Scholar
  33. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25(1), 54–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Säljö, R. (2000). Læring i praksis - Et sociokulturelt perspektiv. København: Hans Reitzels Forlag.Google Scholar
  35. Salmon, G. (2003). E-moderating: The key to teaching and learning online (2nd ed.). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  36. Salmon, G. (2013). E-tivities (2nd ed.). New York, NY: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  37. Schunk, D. H., Pintrich, P. R., & Meece, J. L. (2008). Motivation in education: Theory, research, and applications. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  38. Sfard, A., & Prusak, A. (2005). Telling identities: In search of an analytic tool for investigating learning as a culturally shaped activity. Educational Researcher, 34(4), 14–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Taylor, C. (1985a). Philosophical papers: Volume 1, Human agency and language (Vol. 1). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Taylor, C. (1985b). Philosophical papers: Volume 2, Philosophy and the human sciences. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of practice. New York, NY: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Design and CommunicationUniversity of Southern DenmarkKoldingDenmark

Personalised recommendations