Skip to main content

Safety Considerations in Ambulatory Care Informatics

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 662 Accesses

Abstract

While there has been extensive research on patient safety in high-acuity health care settings, hazards to patient safety in ambulatory care settings remain poorly understood. Workflows and information flows in ambulatory care are highly complex and varied, giving rise to distinct ways in which patient harm can occur. It is hoped that use of health information technology (HIT) can make ambulatory care safer, but concerns exist that hazards to patient safety can also be introduced by such technology. This chapter presents two cases of HIT-related hazards centered on common scenarios in ambulatory care: determining a patient's preventive screening needs and identifying a patient population for chronic disease management.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   64.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Gandhi TK, Lee TH. Patient safety beyond the hospital. NEJM. 2010;363:1001–3.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh H, Esquivel A, Sittig DF, Murphy D, Kadiyala H, Schiesser R, Espadas D, Petersen LA. Follow-up actions on electronic referral communication in a multispecialty outpatient setting. J Gen Intern Med. 2011;26:64–9.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Giardina TD, King BJ, Ignaczak AP, Paull DE, Hoeksema L, Mills PD, Neily J, Hemphill RR, Singh H. Root cause analysis reports help identify common factors in delayed diagnosis and treatment of outpatients. Health Aff. 2013;32(8):1368–75.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Singh H, Thomas EJ, Mani S, Sittig D, Arora H, Espadas D, Khan MM, Petersen LA. Timely follow-up of abnormal diagnostic imaging test results in an outpatient setting: are electronic medical records achieving their potential? Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:1578–86.

    Google Scholar 

  5. Singh H, Mani S, Espadas D, Petersen N, Franklin V, Petersen LA. Prescription errors and outcomes related to inconsistent information transmitted through computerized order entry: a prospective study. Arch Intern Med. 2009;169:982–9.

    Google Scholar 

  6. Lorincz CY, Drazen E, Sokol PE, Neerukonda KV, Metzger J, Toepp MC, Maul L, Classen DC, Wynia MK. Research in ambulatory patient safety 2000–2010: a 10-year review. Chicago, IL: American Medical Association; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Karsh B. Clinical practice improvement and redesign: how change in workflow can be supported by clinical decision support. AHRQ Publication No. 09-0054-EF, 2009. http://www.nachc.com/client/Clinical%20Practice%20Improvement%20and%20Redesign_How%20Workflow%20can%20Support%20CDS.pdf. Accessed 28 June 2014.

  8. Myers RB, Jones SL, Sittig DF. Review of reported clinical information system adverse events in US Food and Drug Administration databases. Appl Clin Inform. 2011;2:63–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Magrabi F, Mei-Sing O, Runciman W, Coiera E. Using FDA reports to inform a classification for health information technology safety problems. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;19:45–53.

    Google Scholar 

  10. Warm D, Edwards P. Classifying health information technology patient safety related incidents — an approach used in Wales. Appl Clin Inform. 2012;3:248–57.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Harrington L, Kennerly D, Johnson C. Safety issues related to the electronic medical record (EMR): synthesis of the literature from the last decade, 2000–2009. J Healthc Manag. 2011;56:31–43.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Pizziferri L, Kittler AF, Volk LA, Shulman LN, Kessler J, Carlson G, Michaelidis T, Bates DW. Impact of an electronic health record on oncologists’ clinic time. AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2005;2005:1083.

    Google Scholar 

  13. NIST 2014. Integrating electronic health records into clinical workflow: an application of human factors modeling methods to ambulatory care. http://nvlpubs.nist.gov/nistpubs/ir/2014/NIST.IR.7988.pdf, Accessed 28 June 2014.

  14. Can der Sijs H, Aarts J, Vulto A, Berg M. Overriding of drug safety alerts in computerized physician order entry. J Am Med Infom Assoc. 2006;113(2):138–47.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Sittig DF, Singh H. A new socio-technical model for studying health information technology in complex adaptive healthcare systems. Qual Saf Health Care. 2010;19 Suppl 3:i68–74.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. International Health Terminology Standards Development Organization. SNOMED CT. http://ihtsdo.org/snomed-ct/, Accessed 9 Nov 2014.

  17. 2014 Edition Release 2 Electronic Health Record (EHR) Certification Criteria and the ONC HIT Certification Program; Regulatory Flexibilities, Improvements, and Enhanced Health Information Exchange; Final Rule. Federal Register 79 (11 Sept 2014): 54330–54480.

    Google Scholar 

  18. AMIA. History of the clinical informatics subspecialty. http://www.amia.org/clinical-informatics-board-review-course/history. Accessed 9 Nov 2014.

  19. Wright A, Sittig DF, Ash JS, Bates DW, Feblowitz J, Fraser G, Maviglia SM, McMullen C, Nichol WP, Pang JE, Starmer J, Middleton B. Governance for clinical decision support: case studies and recommended practices from leading institutions. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2011;18(2):187–94.

    Google Scholar 

  20. Singh H, Wilson L, Peterson LA, Sawhney MK, Reis B, Espadas D, Sittig DF. Improving follow-up of abnormal cancer screens using electronic health records: trust but verify test result communication. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2009;9:49.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Kushniruk AW, Triola MM, Borycki EM, Stein B, Kannry JL. Technology induced error and usability: the relationship between usability problems and prescription errors when using a handheld application. Int J Med Inform. 2005;74(7–8):519–26.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Singh H, Spitzmueller C, Petersen NJ, Sawhney MK, Smith MW, Murphy DR, Espadas D, Laxmisan A, Sittig DF. Primary care practitioners’ views on test result management in EHR-enabled health systems a national survey. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2012;20(4):727–35. doi:10.1136/amiajnl-2012-001267.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Frankel RM, Saleem JJ. “Attention on the flight deck”: What ambulatory care providers can learn from pilots about complex coordinated actions. Patient Educ Couns. 2013;93:367–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Eric Rose M.D., F.A.A.F.P. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Rose, E. (2016). Safety Considerations in Ambulatory Care Informatics. In: Agrawal, A. (eds) Safety of Health IT. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31123-4_15

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31123-4_15

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31121-0

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31123-4

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics