Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Space Syntax of Intelligible Communities

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Community Wayfinding: Pathways to Understanding

Abstract

Cities are complex human artifacts organized to be legible. Their legibility directly affects how easily we can explore them and how effectively we can find our way to specific destinations. Legibility, however, is deeply linked to other kinds of functionality, specifically the distribution of movement and co-presence over public space, and the distribution of land uses relative to the street network. Space syntax, one particular approach to the analysis of the legibility of urban space, links our intuitive understanding of space to rigorous analysis and quantification. By offering quantitative descriptions of the spatial structure of environments as it affects human functions, including exploration and wayfinding, space syntax contributes to interdisciplinary research on spatial cognition. In addition, analytical descriptions such as those offered by space syntax allow us: First, to specify and benchmark the properties of different types of environments thus helping us articulate what is desirable in particular situations according to a growing body of systematic knowledge and evidence. Second, to evaluate design and planning alternatives in order to make decisions. The aim of this chapter is to provide an introduction to current space syntax research that is most directly linked to community wayfinding.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 129.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 169.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  • American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials. (2004). A policy on the geometric design of highways and streets. Washington, DC: American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.

    Google Scholar 

  • Appleyard, D. (1970). Styles and methods of structuring a city. Environment and Behavior, 2, 100–117.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asami, Y., Kubat, A. S., & Istek, C. (2001). Characterization of the street networks in the traditional Turkish urban form. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 777–795.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aultman-Hall, L., Roorda, M., & Baetz, B. W. (1997). Using GIS for evaluation of neighborhood pedestrian accessibility. Journal of Urban Planning and Development-Asce, 123, 10–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bailenson, J. N., Shum, M. S., & Uttal, D. H. (2000). The initial segment strategy: A heuristic for route selection. Memory and Cognition, 28, 306–318.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Barton, K. R., Valtchanov, D., & Ellard, C. (2014). Seeing beyond the visual field: The influence of spatial topology and visual field on navigation performance. Environment and Behavior, 46, 507–529.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedikt, M. L. (1979). To take hold of space: Isovists and isovist fields. Environment and Planning (B), 6, 47–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berghauser Pont, M., & Marcus, L. (2014). Innovations in measuring density: from area and location density to accessible and perceived density. Nordic Journal of Architectural Research, 26(2), 11–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, L. A., Holscher, C., Shipley, T. F., & Conroy Dalton, R. (2010). Getting lost in buildings. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 19, 284–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castells, M. (1996). Network society. Oxford: Blackwell Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chiaradia, A., Hillier, B., Schwander, C., & Wedderburn, M. (2012). Compositional and urban form effects on centers in Greater London. Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers – Urban Design and Planning, 165, 21–42.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Christova, P., Scoppa, M., Peponis, J., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2012). Exploring small city maps. Experimental Brain Research, 223, 207–217.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Conroy-Dalton, R. (2003). The secret is to follow your nose: Route path selection and angularity. Environment and Behavior, 35, 107–131.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowe, D. A., Averbeck, B. B., Chafee, M. V., Anderson, J. H., & Georgopoulos, A. P. (2000). Mental maze solving. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12, 813–827.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dewey, J. (1954). The public and its problems. Athens: Swallow Press Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1968). Ekistics: An introduction to the science of human settlements. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Doxiadis, C. A. (1970). Ekistics, the science of human settlements. Science, 170, 393–404.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Emo, B. (2014). Seeing the axial line: Evidence from wayfinding experiments. Behavioral Sciences, 4, 167–180.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, G. W. (1980). Environmental cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 88, 259–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Figueiredo, L., & Amorim, L. (2005). Continuity lines in the axial system. In A. van Nes (Ed.), Space syntax fifth international symposium (pp. 161–174). Delft: T U Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, N. (1997). Opening address. In Space syntax first international symposium (pp. i–vi). London: University College London.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. D., Schmid, T. L., Sallis, J. F., Chapman, J., & Saelens, B. E. (2005). Linking objectively measured physical activity with objectively measured urban form – Findings from SMARTRAQ. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 28, 117–125.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frank, L. D., Sallis, J. F., Conway, T. L., Chapman, J. E., Saelens, B. E., & Bachman, W. (2006). Many pathways from land use to health – Associations between neighborhood walkability and active transportation, body mass index, and air quality. Journal of the American Planning Association, 72, 75–87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks. Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gärling, T., & Golledge, R. G. (1989). Environmental perception and cognition. In E. H. Zube & G. T. Moore (Eds.), Advances in environmental behavior and design (pp. 203–230). New York: Plenum.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Golledge, R. G. (1987). Environmental cognition. In D. Stokols & I. Altman (Eds.), Handbook of environmental psychology (pp. 131–175). New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haq, S. (2003). Investigating the syntax line: Configurational properties and cognitive correlates. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 30, 841–863.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haq, S., & Zimring, C. (2003). Just down the road a piece: The development of topological knowledge of building layouts. Environment and Behavior, 35, 132–160.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hart, R. A., & Moore, G. T. (1973). The development of spatial cognition. In R. M. Downs & D. Stea (Eds.), Image and environment: Cognitive mapping and spatial behavior (pp. 246–288). New Brunswick: Aldine Transaction.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, P. M. (1997). Measures of connectivity. Places-a Forum of Environmental Design, 11, 58–65.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hess, P. M., Vernez Moudon, A., Snyder, M. C., & Stanilov, K. (1999). Site design and pedestrian travel. Transportation Research Record, 1674, 9–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilbert, D., & Cohn-Vossen, S. (1990). Geometry and the imagination. New York: Chelsea Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1996). Space is the machine. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1988). Against enclosure. In N. Teymur, T. A. Markus, & T. Wooley (Eds.), Rehumanising housing. Oxford: Butterworth.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (1999). Centrality as a process: Accounting for attraction inequalities in deformed grids. Urban Design International, 4, 107–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (2002). A theory of the city as object: Or, how spatial laws mediate the social construction of urban space. Urban Design International, 7, 153–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B. (2012). Studying cities to learn about minds: Some possible implications of space syntax for spatial cognition. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 39, 12–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., & Hanson, J. (1984). The social logic of space. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Leaman, A., Stansall, P., & Bedford, M. (1976). Space syntax. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 3, 147–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Hanson, J., Peponis, J., Hudson, J., & Burdett, R. (1983). Space syntax, a different urban perspective. Architects’ Journal, 178, 47–63.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Burdett, R., Peponis, J., & Penn, A. (1987). Creating life: Or, does architecture determine anything? Architecture et Comportement/Architecture and Behaviour, 3, 233–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Penn, A., Hanson, J., Grajewski, T., & Xu, J. (1993). Natural movement: Or, configuration and attraction in urban pedestrian movement. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 20, 29–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillier, B., Yang, T., & Turner, A. (2012). Normalising least angle choice in DepthMap and how it opens up new perspectives on the global and local analysis of city space. Journal of Space Syntax, 3, 155–193.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, J. (1961). Death and life of Great American cities. London: Penguin.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Y. O., & Penn, A. (2004). Linking the spatial syntax of cognitive maps to the spatial syntax of the environment. Environment and Behavior, 36(4), 483–504.

    Google Scholar 

  • Koschutzki, D., Lehmann, K. A., Peeters, L., Richter, S., Tenfelde-Podehl, D., & Zlotowski, O. (2005). Centrality indices. In U. Brandes & T. Erlebach (Eds.), Network analysis. Methodological foundations (pp. 16–61). Berlin: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Kubat, A. S., Ertekin, Ö., EyüboÄŸlu, E., & Özer, Ö. (2005). Movement activity and strategic design study for Istanbul’s historical Galata district. In A. Van Nes (Ed.), Space syntax fifth international symposium (pp. 566–579). Delft: T U. Delft.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuipers, B. (2001). The skeleton in the cognitive map. Acomputational hypothesis. In J. Peponis, J. Wineman, & S. Bafna (Eds.), Space syntax third international symposium (pp. 10.11–10.17). Atlanta: Taubman College.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuzmyak, R. J., Baber, C., & Savory, D. (2006). Use of walk opportunities index to quantify local accessibility. Transportation Research Record, 1977, 145–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch, K. (1960). The image of the city. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marcus, L. (2010). Spatial capital. A proposal for an extension of space syntax into a more general urban morphology. Journal of Space Syntax, 1, 30–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Moeser, S. D. (1988). Cognitive mapping in a complex building. Environment and Behavior, 20, 21–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Montello, D. R. (1991). Spatial orientation and the angularity of urban routes: A field study. Environment and Behavior, 23, 47–69.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moore, G. T. (1974). The development of environmental knowing. In D. Canter & T. Lee (Eds.), Psychology and the built environment (pp. 84–194). London: Architectural Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Neill, M. J. (1991). Effects of signage and floor plan configuration on wayfinding accuracy. Environment and Behavior, 23, 553–574.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozbil, A., Peponis, J., & Stone, B. (2011). Understanding the link between street connectivity, land use and pedestrian flows. Urban Design International, 16, 125–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, A. (2003). Space syntax and spatial cognition: Or why the axial line? Environment and Behavior, 35, 30–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Penn, A., Hillier, B., Banister, D., & Xu, J. (1998). Configurational modelling of urban movement networks. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 25, 59–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Hadjinikolaou, E., Livieratos, C., & Fatouros, D. A. (1989). The spatial core of urban culture. Ekistics-the Problems and Science of Human Settlements, 56, 43–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Zimring, C., & Choi, Y. K. (1990). Finding the building in wayfinding. Environment and Behavior, 22, 555–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Ross, C., & Rashid, M. (1997). The structure of urban space, movement and co-presence: The case of Atlanta. Geoforum, 28, 341–358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Rashid, M., Kim, S. H., & Bafna, S. (1997). On the description of shape and spatial configuration inside buildings: Convex partitions and their local properties. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 24, 761–781.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Wineman, J., Bafna, S., Rashid, M., & Kim, S. H. (1998). On the generation of linear representations of spatial configuration. Environment and Planning B-Planning & Design, 25, 559–576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peponis, J., Bafna, S., & Zhang, Z. Y. (2008). The connectivity of streets: Reach and directional distance. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 35, 881–901.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2006). The network analysis of urban streets: A primal approach. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 33, 705–725.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., Crucitti, P., & Latora, V. (2008). Multiple centrality assessment in Parma: A network analysis of paths and open spaces. Urban Design International, 13, 41–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porta, S., Strano, E., Ianoviello, V., Messora, R., Latora, V., Cardillo, A., Wang, F., & Scellato, S. (2009). Street centrality and densities of retail and services in Bologna, Italy. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 36, 450–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Read, S. (1999). Space syntax and the Dutch city. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 26, 251–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sakellaridi, S., Christova, P., Christopoulos, V., Vialard, A., Peponis, J., Georgopoulos, A. (2015). Cognitive mechanisms underlying instructed choice exploration of small city maps. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 9, 60.1–60.12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnins.2015.00060.

  • Scoppa, M., & Peponis, J. (2015). Distributed attraction: The effects of street network connectivity upon the distribution of retail frontage in the City of Buenos Aires. Environment and Planning B: Planning & Design, 42, 354–378.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tolman, E. C. (1948). Cognitive maps in rats and men. Psychological Review, 55(4), 189–208.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., Doxa, M., O’Sullivan, D., & Penn, A. (2001). From isovists to visibility graphs: A methodology for the analysis of architectural space. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 28, 103–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Turner, A., Penn, A., & Hillier, B. (2005). An algorithmic definition of the axial map. Environment and Planning B: Planning and Design, 32, 425–444.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weisman, J. (1981). Evaluating architectural legibility – Way-finding in the built environment. Environment and Behavior, 13, 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiener, J. M., Hölscher, C., Büchner, S., & Koniecszy, L. (2012). Gaze behavior during space perception and spatial decision making. Psychological Research, 6, 713–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Architecture, Georgia Institute of Technology, Atlanta, GA, USA

    John Peponis Ph.D.

Authors
  1. John Peponis Ph.D.
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to John Peponis Ph.D. .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Ctr fr HealthPromotion&DiseasePrevention, Univ of North Carolina at Chapel Hi, CHAPEL HILL, North Carolina, USA

    Rebecca H. Hunter

  2. Division of Population Health, Cntrs for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia, USA

    Lynda A. Anderson

  3. Biobehavioral Nursing and Health Systems, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

    Basia L. Belza

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Peponis, J. (2016). The Space Syntax of Intelligible Communities. In: Hunter, R., Anderson, L., Belza, B. (eds) Community Wayfinding: Pathways to Understanding. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31072-5_3

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31072-5_3

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Springer, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31070-1

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31072-5

  • eBook Packages: MedicineMedicine (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation