Skip to main content

Dynamics of Legitimation Work

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
  • 325 Accesses

Abstract

Based on the cases studied in this book, Larsen, in this concluding chapter, discusses the characteristic features of contemporary legitimation work in the culture sector. He discusses how the organizations relate to different audience groups in their performances of legitimacy, and how this plays out in the public sphere. The chapter ends in a discussion of the theoretical implications of the cultural approach to organizational legitimacy presented in the book.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.

Buying options

Chapter
USD   29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD   39.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD   54.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Learn about institutional subscriptions

References

  • Alexander, Jeffrey C. 2004. Cultural pragmatics: Social performance between ritual and strategy. Sociological Theory 22(4): 527–573.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2006. The Civil Sphere. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2010. The Performance of Politics: Obama’s Victory and the Democratic Struggle for Power. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006. On Justification: Economies of Worth. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Daloz, Jean-Pascal. 2007. Political elites and conspicuous modesty: Norway, Sweden, Finland in comparative perspective. Comparative Social Research 26: 173–212.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elias, Norbert. 1996. The Germans: Power Struggles and the Development of Habitus in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries. Oxford: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Esping-Andersen, Gösta. 1990. The Three Worlds of Welfare Capitalism. Cambridge: Polity Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Garnham, Nicholas. 1992. The media and the public sphere. In Habermas and the Public Sphere, ed. Craig Calhoun, 359–376. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Goffman, Erving. 2005 [1967]. On Face-Work. An Analysis of Ritual Elements in Social Interaction. In Interaction Ritual. Essays on Face-to-Face Behaviour. New Brunswick, NJ: Transaction Publishers.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gullestad, Marianne. 1991. The Scandinavian version of egalitarian individualism. Ethnologica Scandinavica 21: 3–18.

    Google Scholar 

  • Haarr, Tone Knudsen, and Anne Krogstad. 2011. Myten om den norske kultureliten. Sosiologisk tidsskrift 19(1): 6–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Habermas, Jürgen. 1989. The Structural Transformation of the Public Sphere: An Inquiry Into a Category of Bourgeois Society. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1996. Between Facts and Norms. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs, Ronald N. 2012. Entertainment media and the aesthetic public sphere. In The Oxford Handbook of Cultural Sociology, ed. Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ronald N. Jacobs, and Philip Smith, 318–340. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarness, Vegard. 2013. Class, Status, Closure. The Petropolis and Cultural Life. PhD, Department of Sociology, University of Bergen.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle. 1992. Money, Morals and Manners: The Culture of the French and American Upper-middle Class. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 1995. National identity and national boundary patterns in France and the United States. French Historical Studies 19(2): 349–365.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2012. Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology 38: 201–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lamont, Michèle, and Laurent Thévenot. 2000a. Introduction: Toward a renewed comparative cultural sociology. In Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States, ed. Michèle Lamont and Laurent Thévenot, 1–22. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— (eds.). 2000b. Rethinking Comparative Cultural Sociology: Repertoires of Evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Larsen, Håkon. 2008. I demokratiets tjeneste. Offentlig debatt om allmennkringkasting i Norge og Sverige. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 49(3): 313–342.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2010. Legitimation strategies of public service broadcasters: The divergent rhetoric in Norway and Sweden. Media, Culture and Society 32(2): 267–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2011a. Legitimering av allmennkringkasting i Norge og Sverige. PhD, Department of Sociology and Human Geography, University of Oslo.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2011b. Public service broadcasting as an object for cultural policy in Norway and Sweden: A policy tool and an end in itself. Nordicom Review 32 (2):35–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • ——— 2014. The legitimacy of public service broadcasting in the 21st century: The case of Scandinavia. Nordicom Review 35(2): 65–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lien, Marianne, Hilde Lidén, and Hallvard Vike (eds.). 2001. Likhetens paradokser: Antropologiske undersøkelser i det moderne Norge. Oslo: Universitetsforlaget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ljunggren, Jørn. 2015. Elitist egalitarianism: Negotiating identity in the Norwegian cultural elite. Sociology:1–16. doi: 10.1177/0038038515590755.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prop. 2005/06. Viktigare än någonsin! Radio och TV i allmänhetens tjänst 2007–2012. Utbildnings- och kulturdepartementet.

    Google Scholar 

  • Reed, Isaac A. 2011. Interpretation and Social Knowledge: On the Use of Theory in the Human Sciences. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scannell, Paddy. 1989. Public service broadcasting and modern public life. Media, Culture & Society 11(2): 135–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sejersted, Francis. 2011. The Age of Social Democracy: Norway and Sweden in the Twentieth Century. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarpenes, Ove. 2007. Den “legitime kulturens” moralske forankring. Tidsskrift for samfunnsforskning 48(4): 531–563.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skarpenes, Ove, and Rune Sakslind. 2010. Education and egalitarianism: The culture of the Norwegian middle class. The Sociological Review 58(2): 219–243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • St.meld. nr. 30 (2006–2007). Kringkasting i en digital fremtid. Det kongelige kultur-og kirkedepartement.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stråth, Bo. 2005. Union og demokrati: Norge og Sverige 1814–1905, Sverige og Norge gjennom 200 år. Oslo: Pax.

    Google Scholar 

  • Swedberg, Richard. 2014. The Art of Social Theory. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Zerubavel, Eviatar. 2007. Generally speaking: The logic and mechanics of Social Pattern Analysis. Sociological Forum 22(2): 131–145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Author(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Larsen, H. (2016). Dynamics of Legitimation Work. In: Performing Legitimacy. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31047-3_6

Download citation

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31047-3_6

  • Published:

  • Publisher Name: Palgrave Macmillan, Cham

  • Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31046-6

  • Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31047-3

  • eBook Packages: Social SciencesSocial Sciences (R0)

Publish with us

Policies and ethics