Abstract
The relationship between coach and coaching partner is presented as a main condition for successful coaching. The role of this relationship seems to be even more important when current societal changes are taken into account, changes which are often the pivotal point for the understanding and necessity of coaching in our society: We live in a hypercomplex society in which both individuals and organizations struggle with increasing diversity and organizational challenges, and where it has become impossible to reach unequivocal and long-lasting solutions to these challenges. The agenda for the coaching conversation is to provide a space for new reflections by initiating a process that leads to transformation, a new self-understanding and enhanced agency. This transformational process may be inspired by third-generation coaching, where the coach and coachee are collaborative partners, and where the dialogical focus is on value reflection and the striving for meaning-making. Based on research into ‘common factors’, the main intention of the chapter is to unfold and illustrate key dimensions that lead towards the coach as a fellow human companion of the coaching partner: (1) The dialogical dimension, (2) The narrative-collaborative dimension, (3) The protreptic dimension; (4) Mentalization and (5) Feedback as collaborative and outcome-oriented practice. The intention of this chapter is to show the importance of relationship with a ‘human face’ as the most important influencing factor in coaching, a factor that is also recognized with growing interest and evidence in both psychotherapy and coaching research.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Asen, E., & Fonagy, P. (2011). Mentalization-based therapeutic intervention for families. Journal of Family Therapy, 34(4), 347–370. doi:10.1111/j.1467-6427.2011.00552.x.
Baron, L., & Morin, L. (2009). The coach-coachee relationship in executive coaching: A field study. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 20(1), 85–106.
Baron, L., & Morin, L. (2012). The working alliance in executive coaching: Its impact on outcomes and how coaches can influence it. In E. De Haan & C. Sills (Eds.), Coaching relationships (pp. 213–226). Faringdon: Libri.
Boyce, L. A., Jackson, R. J., & Neal, L. J. (2010). Building successful leadership coaching relationships: Examining impact of matching criteria in a leadership coaching programme. Journal of Management Development [Special Issue on Coaching and the Relationship], 29(10), 914–931.
Buber, M. (1983). Ich und Du. Heidelberg: Verlag Lambert Schneider.
Carr, D. (1986). Time, narrative and history. Bloomington: Indiana University Press.
Charon, R. (2011). The novelization of the body, or how medicine and stories need one another. Narrative, 19, 33–50.
De Haan, E. (2008). Relational coaching – journey towards mastering one-to-one learning. Chichester: Wiley.
De Haan, E., & Duckworth, A. (2013). Signalling a new trend in executive coaching outcome research. International Coaching Psycholog Review, 8(1), 6–19.
De Haan, E., Duckworth, A., Birch, D., & Jones, C. (2013). Executive coaching outcome research: The contribution of common factors such as relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy. Consulting Psychology Journal: Practice and Research, 65(1), 40–57.
Drake, D., & Stelter, R. (2014). Narrative coaching. In J. Passmore (Ed.), Mastery in coaching – A complete psychological toolkit for advanced coaching (pp. 65–94). London: KoganPage.
Duncan, B. L., & Miller, S. D. (2000). The heroic client. Doing client-directed, outcome-informed therapy. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Duncan, B., Miller, S. D., & Hubble, M. (2007). How being bad can make you better. Psychotherapy Networker, 31(5), 36–46.
Duncan, B. L., Miller, S. D., Wampold, B. E., & Hubble, M. A. (2010). The heart & soul of change (2nd ed.). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Elliott, R., Bohart, A. C., Watson, J. C., & Greenberg, L. S. (2011). Empathy. Psychotherapy: Theory, Research, Practice & Training, 48, 43–49. doi:10.1037/a0022187.
Farlex Partner Medical Dictionary. (2012). Medical model. Retrieved February 2015, from http://medical-dictionary.thefreedictionary.com/medical+model
Flyvbjerg, B. (2001). Making social science matter. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Fonagy, P., & Bateman, A. (2006). Mechanism of change in mentalization based treatment of borderline personality disorder. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 62, 411–430.
Frank, A. (1995). The wounded storyteller. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.
Gendlin, E. T. (1978). Focusing. New York: Everest House.
Gendlin, E. T. (1996). Focusing-oriented psychotherapy. New York: The Guildford Press.
Gendlin, E. T. (1997). Experiencing and the creation of meaning. Evanston: North-Western University Press. (original from 1962)
Horvath, A. O. (2011). Alliance in common factor land: A view through the research lens. Research in Psychotherapy: Psychopathology, Process and Outcome, 14(1), 121–135.
Horvath, A.O., Del Re, A.C., Flückiger, C., Symonds, D. (2015). Alliance in individual psychotherapy. Retrieved February 14, 2015, from http://www.nrepp.samhsa.gov/Norcross.aspx#chapter2)
Kierkegaard, S. A. (2010). Kierkegaards skrifter, SKS*. Copenhagen: Søren Kierkegaard Forskningscenter. (online edition: www.sks.dk)
Kirkeby, O. F. (2009). The new protreptic – the concept and the art. Copenhagen: Copenhagen Business School Press.
Lambert, M. J., & Barley, D. E. (2002). Research summary on therapeutic relationship and psychotherapy outcome. In J. Norcross (Ed.), Psychotherapy relationship that works (pp. 17–32). Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Merleau-Ponty, M. (1968). Sense and non-sense. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
Miller, S. D., & Hubble, M. (2011). The road to mastery. Psychotherapy Networker, 35(2), 22–60.
Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Brown, J., Sparks, J. A., & Claud, D. A. (2003). The outcome rating scale: A preliminary study of the reliability, validity, and feasibility of a brief visual analog measure. Journal of Brief Therapy, 2(2), 91–100.
Miller, S. D., Duncan, B. L., Sorrell, R., Brown, G. S., & Chalk, M. B. (2006). Using outcome to inform therapy practice. Journal of Brief Therapy, 5(1), 5–22.
Miller, S. D., Hubble, M. A., & Duncan, B. L. (2007). Supershrinks. Psychotherapy Networker, 31(56), 26–35.
Miller, S. D., Hubble, M. A., Chow, D. L., & Seidel, J. A. (2013). The outcome of psychotherapy: Yesterday, today, and tomorrow. Psychotherapy, 50(1), 88–97.
Norcross, J. C. (2010). The therapeutic relationship. In B. L. Duncan, S. D. Miller, B. B. E. Wampold, & M. A. Hubble (Eds.), The heart & soul of change (2nd ed., pp. 113–141). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
Qvortrup, L. (2003). The hypercomplex society. New York: Peter Lang Publishers.
Rogers, C. (1975). Empathic – An unappreciated way of being. The Counseling Psychologist, 5(2), 2–10.
Shotter, J. (2006). Understanding process from within: An argument for ‘withness’-thinking. Organization Studies, 27, 585–604.
Stelter, R. (2014a). A guide to third generation coaching. Narrative-collaborative theory and practice. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media.
Stelter, R. (2014b). Third-generation coaching– striving towards value-oriented and collaborative dialogues. International Coaching Psychology Review, 9(1), 33–48.
Stelter, R., & Law, H. (2010). Coaching – Narrative-collaborative practice. International Coaching Psychology Review, 5(2), 152–164.
Sturges, J. W. (2012). Use of therapist self-disclosure and self-involving statements. The Behavior Therapist, 35(5), 90–93.
Swart, C. (2013). Re-authoring the world: The narrative lens and practices for organisations, communities and individuals. Bryanston: Knowledge Resources.
Tomaschek, N. (2006). Systemic coaching. A target-oriented approach to consulting. Heidelberg: Carl Auer International.
Tomm, K. (1988). Interventive interviewing: Part III. Intending to ask lineal, circular, strategic, or reflexive questions? Family Process, 27(1), 1–15.
Wampold, B. E. (2001). The great psychotherapy debate: Models, methods and findings. Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum.
White, M. (2007). Maps of narrative practice. New York: Norton.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Stelter, R. (2016). The Coach as a Fellow Human Companion. In: van Zyl, L., Stander, M., Odendaal, A. (eds) Coaching Psychology: Meta-theoretical perspectives and applications in multicultural contexts. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31012-1_3
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31012-1_3
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31010-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31012-1
eBook Packages: Behavioral Science and PsychologyBehavioral Science and Psychology (R0)