Abstract
This chapter introduces three categories of unintended consequences from school inspections: (1) intended strategic behaviour where schools manipulate the inspection assessment through window dressing, misrepresentation or gaming, (2) unintended strategic behaviour when schools narrow their educational practices as a result of the behaviour of the assessor and/or by the method of working used for the assessment, and (3) other types of consequences, such as stress, anxiety and increased workload. As many inspection systems use standardized student achievement tests to evaluate school output, a fourth category on unintended responses to high stakes testing will also be introduced.
The results from a recent systematic literature review will be used to provide evidence of responses in each of the four categories. The review shows that most studies present examples from England and previous case study work from Perryman (J Educ Policy 21(2):147–161, 2006) will therefore offer more in-depth views of how an English school responds strategically to school inspections. The final section of the chapter provides explanations of the conditions under which such responses may occur.
Keywords
These keywords were added by machine and not by the authors. This process is experimental and the keywords may be updated as the learning algorithm improves.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution.
Buying options
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
Learn about institutional subscriptionsReferences
Altrichter, H., & Kemethofer, D. (2015). Does accountability pressure through school inspections promote school improvement? School Effectiveness and School Improvement: An International Journal of Research Policy and Practice, 26(1), 32–56.
Ball, S. J. (2003). The teacher’s soul and the terrors of performativity. Journal of Education Policy, 18(2), 215–228.
Ball, S. J. (1990). Introducing Monsieur Foucault. In S. Ball (Ed.), Foucault and education: Disciplines and knowledge. London: Routledge.
Ball, S. J. (1997). Good school/bad school: Paradox and fabrication. British Journal of the Sociology of Education, 18(3), 317–336.
Bates, A. (2013). Transcending systems thinking in education reform: Implications for policy-makers and school leaders. Journal of Education Policy, 28(1), 38–54.
Berry, J. (2012). Teachers’ professional autonomy in England: Are neo-liberal approaches incontestable? FORUM: for Promoting 3–19 Comprehensive Education, 54(3), 397–409.
Booher-Jennings, J. (2005). Below the bubble: ‘Educational Triage’ and the Texas accountability system. American Educational Research Journal, 42(2), 231–268.
Braun, A., Maguire, M., & Ball, S. J. (2010). Policy enactments in the UK secondary school: Examining policy, practice and school positioning. Journal of Education Policy, 25(4), 547–560.
Brimblecombe, N., Ormston, M., & Shaw, M. (1995). Teachers’ perceptions of school inspection: A stressful experience. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25(1), 53–61. doi:10.1080/0305764950250106.
Brimblecombe, N., Shaw, M., & Ormston, M. (1996). Teachers’ intention to change practice as a result of Ofsted school inspections. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 24(4), 339–354.
Brookes, C. (2008). (Gen Sec of NAHT) Ch. 8 We need an inspection process. But not this one. In A. De Waal & Institute for the Study of Civil Society (Eds.), Inspecting the inspectorate: Ofsted under scrutiny. London: Civitas.
Campbell, D. T. (1976). Assessing the impact of planned social change (Occasional Paper Series, Paper 8). Hanover: The Public Affairs Center, Dartmouth College.
Case, P., et al. (2000). Please show you’re working: A critical assessment of the impact of OFSTED inspection on primary teachers. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 21(4), 605–621.
Chapman, C. (2000). Improvement, inspection and self-review. Improving Schools, 3, 57–63.
Chapman, C. (2001). Changing classrooms through inspection. School Leadership & Management, 21(1), 59–73.
Chapman, C. (2002). Ofsted and school improvement: Teachers’ perceptions of the inspection process in schools facing challenging circumstances. School Leadership & Management, 22, 257–272.
Courtney, S. J. (2012). Ofsted’s revised school inspection framework: Experiences and implications. Paper presented at BERA conference, Manchester.
Courtney, S. J. (2013). Head teachers’ experiences of school inspection under Ofsted’s January 2012 framework. Management in Education, 27(4), 164–169.
Cullen, J. B., & Reback, R. (2006). Tinkering toward accolades: School gaming under a performance accountability system (Working Paper 12286). Cambridge: National Bureau of Economic Research. http://www.nber.org/papers/w12286
Day, C., & Gu, Q. (2010). The new lives of teachers. London: Routledge.
Dean, J. (1995). What teachers and headteachers think about inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education, 25, 45–52.
De Waal, A. (2006). Inspection, inspection, inspection: How Ofsted crushes independent schools and independent teachers. London: The Institute for the Study of Civic Society.
De Wolf, I. F., & Janssens, F. J. G. (2007). Effects and side effects of inspections and accountability in education: An overview of empirical studies. Oxford Review of Education, 33(3), 379–396.
Duffy, M. (2005, April 22). Friday forum: Inspection. Times Educational Supplement.
Duffy, B. (1999). The analysis of documentary evidence. In J. Bell (Ed.), Doing your. Research project: A guide for first time researchers in education and social science (pp. 106–117). Buckingham: OUP.
Ehren, M. C. M., & Shackleton, N. (2015). Mechanisms of change in Dutch inspected schools; comparing schools in different inspection treatments. British Journal of Educational Studies. http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00071005.2015.1019413#abstract
Ehren, M. C. M., Altrichter, H., McNamara, G., & O‘Hara, J. (2013). Impact of school inspections on teaching and learning; Describing assumptions on causal mechanisms in six European countries. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 25(1), 3–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11092-012-9156-4
Ehren, M. C. M., & Swanborn, M. (2012). Strategic data use of schools in accountability systems. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 23(2), 257–280.
Figlio, D. N., & Getzler, L. S. (2002). Accountability, ability and disability: Gaming the system (NBER Working Paper 9307). http://www.nber.org/papers/w9307
Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1997). The value added national project: Final report: Feasibility studies for a national system of value added indicators. London: School Curriculum and Assessment Authority.
Fitz-Gibbon, C. T., & Stephenson-Forster, N. J. (1999). Is OFSTED helpful. An inspector calls: OfSTED and its effect of school standards. London: Kogan Page.
Follows, M. (2001). After the storm the tale of an Ofsted inspection. Management in Education, 15, 24–28.
Gray, C., & Gardner, J. (1999). The impact of school inspections. Oxford Review of Education, 25, 455–468.
Hall, C., & Noyes, A. (2007). The impact of school self evaluation processes on British teachers’ views of their work and professionalism. Paper presented at the BERA, London. Available from http://www.leeds.ac.uk/educol/documents/167834.doc
Haladyna, T. M., Nolen, S. B., & Haas, N. S. (1991). Raising standardized achievement test scores and the origins of test score pollution. Educational Researcher, 20(5), 2–7.
Hardy, I. (2012). “Managing” managerialism: The impact of educational auditing on an academic “Specialist” school. European Educational Research Journal, 11(2), 274–289.
Harland, J. (1996). Caphter 6 Evaluation as realpolitik (p. 91-106). In D. Scott & R. Usher (Eds.), Understanding educational research. London: Routledge.
Hopkins, D., Harris, A., Watling, R., & Beresford, J. (1999). From inspection to school improvement? Evaluating the accelerated inspection programme in Waltham forest. British Educational Research Journal, 25, 679–690.
Hussain, I. (2012). Subjective performance in the public sector: Evidence from school inspections. London School of Economics and Political Science. London: Centre for Economic Performance.
Jacob, B. A. (2005). Accountability, incentives and behavior: The impact of high-stakes testing in the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6), 761–796.
Jacob, B. A., & Levitt, S. D. (2003). Rotten apples: An investigation of the prevalence and predictors of teacher cheating. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118, 843–877.
Jeffrey, B., & Woods, P. (1996). Feeling deprofessionalised: The social construction of emotions during an OFSTED inspection. Cambridge Journal of Education, 26, 325–343.
Jeffrey, B., & Woods, P. (1998). Testing teachers: The effect of school inspections on primary teachers. East Sussex: Psychology Press.
Jones, K., Tymms, P., Kemethofer, D., O’Hara, J., Skedsmo, G., Myrberg, E., & Huber, S. (in prep). The unintended effects of school inspection.
Keeble-Allen, D. (2004). Inspection at Summerhill: did Ofsted inspection result in improvement? U210580 Ed.D., University of Leicester (United Kingdom).
Kogan, M., & Brunel University, Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice. (1999). The Ofsted system of school inspection: An independent evaluation. Uxbridge: Brunel University Centre for the Evaluation of Public Policy and Practice.
Koretz, D. M., McCaffrey, D. F., & Hamilton, L. S. (2001). Towards a framework for validating gains under high-stakes conditions (CSE Technical Report 551). Los Angeles: CRESST/Harvard Graduate School of Education. http://cse.ucla.edu/products/reports/TR551.pdf
Lee, J., & Davies, J. D. (2000). Bereavement and loss: The emotional consequences of special measures for a sample of special schools. Improving Schools, 3, 44–50 (not in spreadsheet as based on same data set as reference below).
Lupton, R., & Hempel-Jorgensen, A. (2012). The importance of teaching: Pedagogical constraints and possibilities in working-class schools. Journal of Education Policy, 27(5), 601–620.
Macbeath, J. (2004). Putting the self back into self-evaluation. Improving Schools, 7(1), 87–91.
MacBeath, J. (2006). A story of change: Growing leadership for learning. Journal of Educational Change, 7(1-2), 33–46.
Macbeath, J. (2008). Leading learning in the self-evaluating school. School Leadership and Management: Formerly School Organisation, 28(4), 385–399.
Maritzen, N. (2008). Schulinspektion. Zur Transformation von Governance-Strukturen im Schulwesen [School inspection. On the transformation of governance structures in the schooling system]. Die Deutsche Schule [The German school], 100(1), 85–95.
McNamara, G., O’Hara, J., Lisi, P. L., & Davidsdottir, S. (2011). Operationalising self-evaluation in schools: Experiences from Ireland and Iceland. Irish Educational Studies, 30(1), 63–82.
Memduhoglu, H. B. (2012). The issue of education supervision in Turkey in the views of teachers, administrators, supervisors and lecturers. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 12(1), 149–156.
Merton, R. K. (1936). The unanticipated consequences of purposive social action. American Sociological Review, 1, 894–904.
Nees, P. (2006, May/June). Schools and their E.R.O. recommendations: A study of six Wellington area schools (Sabbatical report).
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). (2013). Synergies for better learning: An international perspective on evaluation and assessment. Paris: OECD.
Ouston, J., et al. (1997). What do schools so after OFSTED school inspections – Or before? School Leadership & Management, 17(1), 95–104.
Penninckx, M. (2015). Inspecting school inspections. Doctoral dissertation. University of Antwerp.
Perryman, J. (2002). Surviving special measures: A case study of a ‘Fresh Start’ school. Improving Schools, 5, 46–59.
Perryman, J. (2006). Panoptic performativity and school inspection regimes: Disciplinary mechanisms and life under special measures. Journal of Education Policy, 21(2), 147–161.
Perryman, J. (2007). Inspection and emotion. Cambridge Journal of Education, 37(2), 173–190.
Perryman, J. (2009). Inspection and the fabrication of professional and performative processes. Journal of Education Policy, 24(5), 611–631.
Plowright, D. (2007). Self-evaluation and Ofsted inspection developing an integrative model of school improvement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 35(3), 373–393.
Roberts-Holmes, G. (2014). The ‘datafication’ of early years pedagogy: If the teaching is good, the data should be good and if there’s bad teaching, there is bad data. Journal of Education Policy, 30, 1–13.
Scanlon, M. (1999). The impact of OFSTED inspections. London: National Foundation for Educational Research for the National Union of Teachers.
Sebba, J., Clarke, J., & Emery, B. (1996). How can the inspection process enhance improvement in special schools? European Journal of Special Needs Education, 11, 82–94.
Smith, P. (1995). On the unintended consequences of publishing performance data in the public sector. International Journal of Public Administration, 18(2 and 3), 277–310.
Stecher, B. M. (2002). Consequences of large-scale, high-stakes testing on school and classroom practices). Tests and their use in test-based accountability systems. In L.S. Hamilton, B. M. Stecher, & S. P. Klein (Eds.), Making sense of Test-based Accountability in Education. Santa Monica: Rand cooperation. http://www.rand.org/pubs/monograph_reports/MR1554/
Stewart, W. (2012, 31 August). Financial malpractice rife in schools, says council. Times Educational Supplement.
Stoll, L., & Fink, D. (1996). Changing our schools: Linking school effectiveness and school improvement. Buckingham: Open University Press.
Sturman, L. (2003). Teaching to the test: Science or intuition? Educational Research, 45(3), 261–273.
Sturman, L. (2011). Test preparation: Valid and valuable, or wasteful? The Journal of the Imagination in Language Learning, 9, 31–31.
Troman, G. (1997). Self‐management and school inspection: Complementary forms of surveillance and control in the primary school. Oxford Review of Education, 23(3), 345–364.
Tymms, P. (2004). Are standards rising in English primary schools? British Educational Research Journal, 30(4), 477–494.
Webb, R., Vulliamy, G., Häkkinen, K., & Hämäläinen, S. (1998). External inspection or school self-evaluation? A comparative analysis of policy and practice in primary schools in England and Finland. British Educational Research Journal, 24, 539–556.
West, A., Mattei, P., & Roberts, J. (2011). Accountability and sanctions in English schools. British Journal of Educational Studies, 59(1), 41–62.
Wilcox, B., & Gray, J. (1994). Reactions to inspection: A study of three variants. Cambridge Journal of Education, 24, 245–269.
Wilcox, B., & Gray, J. (1996). Inspecting schools: Holding schools to account and helping schools to improve. Buckingham: OUP.
Wiggins, A., & Tymms, P. (2002). Dysfunctional effects of league tables: A comparison between English and Scottish primary schools. Public Money and Management, 22(1), 43–48.
Wong, M. N., & Li, H. (2010). From external inspection to self-evaluation: A study of quality assurance in Hong Kong kindergartens. Early Education and Development, 21(2), 205–233.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Editor information
Editors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Ehren, M.C.M., Jones, K., Perryman, J. (2016). Side Effects of School Inspection; Motivations and Contexts for Strategic Responses. In: C.M. Ehren, M. (eds) Methods and Modalities of Effective School Inspections. Accountability and Educational Improvement. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_5
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31003-9_5
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-31001-5
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-31003-9
eBook Packages: EducationEducation (R0)