Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Multidimensional Measure of Poverty in Ethiopia: Factor and Stochastic Dominance Analysis

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Poverty and Well-Being in East Africa

Abstract

This study did an in-depth analysis of multidimensional poverty in rural and small towns in Ethiopia. As social well-being or poverty is a multidimensional phenomenon, using a multidimensional measure of poverty helps circumvent problems surrounding the conventional measures of poverty and helps show clearly the realities of households. In this line, our analysis used six dimensions with 14 indicators to construct a multidimensional index of poverty using first rounds of Ethiopian Rural Households’ Socioeconomic Survey data set. The study also employed a factor analysis for determining relative weights in computing a multidimensional index and did an in-depth analysis of stochastic dominancy of poverty for different segments of society. Besides, a comparison of the extent of poverty using the conventional measure of poverty and the multidimensional approach was also done. The results reveal that intensity, severity, and depth of poverty vary considerably across the two measures. Moreover, demographic, regional, and household heads’ characteristics are major factors in determining poverty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Notes

  1. 1.

    The Central Statistical Agency of Ethiopia has designed and formulated a sampling frame. The smallest units from which households or individuals will be selected to keep representativeness is known as the enumeration area (EA).

References

  • Achia, T.N., A. Wangombe, and N. Khadioli. 2010. A logistic regression model to identify key determinants of poverty using demographic and health survey data. European Journal of Social Sciences 3(1): 38–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S. 2007. Choosing dimensions: The capability approach and multidimensional poverty, CPRC Working Paper No. 88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., and J.E. Foster. 2007. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement, OPHI Working Paper No 7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., and M.E. Santos. 2010. Acute multidimensional poverty: A new index for developing countries, OPHI Working Paper No. 38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., and J.E. Foster. 2011. Counting and multidimensional poverty measurement. Journal of Public Economics 95: 476–487.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alkire, S., and M.E. Santos. 2014. Measuring acute poverty in the developing world: Robustness and scope of the multidimensional poverty index. World Development 59: 251–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, G. 1996. Nonparametric tests of stochastic dominance in income distributions. Econometrica 64(5): 1183–1193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anwar, T., and S. Qureshi. 2002. Trends in absolute poverty in Pakistan: 1990–91 and 2001. The Pakistan Development Review 859–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. 1987. On the Measurement of Poverty. Econometrica 55(4): 749–764.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atkinson, A.B. 2003. Multidimensional deprivation: Contrasting social welfare and counting approaches. Journal of Economic Inequality 1: 51–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, G., and S. Donald. 2003. Consistent Tests for stochastic dominance. Econometrica 71(1): 71–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bourguignon, F., and S.R. Chakravarty. 2003. the measurement of multidimensional poverty. Journal of Economic Inequality 1: 25–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brück, T., and W.K. Sindu. 2013. Dynamics and drivers of consumption and multidimensional poverty: Evidence from rural Ethiopia, IZA DP No. 7364, Discussion Paper No. 7364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cameron, A.C., and P.K. Trivedi. 2005. Microeconometrics: Methods and applications. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Chakravarty, S.R., D. Mukherjee, and R.R. Ranade. 1998. On the family of subgroup and factor decomposable measures of multidimensional poverty. Research on Economic Inequality 8: 175–194.

    Google Scholar 

  • CSA and WB. 2013. Living standards measurement study-integrated surveys on agriculture (LSMS-ISA): Ethiopia rural socioeconomic survey (ERSS)-basic information document.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davidson, R., and J.Y. Duclos. 2000. Statistical inference for stochastic dominance and for the measurement of poverty and inequality. Econometrica 68(6): 1435–1464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Decancq, K., and M.A. Lugo. 2013. Weights in multidimensional indices of wellbeing: An overview. Econometric Reviews 32(1): 7–34.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., and P. Krishnan. 2000. Vulnerability, seasonality and poverty in Ethiopia. Journal of Development Studies 36(6): 25–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dercon, S., J. Hoddinott, and T. Woldehanna. 2005. Shocks and consumption in 15 Ethiopian villages: 1999–2004. Journal of African Economies 14(4): 559–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deutsch, J., and J. Silber. 2005. Measuring multidimensional poverty: An empirical comparison of various approaches. Review of Income and Wealth 51(1): 145–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duclos, J.Y., and A. Araara. 2006. Poverty and equity: Measurement, policy and estimation with DAD. NewYork: Springer and International Development Research Centre.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., J. Greer, and E. Thorbecke. 1984. A class of decomposable poverty measures. Econometrica 52(3): 761–766.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Foster, J., S. Seth, M. Lokshin, and Z. Sajaia. 2013. A unified approach to measuring poverty and inequality: Theory and practice. Washington, DC: The World Bank.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, B. 1995. Assessing poverty: Some reflections on the literature. Journal of Population Economics 8(4): 362–382.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hagenaars, A., and K. De Vos. 1988. The definition and measurement of poverty. The Journal of Human Resources 23(2): 211–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • HDR. 2013. The rise of the south: Human progress in a diverse world. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • HDR. 2014. Sustaining human progress: Reducing vulnerabilities and building resilience. New York: United Nations Development Programme.

    Google Scholar 

  • Housseima, G., and B.R. Jaleleddine. 2012. Multidimensional poverty in Tunisia: A non-monetary approach applied to east-central Tunisia. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business 3(9): 856–876.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kakwani, N. 1993. Statistical inference in the measurement of poverty. The Review of Economics and Statistics 75(4): 632–639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khan, A.U., A. Saboor, A. Hussain, S. Sadiq, and A.Q. Mohsin. 2014. Poverty assessment as a multidimensional socio-economic concept: The case of the Rawalpindi region in Pakistan. Asia Pacific Journal of Social Work and Development. doi:10.1080/02185385.2013.844724.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, S.G. 2013. Fuzzy multidimensional poverty measurement: An analysis of statistical behaviors. Social Indicators Research. doi:10.1007/s11205-014-0616-8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Krzanowski, W.J. 1987. Cross-validation in principal component analysis. Biometrics 43(3): 575–584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E. 1986. The measurement and decomposition of multi-dimensional inequality. Econometrica 54(4): 991–998.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E., and A. Heshmati. 2000. Stochastic dominance amongst Swedish income distribution. Econometric Reviews 19(3): 287–320.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E., and A. Heshmati. 2008. Evaluating dominance ranking of PSID incomes by various household attributes. London and New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Maasoumi, E., and T. Xu. 2015. Weights and substitution degree in multidimensional well-being in China. Journal of Economic Studies 42(1): 4–19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MOFED. 2008. Dynamics of growth and poverty in Ethiopia (1995/96–2004/05). Addis Ababa: Ministry of Finance and Economic Development.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller, C. 2006. Defining poverty lines as a fraction of central tendency. Southern Economic Journal 72(3): 720–729.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. 2003. Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics 9: 33–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, C.R. (1964). The use and interpretation of principal component analysis in applied research. Sankhyā. The Indian Journal of Statistics, Series A (1961–2002), 26(4): 329–58.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 1994. Measuring social welfare with and without poverty lines. The American Economic Review 84(2): 359–364.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M. 1996. Issues in measuring and modelling poverty. The Economic Journal 106(438): 1328–1343.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravallion, M., and M. Huppi. 1991. Measuring changes in poverty: A methodological case study of indonesia during an adjustment period. The World Bank Economic Review 5(1): 57–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1976. Poverty: An ordinary approach to measurement. Econometrica 44(2): 219–231.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1990. Development as capability expansion. Cambridge: Harvard University.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A. 1999. Development as freedom. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, P. 1970. The concept of poverty. London: Hienemann.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsui, K. 2002. Multidimensional poverty indices. Social Choice and Welfare 19: 69–93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNSD. 2005. Handbook on poverty statistics: Concepts, methods and policy use.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vyas, S., and L. Kumaranayake. 2006. Constructing Socio-economic Status Indices: How to use principal components analysis, 459–468. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Whelan, C.T., B. Nolan, and B. Maître. 2014. Multidimensional poverty measurement in Europe: An application of the adjusted headcount approach. Journal of European Social Policy 24(2): 183–197.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • WHO. 2002. Addressing the links between indoor air pollution, household energy and human health. Washington, DC: World Health Organization.

    Google Scholar 

  • Woldehanna, T. 2014. Measuring multidimensional poverty: Capabilities, deprivation, and social exclusion in rural and urban Ethiopia, CSAE working paper series.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zimmermann, H.J. 2010. Fuzzy set theory. Advanced Review 2: 317–332.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Economics, Addis Ababa University, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia

    Mekonnen Bersisa

  2. Jönköping International Business School, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden

    Almas Heshmati

  3. Department of Economics, Sogang University, Seoul, Korea

    Almas Heshmati

Authors
  1. Mekonnen Bersisa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Almas Heshmati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mekonnen Bersisa .

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. Dept. of Eco., Jönköping Inter. Busi. Sc, Jönköping University, Jönköping, Sweden

    Almas Heshmati

Appendix: Equivalence Scale

Appendix: Equivalence Scale

Nutrition (calorie)-based equivalence scales

Years of age

Men

Women

0–1

0.33

0.33

1–2

0.46

0.46

2–3

0.54

0.54

3–5

0.62

0.62

5–7

0.74

0.70

7–10

0.84

0.72

10–12

0.88

0.78

12–14

0.96

0.84

14–16

1.06

0.86

16–18

1.14

0.86

18–30

1.04

0.80

30–60

1.00

0.82

60+

0.84

0.74

  1. Source Dercon and Krishnan (2000)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Bersisa, M., Heshmati, A. (2016). Multidimensional Measure of Poverty in Ethiopia: Factor and Stochastic Dominance Analysis. In: Heshmati, A. (eds) Poverty and Well-Being in East Africa. Economic Studies in Inequality, Social Exclusion and Well-Being. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30981-1_10

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation