Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Comparative Performance of Conventional and Islamic Unit Trusts: Market Timing and Persistence Evidence

  • Chapter
Book cover Islamic Finance

Abstract

Mutual funds have been a convenient way for investors to gain the benefit of a diversified portfolio. Mutual fund managers collect funds from a large number of small investors and create a portfolio of assets, and each investor owns a small part of this portfolio in proportion to his investments. The difference between mutual funds and unit trusts lies in their legal structure, but the end result for investors is similar (Investment Company Institute (ICI), 2009). The very obvious potential risk for unit trusts is the volatility of market activities, which will affect the value of a security, bonds or any other security (Lau, 2007). Islamic mutual funds are different from conventional mutual funds as they invest only in Shariah-compliant assets such as stocks and sukuks (Fikriyah et al, 2007; Elfakhani et al, 2005). Conventional unit trust funds managers do not solely invest in equity markets compared with Islamic unit trusts; rather the fund may also comprise all types of risk-free investment (Low and Ghazali, 2007).

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Log in via an institution
Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 109.00
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 139.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  • Bodie, Z., Kane, A. and Marcus, A.J. (2009) Investments. New York: McGraw Hill International Edition.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bollen, N. and Busse, J. (2001) On timing ability of mutual fund managers. Journal of Business Review 44(4): 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown, S.J. and Goetzmann, W.N. (1995) Performance persistence. Journal of Finance 50(2): 679–698.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chance, D. and Helmer, M. (2001) The performance of professional market timers: Daily evidence from executed strategies. Journal of Financial Economics 62(2): 377–411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, E. and Lewellen, W. (1984) Impact of size and flows on performance for funds of hedge funds. Journal of Business 57(1): 57–72.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C.R., Cheng, F.L., Rahman, S. and Chan, A. (1992) A cross-sectional analysis of mutual funds’ market timing and security selection skill. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 19(5): 659–674.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng, L.T.W., Pi, L.K. and Wort, D. (1999) Are there hot hands among mutual fund houses in Hong Kong? Journal of Business Finance and Accounting 26(1–2): 103–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coggin, T.D., Fabozzi, F.J. and Rahman, S. (1993) The investment performance of US equity pension fund managers: An empirical investigation. The Journal of Finance 48(3): 1039–1055.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Connor, G. and Korajczyk, R.A. (1991) The attributes behavior and performance of U.S. Mutual funds. Re-view of Quantitative Finance Accounting 1: 5–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumby, R.E. and Glen, J.D. (1990) Evaluating the performance of international mutual funds. Journal of Finance 45: 497–521.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elfakhani, S., Hassan, M.K. and Sidani, Y. (2005) Comparative performance of Islamic versus secular mutual funds, http://www.middle-east-studies.net/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/sidani-IslamicMutualFunds.pdf, accessed 6 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Elton, E.J., Gruber, M.J. and Blake, C.A. (1996) The persistence of risk-adjusted mutual fund performance. The Journal of Business 69(2): 133–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fauziah, M.T., Suhaimi, S. and Lee, H.L. (2002) Malaysian Unit Trust Fund Performance. Proceedings for the Fourth Annual Malaysian Finance Association Symposium, Penang.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ferson, W. and Schadt, R. (1996) Measuring fund strategy and performance in changing economic conditions. Journal of Finance 51(2): 425–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fikriyah, A., Taufiq, H. and Shamsher, M. (2007) Investigation of performance of Malaysian Islamic unit trust funds: Comparison with conventional unit trust funds. Journal of Managerial Finance 33(2): 142–153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Firer, C., Beale, J.P., Edwards, M.D., Hendrie, J.N. and Scheppening, D.C. (2001) The persistence of performance of South African unit trusts. The South African Journal of Business Management 32(2): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Firth, M.A. (1977) The investment performance of unit trusts in the period 1965–76. Journal of Money, Credit and Banking 9(1): 597–604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W. and Ibbotson, R. (1994) Do winners repeat? Patterns in mutual fund performance. Journal of Portfolio Management 20(2): 9–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goetzmann, W., Ingersoll, J. and Ivkovic´, Z. (2000) Monthly measurement of daily timers. Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 35(3): 257–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grant, D. (1978) Market timing and portfolio management. The Journal of Finance 33(4): 1119–1131.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1989) Portfolio performance evaluation: Old issues and new insights. Review of Financial Studies 5(2): 393–421.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grinblatt, M. and Titman, S. (1992) The persistence of mutual fund performance. Journal of Finance 47: 1977–1984.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendricks, D., Patel, J. and Zeckhauser, R. (1993) Hot hands in mutual funds: Short run persistence of relative performance, 1974–88. Journal of Finance 48: 93–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henriksson, R.D. (1984) Market timing and mutual fund performance: An empirical investigation. Journal of Business 57(1): 73–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hunter, J.E., Coggin, T.D. and Rahman, S. (1992) The correlation between sampling errors in estimating security selection and market timing ability. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University. Working paper.

    Google Scholar 

  • Investment Company Institute (ICI) (2009) How mutual funds and investment companies operate, Investment Company Fact Book, http://www.icifactbook.org/fb_appa.html, accessed 6 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jagannathan, R. and Korajczyk, R. (1986) Assessing the market timing performance of managed portfolios. Journal of Business 59(2): 217–235.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. (1968) The performance of the mutual funds in the period 1945–1964. Journal of Finance 23(2): 389–416.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jensen, M.C. (1969) Risk, the pricing of capital assets, and the evaluation of investment performance. Journal of Business 42(2): 167–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon, S.J. and Jen, F.C. (1979) The investment performance of mutual funds: An empirical investigation of timing, selectivity and market efficiency. Journal of Business 52(2): 263–289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kon, S.J. (1983) The market timing performance of mutual fund managers. Journal of Business 56(3): 321–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, M.M. and Lau, S.H. (2009) The performance persistence and stimulated returns of Malaysia mutual funds, http://www.eurojournals.com/irjfe_44_15.pdf, accessed 6 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, W.Y. (2007) An integrated framework for style analysis: How is it useful to Malaysian equity trust investors? Managerial Finance 33(2): 122–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann, B.N. and Modest, D.M. (1987) Mutual fund performance evaluation: A comparison of benchmarks and benchmark comparisons. Journal of Finance 42(2): 233–265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Low, S.W. and Ghazali, N.A. (2007) The price linkages between Malaysian unit trust funds and the stock market. Managerial Finance 33(2): 89–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Malkiel, B.G. (1995) Returns from investing in equity mutual funds 1971–1991. Journal of Finance 50(2): 549–572.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nassir, A.M., Mohamed, S. and Ngu, M.H. (1997) Selectivity and timing: Evidence from the performance of Malaysian unit trusts. Pertanika Journal of Social Science & Humanities 5(1): 45–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oldham, G. and Kroeger, J.A. (2005) Performance, persistence and benchmarks of selected South African unit trusts for the period 1998–2002. South African Journal of Business Management 36(4): 81–90.

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter, G.E. and Trifts, J.W. (1998) The performance persistence of experienced mutual fund managers. Financial Services Review 7(1): 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Securities Commission of Malaysia (2012) Data and statistics/Unit trust fund in Malaysia, http://www.sc.com.my/main.asp?pageid=302&menuid=252&newsid=&linkid=&type=, accessed 6 November 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, S. and Jhanwar, M. (2008) On stock selection skills and market timing abilities of mutual fund managers in India. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics 15(1): 307–317.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamsher, M., Annuar, M.N. and Taufiq, H. (2000) Investment in unit trusts: Performance of active and passive funds. Proceedings of FEP Seminar, Issues in Accounting and Finance2: 129–41. UPM Press, Malaysia.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharpe, W.F. (1966) Mutual fund performance. Journal of Business 39(1): 119–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treynor, J.L. and Mazuy, K. (1966) Can mutual funds outguess the market? Harvard Business Review 44(4): 131–136.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Nottingham University Business School, University of Nottingham Malaysia Campus, UK

    Nafis Alam (Assistant Professor of Finance) & Kin Boon Tang (Assistant Professor of Finance)

  2. Sheffield University Management School, UK

    Mohammad Shadique Rajjaque (Teaching Associate in Accounting and Financial Management)

Authors
  1. Nafis Alam
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Kin Boon Tang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mohammad Shadique Rajjaque
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Editor information

Editors and Affiliations

  1. University of Edinburgh Business School, UK

    Tina Harrison  & Essam Ibrahim  & 

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 The Editor(s)

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Alam, N., Tang, K.B., Rajjaque, M.S. (2016). A Comparative Performance of Conventional and Islamic Unit Trusts: Market Timing and Persistence Evidence. In: Harrison, T., Ibrahim, E. (eds) Islamic Finance. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30918-7_7

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics

Search

Navigation