Multibody Systems Formulation

  • Paulo FloresEmail author
  • Hamid M. Lankarani
Part of the Solid Mechanics and Its Applications book series (SMIA, volume 226)


This chapter includes the main components necessary to formulate the dynamics of planar multibody systems. In this process, the fundamental issues associated with embryogenesis of multibody systems are presented. The main types of coordinates utilized in the formulations of general planar multibody systems are described. In addition, the fundamental characteristics of some relevant constraint equations are also presented in this chapter. Then, the key aspects related to the dynamic analysis of planar multibody mechanical systems are discussed. The formulation of multibody system dynamics adopted here uses the generalized absolute coordinates to derive the multibody system equations of motion. This formulation results in the establishment of a mixed set of ordinary differential and algebraic equations, which are numerically solved in order to predict the dynamic behavior of multibody systems.


Multibody systems Coordinate systems Kinematic constraint equations Dynamics equations of motion 


  1. Alonso M, Finn EJ (1981) Física: um curso universitário. Vol I—Mecânica, Editora Edgard Blücher Ltda, São Paulo, BrasilGoogle Scholar
  2. Ambrósio J, Veríssimo P (2009) Sensitivity of a vehicle ride to the suspension bushing characteristics. J Mech Sci Technol 23:1075–1082CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ambrósio JAC, Neto MA, Leal RP (2007) Optimization of a complex flexible multibody systems with composite materials. Multibody Syst Dyn 18:117–144CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. Anand DK, Cunniff PF (1973) Engineering mechanics dynamics. Houghton Mifflin Company, BostonGoogle Scholar
  5. Arnold VI (1987) Métodos matemáticas da mecânica clássica. Editora Mir Moscow, Soviet UnionGoogle Scholar
  6. Burton P (1979) Kinematics and dynamics of planar machinery. Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  7. Ceccarelli M (1998) Mechanism schemes in teaching: a historical overview. J Mech Des 120:533–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ceccarelli M, Cigola M (2001) Trends in the drawing of mechanisms since the early Middle Ages. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 215:269–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chace MA (1967) Analysis of the time-dependence of multi-freedom mechanical systems in relative coordinates. J Eng Ind 89:119–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chapra SC, Canale RP (1989) Numerical methods for engineers. 2nd ed. McGraw-HillGoogle Scholar
  11. Eich-Soellner E, Führer C (1998) Numerical methods in multibody dynamics. Teubner-Verlag Stuttgart, GermanyCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. Flores P (2015) Concepts and formulations for spatial multibody dynamics. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  13. Flores P, Claro JCP (2007) Cinemática de mecanismos. Almedina, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  14. Flores P, Ambrósio J, Claro JCP, Lankarani HM (2008) Kinematics and dynamics of multibody systems with imperfect joints: models and case studies. In lecture notes in applied and computational mechanics, vol 34. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, New-YorkGoogle Scholar
  15. Galileo G (1638) Dialogues concerning two new sciences (trans: Crew H, de Salvio A, 1914, reprinted in 1956). Macmillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Hartog JP (1948) Mechanics. Dover Publications, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. Haug EJ (1989) Computer-aided kinematics and dynamics of mechanical systems—volume I: basic methods. Allyn and Bacon, Boston, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  18. Huston RL (1990) Multibody dynamics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Boston, MassachusettszbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. Jálon JG (2007) Twenty-five years of natural coordinates. Multibody Syst Dyn 18:15–33MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. Jálon JG, Bayo E (1994) Kinematic and dynamic simulations of multibody systems: the real-time challenge. Springer, New YorkCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Levinson L (1970) Fundamentals of engineering mechanics. Mir Publishers, MoscowGoogle Scholar
  22. Meireles F (2007) Kinematics and dynamics of biomechanical models using multibody systems methodologies: a computational and experimental study of human gait. M.Sc. Dissertation, University of Minho, Guimarães, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  23. Müller A (2009) Generic mobility of rigid body mechanisms. Mech Mach Theory 44(6):1240–1255CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. Newton I (1687) Philosophiae Naturalis Principia Mathematica. LondonGoogle Scholar
  25. Nikravesh PE (1988) Computer-aided analysis of mechanical systems. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  26. Nikravesh PE (2007) Initial condition correction in multibody dynamics. Multibody Syst Dyn 18:107–115MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. Nikravesh PE (2008) Planar multibody dynamics: formulation, programming, and applications. CRC Press, LondonzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. Orlandea N, Chace MA, Calahan DA (1977) A sparsity oriented approach to the dynamic analysis and design of mechanical systems—part 1 and 2. J Eng Ind 99:773–784CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Paul B, Krajcinovic D (1970) Computer analysis of machines with planar motion, part 1—kinematics, part 2—dynamics. J Appl Mech 37:697–712CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Pombo J, Ambrósio J (2008) Application of a wheel-rail contact model to railway dynamics in small radius curved tracks. Multibody Syst Dyn 19:91–114CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  31. Rahnejat H (2000) Multi-body dynamics: historical evolution and application. Proc Inst Mech Eng Part C J Mech Eng Sci 214:149–173CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Reuleaux F (1963) The kinematics of machinery. Dover, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  33. Schiehlen W (1990) Multibody systems handbook. Springer, BerlinCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. Seabra E, Flores P, Silva JF (2007) Theoretical and experimental analysis of an industrial cutting file machine using multibody systems methodology. In: Bottasso CL, Masarati P, Trainelli L (eds) Proceedings of ECCOMAS thematic conference multibody dynamics 2007. Milan, Italy, 25–28 June, 12 pGoogle Scholar
  35. Shabana AA (1989) Dynamics of multibody systems. Wiley, New YorkzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  36. Sheth PN, Uicker JJ (1971) IMP (Integrated Mechanism Program): a computer-aided design analysis system for mechanisms and linkages. J Eng Ind 94(2):454–464CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Shigley JE, Uicker JJ (1995) Theory of machines and mechanisms. McGraw Hill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  38. Silva M, (2003) Human motion analysis using multibody dynamics and optimization tools. Ph.D. Dissertation, Technical University of Lisbon, PortugalGoogle Scholar
  39. Silva MPT, Ambrósio JAC (2002) Kinematic data consistency in the inverse dynamic analysis of biomechanical systems. Multibody Syst Dyn 8:219–239CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. Späth H (1995) One dimensional spline interpolation algorithms. AK Peters, WellesleyzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. Targ S (1976) Curso Técnico-prático de Mecânica. Lopes da Silva Editora, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
  42. Wehage RA, Haug EJ (1982) Generalized coordinate partitioning for dimension reduction in analysis of constrained systems. J Mech Des 104:247–255CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Zhu W-H, Piedboeuf J-C, Gonthier Y (2006) A dynamics formulation of general constrained robots. Multibody Syst Dyn 16:37–54MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mechanical EngineeringUniversity of MinhoGuimaraesPortugal
  2. 2.Department of Mechanical EngineeringWichita State UniversityWichitaUSA

Personalised recommendations