Skip to main content

Dielectric Structure of Aqueous Interfaces: From Classical Non-Debye Electrostatics to a Quantum Theory of Interfacial Tension

  • Chapter
  • First Online:
Physics at the Biomolecular Interface

Part of the book series: Soft and Biological Matter ((SOBIMA))

  • 796 Accesses

Abstract

This chapter explores the dielectric structure of interfacial water from a classical and quantum electrostatics perspective. The protein-water interface is treated classically, while quantum effects are investigated only for simple featureless nonpolar interfaces due to the inherently higher complexities of the quantum approach. In a classical context, the most striking feature arising from the epistructural physics is the breakdown of the Debye ansatz that postulates the alignment of water polarization with the protein electrostatic field. The complexities of biological interfaces are shown to be in good measure due to this departure from the standard dielectric picture that has been historically—and incorrectly—extrapolated from a bulk interface. Accordingly, concepts like the dielectric permittivity coefficient are shown to be inadequate to describe interfacial electrostatics. The departure from bulk-like behavior is shown to enhance the physico-chemical inhomogeneity of protein surfaces and to enable the chemical functionality of the aqueous interface. Epistructural physics of the protein-water interface identifies a structural defect known as dehydron as causative of anomalous polarization effects causing a breakdown of the Debye standard ansatz. The previous chapter revealed that interfacial tension is a central thermodynamic factor driving biomolecular events and may be alternatively stored as electrostatic energy associated with the non-Debye component of water polarization. This chapter substantively supplements this picture by showing that dehydrons induce chemical basicity in interfacial water as a consequence of the breakdown of Debye dielectrics. Thus, the relevance of dehydrons as catalytic elements is highlighted. We anticipate that this discovery will prompt a re-writing of vast mechanistic chapters of biological chemistry.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this chapter

Chapter
USD 29.95
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
eBook
USD 84.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Available as EPUB and PDF
  • Read on any device
  • Instant download
  • Own it forever
Softcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Compact, lightweight edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info
Hardcover Book
USD 109.99
Price excludes VAT (USA)
  • Durable hardcover edition
  • Dispatched in 3 to 5 business days
  • Free shipping worldwide - see info

Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout

Purchases are for personal use only

Institutional subscriptions

References

  1. Fernández A. The principle of minimal episteric distortion of the water matrix and its steering role in protein folding. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:085101.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926–35.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins. 2006;65:712–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N.Log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:10089–92.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical-integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of N-alkanes. J Comput Phys. 1977;23:327–41.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Berendsen HJ, Postma JP, van Gunsteren WF, Di Nola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 1984;81:3684–90.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA. Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1157–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Jakalian A, Bush BL, Jack DB, Bayly CI. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. J Comput Chem. 2000;21:132–46.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J Comput Chem. 2002;23:1623–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fernández A, Berry RS. Golden rule for buttressing vulnerable soluble proteins. J Proteome Res. 2009;9:2643–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Frushicheva MP, Mills MJ, Schopf P, Singh MK, Prasad RB, Warshel A. Computer aided enzyme design and catalytic concepts. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2014;21C:56–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fersht A. Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. New York: Freeman; 1998.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Fernández A. Communication: chemical functionality of interfacial water enveloping nanoscale structural defects in proteins. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:221102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Frauenfelder H. What determines the speed limit on enzyme catalysis? Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:21–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Korendovych IV, DeGrado WF. Catalytic efficiency of designed catalytic proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;27C:113–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Privett HK, Kiss G, Lee TM, Blomberg R, Chica RA, Thomas LM, Hilvert D, Houk KN, Mayo SL. Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:3790–5.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Fernández A, Rogale K, Scott RL, Scheraga HA. Inhibitor design by wrapping packing defects in HIV-1 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11640–5.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Walsh R, Martin E, Darvesh S. Limitations of conventional inhibitor classifications. Integr Biol. 2011;3:1197–201.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernández A. Transformative concepts for drug design: target wrapping. Berlin: Springer; 2010.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  20. Kapcha LH, Rossky PJ. A simple atomic-level hydrophobicity scale reveals protein interfacial structure. J Mol Biol. 2014;426:484–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fernández A. Epistructural tension promotes protein associations. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:188102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Fernández A, Lynch M. Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity. Nature. 2011;474:502–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Giovambattista N, Rossky PJ, Debenedetti PG. Computational studies of pressure, temperature, and surface effects on the structure and thermodynamics of confined water. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2012;6:179–200.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  24. Fernández Stigliano A. Biomolecular interfaces: interactions, functions and drug design, Chap. 2. Berlin: Springer; 2015.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Ball P. Nanobubbles are not a superficial matter. Chemphyschem. 2012;13:2173–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Ramsden JJ. Biomedical surfaces. Norwood: Artech House; 2008.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Iuchi S, Chen H, Paesani F, Voth GA. The hydrated excess proton at water-hydrophobic interfaces. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:4017–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tian CS, Shen YR. Structure and charging of hydrophobic material/water interfaces studied by phase-sensitive sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15148–53.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kudin NK, Car R. Why are water–hydrophobic interfaces charged? J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:3915–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Buch V, Milet A, Vacha R, Jungwirth P, Devlin JP. Water surface is acidic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:7342–7.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  31. Fernández A. Chemical functionality of interfacial water enveloping nanoscale structural defects in proteins. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:221102.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  32. Marzari N, Mostofi AA, Yates JR, Souza I, Vanderbilt D. Maximally localized Wannier functions: theory and applications. Rev Mod Phys. 2012;84:1419–75.

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

Copyright information

© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland

About this chapter

Cite this chapter

Fernández, A. (2016). Dielectric Structure of Aqueous Interfaces: From Classical Non-Debye Electrostatics to a Quantum Theory of Interfacial Tension. In: Physics at the Biomolecular Interface. Soft and Biological Matter. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30852-4_2

Download citation

Publish with us

Policies and ethics