Abstract
This chapter explores the dielectric structure of interfacial water from a classical and quantum electrostatics perspective. The protein-water interface is treated classically, while quantum effects are investigated only for simple featureless nonpolar interfaces due to the inherently higher complexities of the quantum approach. In a classical context, the most striking feature arising from the epistructural physics is the breakdown of the Debye ansatz that postulates the alignment of water polarization with the protein electrostatic field. The complexities of biological interfaces are shown to be in good measure due to this departure from the standard dielectric picture that has been historically—and incorrectly—extrapolated from a bulk interface. Accordingly, concepts like the dielectric permittivity coefficient are shown to be inadequate to describe interfacial electrostatics. The departure from bulk-like behavior is shown to enhance the physico-chemical inhomogeneity of protein surfaces and to enable the chemical functionality of the aqueous interface. Epistructural physics of the protein-water interface identifies a structural defect known as dehydron as causative of anomalous polarization effects causing a breakdown of the Debye standard ansatz. The previous chapter revealed that interfacial tension is a central thermodynamic factor driving biomolecular events and may be alternatively stored as electrostatic energy associated with the non-Debye component of water polarization. This chapter substantively supplements this picture by showing that dehydrons induce chemical basicity in interfacial water as a consequence of the breakdown of Debye dielectrics. Thus, the relevance of dehydrons as catalytic elements is highlighted. We anticipate that this discovery will prompt a re-writing of vast mechanistic chapters of biological chemistry.
Access this chapter
Tax calculation will be finalised at checkout
Purchases are for personal use only
References
Fernández A. The principle of minimal episteric distortion of the water matrix and its steering role in protein folding. J Chem Phys. 2013;139:085101.
Jorgensen WL, Chandrasekhar J, Madura J, Impey RW, Klein ML. Comparison of simple potential functions for simulating liquid water. J Chem Phys. 1983;79:926–35.
Hornak V, Abel R, Okur A, Strockbine B, Roitberg A, Simmerling C. Comparison of multiple Amber force fields and development of improved protein backbone parameters. Proteins. 2006;65:712–25.
Darden T, York D, Pedersen L. Particle mesh Ewald: An N.Log(N) method for Ewald sums in large systems. J Chem Phys. 1993;98:10089–92.
Ryckaert JP, Ciccotti G, Berendsen HJC. Numerical-integration of Cartesian equations of motion of a system with constraints: molecular dynamics of N-alkanes. J Comput Phys. 1977;23:327–41.
Berendsen HJ, Postma JP, van Gunsteren WF, Di Nola A, Haak JR. Molecular dynamics with coupling to an external bath. J Chem Phys. 1984;81:3684–90.
Wang J, Wolf RM, Caldwell JW, Kollman PA, Case DA. Development and testing of a general Amber force field. J Comput Chem. 2004;25:1157–74.
Jakalian A, Bush BL, Jack DB, Bayly CI. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: I. Method. J Comput Chem. 2000;21:132–46.
Jakalian A, Jack DB, Bayly CI. Fast, efficient generation of high-quality atomic charges. AM1-BCC model: II. Parameterization and validation. J Comput Chem. 2002;23:1623–41.
Fernández A, Berry RS. Golden rule for buttressing vulnerable soluble proteins. J Proteome Res. 2009;9:2643–8.
Frushicheva MP, Mills MJ, Schopf P, Singh MK, Prasad RB, Warshel A. Computer aided enzyme design and catalytic concepts. Curr Opin Chem Biol. 2014;21C:56–62.
Fersht A. Structure and mechanism in protein science: a guide to enzyme catalysis and protein folding. New York: Freeman; 1998.
Fernández A. Communication: chemical functionality of interfacial water enveloping nanoscale structural defects in proteins. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:221102.
Frauenfelder H. What determines the speed limit on enzyme catalysis? Nat Chem Biol. 2008;4:21–2.
Korendovych IV, DeGrado WF. Catalytic efficiency of designed catalytic proteins. Curr Opin Struct Biol. 2014;27C:113–21.
Privett HK, Kiss G, Lee TM, Blomberg R, Chica RA, Thomas LM, Hilvert D, Houk KN, Mayo SL. Iterative approach to computational enzyme design. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012;109:3790–5.
Fernández A, Rogale K, Scott RL, Scheraga HA. Inhibitor design by wrapping packing defects in HIV-1 proteins. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004;101:11640–5.
Walsh R, Martin E, Darvesh S. Limitations of conventional inhibitor classifications. Integr Biol. 2011;3:1197–201.
Fernández A. Transformative concepts for drug design: target wrapping. Berlin: Springer; 2010.
Kapcha LH, Rossky PJ. A simple atomic-level hydrophobicity scale reveals protein interfacial structure. J Mol Biol. 2014;426:484–98.
Fernández A. Epistructural tension promotes protein associations. Phys Rev Lett. 2012;108:188102.
Fernández A, Lynch M. Non-adaptive origins of interactome complexity. Nature. 2011;474:502–5.
Giovambattista N, Rossky PJ, Debenedetti PG. Computational studies of pressure, temperature, and surface effects on the structure and thermodynamics of confined water. Annu Rev Phys Chem. 2012;6:179–200.
Fernández Stigliano A. Biomolecular interfaces: interactions, functions and drug design, Chap. 2. Berlin: Springer; 2015.
Ball P. Nanobubbles are not a superficial matter. Chemphyschem. 2012;13:2173–7.
Ramsden JJ. Biomedical surfaces. Norwood: Artech House; 2008.
Iuchi S, Chen H, Paesani F, Voth GA. The hydrated excess proton at water-hydrophobic interfaces. J Phys Chem B. 2009;113:4017–30.
Tian CS, Shen YR. Structure and charging of hydrophobic material/water interfaces studied by phase-sensitive sum-frequency vibrational spectroscopy. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2009;106:15148–53.
Kudin NK, Car R. Why are water–hydrophobic interfaces charged? J Am Chem Soc. 2008;130:3915–9.
Buch V, Milet A, Vacha R, Jungwirth P, Devlin JP. Water surface is acidic. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007;104:7342–7.
Fernández A. Chemical functionality of interfacial water enveloping nanoscale structural defects in proteins. J Chem Phys. 2014;140:221102.
Marzari N, Mostofi AA, Yates JR, Souza I, Vanderbilt D. Maximally localized Wannier functions: theory and applications. Rev Mod Phys. 2012;84:1419–75.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
Copyright information
© 2016 Springer International Publishing Switzerland
About this chapter
Cite this chapter
Fernández, A. (2016). Dielectric Structure of Aqueous Interfaces: From Classical Non-Debye Electrostatics to a Quantum Theory of Interfacial Tension. In: Physics at the Biomolecular Interface. Soft and Biological Matter. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30852-4_2
Download citation
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30852-4_2
Published:
Publisher Name: Springer, Cham
Print ISBN: 978-3-319-30851-7
Online ISBN: 978-3-319-30852-4
eBook Packages: Physics and AstronomyPhysics and Astronomy (R0)